Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Evilness in lord of the flies
How is evil represented in lord of the flies
Civilization and savagery in Lord of the Flies
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Evilness in lord of the flies
Evil holds a great amount of power, that many people are oblivious to. Evil holds the ability to shape and influence many people because of the destruction, chaos and ugliness it brings out of humans. In, Lord of The Flies, William Golding tells the childhood story of Coral Island, but in dystopian view as the boys struggle to keep civilization and structure alive on the island. Through savagery and fear, Golding shows human nature is exclusively evil as humans are easily lured by the evil within and around them.
Fear harbors future outbreaks of evil tendencies within the boys. Fear is seen used as a tactic to gain authority and justify violence. Jack uses fear to manipulate the boys into following him instead of Ralph through the beast. Jack enforces the existence of the beast by stating “"I expect the beast disguised himself. Perhaps we'd better keep on the right side of him, anyhow. You can't tell what he might do. The tribe considered this; and then were shaken, as if by a flow of wind. The chief saw the effect of his words and stood abruptly.” (142-143.Golding) Jack purposely exerts fear into the boy’s mind by giving the beast supernatural abilities, shapeshifting. Jack uses the pathos as a method of persuasion because he
…show more content…
targets the boy’s emotions to gain authority. This creates chaos to develop within the boys because they lack intellect and comprehension on the initial goal, rescue, instead of chasing after a “beast.” Fear controls the boys to the point where they choose ignorance and stupidity, Jack, over rationality, order, and truth, Ralph. This clearly shows the internal conflict that plagues the boy's mind, security over possible endangerment if they continue to stay with Ralph. Moreover, demonstrating the power struggle between good and evil seen in the situational archetype. The dangerous power shift between both characters exemplifies the external conflict prevalent since the beginning of the novel revealing Jack’s stubborn and flat characterization; a character who remains the same throughout the story; Jack fixates himself to hunting, fun instead of responsibility and structure. Furthermore, Jack an uncivilized being, lacking responsibility and ethics, are chosen to be the new chief, showing without the bonds of civilization humans revert to their natural state, evil. Although it is clear that boys tend to their savage instinct by choosing Jack, it is evident that Hobbes theory, people go back to their original state of evil without the presence of structure and society, plays true to the boy’s situation. Fear brings out the boy’s violent tendencies while on the island. The beast shows a prevent hand in the boy’s violent action The powerful figure of the beast is a personification of the boys fear by stating, "It was furry. There was something moving behind its head—wings. The beast moved too—That was awful. It kind of sat up— There were eyes—Teeth—Claws—We ran as fast as we could—" (67-75. Golding). Moreover, the image the beast portrays generates an obsession and idolization of the beast, as seen when an offering, lord of the flies, is given and their constant mission of hunting. Furthermore, he makes the beast seem like a reality than an imaginative creature. This then results in their fear to become a delusion of threat and endangerment. Furthermore, this encourages the boys to dive deeper into their savage instinct, committing acts of murder and brutality understand false understanding. Savagery turns the boys into destructive and malicious beings. The savagery is seen through acts of murder and rivalry. The boys savage state results in them turning against one another. Ralph is an outcast because of his opposing views from Jack. In turn, Jack orders his hunters to hunt and kill Ralph down stating “They hate you, Ralph. They’re going to do you. They’re going to hunt you tomorrow.” (180.Golding) Jack is captivated with the idea of hunting the beast that in turn disrupts and disturbs his judgment into thinking murder is acceptable. Furthermore, Jacks deterring state of mind into savagery influences him to kill his own friends. Similar to The Most Dangerous Game, by Richard Connell, Zaroff kills humans as a way to satisfy his desire for the ultimate hunting game. Likewise, to Jack, who hunts to satisfy his savage instinct. Both characters are unable to differentiate between right and wrong due to their lack of connection to civilization. Although it is clear savagery is the consequence of no civilization, it is evident that an individual’s ID also plays a critical role in corrupt morality, as desires and impulses are put first before ration and reason. This creates a barrier between Jack rationality, causing him to act reckless and immoral. Although it's clear that jack sate of mind it the reason for his inhumane action and beliefs, it is clear that Hobbes theory clearly illustrates human’s natural instinct is evil when society and civilization are suppressed. Murder reflects the true nature of these boys, savages. Simon runs back to the camp, but witnesses a gathering and becomes the main target; he is seen as the beast. In turn, the boys begin to shout “Now out of the terror rose another desire, thick urgent. Kill the beast! Cut his throat! Spill his blood! The beast stumbles into the horseshoe… Simon was crying out something about a dead man on a hill… Kill the beast! Cut his throat! Spill his blood,” (152-Golding) murdering Simon. The boy's disturbing chant refers to the ritual archetype organized ceremony that involves honoring members of a given community and an initiate. The constant chant of murder and violence puts the boys in a state of trance where the idea of murder and actions is probably and acceptable. This atmosphere welcomes corrupt and malicious behavior to grow within the hurdle of boys. Consequently, creating a hunger for blood thirst which clearly shows the ID of the mind, wants whatever feels good at that time, completely taking over, removing the ego and superego. In addition, this severs the bonds between humanity, demoralizing the boys to a state of savagery, where the boys are completely oblivious too. Thus, illustrating the severity of the boy's absent minds; they are unable to acknowledge or care for their action. In conclusion, according to Golding view, savagery and fear are the main factors that revert humans back to their original state of evil.
Indeed, it is certain that without the restriction of civilization, humans are bound to fall back to their original state of evil. Similar to William Shakespeare’s Macbeth, Macbeth exchanges his morality and humanity for power and wealth, exerting his own will by committing multiple acts of murder and betrayal. Humans are vulnerable to the evils which surround them, likely leading them to give in, and disdain individuals from conduct, civilization, and law and order. Under these condition individuals are unable to successfully govern oneself and others, thus resulting in an uprising of pure evil to
spread.
The evil in man is seen in many parts of life and it could be only be brought out when they have the power and position to do it. In the novel Lord of the Flies by William Golding symbolism is used to show the theme of the Inherent Evil of Man through the conch, the Lord of the Flies, and the fire. The breaking of the conch shows how the boys forget authority and destroy their only symbol of civilization. The Lord of the Flies shows the violence of the boys, and the temptation of the evil Lord of the Flies. The fire shows how something used for rescue and hope is turned into something violent and evil. The fire burns down trees and parts of the island when the savage boys are trying to kill Ralph.
William Golding’s Lord of the Flies portrays the lives of young British boys whose plane crashed on a deserted island and their struggle for survival. The task of survival was challenging for such young boys, while maintaining the civilized orders and humanity they were so accustomed too. These extremely difficult circumstances and the need for survival turned these innocent boys into the most primitive and savaged mankind could imagine. William Golding illustrates man’s capacity for evil, which is revealed in man’s inherent nature. Golding uses characterization, symbolism and style of writing to show man’s inhumanity and evil towards one another.
Mankind is innately evil. The allegorical novel, The Lord of the Flies, allows for little interpretation about human nature. William Golding depicts the idea, “evil is an inborn trait of man” (Golding). Throughout the novel the children who have crash landed on the island begin to uncover their savage nature. Although all of the children somehow succumb to a heinous behaviour, Jack, Ralph, and Roger become most noticeably corrupt. Ultimately, it becomes clear that malicious intent is intrinsic in mankind.
Author William Golding uses Lord of the Flies to paint a picture of the internal evil of man through a variety of different mechanisms. Ralph, while being one of the most civilized boys on the island, still shows characteristics that would indicate an inherent evil. Henry also displays a darker personality, even as he practices innocent childhood activities in the sand. The island on which the story takes place holds evidence that man possesses inherent evil, seen in the way the boys corrupt and destroy the innocence and purity of the tropical oasis, and viewed in the symbolic manner in which the island's pristine exterior shields a darker inside. The use of a stick sharpened at both ends provides evidence of the savagery of the boys, and the dead parachutist shows that the boys are blinded by their internal evil and have become so villainous that they do not even recognize a human being. Golding shows throughout the novel that evil is the prevalent force within man, and that savagery takes precedence over even childhood innocence.
Part of Golding’s intent was to demonstrate that the evil is not recognised in specific populations or situations. On the island the beast is manifest in the deadly tribal dances, war paint and manhunt: in the outside world the same lust for power and control plays out as a nuclear war. Throughout ‘The Lord of the Flies’ Golding has managed to show that evil is present in everyone.
When viewing the atrocities of today's world on television, the starving children, the wars, the injustices, one cannot help but think that evil is rampant in this day and age. However, people in society must be aware that evil is not an external force embodied in a society but resides within each person. Man has both good qualities and faults. He must come to control these faults in order to be a good person. In the novel Lord of the Flies, William Golding deals with this same evil which exists in all of his characters. With his mastery of such literary tools as structure, syntax, diction and imagery, The author creates a cheerless, sardonic tone to convey his own views of the nature of man and man’s role within society.
When Ralph sees the naval officer that appears on the island to save them, he realizes that he will return to civilization. The shock causes him to reflect on what has happened. The rescue does not produce joy; instead he feels despair at what he has been through. He is awakened to the reality that he will never be the same. He has lost his innocence and learned about the evil that lurks within himself and all men through his experiences on the island. Ralph’s revelation to his loss of innocence and societal order among the boys is exemplified through the collapse of the attempted Democratic government, the killing of the pig, and the death of Piggy and Simon.
The novel Lord of the Flies by William Golding used a group of British boys beached on a deserted island to illustrate the malicious nature in mankind. Lord of the Flies dealt with the changes the boys underwent as they gradually adapted to the freedom from their society. William Golding's basic philosophy that man was inherently evil was expressed in such instances as the death of Simon, the beast within the boys, and the way Ralph was fervently hunted.
The Lord of the Flies by William Golding is tale of a group of young boys who become stranded on a deserted island after their plane crashes. Intertwined in this classic novel are many themes, most that relate to the inherent evil that exists in all human beings and the malicious nature of mankind. In The Lord of the Flies, Golding shows the boys' gradual transformation from being civilized, well-mannered people to savage, ritualistic beasts.
In William Golding's Lord of the Flies, the boys who are stranded on the island come in contact with many unique elements that symbolize ideas or concepts. Through the use of symbols such as the beast, the pig's head, and even Piggy's specs, Golding demonstrates that humans, when liberated from society's rules and taboos, allow their natural capacity for evil to dominate their existence.
This paper will explore the three elements of innate evil within William Golding's, Lord of the Flies, the change from civilization to savagery, the beast, and the battle on the island. Golding represents evil through his character's, their actions, and symbolism. The island becomes the biggest representation of evil because it's where the entire novel takes place. The change from civilization to savagery is another representation of how easily people can change from good to evil under unusual circumstances. Golding also explores the evil within all humans though the beast, because it's their only chance for survival and survival instinct takes over. In doing so, this paper will prove that Lord of the Flies exemplifies the innate evil that exists within all humans.
Lord of the Flies provides one with a clear understanding of Golding's view of human nature. Whether this view is right or wrong is a point to be debated. This image Golding paints for the reader, that of humans being inherently bad, is a perspective not all people share. Lord of the Flies is but an abstract tool of Golding's to construct the idea of the inherent evil of human nature in the minds of his readers. To construct this idea of the inherent evil, Golding employs the symbolism of Simon, Ralph, the hunt and the island.
In the book Lord of the Flies by William Golding, a group of young boys from England are evacuated out of their country due to a war. The plane is then shot down and results into a plane crash on a deserted island. The boys are left all alone with no adults, no supplies, and no one to come and rescue them. They are all on their own and have to establish a new “society”. The boys have to choose someone to govern them and that person ends up being Ralph, who had an internal struggle between what is right and wrong closer to the end of the novel. The boys turn into savages, killing each other, and showing their evil inside each of them. According to, William Golding man is inherently evil, evil is in all of us, but it is oppressed by society, and comes out when there is not anything to hold us back, civilization is what holds back evil from coming out, or it is what triggers evil inside of man.
William Golding’s Lord of the Flies shows man’s inhumanity to man. This novel shows readers good vs. evil through children. It uses their way of coping with being stranded on an island to show us how corrupt humans really are.
It seems as though there is so much more evil than good in the world today. We hear of war and fighting 24/7 but we rarely hear about the good things that happen. Everyone is born with both good and bad within them. We, as humans, must choose which one we want to be. In The Lord of the Flies, Ralph is good while Jack is evil. Ralph represents the good side of us while Jack represents the evil side. Although sometimes it is easier to be evil, it pays off to be good. The novel is a perfect example of how all people are born with both sides. At the beginning, the boys choose the good side, with morals and civilization. But as the story moves on, the boys find it more exciting to be on the bad side. It shows that all the boys are torn between good and bad and there is a very thin line that separates both. We realize that people are born inherently good and bad because in life there are always right and wrong choices, children are born good but are easily influenced to do bad, and it is always harder to do what is right than what is wrong.