Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Henry david thoreau viewson nature
Henry david thoreau beliefs
Henry david thoreau viewson nature
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Civil Disobedience: The Classic that It Is
“Government is best which governs least.” This single quote is the most important line of the essay, and defines why this essay is a classic.“Civil Disobedience,” by Henry David Thoreau, is Thoreau’s viewpoint on the issues that faced the nation as a whole including the size of the government, on-going wars, and human rights. These problems though are not just facing the nation during his lifetime, but also our life. Thoreau is considered a classic author due to his work in the transcendentalist movement, and his words in “Civil Disobedience” through the style of the essay and the themes of individualism along with calls for a smaller government.
Born on July 12, 1817 in Concord, Massachusetts, Thoreau
…show more content…
came into a world full of beauty and nature, but he didn’t start his transcendentalist career until his college years. When he was about to start his career, he attended Harvard College, where Thoreau meet Ralph Waldo Emerson. Both of them became close friends and through that friendship, Emerson introduced Thoreau to the world of writing. Since Emerson’s style of writing was based off nature and transcendentalism, he influenced him on writing that certain style, which enabled Thoreau to be one of the greatest transcendentalist writers. One of his most famous works Thoreau wrote was “Walden,” which tells the story of Thoreau’s decision to seclude himself from society since he wanted to live in the most simplest form (Richardson 1143). Additionally, “Civil Disobedience,” also became one of his most famous works. Even though politics was not the most important thing to him, he was a vocal opponent to wars and slavery, which he was considered to be an abolitionist. Nature has though been something he often talked about in his works since through the influence of Emerson, he would look around himself and write about the beauty of nature (Richardson 1146). Besides the fact that Thoreau was one of the most known transcendentalist writers, he was not the one that founded the movement. During the time of accent Greece, the philosopher Plato developed it as a philosophy in which a higher reality exist in the knowledge of people. As time went by and the world shifted, so did Transcendentalism. In the 19th century, Transcendentalism was reborn to be a literary movement more than a philosophical movement. The new transcendentalist movement celebrated the ideas of self-reflection and individualism. They believed that the beauties of the world came from mankind and nature, not technology. Additionally, they believed that there is a flow of energy between the universe and the individual soul. These virtues shaped what transcendentalist writers wrote about including but not limited to Margaret fuller, Ralph Waldo Emerson, Theodore Parker, and of course, Henry David Thoreau. (Funk) Throughout the essay “Civil Disobedience” Thoreau often used the theme of individualism.
In his essay, he states that if a person does not agree with the rules and regulations of a law that they should “break the law.” (Thoreau 98). When a person goes against something they don’t agree with, they are using their conscience to make things right for themselves. He also states that it goes against the right of nature to force someone to think a certain is correct and just even though they simply don’t agree to it. This leads then to the person’s duty to break the law for the right of limited government and in a nonviolent way. (Parel, 424) A perfect example of a nonviolence protest was when Thoreau was sent to jail. It first started out when Thoreau refused to pay his poll tax, a type of taxation that had to be paid to vote in election, to the government since the American bureaucracy still supported the idea of slavery while he was an abolitionist. He believed that all lives mattered and that everyone should be treated with respect and dignity. Anyways, since he violated federal law which states that voting citizens need to pay their poll tax, he ended up going to jail. He was let go when someone, thought to have been Emerson, finally paid his taxes the following day (Thoreau 105). Thoreau testified against the government and broke away from the ways of society to form his own way of
thinking. Another theme in the essay “Civil Disobedience” is the need to have a smaller government. When revisiting the line “Government is best which governs least,” it was made clear that the idea of a smaller government was necessary in the mind of Thoreau. It is said that a government depends on the people it governs. (Parel, 424) This means that when people vote on how they want the government to work, they are the ones that make the decisions on who the country is to be run for the next two or four years. Even though the people of the country only have a say every two or four years, Thoreau believes that individuals during the “off period” have the right to be able to recall officials and even overturn rules and regulations they don't agree with. Now, Thoreau does believe that it is necessary to have a government because without one, people will be running ramped throughout the land. He does state though that as mankind progresses and matures, government oversight should be drawn back, and soon, the idea of government should be gone. Since he clearly knowns that this wont happen for a long time, he does ask for a government that understands its mistakes and stops injustices like funding wars through taxation dollars and supporting slavery. Additionally, he ask for a government that is fast and efficient that will get problems solved, not a slow, ineffective government that takes problems to a whole new level. All of these characteristics are ones a small government counts of. Throughout the essay, the style of the essay develops and becomes more prevalent as it goes on. When looking at the audience Thoreau intended for his essay “Civil Disobedience,” it was mostly geared towards those who identified themselves as abolitionist or as a progressive thinker who leaned forward. This is true since he would often say how slavery was an injustice to the human race since all human should be treated equally, but during his lifetime, the theme of one race being inferior to another was common. (Banion, 190) Additionally, the intended audience would have the emotion of patriotism and hope since they hope to see a reborn American where everyone is treated with dignity. (Banion, 190) Besides the audience and emotional connection, the use of metaphors is used in the essay to compare the government to a machine (Banion, 190) The use of this metaphor, for example, is to show the reader that the government keeps on going regardless of it making a mistake. Thoreau wants the government to be more human and for them to acknowledge their mistakes. The definition of a classical “A form of art regarded as representing an exemplary standard; traditional and long-established in form or style.” (Oxford Dictionary, Classic) Thoreau’s essay “Civil Disobedience” is a classic since it does indeed have exemplary standards since through his life story and his work in the transcendentalism movement, he made the themes of the essay reflect upon his thinking and redefined what the 19th century Transcendentalism movement was.
Thoreau wrote "Civil Disobedience" in 1849 after spending a night in the Walden town jail for refusing to pay a poll tax that supported the Mexican War. He recommended passive resistance as a form of tension that could lead to reform of unjust laws practiced by the government. He voiced civil disobedience as "An expression of the individual's liberty to create change" (Thoreau 530). Thoreau felt that the government had established order that resisted reform and change. "Action from principle, the perception and the performance of right, changes things and relations; it is essentially revolutionary" (Thoreau 531).
injustice to another, then I say, break the law." This shows Thoreau’s policy of civil
Henry David Thoreau (1817-1862) was an American philosopher, author, poet, abolitionist, and naturalist. He was famous for his essay, “Civil Disobedience”, and his book, Walden. He believed in individual conscience and nonviolent acts of political resistance to protest unfair laws. Moreover, he valued the importance of observing nature, being individual, and living in a simple life by his own values. His writings later influenced the thoughts of Mahatma Gandhi and Martin Luther King, Jr. In “Civil Disobedience” and Walden, he advocated individual nonviolent resistance to the unjust state and reflected his simple living in the nature.
Jacobus, Lee A. Henry David Thoreau. "Civil Disobedience." A World Of Ideas: essential readings for college writers. Bedford/St. Martin's, 2002. 141-167
In Thoreau’s view, he felt that the government was insufficient. He didn’t need the laws to be just, he used his conscious and morality. He was compelled to do what morally was right, rather than it being based on government issued laws such as the complacent society there is today. People seem to care about justice, yet are immoral. This was the message Thoreau was trying to get across.
This letter covers the ways in which peaceful protest and standing up against injustice can lead to positive results. Both pieces conveyed a similar message of standing up for what is right. The strongest rhetorical methods which Thoreau uses are allusions, logos, ethos and rhetorical questions. However, King’s use of Thoreau’s piece was written prior to the civil war, and was in response to the Mexican-American war and slavery in some territories. It was intended for US citizens; more specifically, those who are unhappy with the way the United States government is ran.
This is a reason why most people believe that civil disobedience is bad. Civil disobedience is not dangerous because once someone breaks a law and harms others then it is not civil disobedience. Civil disobedience will be peaceful and will not intentionally harm anyone. Thoreau explained in his essay that he “asked for, not at once no government, but at once a better government.” This shows that in civil disobedience is only used to change government laws for the benefit of the people. Thoreau also says “I think that we should be men first, and subjects afterwards.” He believes the law made them subjects and he wanted all men to truly be free, so with civil disobedience he did show he disagreed with the law. With civil disobedience people may show how unjust the laws are because people were being arrested for not
From these three men, we can learn the significance of detaching ourselves from the social norm and instead, fight for our values in a non-violent way, in order to make a change in our government’s corrupt and unjust laws. In “Resistance to Civil Government,” Thoreau articulates the importance he places on resistance against a powerful, controlling government. He opens his essay with a reference to the quote, “‘That government is best which governs not at all,’” and shares the motto, “‘That government is best which governs least’” (Civil).... ...
Thoreau was against the The Mexican American War and the act of Slavery in our society and was very skeptical towards the U.S government regarding these issues. The U.S government did more to harm the citizens of America more than it did to protect them and Thoreau realized that and was not afraid to speak his mind.. The law will never make men free; it is men who have got to make the law free” Thoreau is saying that don't just wait for change to come, make the change happen. He stand for what is right regardless of the consequences, therefore, he wanted the citizens of America to be bold enough to do the same.
In Thoreau's "Civil Disobedience," he uses a hyperbole to support his belief that "one person can make a change," an idea still relevant today. Thoreau uses many forms of literary techniques such as multiple hyperbole, emotional appeals, and paradoxes. Thoreau uses these to sustain his ideas on civil disobedience. He believes if you believe in something, and support something you should do whatever it takes to help the cause. Many people in today's society believe to just go with the flow, rather than living like Thoreau has, and supporting his own beliefs no matter what the consequence. Henry David Thoreau had a lot of personal authority, he was all about his own independence. Many different people believed in being a non-conformist, and Thoreau was one of them, and he very well showed how much he supported it. Thoreau was not the only nonconformist, they're many people who followed his beliefs and they refused to be bound by anybody, or anything they did not support. Other non-conformists were Gandhi, Galileo, Malcom X and many more.
Thoreau explains “There are thousands who are in opinion opposed to slavery and to the war, who yet in effect do nothing to put an end to them; who, esteeming themselves children of Washington and Franklin” (Thoreau 3). George Washington and Benjamin Franklin are two prominent figures of American nationalism and independence, and many American citizens regard them as idols. Thoreau exploits their credential to motivate people to take actions against an ineffective government and oppose the war and slavery in the U.S. Thoreau also questions citizens by explaining what is ethical as a citizen. Thoreau states “but they do nothing in earnest and with effect. They will wait, well disposed, for others to remedy the evil, that they may no longer have it to regret” (Thoreau 4). Thoreau explains that people of the U.S. do not put in their efforts to change such as voting or protesting, yet they still expect other people to discard evils such as corruption, slavery, and government tyranny. Thoreau justifies the uselessness as unethical and condemns the citizens. By using the word such as evil, Thoreau wants people to fight against the evil, government tyranny, and express the true American nationalism. The author employs ethos throughout Civil Disobedience to make the people of the U.S. ethical and become more involved with the problems about the
In the past in this country, Thoreau wrote an essay on Civil disobedience saying that people make the law and have a right to disobey unjust laws, to try and get those laws changed.
Henry David Thoreau (1817-1862) was a philosopher and writer who is well known for his criticism of the American government during the time. During Thoreau’s life, there were two major issues being debated in the United States: slavery and the Mexican-American War. Both issues greatly influenced his essay, as he actually practiced civil disobedience in his own life by refusing to pay taxes in protest of the Mexican War. He states that the government should be based on conscience and that citizens should refuse to follow the law and has the duty not to participate and stay as a member of an unjust institution like the government. I argue that the notion of individualism and skepticism toward government is essential in the basis of many important reform movements in the modern society.
You can see just how important non-conformity is in Thoreau’s life because he is willing to be thrown in jail for it. In act one whilst Thoreau and Bailey are discussing why they are in jail Thoreau says this, “But we’ve got a President who went out and boomed up a war all by himself – with no help from Congress and less help from me.” (pg. 11) What Henry is referring to here is the fact that he did not pay his taxes to help support a war he does not support himself. Everyone else in society is paying their taxes, but Henry will not conform to that. Thoreau is not refusing to pay taxes
“That government is best which governs least”, the opening quote of the essay shows the distrust Thoreau has in government coming from the belief that it is “perverted and abused”. Small groups of elite individuals manipulate the government and against the wants of the majority use it form their own advantages. Thoreau views government as a stumbling block to those that it is supposed to represent and hinders us from accomplishing. He brings an example of how the regulation of trade and commerce have had a negative effect on free market. Due to this he is opposed to following the views