Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Effects of guilt on a person
The effects of guilt
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Who Is Guilty? In Oedipus the King, various disgraceful crimes are committed, and many people suffer and die. Normally it would be necessary to place blame upon those responsible for such crimes , but because Oedipus the King is a rather complicated affair, objective accusations would only be for the weak minded and ignorant. However if one extends beyond the realm of legitimate legality in both the United States legal system and ancient Greek legal system, one will have to understand one major moral infraction had been committed, that being too much pride. In relation to Oedipus the King, the primary character, Oedipus, carried a plethora of pride and confidence. This pride and confidence would lead to major conflict and despair within …show more content…
the tragedy, and therefore from a personal perspective, Oedipus is was morally and ethically guilty. In Ancient Greece it was considered a very damning personality trait to posses hubris, or an excessive amount of pride. According to Greek culture, if one had hubris their ability to make rational conscious decisions was limited. To put the hubris idea in a more clear and modern perspective, an exceptional example of detrimental pride is current american politics. When it comes to pride, it is a great sin because it leads to every other vice imaginable. In politics, where the intoxication of power can magnify even the most modest character flaw, pride is often the most harmful sin imaginable. That sense of personal importance that both fuels a politician’s ambitions and prefigures his or her demise. If you spend time within Washington, D.C., you will find any number of people willing to engage in coky activities . Every would-be hubristic politician, member of Congress or prominent official has their own inner-circle of enablers. Fortunately, most politicians also have someone to keep them in straight in line. President John F. Kennedy had in his brother Robert who helps keep the worst excesses of their egos in check. Unfortunately In the beginning of the play, Oedipus was the ideal leader.
He had strong leadership skills, a passion for justice, was honest with his people, and was interested in doing whatever he could to make Thebes a better place. However, early in the play the Chorus called upon the gods to descend to earth and end the plague that has ravaged Thebes. Oedipus is not a god, but, as a leader he saw it as his duty to answer the Chorus’ prayers. He stated “Is this your prayer? It may be answered. Come, listen to me, act as the crisis demands, And you shall have relief from all these evils” . At first, this seems like Oedipus is doing his duty asking, taking it upon himself to end the plague. But, the chorus had asked the gods to end the plague, not Oedipus. So, by taking it upon himself he is taking on the role of a god, something that the people of Thebes do not approve of. The chorus supported this disapproval when they stated “The tyrant is a child of pride…any mortal who dares hold no immortal power in awe will be caught up in a net of pain”. While Oedipus believed he was doing the right thing, his prideful self skewed his ability to make coordinated and logical
decisions
Sophocles ' Oedipus Rex begs the question: If Oedipus was insensible of his heritage when he slaughtered Laius and then wedded Jocasta, does that make him a moral man? Another question would be: Is he inherently immoral because he somehow should have known his real relatives on some level? If one assumes that he is innocent because no one told him the situation, then that is a modern day take on the event. There are other ways to look at the case. Mainly, children can sense who their parents are on some psychological level and vice versa. Therefore, Oedipus really should have known, even if he claims he had no idea. In the examination of these questions lies the moral ambiguity of the play.
Justice is when you receive fair behavior or treatment. In Oedipus Rex, each character has in a way contributed outcome of the play. Oedipus, as we know did various actions that weren’t right. His heinous crimes lead him to be feel guilt at the end of the play where he finds out the truth from where he comes. At the end of the novel he finds out about he was incest with his mother whom he had four children with (that are now his half siblings). After realizing what he had done, Oedipus ends up begging to be killed. However, he changes his mind. Oedipus ends up wanting to flee the city which he consults with Creon. When Creon gives the okay, Oedipus leaves. I don’t believe that in death punishment, but I also don’t see how it’s okay for Oedipus to just flee. I don’t think it’s fair to the city, and morally. Jocasta was mother and wife. When married to Laius, she became pregnant with Oedipus and arranged to kill the infant. They ended up not killing the child but abandoning it. Jocasta later ends up marrying and bedding with her son, however she does not know it is him. When she finds out the truth, she couldn’t handle what was done. So, she hung herself. Jocasta killed herself. Death is an extreme to what she deserves. Yes she did some wrongs, but there was need for her to hang herself. Laius is killed by his own son, Oedipus. As I may have said, Oedipus wasn’t aware that it was his father. That said, I
Oedipus Rex was first viewed as a bold and intelligent leader ti his people in the city of Thebes. Unfortunately, his search for the cause of the plague led him to target himself and bring misery to his family. Oedipus' initial understanding of justice in the beginning of the play is seeking the murderer of Laius and destroy the plague that was intoxicating the city. From the prophecy that he hears from Tiresias he becomes insulted at the way perceives the words that are spoken and comes
The king was someone who the people of Thebes turned to when they needed help, "find us strength, rescue!" p. 161. Oedipus had set himself high social expectations after helping free Thebes "from the sphinx". Oedipus was admired as being "best of men" p. 161, and therefore socially the citizens would have expected him to help them when they needed it. Oedipus was kinder to the citizens and more open with them than was generally expected from a king, "my children" p. 162. He spoke to them directly and not through a messenger, showing the closeness between the people and their king, "Here I am myself..." p. 159.
Oedipus is guilty because, despite knowing the prophecy that he will commit parricide and incest, he yet kills an elderly gentleman and sleeps with an elderly women. The choice was his, and this accounts for his guilt.
Oedipus is a hero, but sometimes he can not see the reality of this. He goes into states where he lacks mental insight, making rash decisions without thinking about the future or consequences. One of his biggest downfalls because of this shortsightedness is that he does not realize that his destiny is solely in the hands of the gods. After Oedipus is told as a young boy about the prophecy of his life, he can not "see" how he is destined to marry his mother and kill his father. Furthermore, because of his lack of insight he truly believes that he can move without the Oracle’s prophecy following him. No matter what Oedipus does, he has no control over what the gods have predetermined. The gods also punish the people of Thebes with hard times since it is these people who brought Oedipus into the land as their king. The gods do this in order to make the people see through Oedipus’ extreme pride and quick temper. The gods apparently think that the only way to get them to see what Oedipus has done is by causing the city pain and suffering. The gods use their insight to affect Oedipus’ life, family and city.
Oedipus took great pride in saving people and being seen a hero. He wanted the death of Laius to be avenged and he had to be the one to find the murderer and punish him. "I'll fight for him, I'll leave no means untried, to cach the one who did it with his hand..." (Literature, Oedipus the King, Ln. 270-271, page 1081) He did not want to let the people of Thebes down, and he wanted to show that he would be a true hero once again.
On the beginning of the play, Oedipus describes himself to be a person that is willing to do anything to help his people (the people of Thebes). For instance, on the beginning of the play Oedipus says “Here I am, myself, world-famous Oedipus...You may count on me; I am ready to do anything to help...”(6). The theme of the play is Oedipus’s journey to self-discovery, this quote connects to theme by Oedipus, who describes himself to be a great force, a hero for the city; and so far seems to have done something to help the plague-stormed city. However, throughout the play, readers and Oedi...
In perhaps one of the most well known stories in the Western world, Oedipus the King, innocence and guilt are two of the most discussed aspects. The implications surrounding the guilt or innocence of Oedipus can not only be applied to this play, but to almost all stories told throughout the Western tradition. Within Oedipus the King, no one character carries the guilt of the events in the play, rather it is a culmination of humans trying to avoid their fate that create a paradox of individuals who are all at once guilty and innocent, with the different acts of individuals ultimately bringing about the fate that Oedipus suffers.
In conclusion, I think that if Oedipus had not had this huge sense of pride things would have turn out a lot better for him.
Oedipus’ exaggerated sense of pride made him believe he could defy the prophecy set out for him. He believed he could control his own fate. Despite knowing his prophecy, Oedipus did not even think twice about killing the people on the road to Thebes. When he became king Oedipus referred to himself as, “I, Oedipus, a name that all men know” (Sophocles Prologue. 9). Oedipus knew he had great power and a reputation. Oedipus’ hubris had a domino effect in his life. One critic stated, “Oedipus starts as a supremely confident, masterful king, a beloved, caring savior-figure, a man of energy and proven intelligence, and ends as a shunned, polluted, self-blinded outcast, deprived of the most basic freedoms” (Gillett and Hankey 273). When Tiresias told Oedipus that he was the cause of the plague, Oedipus’ pride kicked in as he reminded Tiresias that he solved the riddle of the Sphinx so, the plague could not have possibly been his fault. This hubris was the cause of Oedipus’ ignorance and denial, ultimately leading to the King of Thebes and Jocasta’s
When we are first introduced to Oedipus, he is a strong leader who is thoroughly respected by the people of Thebes. “O greatest of men.” Oedipus was the saviour of Thebes 15 years before he solved the riddle of the Sphinx which freed the city from the plague and death. Because of this act, he inherited the throne although when a new disaster threatened the prosperity of the city, the people of Thebes turned to Oedipus. “I grieve for you my children. Believe me; I know all that you desire of me, all that you suffer.” Oedipus learns that there is an “unclean thing” which is polluting their soil. He declares punishment to this thing that if he owns up now then his punishment will not be harsh but if he conceals the truth and it later outed then nothing will save him. “No matter who he may be, he is forbidden shelter or intercourse with any man.” After declaring this punishment, Oedipus is approached by Teiresias, a frail, blind prophet who says that Oedipus is the “cursed polluter of this land.” Oedipus is horrified by this accusation and mocks the blind prophet. Later on in the play, we see that Oedipus becomes the figure he once mocked.
Oedipus is a tragic man haunted by a cruel fate, of that there is simply no doubt. But does that fate excuse a man’s crimes. It is an important question that needs to be answered before we decide the Oedipus’s guilt. Are the murder of his father and incest with his mother somehow mitigated by the circumstances of the situation that led to them. I think not, a man is responsible for his actions a king more so than any man. In fact as a king Oedipus is responsible for all of Thebes. If he is not held responsible what kind of example is he setting with his authority.
Oedipus was guilty of killing his father and marrying his mother, but perhaps the true sin lay in his overzealous attempt to raise himself to the level of the gods by trying to escape his fate. The chorus chants about how in prosperity, he was envied by all men, he was honored highest above all honors, and how he won happiness by pride (by slaughtering the Sphinx, and by trying to deceive the god’s will.) But, how ultimately, Odipus was judged for it, causing a reversal of fortune in his prosperous
Oedipus, who is the main subject in the play, is an interesting character. The very first lines that are spoken are said by Oedipus himself. When he enters the scene, he seems as if he is very confident person, as he says “everybody everywhere knows who [he is]: Oedipus. King” (11). When being presented as a confident person, it would seem as if the character has everything going for them and have no flaw. But this does not prove accurate with Oedipus. At the beginning of the play, Oedipus asks lot of questions, as if he has no idea of what is actually going on. One of the very first questions that Oedipus asks is that “why are you kneeling? / What can I give you? / how can I help?” (14-16). Oedipus was sent to Thebes to help aid with the plague that the city has been struck with as the former King, Laios, and promises to find the murderer and curse him with the same plague that ...