Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Good vs. evil
Are you evil? Is anyone really evil? What even is evil? Evil is an adjective and noun. In the noun sense it means something that is bad, not good, foul. In the adjective form it means that a person, place, or thing is bad in elementary terms and demonic to the extreme. In a religious standpoint, it means to commit sin, or something similar to Satan. Religiously, evil means sin, and we all commit sin, but that does not really make us evil. The fact that we all have sin in our body the second we are born gives us the ability to act out a sin. Take two major events, 9/11 and the Holocaust, are the people who committed them evil? We refer to those both days as a day when evil happened, but are the people evil, or did they take advantage of the …show more content…
ability to commit sin? Children in religious schools are taught that sin is evil and evil is sin and that everyone has Original Sin, so throughout our lives we will have done at least one evil act. The simplistic terms taught to children is what truly defines evil that evil, being sin, is within all of us, but is within us to act upon it, and it is due to World cultures we can become the noun form of evil. When talking about religion in any sense there is disagreement, but in this case it best defines evil. Monsignor Lorenzo uses ethos to establish that he hears evil, sin, on an everyday basis as a priest. Lorenzo states, “As a priest, I deal with good and evil all the time” (Line 1). Then he expands on the Catholic truth of Original Sin, “Well, first of all, as a human being, I live good and evil all the time, within me” (Lines 1-2). Original Sin the idea that when Adam and Eve ate from the apple, God punished them and all of those who descended by giving them original sin. From that point on we, as humans, are subjected to pain, evil, sins. Adam’s and EVe’s children then proceeded to kill one another, an example that no one was pure after that incident. The only people who could be pure is Virgin Mary and Jesus. They had to be sin free, evil free, to open the gates of Heaven and to redeem Original Sin. Though Jesus completed the prophecies, we still all have Original Sin. It is upon us though to act an evil act, henceforth committing a sin. We all have the ability, it is just us that decides whether or not we actually do evil. On Spetember 11, 2001 Osama Bin Laden had an idea, he wanted revenge. The green eye devil is exactly what the name suggests; it is a devil. As one man’s freedom fighter is another man’s terrorist, he believes what he was doing what right. What we saw, the victims, was pure evil. Typically, when we commit evil we do if towards a specific person, group, or idea. Bin Laden attacked everyone. In his case, he took his ability to do evil and made a day known throughout history as a day where pure evil happened. Even Priest Lorenzo talks about this, “But 9/11 was different. There was a reality present, something it was different.” He then continues to talk about how in the event of 9/11 there was no one real victim, we were all affected, all targeted. He then suggests that, “A boundary has been broken that opens up the floodgates to unstoppable horror, because human is all we are, all we can be, all we can appeal to.” World War II is a known even to every teenager across the world. What Hitler did was atrocious, but where did he start? Was he always evil as we perceive? Within Adolf Hitler’s life, Adolf Hitler was a poor child, a mailman, a person with an idea and the work ethic to change something. He had very little money; he wanted for the other countries to forgive what their grandparents did. To try and make this a reality, he started a political campaign and people agreed with him. Although, as he got more powerful people looked for him to blame specifically someone. In his mind, the Jewish people were the people to blame. After that, he tortured the Jewish people and the rest is known, but his original idea was a decent one in the beginning, but he was not evil growing up as a child; he was no evil as a teenager. It was once he blamed someone that he allowed for evil to corrupt him. Though, none of us are perfect, but some are better than others. In Adolf Hitler’s case, he was better than some until he allowed himself to commit sin without punishment, for we are only human; we all have original sin that we expand on as time goes by. Ergo, the simplistic terms taught to children is what truly defines evil that evil, being sin, is within all of us, but is within us to act upon it, and it is due to World cultures we can become the noun form of evil.
I personally believe that evil is within all of us, but in American religious culture we call it sin, and in american culture we do not even have a name for the little evils, the little sins we do every day. Being disrespectful is something that is associated with rudeness, but it is also associated with teenagers. Lying is something that we try not to do, but it is associated with little children. Breaking the law is illegal, yet adults who drive get pulled over everyday. All these things, are sins that we do not name in American culture. In religious culture, we call it sinning. Within the Catholic Church, we are all human meaning we are all sinners. They are commutative. It is within us to be evil, to act evil, to be the adjective form of evil, but that does not mean that we are evil, the noun sense. We may act small evils, but that does not make us fully evil, that makes us human. Those documented in history as “pawns of Satan,” decided to act on that ability to do evil, and in World culture, we declared them the noun form of
evil.
Upon reading Claudia Card’s “Evils” she deepens her understanding of evil post 9/11. Card goes on to write that her adjustments to the accounts of evil include first that evils are inexcusable and not just culpable, she also states that evils need not be extraordinary and that all institutional evil implies individual reason to blame. Claudia Card continues to define evil as reasonably foreseeable intolerable harms produced, maintained, supported and tolerated by culpable wrongdoings. Evils have two parts, harm and agency. How Card identifies the difference between evil and lesser wrongs is the harm component. Also she has named her theory the atrocity theory because atrocities are her paradigms of evil. But natural disasters such as hurricanes, floods and earthquakes can be disastrous they are not considered atrocities because they are not produced, aggravated by culpable wrongs. They are also not foreseeable. Some examples of evil include genocide or premeditated murder.
“Inside each of us, there is the seed of both good and evil. It's a constant struggle as to which one will win. And one cannot exist without the other” (Eric Burdon). People do not think they are doing good or evil, they just think that they are doing the right thing. Evil comes from within each one of us. You just need to something to bring it out.
Shirley Jackson’s short story “ The Possibility of Evil” is about a little old lady named Miss Strangeworth. She thinks she’s in charge of the town and to make sure it’s free from all evil because her grandfather built the first house on Pleasant Street. At first Miss Strangeworth is a nice little old lady, worrying about people and wondering what others are up to. Then in the middle of the story she becomes a little rude to a few of the townspeople. In the end Miss Strangeworth thought she was getting rid of the evil in the town, but in reality she was causing evil in the town by showing her true colors and being extremely mean and cruel to others. Don’t judge a book by it’s cover because people aren’t always what they seem to be.
There are two kinds of evil, moral and natural. Moral evil is things like murder, rape, stealing, terrorism, etc. Natural evil is things like suffering and unpleasantness typically as a result of moral evil. Evil is that which has no power of its own. Evil is darkness, a negation of light. Its power is in us, in our fear of it, in that we consider it a "something" worth responding to.
In the world of the living, evil is not inherent and can change or influence a person’s aspect of the world based on the community they are in. Evil is the force of things that are morally wrong and the matter of suffering, wrongdoing and misfortune (Merriam Webster). Evil is not inherent because an evil community can change or influence a person’s way of thinking, can consume people the more they are relinquished to it, and can mold a person when a person has power or feel a certain way. Furthermore, evil can be claim as not inherent from reading about Josef Mengele, Stanley Milgram, and the Stanford Prison Experiment. I will persuade my point that evil is not inherent from the sources that depicts the claim of evil.
Karma comes in two ways, good karma or bad karma. However Miss Strangeworth got the worst kind ever, revenge karma. In the short story, The Possibility of Evil by Shirley Jackson, it is clear that judging others can result to bad karma, because she judges her town, and consequences return the favor. She is shallow and has too much power, however it starts with judgement. The Possibility of Evil takes us through a journey of a selfish woman and her consequences.
Evil is to be morally wrong, bad, wicked, and a whole bunch of other synonyms that all boil into one pot. There is so much to this word that it’s almost impossible to pinpoint someone as truly evil. To be evil for no other reason than to be evil would be the worst possible evil. Adolf Hitler and Osoma bin Laden believe the evil they committed was justified by God, or some higher power. Macbeth and Lady Macbeth, from the play by Shakespeare, were not evil because they wanted to be, they did it for a greater good.
One of the many questions Augustine raised is ‘what is evil’? Committing an act of evil is doing something malicious; the act is done with the intent to cause harm. However, there is a problem with this definition
“…And lead us not into temptation, but deliver us from evil.” (Matthew 6:9-13) As it says in the Bible, we wish to be led astray from evil. However, evil is a very curious subject. For most intensive purposes, evil can be described as cruel, heinous, and unnecessary punishment. Evil is a relatively accepted concept in the world today, although it is not completely understood. Evil is supposedly all around us, and at all times. It is more often than not associated with a figure we deem Satan. Satan is said to be a fallen angel, at one point God’s favorite. Supposedly Satan tries to spite God by influencing our choices, and therefore our lives. However, this presents a problem: The Problem of Evil. This argues against the existence of God. Can God and evil coexist?
My claim that we have evil in this world because of our libertarian freedom does not fully answer the notion of “the problem of evil”. Saying we have evil in this world is just like saying we have bad decisions in this world. Bad decisions just like evil do not have a form. Every decision that God makes is a good decision therefore God cannot do evil. Human beings initiated evil. In fact, the first human beings (Adam and Eve) gave ongoing birth to evil because everyone ultimately came from them. So everyone after Adam and Eve is inherently evil. This idea is evident in our lives because every human being has committed evil. The ultimate problem is not how an all-powerful God can exist while evil exist, the ultimate dilemma is how a holy God can accept human beings that are not holy. Stephen T. Davis in “Free Will and Evil” writes, “All the moral evil that exists in the world is due to the choices of free moral agents whom God created” (Davis). Davis argues that free will is the answer to the problem of evil. This is consistent with my view that evil exists because of our libertarian freedom. Unlike Hick, Davis is consistent with my answer for evil and he is also consistent with how evil is solved in regards to heaven and hell. Davis states, “I do believe hell exists, but I do not hold that it is a place where protesting people are led against their will to be tortured vengefully. I believe that the people who will end up separated from God freely choose hell and would be unhappy in God’s presence. Having lived their lives apart from God, they will choose eternally—to go on doing so. So it is not a bad thing that they do not spend eternity in the presence of God. People who will prove to be incorrigibly evil will never come to th...
How exactly does the human brain work? Are humans evil by nature or are they good samaritans most, if not all, the time? As studies throughout history have shown, this is not the case. Humans are inherently evil because they are always seeking as much power as they can, revert to challenging authority and selfishness in times of peril, and become intimidated easily by “authority” figures egging them on, which is reflected in The Lord of the Flies by William Golding, as well as The Zimbardo Experiment conducted by Psychologist Phillip Zimbardo.
The question of evil is a common topic among non-believers. Evil has existed since the beginning of time. In today’s society people have become so desensitized to evil, the true origins become hard to understand. God gave us each the free will and ability to choose right from wrong, although many of God’s creation continue to choose sin. The Holy Bible explains to us the nature and root of sin. This explanation helps us understand why bad things happen and how it might affect our relationships with the Most High.
“God whispers to us in our pleasures, speaks to us in our conscience, but shouts in our pains: It is His megaphone to rouse a deaf world” (Lewis, 1994, p. 91). Throughout history man has had to struggle with the problem of evil. It is one of the greatest problems of the world. Unquestionably, there is no greater challenge to man’s faith then the existence of evil and a suffering world. The problem can be stated simply: If God is an all-knowing and all-loving God, how can He allow evil? If God is so good, how can He allow such bad things to happen?Why does He allow bad things to happen to good people? These are fundamental questions that many Christians and non-Christians set out to answer.
Even though Adam and Eve did not encounter evil until the fall, they still had the potential for evil intrinsically within themselves. Likewise, although Lucifer was not wholly evil at the time of his formation, his pride and thus capacity to sin was part of his identity. If all of these characters developed the evil within them even though they were made good, one could question whether God is the creator of evil and is thus partly evil himself. Milton himself says that God “created evil, for evil only good / Where all life dies, death lives” (2.623-624). This seems in conflict with the earlier claim that God is omnibenevolent and free of
Evil is the ultimate form of political judgment. It constitutes anything that is ill-intentioned and is antagonistic to the good or the force that is adverse to said evil. Evil relies on the concept of good to exist, without a general consensus of good there is only the harsh innocence of life which is neither good nor evil but beneath the two. This was very prevalent in Hitler's rise to power.