Evolutionary Trees

1280 Words3 Pages

Evolutionary trees are the subject of thorough, rigorous analysis that seeks to trace and reconstruct the patterns of branching that have led to the diversity of life as people know it. All these Trees of Life provide the basic information such as historical patterns of ancestry, divergence, and descent, utilizing series of branches that merge at points representing common ancestors, which themselves are connected through more distant ancestors (Gregory, 2008). There are two classic types of data for phylogenetic analysis that are taken into consideration: the morphological and molecular data, each having distinct advantages and potential pitfalls. In this paper, three different scientific articles related to the topic are synthesized. Canadian …show more content…

It does so by identifying congruent hierarchical patterns of variation in the morphological and molecular characters of species. Inclusion of fossils in any large-scale phylogenetic analysis of morphological data resulted to increased congruence with molecular results in the full data set analysis when compared with the extant-only analysis. It provides clear evidence that the addition of fossils improves the results of morphological parsimony analysis in Legg (2013). However, lacking sufficient level of phylogenetic literacy to correctly interpret evolutionary trees is prevalent, and O’ Hara (1997) suggested that importance for biology students of learning how to interpret evolutionary trees is on par with that of geography students being taught how to read maps. Phylogenetic illiteracy have resulted to a few common misconceptions like thinking that other organisms are less evolved and are lower on the evolutionary scale, and that humans represent the end line of evolution. Reading across the tips, when in fact one should base on the nodes, is another common mistake. Also, evolutionary relatedness and physical similarity are not necessarily related. Some even mistake a group to have descended from its sister group instead of the two sharing a common ancestor, or assume that long branches in evolutionary trees imply no change. The truth is that there are no “more evolved” species than another since overall lineage has the same age and amount of time evolving. Molecular and morphological data are both very essential in tracing the branches of evolution, but no amount of data would be useful if the common mistakes listed down by Gregory (2008) are

More about Evolutionary Trees

Open Document