The Letter From the Birmingham Jail, by Martin Luther King Jr., portrays what injustice meant towards the African American people living in the South. This letter is concerning his defense of the protests he was involved in, and the acts of nonviolent resistance towards racism. This letter argued that people who were subjected to being treated unjustly, had a moral responsibility to act out against it. Throughout history and still to this day, the topic of justice has been the object of dispute. Justice has been defined as fair treatment and lawfulness. How is injustice, therefore, defined? Injustice has been defined as lack of justice, or unfairness. I disagree with how this definition explains injustice because of how simplified it is. Injustice is also based on the experiences and events that people go through that are unjust. Most people think that inequality is only based on political injustice and legal injustice; however Martin Luther King Jr. argues that in addition to these two injustices, there is also individual injustice and social …show more content…
injustice. The definition of political injustice is denying somebody the right to vote, the right to having a free speech and the right to peacefully assemble. One of the major political injustices referenced in this letter by Martin Luther King Jr. was being denied the right to vote. He says, “Throughout the state of Alabama all types of conniving methods are used to prevent Negroes from becoming registered voters, and there are some counties without a single Negro registered to vote, despite the fact that the Negroes constitute a majority of the population” (71). Preventing a population of people from voting, which is a natural right for every single person in the United States, is political injustice. Even though African American people in Alabama made up the majority of the population, they were still politically powerless. The white people in Alabama were trying to achieve a higher power through means of voting and making sure there remained a white ruler in charge. So, they denied African Americans the right to engage in these activities like voting, that were associated with the governance of their area. This political injustice isn’t just about depriving African American people of their political rights like voting, free speech and peaceful assembly, but it is also about how they as a group, were excluded from the political activities that these rights were supposed to protect. In addition to the political injustice these African American people faced, the legal injustice they faced goes hand in hand. Martin Luther King Jr.’s letter goes into detail of what a just law should entail and what an unjust law entails. The definition of legal injustice is the unjust and inequitable treatment of all individuals under the law. This has significance within his letter regarding what injustice means because he himself was a victim of legal injustice while writing this letter from the jail. He says, “I don’t believe you would so quickly commend the policemen if you would observe their ugly and inhuman treatment of Negroes here in the city jail; if you would watch them push and curse old Negro women and young Negro girls...” (79). King explains in this part of his letter that the law against parading without a license, which is what he was in jail for, isn’t unjust. But, that the way the law was applied in a discriminatory way, where the police force was abusing the African American protestors, that was unjust. He also mentions in his letter that people praised the police force for arresting the African American protestors for keeping the order in the streets and inhibiting violence. This is the clearest example of how King is defining legal injustice because in a way, he is mocking how people regard the police force, by providing an example of how unjust their actions were. How these African American people were being treated in the Birmingham Jail, as well as most of the South at this time, brings up the individual injustices that these people were facing every day. The definition of individual injustice is the violation of one’s rights, centered on a case-by-case basis.
Martin Luther King Jr. believed that if you were being treated unjustly, you had the right and responsibility to stand up for yourself and to the oppressors. He says, “Now there is nothing wrong with an ordinance which requires a permit for a parade, but when the ordinance is used to preserve segregation and to deny citizens the First Amendment privilege of peaceful assembly and peaceful protest, then it becomes unjust” (71). King acknowledges that the law itself for parading without a permit is a just law, but that it was unfairly applied to only African American people, to further segregate them from society. It may have been unjust to break the law, but if breaking this law would end the injustice they were facing like being pushed, cursed, slapped and kicked in jail, then they broke it for an honorable
reason. In addition to the individual injustices that African Americans were facing during this time in Alabama, Martin Luther King Jr. notes that social injustice was also prevalent. Individual and social justices are different than political and legal justice because you cannot have meaningful political and legal justice, if you do not have individual and social justice. The definition of social injustice is repressing somebody’s ability to engage in social activities within the area that they reside in. He says, “…speech stammering as you seek to explain to your six-year-old daughter why she can’t go to the public amusement park…Funtown is closed to colored children” (70). Segregation sets one apart from another, in this case based off of one’s skin color, and suppresses the freedom that all people are promised in the Declaration of Independence. Using the example described in this quote, the amusement park was a public amusement park meaning that it was open to everyone, as a whole. Even if Funtown were a private amusement park, denying one race of individuals to enter into the amusement park would be repressing their ability to engage in social activities in the area that they live in. In the closing of his letter, Martin Luther King Jr. talks about how African Americans in the South were being arrested and publicly chastened by the police force for their nonviolent protests. Nonetheless, he extols these protests for what they stand for. He says they “…preserve the evil system of segregation…I wish you had commended the Negro sit-inners and demonstrators of Birmingham for their sublime courage, their willingness to suffer, and their amazing discipline in the midst of the most inhuman provocation” (79). Since these people were endeavoring to stop the discrimination they were facing, and did this in a peaceful manner that respected their Judeo-Christian values that all men are created equal, King saw it as exactly what this oppressed group needed. They needed a push of confidence to grasp that they were being treated unjustly, and that they did have the power to stand up to the social injustices that they were facing. These examples of social injustices can be defined as the textbook definition of social injustice, but in the following examples of social injustice, Martin Luther King Jr. dives deeper into the meaning of injustice and what it meant to the people of this time period. He uses events that African American people have gone through to describe the injustice as “…living constantly at tiptoe stance, never knowing what to expect next, and plagued with inner fears and outer resentments; when you are forever fighting a degenerating sense of ‘nobodiness’” (70). To be a person, you have to be regarded as a human being who is an individual within your society. When you are regarded as a non-person, you are nonexistent or are unimportant within your society. This “nobodiness” that many African American people experienced in the South was a struggle between human dignity and their intrinsic worth. They were fighting to fit into a society that disregarded their human dignity, while feeling like within themselves, they had a strong intrinsic worth. Society makes certain oppressed groups feel on edge at all times, making them feel that they have no place in our society. You cannot have legal and political justice without individual and social justice. King makes a point in his letter to describe all four of these injustices and how they were present during this time period. This “inhuman” or callous treatment of the African American people in the South is exactly what injustice is. Injustice isn’t about what it is; it is about who is affected by it, and how they are treated by society. Injustice is lynching people because of their skin color and killing children’s parents right in front of them since they aren’t white and don’t have the same religious values. Injustice is denying a certain race the right to vote, a right that all people are granted in the First Amendment. Injustice is degrading one’s personality and character. Injustice is a direct action against a group of people in order to purify one’s self. Injustice is still prevalent in society today, and all four of these injustices plague our country almost just as much as they had in 1963. After about 60 years, our country still hasn’t figured out that treating someone unjustly is prohibiting certain people the rights that say, “All men are created equal.”
In “Letter from Birmingham Jail”, Dr. Martin Luther Kind JR. uses ethos and antithesis to advocate his view on civil rights. Dr. King’s use of ethos is shown when he says, “We know through painful experience that freedom is never voluntarily given by the oppressor, it must be demanded by the oppressed” (King, 7). Dr. King uses this quote to build his credibility through the use of the word “we”. With this, King tells the reader he is a credible source as he has experience fighting in the Civil Rights Movement in the past, and being a member of the oppressed minority. As a result, King is getting the reader to use this information to believe King’s points more. Along with ethos, Dr. King also uses antithesis to further elaborate on his message,
In the “Letter from Birmingham Jail”, written by Martin Luther King Jr., King delivers a well structured response to eight clergymen who had accused him of misuse of the law. During this letter, King then uses the time to unroot the occasion of nonviolent protests in BIrmingham and the disappointing leadership of the clergy. King relies heavily on the two rhetorical devices, juxtaposition and parallelism, to bolster his argument and aid to make his reasoning more compelling.
Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. wrote his famous “A Letter from the Birmingham Jail” on April 16, 1963 while he was imprisoned in the Birmingham Jail for being involved in nonviolent protests against segregation. The letter is directed at eight white clergymen from Alabama who were very cynical and critical towards African Americans in one of their statements. Throughout the letter, King maintains an understanding yet persistent tone by arguing the points of the clergymen and providing answers to any counterarguments they may have. In the letter, King outlines the goals of his movement and says that he will fight racial inequality wherever it may be. Dr. King uses the appeal three main rhetorical devices – ethos, logos, and pathos – in order to firmly, yet politely, argue the clergymen on the injustices spoken of in their statement.
To establish ethos, arguments must attain three things: credibility, authority, and unselfish motives. Together, Martin Luther King has an excellent display of ethos in his letter, “Letter from the Birmingham Jail”. King “came to Birmingham with the hope that the white religious leadership of this community would see the justice of our cause … Struggle to rid our nation of racial and economic injustice” (1963) His dream of equality is not selfish at all. He goes on to explain his experience being black, being segregated and treated badly as if his people was an exile in their own land. Containing personal experiences and knowing this topic very well, King has an authority to speak. He affirms his credibility by showing he has done his homework by referencing to hard evidence like Jesus Christ, Thomas Jefferson, John Bunyan, Abraham Lincoln, and Martin Luther to support his own cause. Once
Martin Luther King and Henry David Thoreau each write exemplary persuasive essays that depict social injustice and discuss civil disobedience, which is the refusal to comply with the law in order to prove a point. In his “Letter from a Birmingham Jail,” King speaks to a specific audience: the African Americans, and discusses why he feels they should bring an end to segregation. Thoreau on the other hand, in “Civil Disobedience,” speaks to a broader, non-addressed audience as he largely expresses his feelings towards what he feels is an unjust government. Both essays however, focus on the mutual topics of morality and justice and use these topics to inform and motivate their audience to, at times, defy the government in order to establish the necessary justice.
In Martin Luther King’s letter from Birmingham Jail, pathos, ethos, and logos are vividly expressed throughout it. All three rhetorical devices are vital to the meaning of the letter; the most influential being pathos. MLK takes advantage of the human body’s strong response to emotion. It is illustrated in his appeal to empathy, exercised mainly through gruesome depictions; his call for action to his peers, as shown when he expresses his disappointment in them as they preserve order over justice; and his strategic use of pathos as a supporting effort for both ethos and logos arguments.
Letter From Birmingham Jail was a thoroughly written letter by Martin Luther King Jr. It was written in response to a group of clergymen who criticized and questioned King’s actions in Birmingham. The letter explicates that people have the right to break unjust laws in a nonviolent manner just as King intended to do. King also took the central components of the criticism and addressed them separately within the letter. King used numerous rhetorical devices to structure his letter and make it appeal more to the audience.
"It was illegal to aid and comfort a Jew in Hitler's Germany. Even so, I am
The forceful subjugation of a people has been a common stain on history; Martin Luther King Jr.’s Letter from Birmingham Jail was written during the cusp of the civil rights movement in the US on finding a good life above oppressive racism. Birmingham “is probably the most thoroughly segregated city in the United States. Its ugly record of brutality is widely known,” and King’s overall goal is to find equality for all people under this brutality (King). King states “I cannot sit idly… and not be concerned about what happens,” when people object to his means to garner attention and focus on his cause; justifying his search for the good life with “a law is just on its face and unjust in its application,” (King). Through King’s peaceful protest, he works to find his definition of good life in equality, where p...
The author, Dr. Martian Luther King Jr., makes a statement “Nonviolent direct action seeks to create such a crisis and foster such a tension that a community which has constantly refused to negotiate is forced to confront the issue.” He uses this concept to convey the point of the Negros hard work to negotiate the issue has failed, but now they must confront it. The March on Good Friday, 1963, 53 blacks, led by Reverend Martian Luther King, Jr., was his first physical protest to segregation laws that had taken place after several efforts to simply negotiate. The author uses several phrases that describe his nonviolent efforts and his devotion to the issue of segregation that makes the reader believe his how seriously King takes this issue. “Conversely, one has the moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws.” Dr. Martian Luther King, Jr. explains with this that an “unjust law is no law at all.” King does not feel like he has broken any laws in his protest against segregation. In his eyes, laws are made to protect the people, not degrade and punish. “The Negro has many pent up resentments and latent frustrations, and he must release them. So let him March.” As far as King is concerned, the Negros will continue to do whatever is necessary, preferably non-violently, to obtain the moral and legal right that is theirs. If they are not allowe...
Martin Luther King, Jr. was a pastor, activist, and leader in the African-American Civil Rights Movement. Mr. King was a man of honor and respect even in the troubling situations of serving jail time. People who were supposed to support him questioned his actions, Dr. King still stood by what he believed in. In Birmingham, Alabama Dr. King hoped that the white religious leaders will come to his aid but instead found reluctance and opposition. In the “Letter from Birmingham Jail”, Martin Luther King, Jr. refutes his critics claims through the use of passionate tones, metaphors, and allusions.
King clears up any idea that he’s just someone who has broken the law for no reason. He does this by saying; “I would be the first to advocate obeying just laws. One has not only a legal but a moral responsibility to obey just laws. Conversely, one has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws.” (Para 15) This statement tells us that Dr. King is simply adhering to his moral responsibility by doing as he’s supposed to. He knows that following a one-sided makes no sense, and it would be submitting to evil. He even goes on to quote St. Augustine, declaring that, “an unjust law is no law at all.” (Para 15) Therefore, the segregation laws that were implemented in Birmingham at the time were by St. Augustine’s logic, no law at
Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. was the leader of a peaceful movement to end segregation in the United States this mission led him in 1963 to Birmingham, Alabama where officials and leaders in the community actively fought against desegregation. While performing sit-ins, marches and other nonviolent protests, King was imprisoned by authorities for violating the strict segregation laws. While imprisoned King wrote a letter entitled “Letter from Birmingham Jail”, in which he expresses his disappointment in the clergy, officials, and people of Birmingham. This letter employed pathos to argue that the leaders and ‘heroes’ in Birmingham during the struggle were at fault or went against their beliefs.
Letter from a Birmingham Jail Is an individual morally justified in breaking a law? The answer to this question is yes,. There are several reasons that have made me believe that it is morally justifiable in breaking the law; however, the most convincing comes from Dr. Martin Luther King in his letter from the Birmingham Jail. " We can never forget that everything Hitler did in Germany was legal." (Classic Arguments 668 -.
...y, and also fidelity to the law. Acts of civil disobediences are aimed to defend principles of justice. In King’s case he aims to persuade the local government and the businesses to comply with desegregation laws. It was important for him to communicate fidelity to the law. You should lovingly break a law, because your reason behind protesting to to achieve what you see as a higher good. You are not directly hurting the people. King’s argument ultimately is you can break the law to make the law more just. You are attempting to break the law to show that the law is unjust, and it is an act of saying that the law can be made better than it is now. He’s gathered his facts and understanding of the law, it is 100% clear there’s a problem. For civil disobedience to be justified a real injustice must exist, or else it wouldn’t addresses a sense of justice of the majority.