Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Wealth and poverty in the world
The Impact of Urbanization
Effects of urbanization
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
What is spatial inequality? Spatial inequality is unequal amounts of resources in certain areas. Spatial inequality is people in Mexico not getting medical care because one side is using it all. (hook)
The way urbanization impacts standards of living is more people have less jobs, there is no space for people to live. No space for people to live means no more housing. People would have to live on the streets. Since there are no jobs the income is lower and that means more poverty. Only the rich get to have the luxuries of jobs, houses, food, clothes,and education. Those who live in poverty have to work for the rich to get those luxuries. (body paragraph 1)
Some people live in shacks with no water, while others get to live in big fancy houses
with plumbing. Urbanization is the cause of spatial inequality.
Herbert Gans piece on the mass production of suburban styled homes like Levittown with its homes on the outskirts of the city and mixed land uses closer within the core “ analyzes the suburbs and makes it evident that they are not a utopia” no matter the societal segregation they represent (Herbert Gans). These areas have their burdens resulting in physical and social isolation, no access to transportation, the start of gender roles, and inadequate decision making. In comparison, Pleasantville was a society of segregation due to the land constraints and urban planning of the society. Its visible that there is an increase in segregation between the suburban population and inner city. The higher class living in the suburbs would remain in that area unless it was for work.
Chris Abani's quotes perfectly sets the tone for the chapter. Davis starts this chapter by referring to "The Challenge of Slums," a report published by the UN-HABITAT. He dedicates the first two paragraphs to build credibility and validity of the report. Davis (2006) writes that the report is a "truly global audit of urban poverty" (p. 20). In the 'A Global Slum Census' section, Davis provides factual data and figures to portray the staggering rise in urban slum population, particularly of least-developed countries. He writes that only six percent of the city population of the developed countries includes residents of slums, while 78.2 percent of urbanites in the least-developed countries resides in
Mike Davis, in his book Planet of Slums, discusses the Third World and the impact globalization and industrialization has on both urban and poverty-stricken cities. The growth of urbanization has not only grown the middle class wealth, but has also created an urban poor who live side by side in the city of the wealthy. Planet of Slums reveals astonishing facts about the lives of people who live in poverty, and how globalization and the increase of wealth for the urban class only hurts those people, and that the increase of slums every year may eventually lead to the downfall of the earth. “Since 1970 the larger share of world urban population growth has been absorbed by slum communities on the periphery of Third World cities” (Davis 37). Specifically, this “Planet of Slums” Davis discusses both affects and is affected by informal labor and migration, ecological and industrial consequences, and global inequalities, and it seems this trend of urbanization no longer coincides with economic growth, thus reinforcing the notion that the wealth gap only widens, as the rich gain money and the poor lose money.
Gentrification does not follow traditional urban growth theory, which predicts ?the decline of inner city areas as monied classes move to the metropolitan fringe.? The traditional economic model of real estate says that wealthy people can choose their housing from the total city market (Schwirian 96). Once these people decide to live in the suburbs, the lower social classes move into the old homes of the upper class, essentially handing housing down the socioeconomic ladder. Gentrification is actually a reversal of this process. For a variety of reasons, many inner city areas are becoming more attractive to the wealthy, and they are selecting their housing in those areas (Schwirian 96). The problem is that now when the wealthy take over poor homes and renovate them, the poor cannot afford the housing that the wealthy have abandoned. Many researchers have argued whether gentrification has truly created problems in cities. I will analyze the arguments for and against gentrification by exploring the subject from both sides.
There are three distinct classes of houses in the tenement-houses; the cheapest is the attic home. Three rooms is next and is usually for very poor people. The vast majority of respectable working people live in four rooms. Each of these classes reflects the needs and resources of the renters in that the attic home, for example, is generally one small room and is usually rented out by a lonely elderly person with not much money. Three rooms generally consist of a kitchen and two dark bedrooms and are usually rented out to very poor people who have a family. Four rooms generally consist of a kitchen, two dark bedrooms, and a parlor and are usually rented out by respectable, hard working families.
High inequality growth also affects the standard of living of the lower- income earners as they can barely afford their basic necessities such as food, clothing, and shelter as well as health care.
Are you interested in Mexico City, about how they live? If so then let's begin.(Hook) Spatial inequality is the unequal distraction of wealth or resources in the geographic area, so that some places are richer than others. There was so many people that was moving to Mexico City that they had to move more into the highland basin. And because they did that it was make the Lake Texcoco smaller which means that the water supply is being cut down. The spaniards took over the city from the aztecs and they re-named the Tenochtitlan Mexico City.(Background Info) As an result for spatial inequality it affected jobs, money, and the houses of the low, middle, and high standards of living.(Thesis Statement)
Severe income inequality is an issue that plagues the citizens and governments on a local and global scale. While the income gap between the classes grows wider with time, the ability for the poor to improve their socio-economic status declines. In addition, the items that make a significant difference to the quality of life and upward mobility like advanced education, quality health care, safe and decent housing, access to transportation, and high income jobs are the domain of the upper classes.
Shanty towns, as Google defines them, are deprived areas on the outskirts of cities consisting of large numbers of crude dwellings. There is already a countless number of shantytowns around the world, but that number is growing. The main reason why families are moving into shantytowns is economic opportunities…“The driving force behind these migrations is the abundance of jobs in the cities” (Teghrarian, 1997). People, in hopes of pursuing a new career and making money for their family, often resort to these shantytowns for a temporary living space, but soon find out it’s too hard to leave (Painting with appositives). The families that populate shantytowns often work harder than the average citizen, but are forced to live in dirt and tents,
Let us say that the rich, on average, made 1 million dollars on average, and that the average middle class worker made $40,000. These both seem like reasonable, livable wages, although one is significantly higher than the other. Now imagine that middle class workers continued to make $40,000, while the income of the rich began to climb to reaches of five, 50, or even 500 million dollars. Now some may argue that there is nothing wrong with this situation. The middle class are still living, and the rich doing even better than they were doing before. Isn’t is selfish to not want anyone to do better because a portion of society will not benefit?
I conceive that there are two kinds of inequality among the human species; one, which I call natural or physical, because it is established by nature, and consists in a difference of age, health, bodily strength, and the qualities of the mind or of the soul: and another, which may be called moral or political inequality, because it depends on
We must try and understand more about the standard of living. According to Smith, some people have a lower standard of living than others are certainly proof of inequality, but by itself it cannot be a proof of poverty (pg. 351-2). For example, in the town I live in, the majority of the community believes the type of vehicle you drive is of more importance than the home you reside. In other parts of the country, your home is more important than the car you drive. With the poor population all over the world, having food, clothing and medical care would be the essentials to a proper standard of living. If you were to ask each person from all over the world what is consider...
Urbanization is the movement from a rural society to an urban society, and involves a growth in the number of people in urban areas. Urban growth is increasing in both the developed but mostly in the developing countries. Urbanization is associated with the problems of unemployment, poverty, bad health, poor cleanliness, urban slums environmental deprivation. This causes a very big problem for these developing countries and who are some of poorest countries. Africa urbanization is not as big as most developing countries but is on the rise for it outbursts in city growth lately. (Saundry, 2008).
However, despite these dwellers moving to improve their standard of living, urban growth poses a threat to sustainable development in urban areas, as it implies an increase in the consumption space (Williams 2000). The environmental impacts of urban growth have raised concerns among planners and stimulated other models of urban expansion such as "smart growth” (Mohammadi et al. 2012). Unfettered urbanisation has strained the ability of governments to manage with the increasing demands for housing, services and employment in developing countries.
Those living in poverty have a lack of funds to invest in education, thus their schools lack the material and staff to probably train their students for future success. This lack of education is the root cause of poverty, because those with no education can’t compete for higher paying jobs that require basic understanding in subjects like math, such as being an accountant or bank manager. Their lack of education has limited their job opportunities, therefore limiting them from improving their lifestyle. Furthermore, poverty travels from generation to generation like an endless cycle. Also Children living in poverty have a higher number of absenteeism or leave school all together because they are more likely to have to work or care for family members. In addition, Dropout rates of 16 to 24-years-old students who come from low income families are seven times higher than those from families with higher incomes. Also Less than 30% of students in the bottom quarter of incomes enroll in a 4-year school. Among those less than 50% graduate from college(Dosomething). The lack of education and training for well-paying jobs inhabits these people from ever escaping the cycle of poverty. However, the reason many of these people lack the required education is simply that they can’t afford to attend school or earn a degree. Therefore, this allows them to only have jobs that offer little benefit, and