Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The tragedy of julius caesar by william shakespeare
Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare as a tragedy
The tragedy of julius caesar by william shakespeare
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The tragedy of julius caesar by william shakespeare
Walking down the urban streets of downtown San Jose, a blind, elderly man sitting on the sidewalk suddenly jumps up with a finger pointed at you and screams “If thou walketh into Subway for a meal, thou shall receive an ill-roasted egg”. Hearing this, there are three actions triggered. One is to scoff at the man, run away, and still go to Subway. The second is to politely acknowledge what the man says, but considers the fact that eggs are not cooked by roasting and order scrambled eggs in your sandwich. The last way is to fully acknowledge what the man said and avoid going to Subway. Similarly, in the play Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare and edited by Barbara A Mowat and Paul Werstine, when presented with an omen, characters in Julius …show more content…
Caesar take one of the three actions: ignore, misinterpret, or acknowledge. Julius Caesar disregards the warning heeded by a soothsayer. On the other hand, Calpurnia acknowledges the horrific dream about her husband’s blood flowing over Rome and tries to convince to stay home, which is successful until Decius influences him. In order to murder Caesar, Decius misinterprets Calpurnia’s dream to purposely influence Caesar in coming to the Senate meeting to kill him. In this play, Shakespeare creates characters that ignore, misinterpret, or acknowledge omens in an attempt to teach us to accept facts instead of twisting them to fit the circumstances. In approaching a presented omen, one method is to altogether ignore it. When a soothsayer warns Caesar to “beware the Ides of March”, Caesar laughs at the man and brushes the warning off of his shoulders. (1.2.28) He does not seem to consider the fact that a soothsayer possesses the gift to see the future, for he calls the soothsayer a dreamer and continues on with Lam 2 his day.
Another case of Caesar’s ignorance is when he sees the soothsayer on the ides of March and brags of how nothing bad has happened to him yet. Wittily, the soothsayer responds with “Ay, Caesar, but not gone.” (3.1.2) Caesar teases the Soothsayer by saying that the Ides of March has come and nothing has happened to him yet. However, the day has not ended, so it is too early to say that nothing bad will happen to him. These quotes both show how Caesar disregards the soothsayer’s warning and even mocks him about the warning. Also, Caesar misses an important hint that would have caused him to reconsider his actions on the ides of March when Artemidorus tries to vey for his attention. “Hail, Caesar. Read this schedule...O Caesar, read mine first, for mine’s a suit that touches Caesar nearer. Read it, great Caesar.” (3.1.3-7) Artemidorus vehemently tries to get Caesar to read a scroll which also warns him of the danger approaching him. If Caesar had taken the time to read the scroll, he may be convinced that he is in danger. In contrast, he looks down upon Artemidorus and carries along with his day, missing a vital hint that would have changed his fate. For these actions, when brought information, Caesar doesn’t acknowledge omens but does the total opposite, ignoring it. Instead of completely acknowledging but not ignoring either, some characters acknowledge omens but misinterpret …show more content…
them. Other characters accept the information given to them but twist it in their heads to fit the circumstances. Because of this, another way of approaching omens is misinterpreting it. When seeing his wife cry during her sleep that he will be murdered, Caesar hurriedly sends an order for the priests to sacrifice an animal. The priests do not find a heart and bid Caesar to stay at home. However, Caesar twists the idea and explains “The gods do this in shame of cowardice./Caesar should be a beast without a heart/ If he should stay at home today for fear”. (2.2.44-46) He uses the idea of going to go to the Senate meeting because he does have a heart and cannot be declared a coward for being heartless represents cowardice. This presents how Caesar’s ambition will end Lam 3 up killing him.
In addition to that thought, “a beast without a heart” can be interpreted as the conspirators being cowardice. (2.2.45) They plan on killing Caesar because they assume that his ambition will make him take advantage of his power. As a result, the conspirators want to kill Caesar before he takes the crown. Calpurnia goes on to explain her dream to Caesar of how people will be bathing in his blood, and for a moment, is able to convince Caesar to stay home from the Senate meeting. However, Decius enters into Caesar’s home and influences Caesar to attend the meeting. “It was a vision fair and fortunate/…./ Signifies that from you great Rome shall suck/ Reviving blood, and that great men shall press…” (2.2.89, 92-93) Decius completely takes Calpurnia’s dream out of context by saying that Caesar should go to the palace since the dream conveys how he will be crowned king. He purposely did this to convince Caesar to go to the Senate meeting, so the conspirators could murder him. This causes Caesar to drop his wife’s interpretation of her dream and follow what Decius told him. Caesar and Decius misinterpret omens, both purposely and unconsciously, in order to fit a
circumstance. Instead of ignoring or misinterpreting an omen, some characters actually acknowledge it. From seeing a furious storm during the night, Casca comments “A tempest dropping fire. / Either there is a civil strife in heaven, / Or else the world, too saucy with the gods, / Incenses them to send destruction” (1.3.10-13). Casca interprets the weather as an omen for bad things to come, which is correct. However, Cassius misinterprets the omen as the gods warning the conspirators of the actions of Caesar and what he might do to the Capitol if he gains control of the government. This example shows how two different characters interpret an omen. Casca correctly interprets the omen but Cassius, who went around running in the thunderstorm weather and didn’t get killed, declared the omen as a warning from God. Later in the play, Cassius encounters a soldier running away from the battlefield, which represents an omen. During a battle, a soldier would Lam 4 either keep his shield and win or lose his shield and die on the field. As Cassius runs to a desolate hill, he asks Pindarus to view Titinius as he approaches a troop. Pindarus misinterprets the men that surround Titinius as Mark Antony’s men. Hearing this Cassius demands Pindarus to kill him. “O, coward that I am to live so long/To see my best friend ta’en before my face!” (5.3.36-37) The reality was the fact that Titinius was surrounded by Brutus’s own men and they were actually winning the war at the time. However, the one time Cassius actually follows through his word of suicide is at the worst timing. When Titinius comes back to Cassius to report, he has killed himself. Cassius correctly interprets the omen, but due to Pindarus’ misinterpretation, Cassius decides to kill himself. Not only to omens occur in Shakespeare, it also occurs in real life. The actions done by Caesar, Cassius, and Pindaris can all be related to an action we have done in our lives. Similar to the blind, homeless man shouting, it all comes down to us on how to approach omens. We have brains, whose purpose is to process information. We need to use them to analyze what the ma has said because in this day and age, anything can happen. If there was news of Subway causing an abundance of people sickness, it is wise to listen to the man. If there was nothing about Subway, there may be a chance that the omen should be ignored. In the end, it all comes down to you and how you approach an omen because Plato once said “Knowledge is a true opinion”.
Julius Caesar, even though he is considered great, turns out to contain many flaws. He believes himself to be untouchable, and has a confidence that he cannot be harmed, even though that is not the case. He says so when he says, “Caesar shall forth. The things that threatened me ne’er looked but on ...
(Mittelstaedt 119). The character traits he carries are the driving force behind his actions and his actions are the driving force behind the plot of Julius Caesar. Cassius instigates the entire conspiracy against Caesar. His emotionally based reasons to eliminate Caesar breed Cassius’ plot to kill him. Putting the plan in drive, Cassius persuade Brutus’ opinion of Caesar influenced him to join the rebellion. If not for Cassius’ manipulation, Caesar would have continued to reign over Rome. Additionally, his behavior influences his fellow conspirators, for they mirror his actions. For example Decius visits Caesar and his wife, Calpurnia, on the morning of the Ides of March. Calpurnia has had a horrific dream foreshadowing Caesar’s death causing him to contemplate staying home to ease her worries about what the day will bring. When Decius enters the room, Caesar shares Calpurnia’s concerns and asks him to tell the Roman people that he will not be going to the capital today. Decius is quick to rebut his reasoning, exclaiming, “This dream is all amiss interpreted; It was a vision fair and fortunate.” (Shakespeare 2.2.83-84). He continues on, convincing Caesar that Calpurnia has read this dream as dark and terrifying, but it is really about Rome praising him. Understanding Caesar is very susceptible to flattery, Decius manages to assure Caesar there is no danger. Like Cassius, Decius mirrored the maneuver of reading into certain traits of another person, and exploiting those traits to influence him to act in a certain
He was not superstitious; he dismissed the soothsayer’s warning “Beware the ides of March" (1, 2, 18) as words said by a dreamer and not worth pondering over. Caesar refused to believe the numerous omens that had been occurring in Rome and termed them as simply being general signs that would affect everyone and not just him, though the people beside him were trying to convince him not to go to the Capitol on the ides of March for fear that something ill might befall upon Caesar. Though Caesar was not superstitious, he was however, a defeatist man that believed that a man's fate was destined and could not be changed. Calpurnia tried to convince him not to go to the Capitol because she had dreamed of his statue sprouting blood and the people of Rome were bathing their hands in the blood with smiles on their faces. Calpurnia was rather distressed about this and hoped to stop Caesar from walking right into what she saw as death's coldly beckoning hands.
Caesar’s lack of somewhat savage Machiavellian traits foreshadows his downfall a multitude of times. From the beginning, the soothsayer warns him to watch out for the Ides of March. There are also bad signs; men in fire walks up and down the streets, and a lioness gives birth on the streets. Likewise, before he heads to the Senate House to receive the crown, Calphurnia tells him that she has had a nightmare, and pleads him to stay home. However, he ignores all the premonitions and moves toward where the Senators are, with no one to protect him when he is in danger. This action of Caesar contradicts the teachings of Machiavelli, “Before all else, be armed” (The Prince). As a result of his carelessness, the conspirators see that he has no chance of circumventing, and assassinates him. Similarly, he is unsuccessful in recognizing the outrage of Cassius and a few others; he isn’t doubtful enough of their secretive deeds and eventually loses the reigns to eliminate the defiance. "The same thing occurs in affairs o...
As one of the most well known authors of the Elizabethan Era, Shakespeare had written numerous sonnets and plays reflecting the values of people of the time period. Shakespeare often display themes of love and death, fate and free will, and power and weaknesses throughout his works of literature. The play "The Tragedy of Julius” truly highlight the impact of fate and free will in the development of the plot, of the assassination of Caesar’s death. Some may argue that fate is actually the one responsible for the act, but they fail to recognize that it is the acts of men leading to the death. It is the free will at fault for this occurrence, that the Roman senators consciously killed Caesar and Caesar himself facing his mortality.
Julius Caesar is shown to have many reprehensible character flaws over the course of the drama. Namely, he is illustrated as having a belligerent sense of arrogance. Initially, the great majority of the Roman public adores and esteems Caesar. However, this adoration inflates his sense of self-pride and arrogance. For example, in the play’s introduction Caesar is given warning about a plot to extirpate him from the throne. A soothsayer warns him to “beware the ides of March” (890). Rather than to obviate the attempt, Caesar blows off the Soothsayer, stating “he is a dreamer, let us leave him” (890). Later in Act II, Caesar has been informed of dead men walking, a lioness giving birth in the street...
Caesar’s wife, Calpurnia, had a dream, in which she saw her husband’s statue as though it were a fountain pouring blood from a hundred spouts. Around the statue or fountain of blood, Calpurnia
It truly must have shocked the people of that era when Caesar went to the Capitol against all warnings, because “Elizabethans generally believed that prophecies were to be taken seriously, and certainly that no prudent statesman could run the risk of ignoring them” (Ribner 58). The people of the Elizabethan era were very proper, and to see someone, even if only a character in a play, break one of the laws of nature in which they so firmly believed, was quite astounding.
	Julius Caesar has much pride, a hamartia, which brings him to not be wary of the conspiracy. Caesar is given much warning on the threat of his life, yet due to his pride he thinks himself to be too great of a person to have such a downfall. Julius Caesar is warned by a soothsayer, "Soothsayer. Beware the ides of March."(1,2,18) Julius Caesar rebukes the soothsayer by stating, "Caesar. He is a dreamer. Let us leave him. Pass."(1,2,23) Caesar does not take warning to be wary the middle of the month, the day of his assassination. Later, Caesar’s wife Calpurnia has a nightmare that Caesar is slain at the Capitol. Caesar calls for the priests to do a sacrifi...
Decius uses flattery and persuasion when speaking to Brutus. Decius is an active member of the Conspirators so he is very motivated into getting Caesar to go to the Senate House. The first thing that Decius says when he walks into Caesar's house is "Caesar, all hail! Good morrow, worthy Caesar" (II, ii, 30). Decius also goes on and calls Caesar "most mighty". Decius is already on Caesar's good side. After catching up on Calpurnia's dream, he uses his quick wit to distort Calpurnia's foreshadowing dream by saying it is "misinterpreted". He explains that the dream "Signifies that from (Caesar) Rome shall suck/Reviving blood, and that great men shall press/for tinctures, stains, relics, and cognizance" (II, ii, 31). Caesar seems to be amazed by this version of the interpretation; in fact, he likes this version a lot better mainly because Decius uses so much flattery.
In plays, every hero has a tragic flaw which eventually leads to their demise. The tragic flaw Caesar possesses is the quality of arrogance. For example, “I shall remember. /When Caesar says ‘Do this,’ it is performed” (I.ii.12-13). This quote demonstrates Caesar’s arrogance because he expects his “friends” to put his priorities before any else’s
There is much attention paid to omens and nightmares and how they foreshadow Caesars death. The events that lead to the death of Julius Caesar are predicted by omens from multiple characters such as Calpurnia, Caesars wife, the Soothsayer, and a teacher, Artemidorus. The omens in the play were ignored by a majority of the main characters. Even though ignored, these omens appear even after Caesars death to show the guilt-ridden nature of the conspirators. Hence, the play Julius Caesar shows that there is always a relationship between omens and nature in everyday life and this affects those who believe in them. Some people rely on omens to show them how to live their life, and what to do with it. Never less, whatever happens in society or nature is portrayed by omens supernatural beings, which is how they are related.
William Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar is central to the debate of whether or not man is bound to a fate predestined by some divine force hidden within the stars, or a fate controlled by one’s own actions. Based on Sir Thomas North’s Plutarch’s historical accounts, Shakespeare depicts the characters within the play to believe that fate is either controlled by the divine, as indicated through portents or omens, Roman values, or human decision alone. However, Shakespeare ultimately makes the argument that the decisive actions of humans, both good and bad, are what ultimately shape history and therefore fate. Through the use of Plutarch’s writings, Shakespeare develops the life and death of Julius Caesar into a tragedy determined not by the fault of the stars, but one driven by the fault of the human condition. Calphurnia in Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar, based on Plutarch’s account of her having a nightmare where “Caesar was slain, and that she had him in her arms (“Sources” 107),” fears for her husband’s life on account of these superstitious happenings and states “O Caesar, these things are beyond all use, /
Throughout the play The Tragedy of Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare both fate and free will is demonstrated. Cassius argued that everyone has the power to change their future in what they do when Casca came to him frightened by omens. Though, omens have seemed to prove correct throughout the play, therefore it dominates the argument of Fate versus Free Will. All major events had an omen foreshadowing it. The first five were seen by Casca throughout the day.
Representation, Not Exploitation Popular culture is often used to generate publicity and resources for a variety of humanitarian crisis. In the instance of BAND-AID, a song and music video was created with well-known British artists to raise awareness for the famine that was occurring in Ethiopia. BAND AID represents an example of intentional development, specifically interventionism. This theory emphasizes the perceived need for deliberate policy and development alongside capitalism in order to achieve economic and social progress (Thomas 3-4). This form of development creates a framework for justifying efforts like BAND AID because they are rooted in the capitalistic tendencies that encourage the use of publicity and fame to gain power, resources,