Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Social psychological theories of aggression
Social psychological theories of aggression
Empirical review on aggression
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Social psychological theories of aggression
Violence, impulsiveness, anger. These are the three traits that all humans share, and that ultimately lead to their downfall. Throughout history, humans have evolved from animals into civilized humans, yet we still possess the primitive instinct solve problems through violence. William Shakespeare, a playwright, portrays civil humans in animalistic ways, as he uses violence to point out the evil within humans. In William Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet, the use of violence highlights the fact that humans are inherently evil, as the characters impulsively use violence to vent anger, exact revenge, and defend honour.
Firstly, violence is used as a tool to vent anger. One prime example of this is that in the very first conversation of the play,
…show more content…
Sampson says, “I mean, and we be in choler, we’ll draw.” (I.i.3). Here, Sampson announces that if he becomes angry, he will draw his sword out. The very first conversation of the play highlights the fact that violence is a method to release anger. Another moment supporting this is during the street brawl, Capulet arrives and hollers, “Capulet: What noise is this? Give me my long sword, ho! Lady Capulet: A crutch! A crutch! why call you for a sword? Capulet: My sword I say! old Montague is come, And flourishes his blade in spite of me.” (I.i.69-72). Despite being elderly (Lady Capulet says he needs a crutch), Capulet still desires to fight to release his anger. This quote underlines that violence is instinctively used to release anger, no matter how young or old an individual is. Another scenario that shows that violence is the primary way of releasing anger is when Tybalt encounters Romeo in Capulet’s party and says, “This, by his voice, should be a Montague. / Fetch me my rapier, boy.” (I.v.53-54). Tybalt displays the human need to releasing anger, as in the presence of a Montague, he immediately turns to is his sword. As a result, through analyzing the actions of the characters, it becomes clear that humans rely primarily on violence as a way to vent anger. In addition to venting anger, the characters use violence direct their anger into exacting revenge. This is evident when Tybalt finds Romeo in the streets, he says, “Boy, this shall not excuse injuries / That thou hast done me, therefore turn and draw.” (III.i.63-64). Here, Tybalt is looking for Romeo as Romeo attended the party without an invitation, and instead of maturely speaking with Romeo, Tybalt seeks revenge and chooses to kill him. Another significant moment when violence is used to execute revenge is after Tybalt slays Mercutio, Romeo seeks vengeance and yells, Again, in triumph, and Mercutio slain? Away to heaven, respective lenity, And the fire-ey’d fury be my conduct now! Now, Tybalt, take the ‘villain’ back again That late thou gavest me, for Mercutio’s soul Is but a little way above our heads, Staying for thine to keep him company: Either thou or I, or both, must go with him.” (III.i.118-125). Here, not only does Romeo let anger consume him, but he challenges Tybalt to a fight. This is significant because earlier, he was desperately trying to avoid fighting Tybalt (because he is his cousin-in-law now), but wants to kill him now because of his desire to avenge Mercutio. Another example is after Romeo slain Tybalt, Lady Capulet tries to comfort Juliet by saying, “We will have vengeance for it, fear thou not: Then weep no more. I’ll send to one in Mantua, Where that same banish’d runagate doth live, Shall give him such an unaccustom’d dram That he shall soon keep Tybalt company;” (III.v.87-91). Here, Lady Capulet states that she will send a man to poison Romeo, as she is trying to comfort Juliet with the revenge of Tybalt’s death. This quote shows that not only are men violent, but all humans. Thus, violence is impulsively used for revenge, which creates a cycle of hatred and further conflict. Lastly, violence is used throughout the play as method to protect honour. An example of this is before the street brawl, Sampson bites his thumb at Abram and Balthasar, and they argue, “Sampson: Nay, as they dare. I will bite my thumb at them, which is a disgrace to him if they bear it. Abram: Do you bite your thumb at us, sir? Sampson: I do bite my thumb, sir.” (I.i.37-40). In this quote, Sampson and Gregory intentionally disrespect the Montagues in order to begin a fight.
Because of self-honour, Abram does not tolerate Sampson’s action and challenges them to fight. Another example of when a character defends honour is when Mercutio stands up for Romeo. This happens when Tybalt challenges Romeo, Romeo refuses to duel, and Mercutio says, “O calm, dishonourable, vile submission! / ‘Alla stoccata’ carries it away. [Draws] / Tybalt, you rat-catcher, will you walk?” (III.i.70-72). This quote shows that after Romeo disagrees with dueling, Mercutio, his good friend, stands up for him instead. This proves that disgracing honour is an action that humans are unable to tolerate, as Mercutio can not put up with Romeo’s honour being tarnished. Another important time where honour was being defended was when Paris saw Romeo at churchyard, he whispers, “And here is come to do some villainous shame / To the dead bodies. I will apprehend him.” (V.iii.52-53). This quote shows that Paris is a noble man, as he is standing up for the honour of the Capulet corpses, yet he rashfully decides to fight Romeo despite not knowing Romeo’s real intentions for coming. Hence, humans impulsively use violence as a way to defend the honour of themselves and
others. In conclusion, the use of violence to vent anger, exact revenge, and defend honour demonstrates that humans are inherently evil. It shows that humans are no more than animals, as individuals resort to violence in order resolve problems. This is still a current problem, such as in terrorism. Terrorists resort to violence as they vent their anger of being jailed, seek revenge for being criminalized, and defend the honour of their religion. From a third person perspective, it is easily seen that violence is unjust. But in reality, every individual possesses this inner evil. Reading Romeo and Juliet allows one to reflect and understand that violence leads to consequences, as highlighted by the ending of the play. It is important that individuals learn to retrain using violence, as if they do not, they may suffer the same fate as Romeo and Juliet.
As mentioned earlier I would start my discussion with a very prominent emotion called Anger. Anger is defined as a person’s response to a threat or the perception of a threat against an individual or group. Anger is an emotion that is often difficult to control because of the intense physiological reactions involved in the fight or flight response that triggers anger. The fight response is a response triggered naturally by the body to protect itself against the instigating situation (Lazarus, 1991). In the novel The Great Gatsby Fitzgerald narrates two important incidents that stand as a fine example for expressing anger with violence i.e., 1) Tom hits Myrtle 2) Wilson kills Jay Gatsby.
One of the most popular theories about irrational behavior is that people’s actual interests will differ from what they believe is really their interest. In other words, what you think you want is not really what you want, it is not what your real interests are. The story of Romeo and Juliet by William Shakespeare is about two people from two rival families who fall deeply in love. The two lovers believe that they have been in love since the moment that that they landed eyes on each other. However, this did cause some terrible things to happen, only because they loved each other. Shakespeare's purpose in writing this play was to show that you should not be irrational just because you believe that you want something new.
In the Shakespearean play, Romeo & Juliet, aggression is represented in different ways by the different characters in the play. Tybalt, Romeo, Benvolio, and the others all have their own way of dealing with hate and anger. Some do nothing but hate while others can’t stand to see even the smallest of quarrels take place.
violence show how evil a human can may be. According to Tiger Knowles in Nightriding with
Romeo and Juliet’s true love is being mistaken for infatuation because they are in lust and are not emotionally stable enough to be in true love.
Mercutio: Menî–¸ eyes were made to look, and let them gaze. I will not budge for no manî–¸ pleasure, I. This is just a small sampling of crime and violence versus peace and law. Later in this scene, Mercutio challenges Tybalt in a duel, then when Mercutio is slain, Romeo goes on to challenge Tybalt, killing him. If Mercutio, Tybalt and Romeo would have listened to Benvolio, the fights would have not occurred, and the outcome of the play would be changed. An example of love versus hate occurs through the relationship Romeo and Juliet and the hate between their families.
Attitudes to Violence in Act 3 Scene 1 of William Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet. Violent plays have always been popular throughout history. As humans it is in our nature to like violent plays, stories, sports or hobbies. Some cultures include violent celebrations like bullfighting in Spain.
Later on in the play in Act II, scene i. the display of honor and masculinity comes up again during the fight between Mercutio and Tybault. As Mercutio lay slain Romeo says to him, “Courage, man. The hurt cannot be much.” (III.i.96). Even as his friend is dying the two men try and act masculine because they did not want to show their fears.
In William Shakespeare’s "Romeo and Juliet", Prince Escalus exclaims at the end; "All are Punished." Is this true? Montague and Capulet have certainly committed a crime of upholding an ancient grudge that has claimed many lives. The Friars crime was to run away from a suiciding person and also to mastermind Romeo and Juliet’s wedding and plans to run away, which eventually lead to the death of Romeo and Juliet. Even the main characters, who are painted as innocent and saint-like, have committed crimes punishable by the law. We know that the main characters have committed the crime, but do they all serve the time. The paragraphs below explain if they do.
Basically, Shakespeare uses the theme of violence to show how lack of peace can be dangerous to the society because it results to negative things such as deaths, rape and mutilation, conflicts and many others. He also brings out the relationship between revenge and violence. Many characters are seen revenging deaths of their relatives. This brings much conflict leading to intense violence. Most violence in the play has been seen as gratuitous but it helps the audience to discover the price people pay for their good or wrong deeds. It also shows the disparity between reality and appearance.
The play, Hamlet, by William Shakespeare, shows human nature to be greedy, self-involved and vengeful. Claudius is driven by his greed to commit murder. Polonius is always looking out for himself, currying favor at the expense of anyone in his way. Hamlet thinks only of vengeance from the moment he finds out about Claudius murdering his father. Human nature has been all of these things, but it has also evolved through the ages. We can be base and cruel, but we can also show great compassion and kindness.
The sharp clangs of the shiny, metal swords sound throughout the still air. One sword is fueled by burning anger, while the other is merely moving in self-defense, not choosing to cause such a racket. There is always going to be people in the world who are nothing alike… and many times those people don’t get along. A prime example of this is Tybalt and Benvolio, two characters in one of the world's most well-known tragedies. In William Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet, Benvolio, a kindhearted peacemaker, and Tybalt, an impulsive swordsman, are character foils because of how their opposite traits complement each other.
To begin, the parallel world of Romeo and Juliet is almost a mirror reflection of reality through the similarities in the emotions and lifelike events. Many events throughout the drama imitate the experiences people encounter every day. Through the course of the play, the characters have clashing ideas about what is right and wrong. For example, the family feud between the Capulets and Montagues is fueled by the constant wrongdoings of one family to the other. In the first act, Capulet draws his sword toward the Montague family without knowledge of reason. The first brawl, started by both families, contributes to the mimesis of the tale. Young or old, strong or weak, people do not get along with one another. They are neighbors, classmates, or coworkers and each of them have unique views of each other. Capulet acts without thinking, making him a round, realistic character. Although some people act before...
In Shakespeare’s play “The Tragedy of Romeo and Juliet” males make a more dramatic impact because they are the most violent in the story than the woman. Because of how the males act, there is a lot of fighting and arguing going on.
Fight scenes are an essential part to any successful tale. Writers have used them for countless ages. William Shakespeare used fight scenes to move the plot, introduce a conflict, and to introduce a theme. An example of this is in one of his more famous plays, Romeo and Juliet, in act one when the servants of the house Montague and the house Capulet fight, introducing the theme of deep hatred. After the servants fight, Tybalt and Benvolio fight. This gets the audience interested because Tybalt’s words of “I hate the word [peace]/As I hate Hell, all Montagues, and thee./Have at thee, coward” (lines 64-66) tells them that Benvolio is at serious risk of dying because of Tybalt’s deep hatred towards him. By having the servants, Tybalt, and Benvolio