Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The story about Aeneas
The story about Aeneas
The story about Aeneas
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In The Prince by Niccolò Machiavelli, the author states that to be a ruler, a ruler must follow certain rules to maintain his power. Machiavelli proposed that to be a successful leader, a prince must be feared rather than loved, if you cannot be both. Feelings and emotions interferes with tough decisions. Although Aeneas and Turnus in Aeneid by Virgil are both successful leaders, neither fully represents Machiavelli’s theory because they are both feared and love A leader who is feared does not have a sincere relationship with people unlike love enables a mutual relationship between the people and their leader. When you are feared, people will avoid any negative consequences. Nevertheless, when you are loved, people will adore your loyalty …show more content…
and people will enable them to go above and beyond for you. In The Prince by Machiavelli, the author states, “a question arises: whether it be better to be loved than feared or feared than loved? It may be answered that one should wish to be both, but, because it is difficult to unite them in one person, it is much safer to be feared than loved, when, of the two, either must be dispensed with.” Machiavelli believed that as a ruler it was preferable to be feared by the people. Love is an intense feeling of affection and attachment between two people. While fear is someone that you are afraid of. A prince needs to watch his reputation and watch his back because his enemies could be plotting a devious plan behind his back. In Aeneid by Virgil, the author describes how Aeneas and Turnus display the necessary traits of a successful leader described in Machiavelli’s theory.
Aeneas was the protagonist hero and a central character who presents his devotion and responsibility as a leader. Turnus, on the other hand, was an antagonist character. He was the leader of the Latin militaries who was against the settlement of Trojans in Latinum. Both characters show Machiavelli’s theory on how to be a powerful leader but with different characteristic traits. They show great leadership styles however, one character did not fully follow Machiavelli’s main …show more content…
concept. Aeneas achieved his loyalty to his people.
As Machiavelli pointed out, it is better to be scared than to be adored. However, Aeneas failed Machiavelli’s concept because Aeneas was both loved and feared. Aeneas was a leader and people were feared of him although, he was loved because of his likable character. Aeneas was a protagonist hero who was able to achieves his duty to his family, his city and to the gods. Aeneas and his fellow Trojans such as his friends, his father and his son were the few people who not killed when Trojan war fell. The crew decided to leave the city of Troy and sailed to Italy where Aeneas was bound to find Rome. He recalled his conversation with Dido, a ruler of Carthage and had an intimate relationship with Aeneas, about the uselessness to continue fighting any longer, and that he must leave Troy to find his family. In the following quote of Book II, Aeneas found his father, Anchises, in the burning fire of Troy and try to save him. “Did you suppose, my father, that I could tear myself away and leave you? Unthinkable; how could a father say it? Now if it pleases the powers about that nothing stands of this great city; if your heart is set on adding your own death and ours to that of Troy, the door’s wide open for it.” Aeneas tried to convince his father to leave in the fire, but Anchises refused since he has lived and suffered long enough. Aeneas was able to save his family. He carried his father, Anchises, on his shoulder and his son, Iulus, and
his wife, Creusa, to leave the fire. Nevertheless, when Aeneas reached his destination, he found out his wife was missing. Aeneas turned back home to the city to save his wife, once again, risking his life. This shows that Aeneas was devoted his family to risk his life to bring Creusa back to safety. However, Aeneas was too late to save his wife. He simply accepted his fate through the gods and continue his journey to Italy. Virgil demonstrates that Aeneas was sensitive and a compassionate man. In other Machiavelli concept, he can be described as a lion and a fox, unlike Turnus. Aeneas’s story tells us that since he was a leader and hero, he was both feared and loved. Aeneas’s character shows his complete loyalty to his people. His love and his faithfulness are demonstrated when he fled of falling Trojan War. Being a leader, people will be feared because he has the highest position in the hierarchy. But at the same time, Aeneas’s character is likable. His character shows that he was a devoted to his path and that he was a dedicated man. He easily fulfils being a patriotic leader with his people. He provides for his people to provide a safe harbor when they were on their mission by making sure people have food to eat and that he motivates people by reminding of their destined homeland. His character was more loved by the people. In contrast, Aeneas did not fully succeeded Machiavelli’s main concept. Aeneas was portrayed both feared and love. Turnus was portrayed to be “the rash prince” because he lacks control. He was a feared leader because he was fury in the battlefield, however, he used his emotions instead of thinking rationally. Virgil, the author demonstrates Turnus as an antagonist person and the prince of the Rutalian tribe and the leader of the Latin forces who oppose the settlement of the Trojans in Latinum. He is Aeneas’ antagonist. He is a hotheaded and portrayed as compulsive prince. What makes him different from Aeneas is that Turnus is excessively proud of himself and he has a passion of war. He has a passion of war, unlike Aeneas, he has lust for bloodshed. He was against Aeneas and he was determined to fight Aeneas in the battle even though he will know that he will lose. He has the confidence and determination in his ability to battle. When Turnus was about to fight with Aeneas in Book XII in Aeneas, Turnus knew that he will lose in the battle because it was fated for Aeneas to receive the land and marry Lavinia, who is the suitor for Turnus. King Latinus who is Turnus father and Lavinia forced Turnus not to battle with Aeneas. King Latinus states, “The anguish you ear for my sake, generous king, for my sake, I beg you, wipe it from your mind” and Lavinia states, “One Favor now, I pray you. Refrain from going hand to hand with the Trojans” force Turnus not to battle with Aeneas. But however, Turnus was angry that fate that forced him to give up the woman he loved to someone like Aeneas. He could not accept this fate, so he showed his anger to Aeneas. Turnus showed his anger by fighting Aeneas. The more Turnus craves Lavinia and to fight for her, the more he wants to battle. It shows that Turnus’s lacks of emotions clouds battle judgements. He was being irrational with his emotions that he did not thought of rational decisions. Virgil, the author, tells us that anger can drive a person to the most irrational decisions. Turnus went to fight the battle knowing that he certainly will lose the battle and die, a permanent fate that cannot be changed. The problem is that love is an intimate relationship between two people and can affect with other things. Turnus wants Lavinia for himself and love is a strong emotion and he just cannot give his love to Lavinia to Aeneas. Unfortunately, Turnus failed Machiavelli’s main concept. Turnus was portrayed as feared leader because he shows his anger in the battlefield. Turnus has the passion for bloodshed. However, his passion in the battlefield made him weak because he was clouded with emotions. He knew that Aeneas destined was to be with love of his life who is Lavinia. He was furious because that was his woman and that was why they fought. Turnus can also relate as Machiavelli’s fox. Turnus was strong but he was weak because he was not clear with his emotions. Instead of worrying entirely with emotions, he should have fought Aeneas rationally. In Book 12, Turnus lack of anger sealed his fate which is death. He was unable to control his anger and emotions. His passion was described as compulsive and greedy. Because of this, Turnus actions resulted in death when Aeneas ended Turnus life in the end of Book 12. Turmus was a successful leader in the teachings of Machiavelli, but at the same time he did not fully achieve Machiavelli’s concept. Turnus did not use both the lion and fox concept when he fough Aeneas. He only used the lion idea. A lion who is strong but stupid while fox is smart but weak, a successful leader must be both to conquer his power. Turnus is a lion because he is a strong leader, but his lack of emotions controlled showed a lack of intelligence. In conclusion, Aeneas and Turnus in Aeneid are both successful leader in their own unique ways in. However, both characters did not fully succeeded Machiavelli’s concept about “is it better to be feared than love, if you cannot be both.” They both failed because each character was both adored and threatened. Aeneas was portrayed to be a likable leader while Turnus was considered a terror leader. Both characters have different characteristic traits and it shows that their traits made them who they are as a result.
During their travels the Trojans often played games and had competition, this principle of honor and competition would develop a type of mastery within the nation. But even so competition is a catalyst for anger and hatred that can boil men’s blood, so did it build or break the Roman empire? In either case it happened, which did improve the men’s strength from athletic competitions and grew the culture immensely, but also inspired a competition that had the ability to ruin the people’s love for each-other. In addition this competition has inspired western culture even today with the Olympics and sports. Aeneas’ men were inspired and motivated in their competition which led them to pushing and working harder than their normal capacity would allow, so this competition helped the people work harder than thought possible. Although the side-effects of things like this could be problematic the good that comes from it outweighs the problems, and it is a principle for nations to seek out correctly. In conclusion the competition of the Romans inspired men and women to go beyond their natural capacities and do great things for their nation, proving that it acted as a type of masterful competition against one’s
Machiavelli believes that a government should be very structured, controlled, and powerful. He makes it known that the only priorities of a prince are war, the institutions, and discipline. His writings describes how it is more important for a prince to be practical than moral. This is shown where he writes, "in order to maintain the state he is often obliged to act against his promise, against charity, against humanity, and against religion" (47). In addition, Machiavelli argues that a prince may have to be cunning and deceitful in order to maintain political power. He takes the stance that it is better for the prince to be feared than loved. His view of how a government should run and his unethical conduct are both early signs of dictatorship.
Aristotle argues that friendship is a vital part of life. It serves not only as a means to bond individuals together, but also a necessity in achieving overall happiness. Aristotle comments on the various types of friendships that exist, and the role they each play in society. He explains three overarching types; utility, pleasure, and complete friendship. Yet, with family, friendship is different than it is with companionship. As Aristotle states in his piece, Nicomachean Ethics on friendship in families, “they all seem to depend on paternal friendship” (Aristotle, 1161b18). In The Aeneid, Aeneas and Anchises’ relationship, perfectly embodies this. The father son bond does not distinctly resemble one of the three types, rather it is a friendship in of itself; a paternal friendship.
Patterned after Homer's Hector, Virgil's Turnus is also a courageous and devout hero. As the most handsome of Rutilians, Turnus' nobility reflects his physical appearance; he is a god-fearing, libation-bearing soldier. Turnus was greatly admired and respected by his subjects: "by far the fairest (of Italian men) / Was Turnus, favored both in his noble forbears / And by the queen who advanced his claims with eager devotion" (Virgil 147).
In the Gospel of Mark, Jesus is portrayed as the Messiah, a heroic figure for the Jews, and in The Aeneid, Vergil creates Aeneas as the ideal Roman hero, a manifestation of the highest Roman virtues, such as military leadership, pride, and pietas. Although both men are depicted as heroes by their respective authors, they embody completely different sets of ideals. Aeneas, representing the Romans, would heavily disagree with Jesus because of his actions, being a servant-king instead of a ruler to his people and being captured and executed at the hands of his enemies, and because of his teachings to value the immaterial over the material. This contrast between the values represented by Aeneas and the values taught by Jesus reflect the larger conflict between Roman and Christian virtues.
I believe that the ending of the Aeneid shows that Aeneas is very heroic. According to Webster’s New Dictionary, “a man of distinguished bravery” and “admired for his exploits.” Aeneas is very brave when he fights Turnus, especially because it is known that the gods are on his side. He successfully killed Turnus, which is an achievement that calls for admiration.
Ignoring the prophetic dream he received the night of the attack, Aeneas races into battle and is immediately surrounded by the overwhelming scale of death and destruction the Greeks have brought forth. In an act that would have lead to his execution had it been any other day, Aeneas decides to abandon the battle and lead an exodus from the ruined city. Aeneas had most likely taken the oath of allegiance since he was a soldier. He is forced to make a decision that is a double edged sword. Should be choose to die with the city, he would be fulfilling his oath and be considered honorable by Roman standards. However, should he follow the advice of a dream, which may or may not be accurate, he would be saving the spirit of Troy but risks being labeled a coward for abandoning his city in the heat of battle. Choosing the option of fleeing the city showcases Aeneas breaking the code the soldier must have taken years before. By choosing to instead abandon the city and try to allow for as many of its citizens to flee, Aeneas has saved the city in a way that his oath as a soldier would have deemed a cowardious crime and would have seen him executed for. Through his heroic act of fleeing, he would allow his city of Troy to see a victory through his involvement in the creation of Rome decades later (Virgil 29
According to Machiavelli's view of how to be an effective leader, a ruler should be one who is feared but not hated. Machiavelli states that fear is better than love because love is unreliable. All of the reasons that Machiavelli gives relate to how human nature controls men and drives them to commit crimes in order to reach their goals and satisfy themselves.
Through his many years of experience with Italian politics Machiavelli wrote “The Prince”; a how-to guide for new rulers. We are given descriptions of what a leader should do to effectively lead his country. A leader should be the only authority determining every aspect of the state and put in effect a policy to serve his best interests. These interests are gaining, maintaining, and expanding his political power. Machiavelli’s idea is that a ruler should use a variety of strategies (virtues) to secure his power. Machiavelli lists five virtues that a ruler should appear to have; being compassionate, trustworthy, generous, honest and religious. A ruler should possess all the qualities considered good by other people.
If a prince can not be both feared and loved, Machiavelli suggests, it would be better for him to be feared by the citizens
As the story goes on, we learn that a few things about Aeneas. He is not only considered to be an escapee, by which was led out of war by the god’s, but he is now also the leader to those that also fled Troy for Italy.
According to Niccolo Machiavelli “if you have to make a choice, to be feared is much safer than to be loved” (225). Machiavelli was the first philosopher of the Renaissance, and wrote The Prince which argued that leaders must do anything necessary to hold on to power. The main reason it is better to be feared is because men are evil, rotten and will only do things that benefit themselves. Men only think of themselves and it is for this reason fear can control them and keep them loyal to a leader. Since loyalty through love can be easily broken because it involves no punishment, loyalty through fear is the better choice because it involves the “dread of punishment, from which [the subjects] can never escape” (Machiavelli 226). Machiavelli goes on to say that the great leader Hannibal took control of his immense army, because the soldiers saw Hannibal as a fearsome and cruel person, thus, making them loyal to him. Machiavelli in addition gives an example of a leader who chose not to be feared and cruel: “Scipio, an outstanding man not only among those of his own time, but in all recorded history; yet his armies revolted in Spain, for no other reason than his excessive leniency in allowing his soldiers more freedom than military discipline permits”(226). Failure to be cruel and fearsome will cause a leader to lose control of his soldiers, and it will cause the leader’s soldiers to revolt. Hannibal was the better leader; even though he was cruel, he was more merciful in reality than Scipio because he did not allow any disorders to happen.
Machiavelli wrote The Prince in which he states “it is better for a new political ruler to be feared than loved”. Machiavelli stated that rulers should be loved and feared but at the end to remain safe it’s better to be feared than love. Being virtuous plays a major role in securing a state and gaining the support of the citizens but virtue or love doesn’t guarantee the safety of the ruler and or state. Therefore this essay will argue It is better for a new political leader to feared than loved, which would allow the leader to have the state secure or under control, also instilling fear in people would make them obey the rules and regulation and would allow The Prince to be safe and protected.
... that must be wise in general. An avoidant of hatred or despise prince cannot be lead a nation that hates him. Keep faith at a minimum trust is good and well but can be broken over the smallest of greed. Bravery and strength is necessary for any great man. All of these characteristics will build a strong and amazing prince in the eyes of Niccolo Machiavelli.
Aeneas was able to use the same components that Catiline used when he spoke to his conspirators including relating to them, with their history of victory or hardship, and providing a single goal of the group. For Catiline and his men their shared goal was their desire for wealth, while Aeneas and his men to save faith and continue on their journey. Similarly Turnus was able to rally up the opposition against Aeneas and his allies with similar motives and style as Catiline and Aeneas. He starts his speech with: “… peace be damned, ordered his captains to march on Latinus, His battle cry rang out: ‘For Italy! Drive the enemy out! Turnus is here, a match for Teucrians and Latins alike!’” (7.562-566). The following passage is on the Rutulians’ response to Turnus’ speech. These people were brought together and followed him due to Turnus’ good looks, ancestors, and his courage they have seen on the battlefield. This collaboration of men can be contributed to Turnus’ usage of rhetoric, his message of the homeland, and this society’s thoughts on nobility and