Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Question about fate vs. free will
Question about fate vs. free will
Question about fate vs. free will
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Fate vs Free Will has always been one of the most controversial topics from early history, and for no surprise because everyone is fascinated about their future. Many people believe that life is predetermined and anything you do won’t transmute your future. Others believe that you are sanctioned to mold your own destiny and optate your own path. Your mind, for example, has total free will up to the point where you believe that everything you think is controlled by faith. Then you wouldn’t have a free thought because all that you will think was always going to be thought, and thus making faith decide you. Whatever the case may be, one thing is for certain and that is that we’ll never know the future because it is beyond our ken.
The first philosophers to question Fate vs Free Will originated in ancient Greece in the 6th century BCE. The philosophers were called Presocratics and their purpose was to question and investigate the ultimate basis and essential nature of the external world. One of the first philosopher to question fate was Aristotle by saying “…If it was always
…show more content…
true to say that it was or would be, it could not be, or not be going to be. But if something cannot not happen, it is impossible for it not to happen; and what cannot not happen necessarily happens. Everything, then, that will be will be necessary.” (Aristotle, Aristotle’s de interpretatione). For example, you say that the city will flood and someone else says the city will not flood, both of the statements have the potential to be either true or false. That isn’t to say that both of the statements are wrong or both are right, instead both statements have the potential to be either. We can further analyze Fate vs Free Will In shakespeare’s play Macbeth.
In Macbeth Fate vs Free Will is firstly is shown when the Sergeant says “And fortune, on his damned quarrel smiling, Show'd like a rebel's whore: but all's too weak: For brave Macbeth—well he deserves that name— Disdaining fortune, with his brandish'd steel, Which smoked with bloody execution,” ( ) the sergeant implies that Macbeth should have been killed but he was somehow stronger than his own fate. However, the sergeant continues to say that he may have defeated his own fate now, but it will soon catch up to him later. This is foreshadowing his inevitable demise proving the theory of fate. Although, it would also be misleading to say that the sergeant understands fate, instead he could have thought logically because after all Macbeth did undergo a hard battle and so the sergeant could have been surprised he
survived. The greatest question in Macbeth was created by the three witches when it was undefined if they controlled Macbeth’s fate, or if they simply imputed the idea of murder. When Macbeth encounters the three witches , they say “All hail, Macbeth! Hail to thee, Thane of Glamis!, All hail, Macbeth! Hail to thee, Thane of Cawdor!,All hail, Macbeth, that shalt be king hereafter!” (). At first Macbeth didn’t think too much of it until King Duncan rewards him with the title of the Thane of Cawdor, and all land that comes with it. He was then persuaded that the prophecy was coming true, but was it really? Of course he becoming thane of Cawdor did fruition but Aristotle would argue that it happened simply because the three witches predicted three different things. All three things had the potential to happen, especially because he recently defeated the previous king of Cawdor and was already king of Glamis. The feud between Fate and Free Will is also seen within Macbeth and Lady Macbeth. Macbeth after being persuaded about his prophecy reaches out to his wife, Lady Macbeth, and she was not easily persuaded. She encourages Macbeth to ensure his position as king of Scotland by killing King Duncan. He refuses at first, but ultimately takes his fate into his own hands, allowing his ambition and that of his wife to overcome his better judgement. It was his wife that didn’t fully believe in fate and push Macbeth to act upon it. Finally, the final three apparitions that were told by the witches were to beware Macduff, no man born from a women will harm Macbeth, and Macbeth shall never vanquished until the forest moves. These prophacies would undermind the idea that there is such thing as free will. It is undermind because of the fact taht Macbeth knew he was worried about Macduff which is why he tried to kill him but instead ended up killing his family. However , it was still unitble because Macduff still ends up killing Macbeth because he was born of not a women and the soliders that rebleed against macbeths army covered themselfs with “the forest”. It would be hard to defute the fact that Macbeth had free will at the end because he actually tried to do soemthing about it but at the end fate did catch up to him just as the sergeant
A main example of fate would be when Billy is on an airplane. In Slaughterhouse-Five, it states that "Billy, knowing the plane was going to crash pretty soon, closed his eyes, traveled in time back to 1944" (198). Soon after, "the plane smacked into the top of Sugarbush Mountain in Vermont. Everyone was killed but Billy and the copilot" (199). Instead of doing anything about it, Billy just waits for the plane to crash. If Billy had free will, he would have tried to warn the others on the plane, or not gotten onto it at all.
While the fate of the characters have all been planned, the paths they take are still of free will. In the introduction, we first hear the captain praising “brave Macbeth (well he deserves that name) / Disdaining Fortune, with his brandished steel, / Which smoked with bloody execution” (1.2). In these lines, the captain makes it sound like Macbeth is able to evade fate and fortune and escape death using his own abilities.
Marilyn Monroe once said, “I believe that everything happens for a reason. People change so that you can learn to let go, things go wrong so that you appreciate them when they 're right, you believe lies so you eventually learn to trust no one but yourself, and sometimes good things fall apart so better things can fall together.” Is fate subjected to one’s actions or is there another force that intervenes? Two choices to pick from, but each decision will result in a different ending. Most people believe they are free to choose whatever they want, however was fate already predestined that makes people decide their fate regardless of choice? Over the centuries, people have pondered upon the fact that integrity, justice, and moral principles play a role in deciding one’s fate. Does this mean that if Odysseus were to put aside his pride and be humble along his journey home, he would not have gone through all that trouble for anything? Is fate uncontrollable even for the Gods to handle? Forrest Gump is born mental
Fate vs Free Will is one of the most oft used literary techniques in writing. It is never more evident than in Shakespeare’s play Macbeth. The major theme of the story Macbeth is whether or not the story is fueled by the free will of Macbeth, or by his fate. Are the events in Macbeth a result of his mentality and outlook on life, or were they going to happen no matter what? Almost every major event that takes place can be traced back to this question. It can be viewed in different ways, and most people have their own opinions. Dissecting this question is a part of what makes teaching Macbeth still have so much value to this day. But there is a clear answer to this question upon further dissection. The story of Macbeth is fueled by his free will, which he perceives to be a necessary part of achieving his fate.
The three witches told Macbeth of his fate. Did the events in Macbeth?s life occur because of the witches? prophesy or was it because of the choices he made? Could there possibly be some of both? What caused Macbeth to fall? Was it his fate or his free will?
Another thought that exemplifies the significance that free will holds, is seen in elements of Sophocles' classic, which revealed that Oedipus had more knowledge over the details of his dilemma than he let himself become conscious of. The last idea will reveal how the onset of fear will push people down a treacherous path of risk and pain, which is also seen in the play through multiple characters. Free will is an attribute that all people possess. It could work as a tool to get individuals through the scary twists their lives may entail. It could also work against them in many ways, which depends on the level of human weakness and ignorance. But, the most important assertion that can be made after considering the argument of, "fate vs. free will," is that...
Fate is an old, debated concept. Do one's actions truly play a role in determining one's life? Is fate free to some or is it binding to others, in that no individual can make completely individual decisions, and therefore, no one is truly free. Nowadays, fate is a subject often rejected in society, as it is seen as too big, too idealistic, and too hard to wrap a person's head around. However, at the time of Antigone, the concept was a terrifying reality for most people.
Fate can be defined many different ways. Webster's Dictionary defines fate as a power that supposedly predetermines events. Fate is synonymous to the word destiny, which suggests that events are unavoidable and unchangeable. Whatever happens in life is meant to be and cannot be changed by mankind. In Shakespeare's Macbeth, fate plays an important role in the lives of Macbeth, Lady Macbeth and Banquo.
There are many philosophical and religious debates between the concepts of free will and fate. Free will is based on a belief that our future is based on the decisions that we make today. Looking back over our life at where we are is a product of our past.
How much of an influence does fate have on the ideals of a person? Is Macbeth acting out the selfish desires of his own accord? Fate is thought to be unavoidable, and all the paths of life lead to a destiny that is inescapable. In Shakespeare’s Macbeth, not only is Macbeth’s hand forced in committing a murder, his fate is expedited in the process. Macbeth is in control of his own destiny, but is spurned into decisions by the Witches and his wife. Although Macbeth believes he is controlled by fate, a more thorough inspection reveals his control over all his actions.
In the context of the fictional story of Macbeth, it is hard to argue that fate was not controlling his life and actions. Many prophecies were made that seemed impossible at first, but each one came true and things happened as expected, though maybe not in the exact way or at the exact time that they were thought to. It is pretty clear throughout the narrative that the concept of fate prevails in the context of Macbeth, but once these beliefs are placed into the realm of the real world, there is a lot more room for argument. Things in real life are less certain, and there are many variables that can affect a person’s opinion on this matter. Ultimately, it comes down to a personal decision that everyone exercises their freedom of choice on to establish what they believe.
Fate and free will both have a strong rooting in the play Macbeth. The role of fate was to tell Macbeth that he was one day to become king of Scotland. Fate was not the cause of Macbeth’s downfall. The actions made under Macbeth’s free will are the sole reason for his own downfall. Macbeth was afraid that he might not become king, so he took matters into his own hands to be absolutely sure he would attain the throne. He decided to leave out chance and take the throne for himself by killing Duncan. By leaving out chance, Macbeth left out the chance for fate to bring his downfall.
“And fortune, on his damned quarrel smiling show’d like a rebel’s whore. but all too weak; for brave Macbeth disdaining fortune, worth his brandished steel, which smoked with bloody execution” (I..ii 15-17). This quote is saying that Macbeth should have died in that battle, but he is too strong and powerful for his fate. This shows that “Macbeth” is free will because he is fighting against the odds meaning he should have died in that battle. Macbeth is considered a “damned quarry” per the captain because he has escaped his doom this time, but it will come back to haunt him in the future. “If chance will have me king, why, chance may crown me” (I..iii 137-144). In this quote, Macbeth lets chance take its tole rather than murdering anyone else. This conveys free will because Macbeth decides to use chance instead of murder. Chance is also considered free will because he is making bold decisions by himself. Macbeths free will is making others see what kind of leader he is or will be later in the
Fate is non-existent as one's future is based upon their own personal decisions. It is believing
Fate seems to defy humanity at every turn. A man may have his life planned out to the last second, but then some random force intervenes and he dies the second after he has completed his life plan. Some believe in fate, believing that our lives are predetermined from the moment we are born. Other people believe that everything is random, the result of some god rolling the dice in a universal poker game. Still other people believe that each and every person is in total control of his or her destiny, every step of the way. Who is to say which viewpoint is false? Every culture has a unique perception of the role of fate in our lives, and no group has the "right answer," simply a different answer. Taking into consideration the views of other cultures can help an individual refine his personal viewpoint on this inconceivable subject.