Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The impact the supreme ruling had on dred scott
Role of courts in our justice system
The impact the supreme ruling had on dred scott
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The impact the supreme ruling had on dred scott
Reed Morrison
Mr. Boxleitner
AP Government
8 August 2015
The U.S Constitution was signed on September 17, 1787 and established the United States Government. It created three branches of government: Legislative, Executive, and Judicial. James Madison proclaimed, “The constitution proposed by the convention may be considered under two general points of view . . . The second, to the particular structure of the government and the distribution of this power among its several branches” (Madison 251). Some branches were intended to have more important responsibilities. However over time, the branches evolved and the power of the government became more equal. The government when the Constitution was created is vastly different than the modern
…show more content…
day government. The Legislative branch has changed a lot since the start of the first congress. It is split into the Senate and the House of Representatives. They create the United States Congress. The branch has the power to make new laws, build up the military, and declare war. At the onset, the House of Representatives consisted of only 65 members and increased by one member for every 30,000 people added to the population (Webster 153). As the population grown, more members were added to the House. Currently, in the modern House of Representatives, it consists of 435 representatives, five delegates, and one resident commissioner (“Congress Profiles...). The Legislative Branch has gained a lot of members since 1789. There is currently 100 Senators in the Senate. Senators in 1789 were elected by State Legislators. However, since the 17th amendment was put into place in 1913, the Senators are now elected by popular vote (“The Legislative…). The states and the people would now have the power to elect the Senators. The Executive branch by far has changed the most out of the three branches when compared to the George Washington Administration.
A historian from U.S History in Context stated, “Today's Executive Branch is much larger, more complex, and more powerful than it was when the United States was founded” (“Executive Branch”). According to (“Executive Branch”) when the Founding Fathers wrote the Constitution, they were influenced tremendously by Britain's government. They saw how the kings and queens abused their power. With that in thought, the Founding Fathers created an Executive Branch that had limited responsibilities and could not lead to a tyranny (“Executive Branch”). So the George Washington Administration was very limited with its powers in the …show more content…
government. The modern day Executive Branch has a lot more power than it used to. The Constitution gave a broad understanding of the Executive Branch’s duty which gave them room to advance power and gain flexibility. Modern day Presidents have more people to help them make decisions. In the George Washington Administration, the President had to rely on his Cabinet for help (“The Executive…”). The Cabinet would help the president make important political decisions. Modern day presidents use their Cabinet members for opinions and less for decision making (“The Executive…”). The Jay Court and today’s modern Roberts Court are very different in scope and in their size. The Jay Court had three levels of courts under the United States Government. The highest level was the Supreme Court and consisted of 6 justices (Kaminski). The Supreme Court's role was to provide the final decision in major court cases. The intermediate level of courts were the United States Circuit Courts. The Circuit Courts were created to have boundaries that would correspond with the state’s boundaries (Kaminski). There were three circuits created: Eastern, Middle, and Southern (“History of…”). The final level of courts were the District Courts and each court had one judge. The District Court covers minor issues within their district. The United States in 1789 consisted of one Federal District Court for each of the 11 states except for Virginia and Massachusetts which had two (Kaminski). Kentucky and Maine weren’t states at the time so they were grouped in with Massachusetts and Virginia. All of the courts were created in the Judiciary Act of 1789. Every so often the Judges of the Circuit Courts would rotate to a new court. John Jay proposed this “circuit riding” so that the judges weren’t stationed in the same Circuit Court where they resided (Kaminski). Over the course of time, the United States has gained a lot of states since 1789. When there is more states, there is more districts and more circuits. The Roberts Court currently has 94 District courts and 13 Circuits (“Introduction to…”). Circuit riding does not occur in today's Robert Court. The Federal Courts deal with issues relating to the Constitution rather than criminal cases in which the state courts take over (“Introduction to…”). The size of the District Courts and Circuit Courts has grown tremendously over time. There have been a lot of new specialty courts added to the Federal Court System. For example, The United States Bankruptcy Court covers cases with bankruptcy and The United States Court of Federal Claims covers claims against the Federal Government (“Introduction to…”). The Supreme Court is still the highest court in today’s government and now has nine justices. The justices are appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate. In the United States Government each of the branches have different tasks and sometimes power can be shifted to one of those branches. One belief is that the Founding Fathers created a stronger Legislative Branch so the president didn’t end up with all the power. James Madison proclaimed in The Federalist Papers “The legislative department is everywhere extending the sphere of its activity and drawing all power into its impetuous vortex” (Madison 306). In modern day government the power of each branch has equalled out. Presidents now are selected and elected by a larger population than they used to be. This gives the President popular mandate which in some cases Congress can’t match (“The Evolution…”). The Executive Branch had started to catch up with the Legislative Branch when Franklin Roosevelt was President in the 1930’s. He brought the nation out of the Great Depression with his New Deal programs which strengthened his power in the economy (“The Evolution…). He also led the country’s foreign affairs during World War 1 which helped the Executive Branch gain back its power. Strong Presidents throughout our history have shaped the Executive Branch to how it is today. Also, the Judicial Branch has control over Civil Rights issues.
For example, the cases of Dred Scott v Sanford and Plessy v. Ferguson created a lot of Civil Rights movements. The Judicial Branch was able to deny the freedom of an african american man and create “separate but equal” facilities for blacks and whites (“Supreme Court…”). The Judicial Branch has the power to interpret the laws with judicial review (Kaminski). Judicial review is one of the checks and balances the Judicial Branch has on the other branches. Alexander Hamilton declared in the Federalist Papers, “The judiciary, on the contrary, has no influence over either the sword or the purse; no direction either of the strength or of the wealth of the society, and can take no active resolution whatever” (Hamilton 464). The judicial branch has no control over the nation's budget and the nation’s
military. A popular belief is that the Legislative Branch is still the most powerful. They can appoint new judges for the Judicial Branch, with the help of the President, and Congress can create new bills. When a bill passes the House and the Senate, it goes to the President to be signed. Even if the President doesn’t sign the bill, the Legislative Branch can uphold the veto by a two thirds vote in each House (“The Legislative…”). They can almost get around the President whenever they want. Also, they appoint justices for the Judicial Branch so there essentially stocking the Supreme Court with who they want. Congress also levies taxes and can authorize borrowing to make up for the government’s cost (“The Legislative…”). The Legislative Branch is definitely still the most powerful out of the three branches. The Government has changed a lot since the Constitution was written. Each branch of government has grown in size and has expanded their role in governing tremendously. The Executive Branch has grown more powerful over the years since the Constitution was created, but it is still not as powerful as the Legislative Branch. The government today might not have been the way the Founding Fathers envisioned it but it is stronger than ever.
Federalist #78, written by Alexander Hamilton, is an essay to argue for the proposed federal courts, their powers, and means of appointing judges. In the essay, Hamilton claims that the judiciary will be the “least dangerous to the political rights of the Constitution.” He says it will be the least , dangerous because the branch will be the least in abundant use. This implies that the other two branches will be used more. The executive branch not only “dispenses the honors”, but also enforce the laws over the entire country. The legislative branch holds the budget for the country and creates the laws in which the citizens must abide by. The judiciary, he says, will have no power over the executive and legislative branches. He also writes that it cannot move forward the society in wealth and in strength, and cannot resolve any active problems that the country is facing in any circumstances. According to Hamilton, the judiciary could be said to have “neither force nor will, but merely judgment,” and that it must depend on the executive branch, even to make their judgments more effectiv...
In Federalist 78, Alexander Hamilton argued that the Judicial Branch is the “least dangerous to the political rights of the Constitution" and that it is “beyond comparison the weakest of the three departments of power” since it has “neither force nor will, but merely judgment.” [*] While it is true that Hamilton wrote the Federalist Papers as propaganda to garner support for the Constitution by convincing New Yorkers that it would not take away their rights and liberties, it is also true that Article III of the Constitution was deliberately vague about the powers of the Judicial Branch to allow future generations to decide what exactly those powers should be. In the 1803 case of Marbury v. Madison, the Supreme Court, led by Chief Justice John Marshall, established the Court’s power of judicial review. However, as Jill Lepore, Harvard professor of American History, argued, “This was such an astonishing thing to do that the Court didn’t declare another federal law unconstitutional for fifty-four years” after declaring the Judicial Act of 1789 unconstitutional in Marbury v. Madison. [*Jill Lepore] Alexander Hamilton was incorrect in his assertion that the Judicial Branch is the least dangerous to political rights and the weakest of the three government branches because judicial review has made the Supreme Court more powerful than he had anticipated. From 1803 to today, the controversial practice of judicial activism in the Supreme Court has grown—as exemplified by the differing decisions in Minor v. Happersett and United States v. Virginia—which, in effect, has increased the power of the Supreme Court to boundaries beyond those that Alexander Hamilton stated in Federalist 78.
One of the Judicial Branch’s many powers is the power of judicial review. Judicial review allows the Supreme Court to decide whether or not the other branches of governments’ actions are constitutional or not. This power is very important because it is usually the last hope of justice for many cases. This also allows the court to overturn lower courts’ rulings. Cases like Miranda v. Arizona gave Miranda justice for having his rules as a citizen violated. The court evalutes whether any law was broken then makes their ruling. Also, the Weeks v. United States case had to be reviewed by the court because unlawful searches and siezures were conducted by officers. One of the most famous cases involving judicial review was the Plessey v. Ferguson
September 17, 1787, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; during the heat of summer, in a stuffy assembly room of Independence Hall, a group of delegates gathered. After four months of closed-door quorums, a four page, hand written document was signed by thirty-nine attendees of the Constitutional Convention. This document, has come to be considered, by many, the framework to the greatest form of government every known; the Constitution of the United States. One of the first of its kind, the Constitution laid out the frame work for the government we know today. A government of the people, by the people, and for the people; constructed of three branches; each branch charged with their own responsibilities. Article one established the Congress or Legislative branch, which would be charged with legislative powers. Article two created the Executive branch, providing chief executive powers to a president, who would act in the capacity of Commander in Chief of the Country’s military forces. The President of the United States also acts as head of state to foreign nations and may establish treaties and foreign policies. Additionally, the President and the departments within the Executive branch were established as the arm of government that is responsible for implementing and enforcing the laws written by Congress. Thirdly, under Article three of the Constitution, the Judicial branch was established, and consequently afforded the duty of interpreting the laws, determining the constitutionality of the laws, and apply it to individual cases. The separation of powers is paramount to the system of checks and balances among the three branches; however, although separate they must support the functions of the others. Because of this, the Legislative an...
The three branches of the federal government is the Legislative, Judicial, and the Executive branch. According to the federalist papers, the Legislative branch is the strongest branch since they enact laws, therefore, by cutting the legislative branch in half by creating a Senate and a House of representatives, it makes the separation of powers more of a level playing field. Furthermore, the Judicial branch is considered the weakest out of the three since it has "...no influence over either the sword or the purse... can take no active resolution whatever... neither FORCE nor WILL, but merely judgment; and must... depend upon the aid of the executive arm... for... judgments” (Hamilton, Federalist 78) This means that it has no monetary or military power and that it relies directly on the legislative and executive branches to follow their rulings which makes sure that the government does not have too much power individually. Therefore, since it is the weakest branch, the court has the power of judicial review, which is the ability to decide whether acts by the other branches are constitutional or not (Hamilton, Federalist 78). Furthermore, one should not be concerned about the use of excess of power since according to Hamilton these are good people who aren’t influenced by outside sources other than the constitution. The separation of these three branches creates a system of checks and balances in which each individual form of government is independent of one another and is able to ensure that each other do not step out of line (Hamilton, Federalist
Madison, declared the power of the courts to interpret the Constitution and affirmed the power of judicial review. The power of judicial review averted the judiciary branch of the inherent weakness and lack of equality in power among the three branches of government. The independence of the Supreme Court is paramount in protecting the civil liberties granted to citizens. The judicial power afforded by means of the doctrine of judicial review is not superior or above the other two branches of government. The Supreme Court’s duty is to nullify legislative acts contrary to the Constitution. Hamilton expounds the power of the courts in the Federalist Papers No. 78, “it only supposes that the power of the people is superior to both”, and judges should regulate their decisions by the fundamental laws, (Hamilton, 2008). The Supreme Court’s duty is to nullify legislative acts contrary to the
In 1776, when the United States declared independence from Britain, the new country needed a set of laws to apply to all of the states to replace the earlier British rule. The colonists, however, were concerned that if the United States put too much power in the central government the states rights would vanish. Therefore, the first form of government, the Articles of Confederation, gave too much power to the states and insufficient power to the central government. States could create their own money and refuse federal taxes, which caused many tribulations and almost destroyed the new country. In 1787, delegates from twelve states came together to revise the Articles of Constitution to provide the citizens with a stronger central government. However, instead of revising the Articles, the constitution was formed. The final document the delegates produced provided great compromises and ratification would help save the country from upheaval.
The Judiciary Branch offers checks and balances to the other branches of government. To both the Legislative and Executive branches, the Judicial Branch holds the power of judicial review. The Judicial branch can also declare existing laws as unconstitutional.
The Constitution bestowed essential powers to the nation, without which, America would crumble. Under this newly created document, three different branches of government were created: the judiciary, the legislative, and the executive. The legislative was composed of Congress, which now had the power to create a military, control interstate and international commerce, and create laws. The Judicial branch was the Supreme Court, which would review the decision of the President (in the executive branch...
The U.S. Constitution has a unique history. Facing drafts and ratifications it was finally created under the founding fathers in 1787. The constitution is the foundation for the government we have today and influences almost every decision that government officials make. However, before the constitution was influencing, it was influenced. The political, economic, and diplomatic crises of the 1780s not only helped shape America, but also the provisions found the constitution.
Before the adoption of the United States Constitution, the U.S. was governed by the Articles of Confederation. These articles stated that almost every function of the government was chartered by the legislature known as Congress. There was no distinction between legislative or executive powers. This was a major shortcoming in how the United States was governed as many leaders became dissatisfied with how the government was structured by the Articles of Confederation. They felt that the government was too weak to effectively deal with the upcoming challenges. In 1787, an agreement was made by delegates at the Constitutional Convention that a national judiciary needed to be established. This agreement became known as The Constitution of the United States, which explicitly granted certain powers to each of the three branches of the federal government, while reserving other powers exclusively to the states or to the people as individuals. It is, in its own words, “the supreme Law of the Land” (Shmoop Editorial Team).
Judiciary as the Most Powerful Branch of Government In answering this question I will first paint a picture of the power that the court holds, and decide whether this is governmental power. Then I will outline the balances that the court must maintain in its decision making and therefore the checks on its actions as an institution that governs America. "Scarcely any political question arises that is not resolved sooner or later into a judicial question." (Alexis de Tocqueville Democracy in America) If we take Tocqueville on his word then the American Judiciary truly is in a powerful position.
In the summer of 1787, fifty- five delegates representing twelve of the thirteen states met in the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia to help fix the national government because under the Articles of Confederation because the government was weak and state’s were functioning like independent countries. The delegates planned a new federal government with three branches of executive, judiciary, and legislative along with the system of checks and balances to ensure that no single branch would have too much power. The U.S Constitution established America’s national government and fundamental laws, and guaranteed the rights for the people.
In the second discussion, we broke down the functions of our three branches, legislative, executive and judicial. The primary function of the legislative branch would be to make and pass laws and creates budgets, while the executive branch enforces laws, and the judicial branch ensures that the constitution is followed. The legislative branch would remain mostly the same, being bicameral. House representatives would serve up to five terms of two years each while the term limits for the senate remain the same. The executive branch is similar to the United States as the term limits are the same, but in regards to military action, as Chief Commander, the president is allowed 180 days to propose a war to Congress or bring the troops back. The judicial department would be the same as the United States, except there would be a degree requirement of some form of government context to be in the Supreme Court, which has a life-long term
One example is the Attorney General’s office was caught spying on reporters, threatening the freedom of the press. This does not necessarily mean that the judicial branch is not sufficiently separated from the executive and judicial branches, but due to the separation of powers, checks and balances can be applied in this situation. Because the judicial branch took actions that violate American citizens’ constitutional rights by threatening the freedom of the press, the executive and legislative branches have the power to prevent the judicial branch from taking such actions again. They have the power to protect the rights of the people, and to protect the abuse of power by one branch of