Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Literary analysis on oedipus the king
Oedipus the king synopsis
Oedipus the king synopsis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Oedipus is guilty because, despite knowing the prophecy that he will commit parricide and incest, he yet kills an elderly gentleman and sleeps with an elderly women. The choice was his, and this accounts for his guilt. This is implausible because, at the time he killed the old man (his father) he had no idea of the prophecy that foreseen this happening. Even if he would have known about the Gods saying that he would do these things, it wouldn't have made much of a difference. For Oedipus thought his parents were different than who they really were. He had no idea that his real parents knew of the phrophecy and had him put in the mountains with pins in his ankles to die. He had no idea that a sheperd saved him and gave him to the King of Corinth. So he had no idea that the old man he met where the tree roads meet, was his real father, and he had no way of knowing that Jocasta was his real mother. So even if he knew that he would kill his father and sleep with his mother, he wouldn't have know that Laius was his real father and that Jocasta was his real mother. Even though the decisions to kill the old man and sleep with the older women were choices he made, he had no idea that these would be his parents. Also if the Gods make a prophecy, how is it that a mere mortal could change his own fate? A mere mortal cannot even see a God it its true form. So how could Oedipus defeat the prophecy made by a God. Although Oedipus may have been wrong to do what he did, I do not think you can use the word guilty to describe him. Even though Oedipus may be the hero, he is also selfish and ruthless. One example of his ruthlessness is when he meets Laius at the place where the three roads meet. Instead of letting the older man pass, he makes a scene, why should he be the one to move? He is royalty. He believes that he should move for no man. He is also selfish in the fact that when Teresias enters and gives Oedipus the clues that tell him that he has killed Laius, he refuses to believe him, to the point of insulting him, and kicking him out.
When Jocasta describes Laius' murder,it is easy to piece the story together and figure out that Oedipus was the murderer. The only reason that Oedipus does not realize the truth is because he does not want to, he is in denial and refuses to accept his identity. Likewise, when the messenger is speaking of the child brought to Polybus and Merope with bounded ankles, Oedipus should have realized that he was the child the messenger was speaking of, but he still refused to completely believe it until the herdsman was able to corroborate the messenger's
The selfishness that Oedipus possesses causes him to have abundance of ignorance. This combination is what leads to his father’s death. After fleeing Corinth and his foster family, Oedipus gets into a skirmish with an older man. The reason for the fight was because, “The groom leading the horses forced me off the road at his lord’s command” (1336). Oedipus is filled with a rage after being insulted by the lord and feels the need to act. The two men fight, but Oedipus ends up being too much for the older man, and he kills him. What Oedipus is unaware of is that the man was actually his birth father and by killing him, Oedipus has started on the path of his own destruction. Not only does Oedipus kill his father, but also everyone else, “I killed them all” (1336). The other men had no part in the scuffle, but in his rage, he did not care who he was killing.
The choir represents the voice of the people, the voice of the masses. People often conform to this uniform truth, they want to be like other people. This conformation leads to a uniform voice from the public. This voice is often ignorant to the truth, seemingly to the point that it creates its own truth.
The first solution to this question, as I said earlier, is the idea that destiny makes character. As destiny supposedly in the Greek mindset maps out all events before they occur, we can today assume with this logic that perhaps the components that "built" Oedipus' character were caused by fate. We know today that character is determined by biological factors and experience. These biological factors would have been determined by how well he was fed, how well he developed, his genes etcetera. The experience would have also been determined by the pre-destined master plan of Fate. Thus it is possible to argue that Oedipus, as components of his character and mind, was entirely shaped by fate and therefore cannot be held responsible for what he has done, as he has no control over his actions.
-not knowing it was his biological father- could not be avoided, his ignorance in a certain way absolves him of all blame. As for the "incest" matter, Oedipus is certainly not guilty of such a thing for it was Jocasta who promised to marry him in the first place, we can blame Jocasta for the downfall as much as we can blame Oedipus for it. Oedipus is certainly not guilty of anything.
Since Oedipus had no knowledge of his birth parents, he cannot be accused of knowingly fulfilling the prophecy. He had no understanding of Laius as his birth father upon killing him. One might say that Oedipus is then guilty of murder regardless, but if he had killed in self defense, that cannot be true. Likewise, if Oedipus had no understanding of Jocasta as his birth mother, then he cannot be guilty of incest. Neither can he be guilty of defiling Laius’s marriage bed, as he did not know that Jocasta was the wife of the man he had murdered.
of a mother-son marriage. Greek law considers the act, not the motive. meaning that even though she nor Oedipus knew they were related, they committed. the crime of the.. & nbsp; Finally, Oedipus's guilt. In some ways, Oedipus was the most guilty of them all. Consider his 'hubris'. He regarded himself as almost a god, assuming. that since he alone had solved the sphinx's riddle, he was the one of the gods. favorites. He was very quick to judge, and judged on the most flimsy of evidence. He calls on Tiresias to tell him what he should do, and when he. doesn't like what he hears, Oedipus says, "Your words are nothing - futile".
No one can be held fully responsible for actions committed under some kind of external constraint, and for the case of Oedipus, such constraint might be exerted by god. But it does not mean that Oedipus suffers not because of his guilt, but of his goodness, because Oedipus is responsible for those actions which are not performed under constraint. Oedipus has choices, but every time he chooses the wrong one even he knew that the one he chose will turn out to be bad. He still chooses this road to certain extend, is because of his arrogant pride. I think the events of the play are Oedipus fault. Oedipus makes important mistakes or errors in judgment that lead to this ending. His pride, blindness, and foolishness all play a part in the tragedy that befalls him.
After being told by Creon that the killer of King Laius should be brought to justice, Oedipus goes through a series of events in an attempt to find the murderer. Oedipus sends for Tiresias to bring light upon the investigation. Once arriving and hearing Oedipus’s voice, Tiresias immediately knows that Oedipus had already killed his father and slept with his mother. He tells Oedipus that “[His] marriage is a sin. [His] love is a sin./ [His] bed is stained with sin.” (31) Oedipus refuses to process what Tiresias has said and immediately lashes out in anger. When Tiresias said that his marriage, love, and bed is a sin, Oedipus is blind to his own prophecy, so
in my mind, is not valid simply because of what it might do to the
Oedipus, king of Thebes, was destined to have two things happen to him: he was to murder his father and marry his mother with whom he’d have children. Despite his and others attempts to avoid this prophecy from coming true, unfortunately he was unable to avoid his fate. While he is guilty of actually doing the crimes he desperately tried to avoid, he is innocent of having malicious intent to commit the crimes or knowledge that he had actually committed them.
Oedipus is innocent because he did not know the truth. He did not know his true parents. He was living his whole life a lie. When the messenger told him about the prophecy that he was going to kill his father and marry his mother. He left Corinth to avoid the prophecy.
Oedipus the king was destined to kill his father and marry his own mother, but a specific god seeks for justice be served. One of characters of on Oedipus Rex the priest pleads the king of the sufferings in Thebes, and the messenger brings down the blind prophet Tiresias to answer the king what Apollo has responded. "Relief from the plague can only come one way...[Uncover] the murderers of Laius, put them to death or drive them into exile." (Oedipus 621). Since Oedipus escaped his town in order to not make the prophecy true, what fault did he have that the prophecy had his future written down. He had no intentions of making that prophecy come true, but him killing the people in the carriage without even acknowledging it is the king is reasonable. He didn’t want them to know who he was, his parents have the fault of what happened to him, especially the king for sending him to be killed as a newborn. In the middle of the story Oedipus finds out that his father Polybus is fine, but he meets the sheep herder, Jocasta has already figured out who pleading the king to stop.
In most cultures killing another human is considered an act of severe moral consequences, for both the one who commits the murder and for society. Oedipus seems to be an honorable man and to discover he has inadvertently killed King Liaus, who also happened to be his long-lost father, would have surely placed the poor guy in a state of consternation. Sleeping with his mother, even inadvertently, I’m with Oedipus on that being an abomination, that would be hard to take. Again, Oedipus being an honorable man, both these acts and the suffering he has brought to his children and the city is an evil act.
The topic of Oedipus being innocent or guilty for his acts is contemplated amongst many. “Guilt is an internal punishment that feeds on itself, resulting in an individual to have an obsessive behavior”. In Oedipus Rex, Oedipus is on a search to take revenge for the murderer of King Laios; however, throughout the course of the play, Oedipus discovers that the assassin is himself, fulfilling his destiny. Through my eyes, Oedipus is innocent because he committed such acts unknowingly. He proves himself innocent through his continuous honor to himself, the Gods, and his people by seeking for the sole slayer, wanting to discover his true identity when his memory of his killing comes back, and by brutally punishing himself for his unknowing acts.