Examples Of Unfairness Of Power In The Crucible

1007 Words3 Pages

Throughout the 1940’s and 1950’s, fear of Communist and Soviet influence was abundant in the United States. The citizens held a strong fear of the unknown and began to distrust the people they were surrounded with, scared they may be Soviet spies. This fear of the unknown led to the destruction of relationships between family and friends, ruining of careers, and false accusations put on suspected communists which led to some even being imprisoned. Many people became scared of the people around them and the false accusations themselves, resulting in them accusing others of saving themselves. The words of those who had more power and trust in their communities were more likely to be trusted. The crucible shows a similar example of such with the …show more content…

Danforth attempts to assert that the court holds absolute power over the proceedings taking place with the trials, and if someone doesn't conform to their way of doing things, they’ll become an enemy. Adding on, Proctor further expresses the unfairness of power by stating “is the accuser always holy now? Were they born this morning as clean as God’s fingers?” (10.2). Proctor wants to bring the unfairness of power to light, saying that the court just accepts whatever the accuser says, painting their views and their story as right without questioning their credibility, as a result giving the accusers more power than the accused. Proctor himself brought this issue to light, as he knows with the difference of power between the court, the accusers, the accused, and normal citizens, unfairness of power would play a major role in causing the deaths of many and without his knowledge, even himself. Last but not least, the idea of blaming others to save one's own skin is very prevalent in the play The Crucible, and is one of the biggest causes of John Proctor's death. This is shown when Abigail blames others for gaining more control over the

Open Document