Evaluating Crime Statistics

2455 Words5 Pages

Evaluating crime statistics regularly is crucial in maintaining law and order within a country or a city and therefore criminologists strive to investigate in depth in order to examine the nature and impact of criminal activity in the country (Weatherburn, 2011).

The general public tend to judge the severity of a particular crime by its prevalence and consequences to society or victims. Crime statistics enable criminologists and researchers in getting familiar with the crime trend and facilitating crime control policy formulating in order to deter crime further (Federal Bureau of Investigation, 2010). Consequently, crime statistics can be seen as an indicator in representing social harmony and stability. However, crime data is not merely …show more content…

There may also be scenarios in which police officers are reluctant to file a formal report when it is not very likely that the case will be processed in court afterwards (Skogan, 1975). Victims with higher-status are more likely to convince police officers in filing a report. This is because the police tend to act according to their pre-set assessment standards in writing crime reports (Skogan, 1975).

Omission of important parts
Several crucial elements of crime reports such as the characteristics of offenders and surrounding circumstances where most crimes take place are not included in most UCRs (Skogan, 1975; Loftin & McDowall, 2010.) Furthermore, some missing data is documented poorly that it is difficult to discover for analysis (Loftin &McDowall, 2010). This inevitably renders bias. Characteristics of crime victims are also significant parts of UCRs (Skogan, 1975). However, this is found to be absent in UCRs which may hinder study of the nature of particular crime …show more content…

For instance, it is not likely for victims to report conflicts with people they acquaint such as friends or relatives to avoid embarrassment (Skogan, 1975). Crimes of sensitive nature like rape and domestic violence are unlikely to be reported (Bureau of Justice Statistics, 1981; Skogan, 1975). Victims may also have tendencies to make up stories to mask their culpability (Skogan, 1975). All these unfavourable factors constitute underestimation of crimes.

Validity and relevance vary over time
The ability for crime victims to remember crime details fades out over time which leads to inaccuracy and bias in deriving crime data (Bureau of Justice Statistics, 1981). Victims are often required to recall crime details with time frames that are distinct from the event (Skogan, 1975; James, 2008). Consequently, most of them are unable to remember the incidents and recall important aspects of the crime. Even though victims are able to remember the incident, some of the details surrounding the incident are distorted or remembered wrongly (Bureau of Justice Statistics, 1981). Due to the forgetting trend of victims over time, instructions and signposts are used to guide victims in recalling crime incidents (Skogan, 1975). This inevitably misguides victims and creates biased result which leads to irrelevance of crime

Open Document