Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Nike and adidas comparison essay
Nike and adidas comparison essay
Under armour case study answers
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Nike and adidas comparison essay
Under Armour is a company that is similar to Nike, however the company is much smaller in size. For Example, in 2015, Under Armour computed annual revenues of $3.9 million compared to Nike’s $30. 6 billion. Nonetheless, Under Armour had a growth rate of 28.5% from the previous year in comparison to Nike’s 14%. The rapid sales growth was driven by footwear which increased by 57.3% and license agreements which escalated by 25%. According to Davis (2015), the recent success of the Golden State Warriors All-Star point guard Stephen Curry, has strengthened sales for Under Armour’s basketball shoes and extended the basketball shoe product line. Also in 2015, both companies had an increase in gross profits yet, Nike’s profitability totaled $15. 2
Under Armour provides innovatively designed performance products that incorporated a variety of technologically advanced fabrics and specialized manufacturing techniques, all in attempt to make the wearer feel “drier, lighter, and more comfortable.” This is Under Armour’s core competitive strength.
Under Armour hopes to grab 10% of the sportswear market in their future. While Nike has 26.38$ billion capitalization, Under Armour is at 1.28 billion capitalization. Although they are both very successful companies, they advertise things very differently. While Under Armour focused on the working out part and being fit, Nike just wanted to get the point across that everyone was happy and content while wearing Nike. Nike was very clear that they wanted everyone to be able to wear Nike and feel comfortable while doing it. Under Armour only focused on athletes. While both of these industries had some of the same intentions such as, putting famous names out there and showing countries all over the world with their brand, they had two different intentions in their commercials. Both companies futures look very bright but can Under Armour keep
They could overtake Adidas if they continue with their innovative strategy because they’re only $3.5 billion away. Since now-a-days consumers are all about technology and new innovative products, if Under Armour continues with their innovative strategy they will continue to see an increase of financial growth, become a major competitor for Adidas, and a closer competitor to Nike.
Under Armour is a leading athletic clothing line directed towards the overall athlete who is looking for the most comfort during extracurricular activities. The mission of the company is, "to provide the world with technically advanced products engineered with exclusive fabric construction, supreme moisture management, and proven innovation. In short, every Under Armour product is doing something for you; it's making you better."
The Sporting Goods Manufacturers Association has projected that revenues from athletic footwear will grow at a rate of 5.1% (Wheelen, Hunger, Hoffman, & Bamford, 2015, 2012, 2010). Under Armour should target at least this 5% growth rate in its footwear segment
The first shoes Michael Jordan made were the Air Jordan which changed the athletic shoe industry. “Most basketball shoes were white but the bold black and red styling of the Jordan changed that convention”. (Biography) Air Jordan’s changed the style of other basketball players and almost half of the league is wearing Jordan’s. The shoes were so popular everyone in the world started wearing them. In 2012 Jordan shoes made about 2 million dollars all around the world and in 2013 they made about 2.5 million. While Jordan’s sales were going up the Nike sales started going down frequently. So many people wear Jordan shoes on/off the court every single day. Jordan’s became the most popular shoes, the company that makes the shoes make about 80% of profit. “Nike decided that the Jordan brand was so strong that it should become a sub-brand of Nike”. (Biography) The Air Jordan’s have always been part of the Nike Company and
Under Amour Company ventured into a market segment that was overcrowded, it had thousands of companies that competed against each other. Out of the many companies involved in the trade, the two most formidable threats seemed to be orchestrated by Nike and Adidas. These are two giant sports apparel and footwear, which pride themselves as having been long term veterans in the industry. Nike in particular was christened as the ultimate shoe and athletic apparel company with revenues of $18.6 billion, net income of $1.9 billion and more than thirty two thousand employees globally in the year 2008. This makes it the largest athletic shoe and apparel seller in the world. This company has seen major expansions in outlets throughout the world over the years. Adidas on its part has managed to build a powerful brand through its technological innovations and aggressive marketing where they spend up to thirteen per cent of their revenue besides offering high quality services. These scenarios seem to present Under Armour with a massive competitive disadvantage.
The sports apparel and accessories industry has a highly competitive market. Businesses are constantly competing for elite athletes to sponsor, raw materials, and every opportunity to expand. Under Armour is able to not only survive but thrive in this market because of their ability to think outside of the box. They are constantly creating new and exciting products that help athletes everywhere.
There are as many brands as there is ants in the world, but the two brands that pop out are adidas and nike. Those two brands have been going head to head for ages to see who is the better brand. It’s been tested, compared, and debated which brand is better. Whether it’s the quality of the materials or the cost of it, the debate is ongoing. Both brands have been fighting for the top ever since they were both created and I don’t blame them it’d be fantastic to be the best brand in the world. When Nike and adidas are contrasted, it becomes clear that the Adidas brand are better for the overall consumer and enhances sport performance than Nike.
Nike’s Asian operations had previously continued to soar generating US$300 million in 1994 in revenues to a whopping US$1.2 billion in 1997. However based on the Asian economic crisis, this had adversely affected revenues, while regional layoffs were inevitable. Nike also performed well in the European market generating about US$2 billion in sales and a good growth momentum was expected, however, some parts of Europe were only slowly recovering from an economic downturn. In the Americas (Canada and the U.S.A.), Nike experienced a growth rate for several quarters. The U.S. alone generated approximately US$5 billion in sales. The Latin American market at this point was exposed to economic volatility; however Nike still saw them as a market with “great potential for the future”.
Nike’s positioning in the market has more of a mass appeal compared to their main competitor Adidas who strive to make products for elite athletes. The positioning strategy for Nike is currently working at a satisfactory level as Nikes global annual sales between 2013-2014 was reported as 27.8 billion (Statista, 2014) compared to Adidas’ 19.95 billion (Statista, 2014). The global market for sports apparel is expected to grow at a compound annual growth rate of 4% between 2012-2019, Nikes compound annual growth rate during 2010-2012 was 12.3% which is an excellent result as the brand’s growth was larger than the market as well as outgrowing Nike’s closest competitors Adidas, Puma and Asics (Forbes,
Nike is the number one innovator in the world in athletic footwear, apparel, equipment, and accessories. This worldwide company operates in an extremely different organizational structure than other companies, such as Reebok and Adidas. Nike operates tremendous marketing strategies and develops inventive designs to inspire athletes around the world. This company is one of the largest suppliers in the world in athletic footwear and apparel, main producer of sports equipment, and making Nike the most valuable brand among sports companies. The task for Nike is to join diversity and inclusion to encourage ideas and innovation. Around the world, this company is a popular brand.
An economy of scope happens when it’s cheaper to produce two products together than to produce them separately. Nike benefits from economies of scope because of its manufacturing, distributing sales in the economy. Nike is one of the world’s larger footwear companies that have many factories and etc. to help with a successful production and
Nike American Sportswear generated revenue of 7495 million US dollars in 2014, which was almost double of 2009 revenue of Nike Sportswear (Statista, 2015).The sales of (Athletic) Sportswear of Nike 90 million US dollars, however, the sale of Adidas Sportswear (Competitor of Nike) was 25 million US dollars, which was not even one third of Nike Sportswear sales (Statista, 2015).Nonetheless, the return on assets and equity are 13.41% and 26.43% respectively (Yahoo Finanace, 2015).
The first company I will be investigating is ‘Nike’ which in 2011 was number five on the rank list of the top six companies that exhibited year – on – year revenue growth as well as ...