Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The importance of authority
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The importance of authority
Obedience and The Chocolate War The question of what causes people to obey is a complicated one. When teenagers are growing into young adults, many of them tend to disobey. In The Chocolate War, only few have the courage to disobey due to fear of punishment. “The world is a dangerous place to live, not because of the people who are evil, but because of the people who don’t do anything about it.”- Albert Einstein. In The Chocolate War, those who obey are those who don’t do anything to take a stand against evil. Brother Leon is an evil person who uses his power to manipulate students and teachers to obey him, such as students like David Caroni who allowed himself to be blackmailed. Richy is a character who obeys because of his need …show more content…
to follow the group, and I am like both Richy and David because I obey out the fear of punishment, need to go along with the group, and the belief in the rightness of rule. Richy is one who obeys because of the need to go along with the group, and power in authority. Richy decides not to sell the chocolates anymore instead of being an obedient trinity student because of Howie Anderson, who was president of the Junior class. When he heard Howie speak of not selling the chocolates, Howie’s voice rang with authority, as if he was delivering a pronouncement to the world. Richy listened with a kind of awe. (p.135) Richy was under the influence of power in authority because a upper class men who was president of the Junior class decided to disobey, so Richy realizes that if Howie Anderson did this, “-that was something” (pg.134) ,and it had to be the right thing to do because someone with so much authority like Howie is doing it. Richy needs reassurance that this is the right thing to do if everyone else is doing it Want to make it official? I mean, call as meeting of the class?”(p.135) To call a meeting of the class would finalize that everyone is dong this, and Richy would not be alone in his decision which is what he needs to get the courage to disobey. David Caroni was one who obeys because of fear of punishment. David was an easier person to pick on by Leon because “..he seldom received a mark lower than an A” (p.103). This made him an easy victim because David had a lot to lose if he chose not to obey. David obeyed Brother Leon by telling Leon why Jerry was not selling the chocolates. The consequence of not obeying would be that Brother Leon would give him the failing grade forever, and David considered “all the other F’s it was possible that Leon could give him in the future” (p.108). This is fear of punishment because the punishments David could receive from not obeying were the F’s, disappointed parents, and angry Vigils who got ratted out. All of those are consequences of disobedience, and obeying seemed like the easier choice,. Although the consequences of obeying would be much easier than disobeying, Caroni allowed himself to be blackmailed and take the easy way out. Jerry is outside of David’s universe of obligation so it wouldn’t have had a consequence for him if revealed the truth. Another reason that motivated him to obey was because he had never gotten an F before, and he hoped that if he told Brother Leon he could “..erase that F by telling Brother Leon simply what he wanted to hear..” (p.108). Although David chose to obey Brother Leon, the consequence of him obeying led him to lose his faith in humanity and believe that people could not be good “And he did see- that life was rotten, that there were no heroes, really, and that you couldn’t trust anyone, not even yourself” (pg.109). Also now he knows that he had the chance to stand against evil, but he didn’t. Because David obeyed, he has this burden of knowing he did the wrong thing with him forever and his feeling are evident because once he made his choice, “he had to get out of there as fast as possible, before he vomited all over Brother Leon’s desk” (p.109) Therefore David is one who obeys, but was in a difficult choice either choice, he would have to suffer the consequences. Throughout the book people obey Leon under the influence of many of the reasons of obedience. Brother Leon uses fear of punishment to bring all students to obey him. An example is when Brother Leon brought Bailey in front of the class, and he slapped him, and accused him of cheating. This makes all other classmates in fear of punishment from Brother Leon because they will now obey him in fear that the same thing that happened to Bailey could happen to them. You can tell the entire classroom is effected by Leon’s act such as Jerry who “..squirmed in his chair” (p.41),and everyone is “..alert every minute, just as everyone was alert now, looking at Bailey, wondering what Leon’s next move would be” (p.41). The students inability to stand up to brother Leon proved to him that all the students are afraid of him and fear of punishment works for obedience. What was once said by Edmund Burke, “The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.” Leon gains obedience from almost all the students at Trinity because of fear of punishment. Brian Cochran, Treasurer of the Chocolate Sale, is an example of this because “he hated the job because he lived in fear of Brother Leon” (p.93), and he only has the job he has because he is afraid of what punishment brother Leon could bring to him if he disobeyed him. Brother Leon not only has students obey him, but he has other teachers to obey him too. Leon has the advantage as ext in line for headmaster to affect teachers jobs of those who challenge him. An example of someone who challenge Leon, but then stopped is Brother Jacques. This is because Brother Leon has fear of punishment over Brother Jacques. Because of Leon’s position in the school, he can take away anyone’s job such as Brother Jacques. It is evident that Brother Jacques cannot disobey Brother Leon without punishment when he has “rebuke in his voice but a gentle, guarded rebuke, not the hostility he had reviled to Archie.” Brother Leon also has a belief in authority over Brother Jacques, because information that comes from the next possible headmaster is more believable than a new teacher who has this crazy theory of what really happened . Even Archie notices this when he “realized that Leon was still in command, still in the position of power.” Although it often seems as though only students fear disobeying Brother Leon, teachers do as well because of the power he holds over their fate. Brother Leon uses his power from obedience to convince David Caroni into feeding him information about Jerrys resistance.
Brother Leon uses fear of punishment to get David to say what he wants by purposely giving him a bad grade. If David obeys, he may get the mark fixed and if he doesn’t, Brother Leon will give him a failing grade, and David will have “allowed Brother Leon to blackmail him (pg.109). This puts David in fear of punishment because as a scholarship student, it would be such a disappointment and shame to continue having this F, and possible other f’s in the future. When David submits to brother Leon and tells him about the assignment, it gave Brother Leon the obedience he wanted and the idea that he could blackmail students to get …show more content…
obedience. When I was six, I stole a bunny picture, and had not obeyed what my mother always said and what I was always taught.
Being the child I was, I had not thought about the girl who drew it, nor the punishment I could receive from stealing the picture. All I thought about was I want the picture. So ignoring the morals I grew up with, I stole it. Three days later when I was confronted about it, I broke out crying in front of everyone.The remorse and guilt that I still feel to this day has prevented me from ever doing something that will hurt others. My actions not only hurts others, but it hurts myself. This is fear of punishment because I don’t want to ever feel that way again, or having someone call me out in public again, but is also belief in rightness of the rule because I feel guilt due to my brain knowing that I did a bad thing to hurt others, and I should not do that again. I do not obey when it is a small choice in life. For example, if my mother tells me not to eat cake after eight at night, sometimes I don’t listen because the consequence is not that bad and I am not inflicting pain on others. If there is a heavy consequence, I will usually choose to obey, but If the consequence is small and has little impact, I most likely will
disobey. Our entire lives are influenced depend on people deciding if they likes us or not,and that determines our future. If I do what everyone else is doing, I tend to be liked more. I am like Richy in this way, because he wanted confirmation in not selling the chocolates, that he was not alone in his decision.When doing something rebellious or different in some way, I always need a crowd or another person to do it with me. For example last year when everyone wanted to boycott by wearing Sperrys to school, they announced in a Blazer New Networks because the consequence would be less severe if a large sum of people disobeyed. Like Richy wanted to cal a class meeting, the Blazer news Network was like an official event in the middle school that confirmed that this is happening. All three of my characters are different, as David Caroni chooses to obey, Brother Leon demands obedience, and Richie chooses not to obey Brother Leon, but his peers. People obey due to how it will affect them in the end, as showed by David Caroni. I am like David Caroni in which I obey because I fear punishment, but I am also like Richie because a crowd of people encourages me to disobey as well. The entire book regards to obedience because if none of the kids had obeyed and sold the chocolates, there would be no fight or assignments regarding Jerry. “The power of the leader comes from those who allow themselves to be lead.”- And thats what all the boys at trinity let themselves do.
As depicted in A Few Good Men, authors Fromm, Dalrymple, and Szegedy-Maszak provide evidence as to why blind obedience influences individuals’ motives, such as fear and trust, to examine how unjust authority pollutes a person’s ability to
Obedience is when you do something you have been asked or ordered to do by someone in authority. As little kids we are taught to follow the rules of authority, weather it is a positive or negative effect. Stanley Milgram, the author of “The perils of Obedience” writes his experiment about how people follow the direction of an authority figure, and how it could be a threat. On the other hand Diana Baumrind article “Review of Stanley Milgram’s experiments on obedience,” is about how Milgram’s experiment was inhumane and how it is not valid. While both authors address how people obey an authority figure, Milgram focuses more on how his experiment was successful while Baumrind seems more concerned more with how Milgram’s experiment was flawed and
One cannot be obedient to one’s power without being disobedient to another. In his article, “Disobedience as a Psychological and Moral Problem,” Erich Fromm argues people obey authority to feel safe. When one obeys, they become an ambiguous part of a whole, no longer accountable for actions or left on their own. In Ian Parker’s article, “Obedience,” analyzing Milgram's experiment, he claims people obey orders when there is no second option. According to Parker, if someone obeys an order, but there is no alternative, their accountability is lessoned. The two articles can speak to the tomfoolery that takes place in the motion picture, Mean Girls, which highlights a typical high school under the regime of the queen bee, Regina George, with her followers Gretchen Weiners and Karen Smith; the regime is usurped by a new girl, Cady Heron. Under the scope of Parker and Fromm, it can be argued that Gretchen was not disobeying Regina when she realigned with Cady, but actually remaining obedient to the social order of high school.
An powerful leader can lead people to do many things, even when a leader is evil, men will still obey the authority figure. One example of this obedience is where the German citizens allow the Nazi soldiers to live in their homes. This example shows that the citizens are following this authority figure. The obedience is
More specifically, the movie A Few Good Men depicts the results of blindly obeying orders. Stanley Milgram, a Yale psychologist, also explores obedience to authority in his essay “ The Perils of Obedience”. On the other hand, Erich Fromm, a psychoanalyst and philosopher, focused on disobedience to authority in his essay “ Disobedience as a Psychological and Moral Problem.” Milgram wrote about how people were shockingly obedient to authority when they thought they were harming someone else while Fromm dissected both: why people are so prone to obey and how disobedience from authoritative figures can bring beneficial changes for society. Obeying commands, even when they go against our morals, is human nature; Disobeying commands, however, is challenging to do no matter what the situation is.
By the end of the novel, The Chocolate War, Jerry Renault was broken down mentally and ruined by the Vigils. The Vigils is a club of the school only some people can be in that give people assignments that they must do. They are very strong and have a lot of power. Jen Menzel states in her article, Intimidation in Cormier’s Tunes for Bears To Dance To, We All Fall Down, and The Chocolate War that, “The Vigils have the capability of pulling a few strings and making Jerry’s life miserable through ingenious strategies” (Par. 18). They are capable of a lot more than they let on, therefore the Vigils are master manipulators and try to ruin Jerry’s life. Archie is one of the main manipulators, head of the Vigils and is set to ruin Jerry in any way possible. “With the cooperation of Leon and the rest of the
is a fight just to survive for the next day . As a child David is taught a very harsh way of
Obedience has always been a trait present in every aspect of society. Parents have practiced enforcing discipline in their homes where children learn obedience from age one. Instructors have found it difficult to teach a lesson unless their students submit to their authority. Even after the adolescent years, law enforcement officers and governmental officials have expected citizens to uphold the law and abide by the standards set in society. Few will understand, however, that although these requirements for obedience provide positive results for development, there are also dangers to enforcing this important trait. Obedience to authority can be either profitable or perilous depending on who the individual in command is. In the film, The Crucible,
“The Perils of Obedience” was written by Stanley Milgram in 1974. In the essay he describes his experiments on obedience to authority. I feel as though this is a great psychology essay and will be used in psychology 101 classes for generations to come. The essay describes how people are willing to do almost anything that they are told no matter how immoral the action is or how much pain it may cause.
Fromm explains that humans obey orders because of “fear, hate, and greed”, which, in the end, harms humanity (Fromm 125). Agreeing with this idea, Zimbardo states that “self-aggrandizement” is accomplished by “self-deprecation” of others (Zimbardo 109). Christopher Shea’s experiment also backs up the claim that people act for themselves. Shea would concur with Fromm that humans behave greedily (Shea). In contrast, Shea would not believe that people behave to put others down, which is Zimbardo’s beliefs (Shea). Jessup wished to express his authority by giving orders and allowing himself to advance even higher. Jessup harmed Santiago to advance personally; in addition, Dawson and Downey obeyed orders to gain approval from Jessup. Fromm may argue that Dawson and Downey followed commands due to fear. Zimbardo would believe that they thought completing the order was the correct action to be taken. The article “Human Obedience: The Myth of Blind Conformity” also connects with Zimbardo’s viewpoint. The article explains why people become passive and eventually deem their actions as correct (Human Obedience: The Myth of Blind Conformity). Zimbardo would not consider humans to be passive just blind to the truth. “Human Obedience: The Myth of Blind Conformity” would reply that individuals need to rely on their mind and not listen to commands. Both authors believe the marines’ actions
Obedience is a widely debated topic today with many different standpoints from various brilliant psychologists. Studying obedience is still important today to attempt to understand why atrocities like the Holocaust or the My Lai Massacre happened so society can learn from them and not repeat history. There are many factors that contribute to obedience including situation and authority. The film A Few Good Men, through a military court case, shows how anyone can fall under the influence of authority and become completely obedient to conform to the roles that they have been assigned. A Few Good Men demonstrates how authority figures can control others and influence them into persuading them to perform a task considered immoral or unethical.
Through my research and findings of obedience to authority this ancient dilemma is somewhat confusing but needs understanding. Problem with obedience to authority has raised a question to why people obey or disobey and if there are any right time to obey or not to obey. Through observation of many standpoints on obedience and disobedience to authority, and determined through detailed examination conducted by Milgram “The Perils Of Obedience,” Doris Lessing “Group Minds” and Shirley Jackson “The Lottery”. We have to examine this information in hopes of understanding or at least be able to draw our own theories that can be supported and proven on this subject.
Robert Cormier’s The Chocolate War conveys that change in a community demands nonconformity from individuals, for instance, common events at Trinity High would have stayed the same if Jerry hadn't shown nonconformity then no change would come to the school.
Introduction Individuals often yield to conformity when they are forced to discard their individual freedom in order to benefit the larger group. Despite the fact that it is important to obey the authority, obeying the authority can sometimes be hazardous, especially when morals and autonomous thought are suppressed to an extent that the other person is harmed. Obedience usually involves doing what a rule or a person tells you to, but negative consequences can result from displaying obedience to authority; for example, the people who obeyed the orders of Adolph Hitler ended up killing innocent people during the Holocaust. In the same way, Stanley Milgram noted in his article ‘Perils of Obedience’ of how individuals obeyed authority and neglected their conscience, reflecting how this can be destructive in real life experiences. On the contrary, Diana Baumrind pointed out in her article ‘Review of Stanley Milgram’s Experiments on Obedience’ that the experiments were not valid, hence useless.
To come to understand why people act with deviant behavior, we must comprehend how society brings about the acceptance of basic norms. The “techniques and strategies for preventing deviant human behavior in a society” are called social control (Schaefer, 2009). As we respect and acknowledge these social norms we expect others to do so as well. Therefore, according to our behavior sanctions are carried out whether they are positive or negative. Conformity, which refers to “going along with peers, people of our own status who have no special right to direct our behavior” (Schaefer, 2009), is one way social control occurs in a group level which influence the way we act. On the other hand, obedience is the compliance with a higher authority, resulting in social control at a societal level. The sanctions used to promote these factors can be informal and formal social control. Informal social control can be very casual in enforcing social norms by using body language or other forms of discipline, however formal social control is carried out by authorized agents when desired behavior is not obtained by informal sancti...