Excavating My Backyard

1716 Words4 Pages

Archeologists dedicate their time into explaining how culture develops with time. Archaeological sites and supposed behavior can reflect what may have taken place in the past. Studying archaeological sites can help archaeologist make inferences about what events left behind remains, artifacts, features, and ecofacts. When researching we want to conclude the purpose of an object and reasoning behind it surviving. Archaeological context exists among artifacts that enter the ground surface and experience ongoing affected by the physical world, including people or weathering. Meanwhile, systematic context is the idea behind how we interpret various material records. The location of an object is most often a result of an object that was once lost, …show more content…

I believe that excavating my backyard a thousand years in the future will allow the individuals to reconstruct an idea of what once took place in this location. After being abandoned for a thousand years there are certain materials that will remain or be preserved over time while others degrade or decay. With time the foundation of my backyard will not be too difficult to reconstruct in the minds of those excavating it. A few of the specific foundational items will hold their structure and result in remains. This could potentially include most of the cement structure, metals, and stones. Specific metal items would most likely include the metal table, the metal frames for tables/chairs and the Ping-Pong table. The specific stone structure, on the other hand, would include the fire pit and the stone chairs. Other items that will most likely be found as remanence of objects that were broken down or decayed would include cheap or thin metals and plastics, and woods which rot with weathering. The metal top that resides on the fireplace for cooking foods on, the little metal light fixtures around the door/ tanning chairs/ fire pit, and the metal poles for the volleyball net would most likely be a few thin metal objects to degrade easier than the table and other items that are denser. I am not sure if the thin plastic basketball hoop would …show more content…

Rocks can break down with weathering, but the majority of it would be left in tacked. Whole stone objects would still preserve better than cement, though. Cement is already broken down rocks and minerals in a combined mixture. Often times we see cement wear out and become cracked due to different things that wear it down. I believe that the cement layout could most defiantly be found if we fast forward a thousand years in the future. Unlike a road that is being driven on and worn down this cement in my back yard is only going through different seasons of weather. I could also say that the cement foundation of the pool would hold up even longer than the rest of the cement found. The preservation would help archaeologist conclude the fact of a pool in my back yard. The cement pool is lined with a rubbery material and has a pool cover that resides on top which helps better preserved its structure. Over time the rubber would most likely decompose from being in the sun and having the UV rays striking down on it for the numerous years. Once the cement is exposed and the rubber lining has disappeared, the cement would be much stronger and less worn down than the rest of the cement. The other plastic and rubber-like items in my back yard such as the fence, tanning chairs, side tables, storage containers,

More about Excavating My Backyard

Open Document