Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Ethical issues regarding euthanasia
Arguement against euthanasia
Is it ethical or unethical euthanasia
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Ethical issues regarding euthanasia
Over the past few years, the quality of medical services has risen incredibly. Diseases that were incurable years ago can be healed now. Even though this advances, and the devices for early detection, still there are some health problems that cannot be cured. No matter how hard the doctors or physicians try, the patient will not get better. Patients with these conditions, called terminal diseases, can only be prepared to die. Sometimes the suffering until death comes in a few days, but sometimes it takes years. For diminishing patient’s suffering, physicians came with euthanasia and continuous sedation. The legalization of these practices has been in conflict for several years all over the world. If these options are intended to help the patient, what it’s the problem for making them legal? Both practices for scientific and ethical reasons are problematic as every treatment decision near the end of life (Broeckaert). Euthanasia is defined as the practice of intentionally ending someone’s life in order to retrieve pain and suffering; any action or omission intended to end the life of a patient on the grounds that his or her life is not worth living (ProCon.org, What is euthanasia?). As these definitions state, the purpose of euthanasia is to reduce suffering of a patient with a terminal disease. On the other hand, continuous sedation is defined as the practice where sedation (the lowering of the patient’s consciousness) is administered continuously until the time of death (Anquinet, Raus and Sterckx). It’s considered as an alternative to physician-assisted suicide also known as euthanasia. Continuous sedation is intended to find a solution for a refractory symptom, and lowering the level of consciousness as much as needed by the p... ... middle of paper ... ...emic Search Premier. Web. 13 Mar. 2014. Griffith, Richard. "Should assisted dying be lawful?" British Journal Of Community Nursing 19.2 (2014): 94-98. Academic Search Premier. Web. 13 Mar. 2014. Messerli, Joe. BalancedPolitics.org. 01 Jun 2012. 23 Mar 2014. Powers, Carol L. "The Community Speaks: Continuous Deep Sedation As Caregiving Versus Physician-Assisted Suicide As Killing." American Journal of Bioethics 11.6 (2011): 65-66. Academic Search Premier. Web. 23 Mar. 2014. ProCon.org. "Is the Debate over Euthanasia and Physician-Assisted Suicide Primarily Religious in Nature?" 5 Jun. 2008. ProCon.org. Web. 13 Mar. 2014. —. "Should Euthanasia or Physician-Assisted Suicide Be Legal?" 13 Mar. 2009. ProCon.org. Web. 13 Mar. 2014. —. "Top 10 Pros and Cons." 13 Dec. 2013. ProCon.org. Web. 13 Mar. 2014. —. "What is euthanasia?" 14 Sep. 2011. ProCon.org. Web. 13 Mar. 2014.
Sloss, David. "The Right to Choose How to Die: A Constitutional Analysis of State Laws Prohibiting Physician-Assisted Suicide." Stanford Law Review. 48.4 (1996): 937-973. Web. 2 March 2015.
Dworkin, Gerald. " The Nature of Medicine." Euthanasia and Physician Assisted Suicide: For and Against. 1st ed. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1998.
The issue at hand is whether physician-assisted suicide should be legalized for patients who are terminally ill and/or enduring prolonged suffering. In this debate, the choice of terms is central. The most common term, euthanasia, comes from the Greek words meaning "good death." Sidney Hook calls it "voluntary euthanasia," and Daniel C. Maguire calls it "death by choice," but John Leo calls it "cozy little homicides." Eileen Doyle points out the dangers of a popular term, "quality-of-life." The choice of terms may serve to conceal, or to enhance, the basic fact that euthanasia ends a human life. Different authors choose different terms, depending on which side of the issue they are defending.
However, the framework in practice is very complex, and has various inconsistencies, such as the legality of refusing treatment, the sovereignty of a living will and the issue of prosecuting those who assist someone to end their lives. There is evidence that shows doctors using palliative sedation as a means to facilitate death in patients that are in extreme pain and the use of limiting or even stopping treatment at the patient’s request is not uncommon. The difficulties of putting the law into practice make it extremely difficult for courts, legislators and doctors to reach clear decisions on individual cases. Therefore, the inconsistencies in the legal framework need to be addressed, as with these present the argument against legalising the right to die is weakened. Legalising assisted dying would simplify the framework and ensure that set barriers and safeguards could be created in order to protect the patient and his/her
Euthanasia comes from the Greek word that means “good death” (“Euthanasia” Literary). In general, euthanasia refers to causing the death of someone to end their pain and suffering oftentimes in cases of terminal illness. Some people call this “mercy killings.”
distant cousin of euthanasia, in which a person wishes to commit suicide. feels unable to perform the act alone because of a physical disability or lack of knowledge about the most effective means. An individual who assists a suicide victim in accomplishing that goal may or may not be held responsible for. the death, depending on local laws. There is a distinct difference between euthanasia and assisted suicide. This paper targets euthanasia; pros and cons. not to be assisted in suicide. & nbsp; Thesis Argument That Euthanasia Should Be Accepted & nbsp;
Cotton, Paul. "Medicine's Position Is Both Pivotal And Precarious In Assisted Suicide Debate." The Journal of the American Association 1 Feb. 1995: 363-64.
The practice of using continuous sedation (CS) to reduce or take away the consciousness of a patient until their death follows is a similar grey area in healthcare. This was addressed in Washington v. Glucksberg when Justice O’Connor’s statements proclaimed that CS was legal and ethically acceptable. The case also suggested the availability of CS renders the legalization of PAS as unnecessary (Raus, Sterckx & Mortier, 2011). This argument leaves a great deal of life ending treatments up to individual interpretation. PAS is illegal in some states in the United States but passive euthanasia or the right to refuse medical treatment, including life-sustaining medical treatment, is well-established in the US by common law and landmark court decisions.
Euthanasia is divided into two separate classifications consisting of passive euthanasia and active euthanasia. Traditionally, “euthanasia is passive when a physician allows her patient to die, by withholding or withdrawing vital treatment from him…euthanasia is active when a patient's death results from his physician's killing the patient, typically by administering lethal medication” (Varelius, 2016). While active euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide share many of the same characteristics, they differ in the role for committing the final act, resulting in the death of the patient. A third party, consisting of either a family member or the physician, is responsible for “pulling-the-plug” in active euthanasia. On the other hand, in physician-assisted suicide, it is ultimately up to the patient to commit the final death-inducing act. Varelius suggests that the separation of passive and active euthanasia can be explained by the involvement that the physician partakes in their patients’ death
Pereira, J. (2011). Legalizing euthanasia or assisted suicide: The illusion of safeguards and controls. Retrieved November 29, 2016, from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3070710/
"Assisted Suicide: Finding Common Ground." Lois Snyder, JD; and Authur L. Caplan, PhD. Annals of Internal Medicine. March 21, 2000. v.132, n.6
As patients come closer to the end of their lives, certain organs stop performing as well as they use to. People are unable to do simple tasks like putting on clothes, going to the restroom without assistance, eat on our own, and sometimes even breathe without the help of a machine. Needing to depend on someone for everything suddenly brings feelings of helplessness much like an infant feels. It is easy to see why some patients with terminal illnesses would seek any type of relief from this hardship, even if that relief is suicide. Euthanasia or assisted suicide is where a physician would give a patient an aid in dying. “Assisted suicide is a controversial medical and ethical issue based on the question of whether, in certain situations, Medical practioners should be allowed to help patients actively determine the time and circumstances of their death” (Lee). “Arguments for and against assisted suicide (sometimes called the “right to die” debate) are complicated by the fact that they come from very many different points of view: medical issues, ethical issues, legal issues, religious issues, and social issues all play a part in shaping people’s opinions on the subject” (Lee). Euthanasia should not be legalized because it is considered murder, it goes against physicians’ Hippocratic Oath, violates the Controlled
Larson, Edward J. “Legalizing Euthanasia Would Encourage Suicide” Euthanasia- Opposing Viewpoints. Ed. Carol Wesseker. San Diego: Greenhaven Press, 1995. 78-83. Print.
Euthanasia is one of the most recent and controversial debates today (Brogden, 2001). As per the Canadian Medical Association, euthanasia refers to the process of purposely and intentionally performing an act that is overtly anticipated to end the person’s life (CMA, 1998)
Euthanasia is a medical procedure which speeds up the process of dying for people with incurable, painful, or distressing diseases. The patient’s doctor can stop treatment and instead let them die from their illness. It come from the Greek words for 'good' and 'death', and is also called mercy killing. Euthanasia is illegal in most countries including the UK . If you suffer from an incurable disease, you cannot legally terminate your life. However, in a number of European countries it is possible to go to a clinic which will assist you to die gracefully under some very strict circumstances.