Examples Of Corrupt Leaders In Julius Caesar

1105 Words3 Pages

“Power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Great men are almost always bad men.” Lord Acton famously wrote this quote in 1870. This proclamation is still applicable today. From Shakespeare’s The Tragedy of Julius Caesar to the leaders of today, evidence of selfish leaders has existed since the first governments. Throughout history and in modern times, there have been corrupt leaders who have damaged their dominions even when they originally had no intention to put themselves first. In Shakespeare’s play, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, Marc Antony was corrupted by power when the people of Rome began supporting him. Initially, Antony is presented as a moral person when he moves his audience with his emotional speech at Caesar’s …show more content…

/ Fetch the will hither, and we shall determine/ How to cut off some charge in legacies” (Shakespeare 4.1. 7-9). Before teaming up with Lepidus and Octavius, Antony used Caesar’s will as a way to win the Plebeians over to support avenging Caesar. Now, after promising them their dues, he wants to rewrite the will so the commoners would receive less money from Caesar than himself. Though he was loyal to Caesar, he has become more concerned for his own gain and is prepared to steal from his former hero. The plotting to rewrite Caesar’s will for his benefit proves that Antony’s sudden power has corrupted him. Accordingly, when his associate Lepidus left the room, Antony considers using Lepidus and then leaving him because he considers Lepidus inferior. After Octavius points out that Lepidus is a “valiant soldier,” Antony maintains, “So is my horse… it is a creature that I teach to fight… and in some taste is Lepidus but so. / He must be taught, and trained, and bid go forth… Do not talk of him, / …show more content…

Sani Abacha, “the first Nigerian soldier to make full general without missing a single rank,” was the president of Nigeria from 1993 to 1998 (Sandbrook). Though he helped the country’s economy during his term, Abacha was not concerned by the people’s rights and opinion. Within a year of his presidency, Sani Abacha “issued a decree that placed his government above the jurisdiction of the courts, a move that gave him absolute power” (Sandbrook). Even though Abacha was already the most powerful force in Nigeria, he still grasped for more influence. The people were supportive of Abacha until he began his oppressive rule. The people knew Abacha was gaining power and spoke up, so Abacha stripped them of their rights. He was paranoid that the people would try to end his rule, so he did whatever was necessary to gain absolute power. The author highlights, “Abacha purged the military, banned political activity, and took control of the press” (Sandbrook). Abacha destroyed the possibility of the people rising against him because they didn’t have the resources to sufficiently rebel. He also describes Abacha’s rule as to have included, “appalling human rights abuses” in the overview of his time in power (Sandbrook). Not only did Sani Abacha take control of Nigeria’s government, but he also oppressed the people of Nigeria in order to maintain

Open Document