Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein can be read as a commentary on a theme that the text believes strongly about. The text often questions the ideas of Destiny and free will. It brings up the age old debate of Nature vs. Nurture in various areas throughout the book. It develops this idea through the use of literary elements in the text. In many areas it leaves the reader wondering if the characters are born with their traits or develop them through everyday experiences. The text creates strong evidence that characters develop their personality from their reality. Victor, the Creature and Henry’s personalities are developed by the experiences they go through, in which the text shows that nurture is what develops their personalities through the use …show more content…
of literary elements. Victor Frankenstein was born into a perfect childhood. In the text Victor’s family is described as “..one of the most distinguished of the republic.” (Shelley 27) he then goes on to say “My mother’s tender caress and my father's benevolent pleasure while regarding me, are my first recollections.” (Shelley 29) This imagery of Victor’s childhood portrays a childhood in which a child could not have any qualms.
A childhood like this creates a child just as gifted as his child hood. While experiencing no issues, Victor was a perfect child. He seldom caused trouble and devoted himself to noble causes such as his education. It was all going well until disaster struck in the form of the death of his Mother. After that happens Victor says “but before the day resolved upon could arrive, the first misfortune of my life occurred-an omen,as it were of my future misery.” The foreshadowing here makes it seem as if Victor does not believe that the events in his life are …show more content…
connected. The use of the word omen makes it seem more magical than it is. This is nurture going into effect, bad experiences in Victor’s life framed a worse future. This event took a toll on Victor and began to turn him away from humanity. Victor devoted himself to a maniacal form of science, to the dismay of those around him. This changes him for the worse, he no longer enjoys what he did as a frivolous youth. This is evidenced in this quote of Victor’s “If this journey had taken place during my days of study and happiness, it would have afforded me inexpressible pleasure.” This characterization shows that Victor’s personality has changed due to the turns his life has taken, once again reinforcing the idea that the author believes in nurture shaping a person’s future. In the case of the monster nurture is even more evident.
Firstly, there is no way the monster can have a personality based on his genetics because he was made from scraps of other people, not born. Early on, the monster develops a helping and tender personality evidenced when he realizes what he has been doing to the De Laceys’ “I had been accustomed during the night, to steal a part of their store for my own consumption; but when I found in doing that I inflicted pain on the cottagers, I abstained.” This characterization of the monster helps reveal to the reader the tender heart inside of the monster’s hideous outside. It shows that before it went through hardships, the monster was a caring being. After being beat up and hated by the people who he cared for the monster turns into a completely different being. The monster starts to blame it’s creator for turning him into the wretched being he became and says "I too can create desolation, my enemy is not invulnerable; this death will carry despair to him, and a thousand other miseries shall torment and destroy him.” The monster seeks vengeance on Victor, fueled by life’s misdemeanors toward him. This characterization shows a complete opposite of the tender being first mentioned. The monster is shown as an evil, felonious
thing. Throughout the story the frequent allusions to the poem Paradise Lost also help display that nurture is what affects one’s personality. In Paradise Lost, Adam and Eve are perfect beings before their meeting with Satan. This experience that they endure causes them to turn into different people. They eat the apple and succumb to desire, whilst disobeying god which is something they had never done. The text in Frankenstein is up for interpretation by anyone. But, I think that the text strongly believes that humans are shaped by their experiences and not their genetics. This is evidenced by literary devices throughout the story that show how the creature and Victor Frankenstein change because of their experiences. The allusion to Paradise Lost is the last piece that reinforces the idea.
Moreover, the Monster learns history and social systems from Felix’s instructions to Safie, and becomes a rational, deep thinking being. All these actions of the Monster apparently show that nurture outweighs the nature of the Monster. Also, the story of the De Lacey family draws the significance of how nurturing determines one’s personality and characteristics. “The patriarchal lives of my protectors caused these impressions to take a firm hold on my mind; perhaps, if my first introduction to humanity had been made by a young soldier, burning for glory and slaughter, I should have been imbued with different sensations.
Frankenstein by Mary Shelley introduces the change from good to evil with the attention that guardians give a child. William Crisman, in his critique of Mary Shelley’s work, identifies the “sibling rivalry” between Victor and the rest of his family. Crisman remarks that Victor feels as if he is the most important person in his parents’ lives, since he was Alphonse’s and Caroline’s only child. The Frankensteins adopt Elizabeth and Victor sarcastically remarks that he has a happy childhood. This prompts Victor starts to read essays about alchemy and study natural science. Anne Mellor, another critic of Frankenstein, proposes that Frankenstein’s creature was born a good person and society’s reaction to him caused him to turn evil. Victor’s makes the creature in his own perception of beauty, and his perception of beauty was made during a time in his life when he had secluded himself from his family and friends. He perceived the monster as “Beautiful!”, but Victor unknowingly expressed the evil in himself, caused by secluding himself from everybody, onto the creature (60). In this way, the creature is Victor’s evil mirrored onto a body. The expression of Victor onto the monster makes the townspeople repulsed by the creature. The theory of the “alter ego” coincides with Crisman’s idea of sibling rivalry (Mellor). Mary Shelley conveys that through Crisman’s idea of sibling rivalry, Victor isolates himself from society. Mellor describes the isolation during his creation of his creature leads to him giving the creature false beauty that causes Victor to abandon him and society to reject him.
Mary Shelley's Frankenstein explores the downfall of certain human characteristics, set to the backdrop of creation, destruction, and preservation. The subtitle denoted by Shelly herself supports this idea, by relating the fact that the title can be viewed as either Frankenstein or The Modern Prometheus. One scholar, Marilyn Butler, also maintains this by noting, "It can be a late version of the Faust Myth"(302). Shelly uses the story of the main character, Victor Frankenstein, to produce the concept of a dooming human characteristic of which Frankenstein states, "I have . . . been blasted in these hopes"(Shelley, 152). The reader finds, as a result of his thirst for knowledge and infatuation with science, Victor creates a living being by whom he has "suffered great and unparalleled misfortunes"(Shelley, 17). Eventually, Victor realizes this self-destructive trait, but he is not able to save himself stating, "I have lost everything, and cannot begin life anew"(Shelley, 16). Although everything in his life that is dear has been lost, Victor is able to convince one in his same position--Robert Walton--to not "lead [his crew] unwillingly to danger"(Shelley, 151). While addressing the concept of characteristic and self-discovery, it is possible to realize that the monster also possesses the characteristics held by both Victor and Walton; except in his learning, the monster is driven to continue to cause destruction. Most important about the thirst for knowledge is that, as a form of human characteristic or downfall, it leads to large, critical pieces of self-discovery. In obtaining these critical pieces, Frankenstein finds satisfaction in j...
The Creature, Victor Frankenstein’s creation, is shaped into a monster through its experiences, instead of the nature of itself, which is more expected. Victor Frankenstein, on the other hand, is shaped into a monster because of his mind’s power-hungry nature. Victor treats his creature poorly and he himself becomes wicked. While the Creature also becomes wicked in the end, its actions are more justified because multiple people treated it poorly, causing the Creature to lash out. Even though Victor Frankenstein and the Creature both turn into wicked monsters, to some extent, only one of
The monster is seen as the complete opposite of Victor Frankenstein. This is due to the creature being alone, having to face the challenges of life while being at the mercy of the environment surrounding it. The creature’s young life is most influenced by nature. But the nature of the creature first starts before the creature is even created. Shelly’s uses complex and strong diction to provide the reader with a vivid picture of the inhuman way Victor created the monster. Victor saw the body parts needed to create the creature as “raw materials.” This unethical deed “had no effect upon [his] fancy, and the churchyard was to [him] merely the receptacle of bodies deprived of life,” (Shelly 38) Victor states. The nature of the creature is that of the action needed for the creature to be created; a disgusting, dishonorable act. Victor resents his creation from the first moment it is produced. He describes his emotions toward the “demoniacal corpse to which [he] had so miserably given life to” (40). Shelly’s delivery in this description of the creature is utterly shocking and very complex. Her phrasing of a depressing tone creates a melancholy atmosphere that foreshadows coming events in the creature’s life. Also the words “demoniacal corpse” causes an aggressive and miserable representation of this creation to the reader. The only
Victor’s lack of compassion and sympathy towards the monster causes him to become angry instead of guilty. His cruelness to his creation made the monster kill and hurt the people he did but “when [he] reflected on [the monster’s] crimes and malice, [Victor’s] hatred and revenge burst all bounds of moderation,”(Shelley 325). Without compassion Victor thinks that the only way to stop the monster is to get revenge on him, instead of just giving him the empathy and kindness that monster craved. Victor realizes that "if he were vanquished, [he] should be a free man...balanced by those horrors of remorse and guilt which would pursue [him] until death. ”(Shelley 731).
Victor never even fathomed the actual existence of the creature, somewhat resembling an unplanned pregnancy that was never emotionally and rationally dealt with even after the actual birth of the child. He certainly did not adequately prepare himself for parenthood.
In this essay I will be looking at the differences between the creation of the first and second monster, how Mary Shelley portrays the feelings of Victor and the monster and the different myths and legends that she refers to within the novel. Victor Frankenstein had a wonderful life as a child: 'No human being could have passed a happier childhood than myself' (p.39) He was loving and cared deeply for his family, especially for his foster-sister, Elizabeth, who he looked upon as his own, and saw as a 'more than sister' (p.37). Victor always had an 'eager desire to learn' (p.39) about 'the secrets of heaven and earth' (p.39). When he was thirteen years old he started studying the works of Cornelius Agrippa and the fact that his father called it all 'sad trash' (p.40) fuelled his curiosity and enthusiasm and caused him to study even more which was to him, 'the fatal impulse that led to my [his] ruin' (p.41).
After learning about the life of Mary Shelley, I have grown to appreciate the novel, Frankenstein, even more since the first time I read it. She led a life nearly, as tragic as the monster she created through her writing. Mary seems to pull some of her own life experiences in Victor’s background, as in both mothers died during or after childbirth. Learning about Mary’s personal losses, I have gained a better appreciation of her as an author and a woman of the 17th century. She had association with some the most influential minds of that
“Allure, Authority, and Psychoanalysis” discusses the unconscious wishes, effects, conflicts, anxieties, and fantasies within “Frankenstein.” The absence of strong female characters in “Frankenstein” suggests the idea of Victor’s desire to create life without the female. This desire possibly stems from Victor’s attempt to compensate for the lack of a penis or, similarly, from the fear of female sexuality. Victor’s strong desire for maternal love is transferred to Elizabeth, the orphan taken into the Frankenstein family. This idea is then reincarnated in the form of a monster which leads to the conclusion that Mary Shelley felt like an abandoned child who is reflected in the rage of the monster.
Andrew Lustig proposed a great question to the readers of Mary Shelley’s novel Frankenstein, “How far should we go in out efforts to alter nature, including human nature? As stewards of God’s creation what are our responsibilities?” (Lustig 1) This question results in theme of nature vs. nurture in the novel. The nature vs. nurture debate is an important topic in Mary Shelley’s novel Frankenstein. The two central characters, Victor Frankenstein and the creature that he creates; both, characters were raised differently. The nature and the nurture of their upbringing can be a cause of why they are, the way they are. Victor and his creature are subject to very different nurturing styles. Shelley also incorporates the representations of light and fire. This representation is key to the nature vs. nurture discussion in the novel.
In Frankenstein, Shelley creates two very complex characters. They embody the moral dilemmas that arise from the corruption and disturbance of the natural order of the world. When Victor Frankenstein is attending school, he becomes infatuated with creating a living being and starts stealing body parts from morgues around the university. After many months of hard work, he finishes one stormy night bringing his creation to life. However, “now that [Victor] had finished, the beauty of the dream vanished, and breathless horror and disgust filled [his] heart” (Chambers). Right after Victor realizes what he has done, he falls into deep depression and must be nursed back to health by his friend. Victor spends the rest of the story facing consequences and moral problems from creating unnatural life. When he realizes that the ‘monster’ has killed his brother, even though no one believes him, he feels responsible for his brother’s murder because he was responsible for the existence of the ‘monster’. Also feeling responsible, Victor...
In Mary Shelley’s novel, Frankenstein, many similarities can be seen between the creature and his creator, Victor Frankenstein. While Victor and the creature are similar, there are a few binary oppositions throughout the book that make them different. The binary oppositions in the novel serve as thematic contrast; and some of the most illustrative oppositions between the two characters are on the focus of family, parenthood, isolation and association with others.
Mary Shelley’s gothic novel Frankenstein is a novel narrated by Robert Walton about Victor Frankenstein and the Monster that he creates. Frankenstein grew up surrounding himself with what he loved most, science. He attended Ingolstadt University where he studied chemistry and natural philosophy, but being involved in academics was not enough for him. Frankenstein wanted to discover things, but did not think about the potential outcomes that could come with this decision. Frankenstein was astonished by the human frame and all living creatures, so he built the Monster out of various human and animal parts (Shelley, 52). At the time Frankenstein thought this creation was a great discovery, but as time went on the Monster turned out to be terrifying to anyone he came in contact with. So, taking his anger out on Frankenstein, the Monster causes chaos in a lot of people’s lives and the continuing battle goes on between the Monster and Frankenstein. Throughout this novel, it is hard to perceive who is pursuing whom as well as who ends up worse off until the book comes to a close.
In Frankenstein, Mary Shelley highlights on the experiences her characters undergo through the internal war of passion and responsibility. Victor Frankenstein lets his eagerness of knowledge and creating life get so out of hand that he fails to realize what the outcome of such a creature would affect humankind. Mary Shelley’s novel, Frankenstein, highlights on how Frankenstein’s passion of knowledge is what ultimately causes the decline of his health and the death of him and his loved ones.