The year is 1692 in a small yet infamous city of Salem, Massachusetts. The author of The Crucible, Arthur Miller, writes a clear vision about the witch hunt on people who were essentially innocent and then hanged for absurd crimes. The Crucible gives a precise historical account of a concept known as McCarthyism, but its purpose is much deeper than that. The real idea stems from the many important issues it deals with. The author explains through these characters his concerns with Abigail’s “conscience”, John proctors “guilt”, and Deputy Governor Danforths “justice.” Those three characters develop important and intriguing topics or issues throughout the play that fit like a glove into the victims, criminals, and justice portion of this class. The justice system of Salem validates Abigail's inaccurate claims and strips her of her “conscience” and she is left with little remorse for what she has done to the citizens of Salem. This selfishness complex eventually spreads throughout the cities community where people willingly lose site of their morals in the developing stages of what is known as hysteria. In the play, the citizens of Salem are bothered by the fact that they are not as “pure” as they are supposed to be. The trials that happened were a perfect …show more content…
opportunity for the people to get rid of their guilt and prove in a public manor that they were following the common beliefs within their community. John Proctor juggles with himself about how he does not understand the importance of his conscience.
What makes him stand out from the other two characters is that he does not give into this societal hysteria even if it means salvaging his own life. Proctor acknowledges his wrong doings with Abigail therefore is fearful of the situation. He, as a respectable man, knows that his affair with Abigail was a mistake; not because the act was morally wrong, but his guilty conscience told him it is wrong. At the end of the play, Proctor makes a decision to tell the truth because he is aware that he is not the best person who could be and has an epiphany that if he is going to be killed it might as well be for the
truth. As we come down to Deputy Governor Danforth he best represents how messed up a “justice” system can really be. Danforth was a judge during the Salem witch trials who thinks that he is equal-minded. He was infuriated to find that the people of Salem were fearful of the “justice” system. He believes that an innocent person has nothing to fear in the justice system and that he and Judge Hathorne are led under the power of God, therefore having the best judgment in the land. Consequently with this idea he does not look over the evidence in with a detailed eye or even doing something to stop the societal hysteria. As the play closes Danforth still refuses to acknowledge the role that the trials played in the Salem society degeneration. Arthur Miller was inspired by the McCarthy trials which happened in the fifties. Miller wrote this play a semi non fiction because he wanted to make a point about the historical concept McCarthyism. These three characters make for good examples for relationships between victims, criminals, and punishment/justice.
The focus of Miller’s The Crucible is an appalling witch trial that morfs the once-peaceful town of Salem into a cutthroat slaughterhouse. As a lucrative playwright and a not-so-subtle allegory author, Miller is a seasoned wordsmith who addresses people akin to himself, and is not secretive about that information. The Crucible best serves its purpose as a learning device and a social statement, especially at the time of its publishing. Miller‘s piece showcases the appeals in an easy-to-identify manner that is perfect for middle or high school students who are new to the appeals, or for English majors who have no problem pinpointing them, making this play ideal for a classroom setting.
The tragic tale of the Salem Witch Trials in Massachusetts was re-written by Arthur Miller in the form of the play “The Crucible”. The trials have been studied to figure out what really happened, but no one will ever know since it happened decades ago. The play is the closest reenactment we have to help us see how people could have reacted to life. “The Crucible” shows how using others as a cushion to keep from being punished can go extremely bad. Amidst all the chaos a man by the name Reverend John Hale came to help but ended up with making it a huge amount worse.
The Crucible, by Arthur Miller, was written during the early 1950s.It was the time of The rise of Senator Joseph McCarthy’s.All throughout history, accusations of witchcraft have been used as an excuse for the discrimination of people who cultures, traditions, race, and ideas were not easily accepted nor understood by the society even if it was untrue.In today’s society students are taught this because it show’s how important “The Crucible, and McCarthyism were and what changes they went through because of the human condition.It is extremely important and appropriate because it allows students the opportunity to respond in terms of their own experiences .The Salem Witch Trials and McCarthyism had many similarities. In The Crucible Abigail
During the early years of the colonies, there was a mad witch hunt striking the heart of Salem. Anger, reputation, and even religion play an important part during the play of The Crucible, written by Arthur Miller. The author allows us to witness the vivid idea of the hysteria taking place in Salem, Massachusetts, and why it was so vulnerable during the time.
The Crucible is one of the most bizarre accounts of a historical event to date. The naïveté of the townspeople leads them down a road of madness and confusion, led by a shameless Puritan girl. Abigail Williams was a ruthless girl who showed no mercy upon accusing her victims of witchcraft. Knowing the entire town of Salem would believe her and the other girls, she would not hesitate at charging anyone she wished with the crime of the Devil’s work. However, a challenge arose to Abigail when she decided to accuse Elizabeth Proctor, and eventually her husband John, of witchcraft. The Proctor marriage was not just any simple marriage; it had its times of cold shoulders, heartfelt truth, and undying love.
The Crucible, a play written in the 1950’s by American playwright, Arthur Miller, is based on the chaotic witch hysteria in Salem, Massachusetts during the 1600’s. Abigail, a sinful protagonist in the play, is the root to the myriad problems that conspire throughout the play. She is to blame for the executions of innocent citizens, and for acts of lechery between marriages. An important reappearing theme throughout the play is one’s reputation and the extremes the characters would take in order to preserve their name. The characters in The Crucible, particularly, Parris, John Proctor, and Judge Danforth, use the sanctity of their names to prioritize how they will look in the public eye, rather than what is beneficial to them individually.
The purpose of my paper is to compare and contrast Arthur Miller’s The Crucible with the actual witch trials that took place in Salem in the 17th Century. Although many of the characters and events in the play were non-fictional, many details were changed by the playwright to add intrigue to the story. While there isn’t one specific cause or event that led to the Salem witch trials, it was a combination of events and factors that contributed to the birth and growth of the trials. Some of these events included: a small pox outbreak that was happening at the time, the revocation of the Massachusetts Bay Colony charter by Charles II, and the constant fear of Native attacks. These helped in creating anxiety among the early Puritans that they were being punished by God himself.
Through time it can be seen that the world’s history has a nature of repeating its self. Author Miller, was aware of this as he experienced a repitition of history of society’s flawed government. In the text The Crucible, the writer, Author Miller has identified and illustrated the problems society faced during the 1950’s setting by drawing parallels with the setting of the 1962 Salem witch hunt. This setting helps readers to understand the characters of John Proctor and Giles Corey.
In The Crucible, by Arthur Miller, justice and injustice is portrayed through the characters of John Proctor, Elizabeth Proctor and Abigail Williams. It is also shown through the minor characters of Mary Warren and Mercy Lewis, followers of Abigail Williams, and through Danforth and various townspeople.
The Crucible: Hysteria and Injustice Thesis Statement: The purpose is to educate and display to the reader the hysteria and injustice that can come from a group of people that thinks it's doing the "right" thing for society in relation to The Crucible by Arthur Miller. I. Introduction: The play is based on the real life witch hunts that occurred in the late 1600's in Salem, Massachusetts. It shows the people's fear of what they felt was the Devil's work and shows how a small group of powerful people wrongly accused and killed many people out of this fear and ignorance.
The impact of the convictions have on the people of Salem. People were being accused of being witches because of the fact that the girls especially Abigail wants something out of it. Like Abigail wants John Procter and wants Elizabeth Proctor out of the way. That accuses in the play were the group of girls, such as, Abigail Williams, she was the leader of the group. The so called “witches” in the play were over 50 people such as John Procter, Elizabeth Proctor, Rebecca Nurse, Giles Corey and many more. The town and the judges blindly tr...
The play “The Crucible” is an allegory for the McCarthyism hysteria that occurred in the late 1940’s to the late 1950’s. Arthur Miller’s play “the crucible” and the McCarthyism era demonstrates how fear can begin conflict. The term McCarthyism has come to mean “the practice of making accusations of disloyalty”, which is the basis of the Salem witch trials presented in Arthur Miller’s play. The fear that the trials generate leads to the internal and external conflicts that some of the characters are faced with, in the play. The town’s people fear the consequences of admitting their displeasure of the trials and the character of John Proctor faces the same external conflict, but also his own internal conflict. The trials begin due to Abigail and her friends fearing the consequences of their defiance of Salem’s puritan society.
Authors often have underlying reasons for giving their stories certain themes or settings. Arthur Miller’s masterpiece, The Crucible, is a work of art inspired by actual events as a response to political and moral issues. Set in Salem, Massachusetts in 1692, The Crucible proves to have its roots in events of the 1950’s and 1960’s, such as the activities of the House Un-American Committee and the “Red Scare.” Though the play provides an accurate account of the Salem witch trials, its real achievement lies in the many important issues of Miller’s time that it dealswith.
Explore Miller’s dramatic presentation and development of the theme of power and authority. Even though The Crucible is not historically correct, nor is it a perfect allegory for anti-Communism, or as a faithful account of the Salem trials, it still stands out as a powerful and timeless depiction of how intolerance, hysteria, power and authority is able to tear a community apart. The most important of these is the nature of power, authority and its costly, and overwhelming results. “But you must understand, sir, that a person is either with this court or against it,” says Danforth conceitedly. With this antithesis, Miller sums up the attitude of the authorities towards the witch trials that if one goes against the judgement of the court
“Proctor, respected and even feared in Salem, has come to regard himself as a kind of fraud. But no hint of this has yet appeared on the surface…” (Miller 19). Proctor and Abigail Williams have an affair; because of this, Proctor sees himself as broken through the eyes of Elizabeth and God. The affair is first brought up and revealed to the readers in a conversation between Proctor and Abigail quite early in the play, and it is clear that Proctor feels extremely guilty for betraying his wife. Throughout the play, Proctor is trying to attain Elizabeth’s forgiveness even though he cannot forgive himself. Even though what Proctor did is not easily forgivable, for any party involved, it would not be fair to say that every part of him is