Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Analysis of the novel called the scarlet letter
Analysis of the novel called the scarlet letter
Analysis of the novel called the scarlet letter
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Analysis of the novel called the scarlet letter
Makaylee Roylance Honors English II Ms. Lovelace 2 December 2016 The Scarlet Pimpernel, by Baroness Orczy, is a book that has been loved and revered for more than a century since its original publishing in 1905. This book is set in the year 1792 amid the Reign of Terror in which aristocrats are getting slaughtered daily by guillotine. The Scarlet Pimpernel and his band of followers are out to save them. From the perspective of Lady Blakeney, a great struggle between the mysterious Scarlet Pimpernel and Chauvelin, a french agent, is revealed. Orczy wrote using excellent foreshadowing and syntax, but at times there was poor plot development. Orczy used foreshadowing throughout her story predominantly to hint at who the scarlet pimpernel is. …show more content…
In the very first chapter the author tells that the Scarlet Pimpernel is the master of disguise. Not a page later there is an old woman loudly proclaiming that her son has the plague. The instant she says that everyone is hurrying her out of the city as fast as possible. This was foreshadowing that the old hag was actually the scarlet pimpernel making an escape with a family of aristocrats. A few chapters later, Chauvelin gains the knowledge that the Scarlet Pimpernel will be in at a party in a dining room at one o'clock. When he enters the dining room the only person inside is Lord Blakeney sleeping. Chauvelin would never suspect Lord Blakeney, for he was widely known as a very inane and dull-minded man; However, this was just foreshadowing that the Scarlet Pimpernel's identity was Lord Blakeney who had hidden his true ingenuity and cleverness. The overall plot and storyline was good, but at times the plot development was not good. From the beginning of the book Lady Blakeney was forced to betray the Scarlet pimpernel, who she did not know was her husband. One would expect some major complications to come up that the characters would have to work through, but there were only very minor complications to lord Blakeney's plan and everything went as expected despite Lady Blakeney's major mistake. There were also many things that just so happened to occur that took away the suspense and helped the Scarlet Pimpernel to save the men. One instance of this occurred when Chauvelin was about to get on his boat in pursuit of Lord Blakeney, a strong storm picks up, which causes Chauvelin to be stuck on England's shore while Lord Blakeney sails on to France.Aside from these issues, there was never any major climax. Throughout the last few chapters of "The Scarlet Pimpernel," Orczy seemed to be building up for some big conflict between Lord Blakeney and Chauvelin. Instead, the Scarlet Pimpernel tricks the french agent into avoiding any struggle between the two of them. This was an underwhelming climax and resolution after all the build-up beforehand. The syntax, much like the foreshadowing, was of very high quality.
Each word appeared to be carefully thought out and considered. Orczy used many literary devices such as metaphors and personification, and she always had excellent sentence structure. These were all demonstrated when she wrote: "He made her eyes glow with enthusiasm by telling her of his bravery, his ingenuity, his resourcefulness, when it meant snatching the lives of men, women, and even children from beneath the very edge of that murderous, ever-ready guillotine" (p.166-167). She also had skillful use of adjectives and adverbs, which she often used to build suspense. This can be seen in words and phrases like "even children," "very edge," and "murderous, ever-ready guillotine" (p.167). These literary devices and writing techniques give "The Scarlet Pimpernel" a very sophisticated and mature feeling. In "The Scarlet Pimpernel" Orczy wrote with great foreshadowing and syntax but sometimes her plot development lacked. This book was well-written and enjoyable to read, and it would be best for young adults and teenagers with a high reading level. This is because "The Scarlet Pimpernel" was not usually fast-paced and the writing was very mature and old, which can take time to get accustomed to. Though this book is not for everyone, overall it is very
good.
In The Scarlet Letter, author Nathaniel Hawthorne efficiently conveys his purpose to the audience through the use of numerous rhetorical devices in his novel. Two such rhetorical strategies Hawthorne establishes to convey his purpose of informing the audience of valuable life lessons in The Scarlet Letter are characterization and the theme of duality.
Pearl is an example of the innocent result of sin. All the kids make fun of Pearl and they disclude her from everything. She never did anything wrong, but everyone treats her like she committed the sin also. Pearl acts out against the children that make fun of her and acts like a crazy child. She cannot control the sins that her parents committed.
Hester, the wearer of the scarlet letter, is now facing public humiliation upon the scaffold in front of the whole community. Hester spots a man, a stranger standing in the crowd. Is he really a stranger? The way Hester and the man exchange looks, there's evidently a connection between them. Hawthorne uses figurative language devices to show the emotions the stranger has when he spots Hester. While standing on the scaffold, Hester emulates the sin that she committed and the horror that this stranger is feeling when he shows up. Hester’s life is now converging her new life, advancing the plot through the meeting of her husband upon standing at the podium. This critical event in Hester’s life advances the plot by introducing her husband, as we later learn is Roger chillingworth, creating a new conflicts.
Nathaniel Hawthorne, the author of The Scarlet Letter, has an extremely elaborate, and well-depicted vocabulary. Many of his sentences and paragraphs tend to be very verbose, but at the same time very helpful in giving the reader an accurate representation of the exactly how Chillingworth reacts when he first sees Hester. Within the passage on page sixty-seven Hawthorne is giving an intricate description of Chillingworth’s reaction when he first sees Hester after she is released from prison. With his usage of both syntax and imagery throughout this passage, he most effectively illustrates his vision of Chillingworth. Hawthorne gives us quite a bit of description within this passage, which allows us to see an intellectual side of Chillingworth. Generally people are intellectual or religious, the big bang vs. Genesis. Chillingworth is portrayed as intellectual, which conflicts with the Puritan views of religion.
In the acclaimed novel, The Scarlet Letter, Hawthorne uses juxtaposition, as well as parallel structure, to illustrate the negative effects of Puritan’s religious traditions, and the harmfully suppressive nature of Puritan culture as a whole.
Griswold, Rufus Wilmot. "The Scarlet Letter." The Library of Literary Criticism of English and American Authors. Ed. Charles Wells Moulton. Gloucester, Massachusetts: Peter Smith Publishing, 1989. 341-371.
The Scarlet Pimpernel is a novel about a rich English man saving many aristocrats from the fate of the guillotine which has been interpreted into many versions of movies. This action packed story takes place in France and England during 1792. In this story a man named Sir Percy Blakeney turns out to be the Scarlet Pimpernel. In the story there is the romance element between Percy and Marguerite. The two love each other, but when Sir Percy finds out that she had something to do with the Marquis de St Cyr and his family being killed their trust and love is not that strong in each other. In the end, both Marguerite and Sir Percy end up loving each again and they get away from the villain in the story, Chauvelin.
Light and Dark Light and dark is an everyday aspect of life, The Scarlet Letter really reveals how light and dark everyone can be. Though it was sometimes hard to read, the book made me think more about the good and evil in everyone. Throughout the novel, Hawthorne uses the symbols of light and dark to depict good and evil among the characters Hester Prynne, Arthur Dimmesdale, and Roger Chillingworth. Hester Prynne is considered a light and dark character in the book; many of the things that are noticeable about Hester in the book involve the sunshine. Hester explains this to Pearl in the book “Thou must gather thine own sunshine I have none to give thee” (Hawthorne 95).
The Scarlet Letter is a story about human reaction to circumstances and the justification behind these actions. Each of the central characters in the novel represents a side of an extremely serious situation, adultery. Each of the characters has a certain amount of justification behind their actions and each searches for a way to rise out of his/her condition.
Smiles, Samuel. "The Scarlet Letter." The Critical Temper. Ed. Martin Tucker. New York City: Frederick Ungar Publishing Company, 1962. 266.
Gerber, John C. "Form and Content in The Scarlet Letter." The Scarlet Letter: A Norton Critical Edition. Eds. Seymour Gross, Sculley Bradley, Richmond Croom Beatty, and E. Hudson Long. New York: W.W. Norton and Co., 1988.
Hawthorne manages to create many metaphors within his novel The Scarlet Letter. The rose bush outside the prison door, the black man, and the scaffold are three metaphors. Perhaps the most important metaphor would be the scaffold, which plays a great role throughout the entire story. The three scaffold scenes which Hawthorne incorporated into The Scarlet Letter contain a great deal of significance and importance the plot. Each scene brings a different aspect of the main characters, the crowd or more minor characters, and what truth or punishment is being brought forth.
Sewall, Richard B. "The Scarlet Letter: Criticism." Novels for Students. Ed. Diane Telgen. Vol. 1. Detroit: Gale, 2001. 319-27.
The Scarlet Letter by Nathaniel Hawthorne and The Little Prince by Antoine de Saint-Exupéry are two novels that are quite similar, due to their authors' use of style, character actions, and setting. Their techniques contribute to the conflict and the overall effect through an exploration of the theme of guilt and blame. Although the stories seem different, there are still some similarities in both while keeping the themes of guilt and/or blame present in either novel.
The historical context, psychological exploration of the characters, and realistic dialogue make this fictional novel more realistic. The symbolic representation of the scarlet letter, Pearl, and the settings along with the morals taught by the stories of the characters make the novel more insightful, symbolic, and allegorical. These aspects of The Scarlet Letter make the novel a brilliant combination of the literary devices of Realism, symbolism, and allegory, and fill the novel with profundity, suspense, romance, and tragedy.