Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The great gatsby criticism of society
The great gatsby criticism of society
The great gatsby criticism of society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The great gatsby criticism of society
Intro: F. Scott Fitzgerald’s acclaimed novel, The Great Gatsby, is a critique of the American upper-class, and furthermore, the overall degeneration of American society as a whole. Fitzgerald establishes Nick Carraway as the narrator, and it is through Nick’s insightful, and deeply philosophical commentary, that Fitzgerald expresses his own contempt towards upper-class society, as after witnessing the downfall of Gatsby, Nick (and thus Fitzgerald) concludes that the notion of aristocracy is established upon a “quality of distortion”, and in truth, “they [are] careless people… [who] [smash] up things and creatures and then [retreat] back into their money or their vast carelessness.” Thus, Fitzgerald establishes theme of duality, the motif of distorted images, and ultimately questions the extent to …show more content…
which an individual’s self-perception affects their ability to discern reality and illusion.
It is not surprising then, that Daisy Buchanan views herself as an elevated individual - in part due to her aristocratic lineage - and attempts to portray herself as such. However, her image progressively deteriorates in the eyes of Nick, and Fitzgerald herein captures his contempt towards the aristocracy, as despite having once been “the golden girl”, Daisy is now described as the embodiment of “vast carelessness”, Furthermore, Fitzgerald extends the “quality of distortion” to all classes in contemporary American society, as both Gatsby and Myrtle attempt to reject their impoverished dispositions, and portray themselves as elevated individuals. Gatsby’s attempt is ultimately futile, as despite his ostentatious displays of wealth, none of those who formerly attended his parties, attend his funeral, and he is thus left to die alone. Myrtle’s death, similarly reflects the futility of attempting to escape reality, as in an attempt to literally escape her disposition, she throws herself in front of Gatsby’s car. Thus, Fitzgerald effectively - yet quite pessimistically - expresses that it is futile to portray one’s self in an elevated manner, and living out one’s
delusions. Paragraph 1: Fitzgerald’s critiques the Aristocratic notion of elevation in the characterization of Daisy Buchanan. Initially she is portrayed as “The King’s Daughter”, “The Golden Girl” She naturally draws men into her, and is admired for her beauty Daisy is described as having “a voice full of money”, Fitzgerald portrays her a symbol for aristocracy, of wealth, and power, able to draw people in to admire her for her beauty However, according to Fitzgerald, “beauty is only skin deep” Daisy is revealed to be heartless She is directly responsible for the death of Myrtle, yet she keeps driving Daisy is apathetic Nick describes both her and Tom as “careless people” She allows Gatsby to take the blame, and quickly rekindles her relationship with Tom, not bothering to even attend Gatsby’s funeral Essentially, is the epitome of feminine beauty, and she portrays herself as such She maintains a degree of innocence in her behaviour, yet it is suggested that this is merely a facade. Daisy embodies the “quality of distortion” that is inherent - according to Nick - to the Aristocracy The notion of aristocracy is based upon the intangible illusion of lineage that somehow keeps her and the rest of the Aristocrats elevated They think themselves superior to others, and are perhaps perceived that way by others as well, yet in reality (according to Fitzgerald) they have no right to believe so. The condescending views inherent to the Aristocracy, are a hinderance to American society, as they limit those who are not born into the class; in reality they are “careless people” and Fitzgerald thus asserts that as long as the aristocracy exists, the “orgastic future” is dead, so too is the American Dream. Paragraph 2: Gatsby himself, epitomizes the notion of elevated self-perception, as he rejects his impoverished past, attempting to portray himself as part of upper-class society. He claims that he is “an Oxford man” His past is convoluted, and he keeps it that way Some believe him to be a “German spy”, or “Cousin to the Kaiser”, and it is through these elaborate stories that Gatsby’s past remains hidden for so long His ostentatious displays of wealth, are however, merely his attempt to make a name for himself He is a self-proclaimed “Son of God”, a larger than life figure Gatsby maintains the persona, of an exceedingly rich, british aristocrat, and this is reflected in all manners of his life His parties His glamorous mansion His expensive shirts His diction, particularly the phrase “old sport”, which he overuses All of this is a facade however James Gatz was born to a family of poor farmers, and, unsatisfied with his disposition, he endow himself with great wealth and fortune Ultimately, Gatsby’s attempt to reject his origins is futile. Gatsby’s legacy ends with his death, and despite the numerous admiration his parties received, not a single one of his former guests attends the funeral (apart from the man dubbed “Owl-eyes” -, and thus Fitzgerald conveys the futility of attempting to escape reality, as even the “Great Gatsby”, the self-proclaimed “Son of God”, was unable to do so.
There is only one thing which every philosopher who speculates about the human condition can agree on, and that is the idea that humans are complex, imperfect beings who may not always understand themselves. F. Scott Fitzgerald, in his novel The Great Gatsby, attempts to reveal this idea about human character by fashioning the narrator, Nick Carraway, into a complex character. He does this by highlighting Nick’s contrasting opinions of and interactions with life amongst the rich, and showing that Nick’s character is not as infallible as he himself would like to believe. Through his contrasting judgements and actions,
The narrative point of view adopted by F. Scott Fitzgerald in The Great Gatsby supports the novel's criticism of the upper class and the importance of wealth in society. Fitzgerald uses Nick Carraway as the narrator who views the upper class as entirely superficial. Through his observation of people at Gatsby's party, at the beginning of chapter three, Nick seems to feel that the wealthy are clones of a stereotype accepted and created by themselves. To him it seems as though this society is based on appearance and recognition and judges people according to how much they own rather than what they believe in. Nick's criticisms are accepted by the reader as impartial because Nick is the only major character who is not preoccupied with wealth. This is established in the first few pages of the novel where Nick describes himself and his upbringing in a manner that immediately secures the trust of the reader. This allows Nick to act as a measure for other characters who are in a relentless pursuit of money and power.
F. Scott Fitzgerald’s The Great Gatsby recounts a love story of fortune, sacrifice, and passion. Mystified by the foreign land of excessive capital and immense material possessions, the narrator, Nick Carraway, judges or exalts numerous inhabitants of the East and West Eggs, especially Jay Gatsby, whose mystery and secrecy attracts many. Although it seems like Mr. Carraway obsesses about Gatsby, strictly, for his wealth, a careful look at craft choices and his characterization reveals that Jay Gatsby captivates Nick because he is one of the only characters, who, unclouded by prosperity, recognizes his own fascination with money.
In the novel The Great Gatsby, F. Scott Fitzgerald gives the reader a glimpse into the life of the high class during the 1920’s through the eyes of a man named Nick Carraway. Through the narrator's dealings with high society, Fitzgerald demonstrates how modern values have transformed the American dream's ideas into a scheme for materialistic power and he reveals how the world of high society lacks any sense of morals or consequence. In order to support his message, Fitzgerald presents the original aspects of the American dream along with its modern face to show that the wanted dream is now lost forever to the American people. Jay Gatsby had a dream and did everything he could to achieve it however in the end he failed to. This reveals that the American dream is not always a reality that can be obtained. Fitzgerald demonstrates how a dream can become corrupted by one’s focus on acquiring wealth and power through imagery, symbolism, and characterization.
He writes, through the voice of Gatsby, that “her voice is full of money” (127), implying that Daisy speaks with an eloquence and elegance found only in the voice of those born wealthy. Gatsby inherently connects Daisy with the idea of wealth and money, and shows a desire to be seen as one born with money. Hence, the reader can conclude that Gatsby is in love with what Daisy represents: wealth and the high class. By associating Daisy with the high society, Fitzgerald indirectly reveals his attitude towards America of the 1920s. He implies that similar to how Daisy chooses material pleasure and societal benefit as opposed to a real feeling that brings true joy, the people of the 1920s prioritize wealth and fleeting pleasure over concrete feelings that bring true happiness. He even takes his commentary a step further, as the “true” feeling represented in The Great Gatsby is love. Ironically, the love depicted in this society is corrupt and fake. Thus, Fitzgerald states that the ideologies and values of the American 1920s will result in its downfall, just as the corrupt and fake love between Gatsby and Daisy results in the downfall of Gatsby. Furthermore, through his portrayal of Daisy’s inadvertent cruelty towards both Myrtle and Gatsby, Fitzgerald parallels the unconscious depravity of the high society and its negative impact on America. This is seen
Gatsby makes many mistakes throughout the novel, all of which Fitzgerald uses these blunders as a part of his thematic deconstruction of the American Dream. However, Fitzgerald does not write Gatsby as a bad person whom embodies all that is wrong with western capitalism. Instead, Fitzgerald portrays Gatsby as a good man who was victim of the qualities ingrained in him by an imperfect ideological system. It is this distinction which makes Fitzgerald’s argument all the more potent, and his audience’s ability to mourn Gatsby as a tragic figure all the more important. Whereas Fitzgerald’s opinion of Gatsby may otherwise have been misconstrued as a negative one, the scene of Gatsby’s funeral clearly conveys the character of Gatsby as a tragic and sorrowful one.
“Two unusual formations of land,” located not far from the bustling city of New York, “identical in contour” and yet differing in apparently all other aspects, provide the main setting for F. Scott Fitzgerald’s masterpiece, The Great Gatsby (4). On one side lies West Egg, the garish center for the newly rich, teeming with low-lifes and criminals. Across the bay lies East Egg, the more “fashionable” home of the idle rich, where the wealthy elite live in carefree luxury, safe from scandal and worry (5). At least, that is the image that Fitzgerald attempts to portray in his quest to reveal the corruption and infallibility of society. However, the discrepancies in his argument are obvious under further examination, for even while he labels West Egg inferior, highlighting the vulgarity in construction and society, Fitzgerald inadvertently reveals the inadequacies of East Egg, thus undermining his entire theory and leaving the reader wondering if all of society is corrupt or if there is some hope for the world.
The evolving character of an interactive narrator can help discern key themes in a novel. F. Scott Fitzgerald's social examination of life in America's Jazz Age relies heavily on Nick Carraway, the narrator, acting as a 'Trojan horse' for Fitzgerald to smuggle his own ideologies into The Great Gatsby. Fitzgerald endorses realist class relations as power relations over the romantic and archaic 'Jeffersonian dream of simple agrarian value'. He also favours the view that the American upper class's 'carpe diem' approach to life placed capitalist society in a moral downwards spiral, instead of conforming to mainstream ideas of the Age such as 'money can buy happiness'.
Although Fitzgerald glamorises the lifestyles of the rich minority, he also asks us to question how attractive money really is, by conveying. to us the destruction and unhappiness that huge wealth can cause. underneath its dazzling exterior. We are led through the various events of the novel by our narrator. Nick Carraway, who is also Gatsby's neighbour.... ...
Hugh Hefner once said, “I looked back on the roaring Twenties, with its jazz, 'Great Gatsby' and the pre-Code films as a party I had somehow managed to miss.” The parties of the Roaring Twenties were used to symbolize wealth and power in a society that was focused more on materialism and gossip than the important things in life, like family, security, and friends. The Great Gatsby, by F. Scott Fitzgerald, portrays the characters of Tom and Daisy Buchanan as the epitome of the era. The reader sees these characters acting selfishly and trying to meddle with others’ lives. On the other hand, Nick Carraway, the narrator, acts more to help others and act honestly. Initially the reader sees Carraway’s views towards Jay Gatsby as negative as Gatsby’s actions are perceived as being like the Buchanan’s. As the novel moves forward, the reader notices a change in Carraway’s attitude towards Gatsby. Carraway sees Gatsby for whom he truly is, and that is a loving person who only became rich to win Daisy’s heart. But in this the reader also sees how corrupt and hurtful Gatsby’s actions were to the love of his life. Gatsby’s relationship with Daisy reveals that just as Gatsby’s dream of wooing Daisy is corrupted by illegalities and dishonesty, the “American Dream” of friendship and individualism has disintegrated into the simple pursuit of wealth, power, and pleasure.
The Great Gatsby is an American novel of hope and longing, and is one of the very few novels in which “American history finds its figurative form (Churchwell 292).” Gatsby’s “greatness” involves his idealism and optimism for the world, making him a dreamer of sorts. Yet, although the foreground of Fitzgerald’s novel is packed with the sophisticated lives of the rich and the vibrant colors of the Jazz Age, the background consists of the Meyer Wolfsheims, the Rosy Rosenthals, the Al Capones, and others in the vicious hunt for money and the easy life. Both worlds share the universal desire for the right “business gonnegtion,” and where the two worlds meet at the borders, these “gonnegtions” are continually negotiated and followed (James E. Miller). Gatsby was a character meant to fall at the hands of the man meant to be a reality check to the disillusions of the era.
Through Fitzgerald’s symbolic description of Gatsby, he explores the extent of the American Dream’s deceptive nature that slowly destroys a person and his/her morals. During the Roaring 20s it was very common for people to project illusions to mask who they truly were; to fit in, it was almost essential to have one to survive in the highly materialistic and deceitful society. Nick is introduced as the objective narrator...
“The Great Gatsby”, written by F. Scott Fitzgerald, portrays a world filled with rich societal happenings, love affairs, and corruption. Nick Carraway is the engaged narrator of the book, a curious choice considering that he is in a different class and almost in a different world than Gatsby and the other characters. Nick relates the plot of the story to the reader as a member of Gatsby’s circle. He has ambivalent feelings towards Gatsby, despising his personality and corrupted dream but feeling drawn to Gatsby’s magnificent capacity to hope. Using Nick as a moral guide, Fitzgerald attempts to guide readers on a journey through the novel to illustrate the corruption and failure of the American Dream. To achieve this, Nick’s credentials as a reliable narrator are carefully established and reinforced throughout the story.
In F. Scott Fitzgerald’s The Great Gatsby (1925), the upper class and Daisy were portrayed as being “a fast crowd, all of them young and rich and wild, but [Daisy] came out with a perfect reputation” (77). Despite this attribution, the upper class is characterized as living in an artificial, ignorant world of illusions and a distorted reality, with an appearance that contrasts their hollow interior. Fitzgerald emphasizes through their false appearances and feigned identities the true corruption of New York’s high society. Although those in Nick Carraway’s world were portrayed on the outside as young, rich, wild, and beautiful, on the inside, they were all just “hollow” and empty–always demonstrating the image of a perfect life yet damaged on the inside.
In The Great Gatsby Fitzgerald explores the idea of the American Dream as well as the portrayal of social classes. Fitzgerald carefully sets up his novel into distinct social groups but, in the end, each group has its own problems to contend with, leaving a powerful reminder of what a precarious place the world really is. By creating two distinct social classes ‘old money’ and ‘new money’, Fitzgerald sends strong messages about the elitism underlying and moral corruption society. The idea of the American dream is the ideal that opportunity is available to any American, allowing their highest aspirations and goals to be achieved. In the case of The Great Gatsby it centres on the attainment of wealth and status to reach certain positions in life,