European Vs American English Colonization

718 Words2 Pages

In the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, European powers began sending explorers, merchants, missionaries, and brave settlers to America. The English, Spanish, French, and Portuguese all began to stake their territorial claims in the New World. Patricia Seed discusses how each European state used a distinct ceremony or ritual action to take possession of the territory. However, of all the European states, England was very unique in how it colonized its territory. Each European State had a distinct colonizing method that usually included some form of ritual, however, the English used a very distinct way of taking possession that voided rituals through their initial ideology on colonization and how they interacted with the native populace. …show more content…

They placed their major focus on the land, deterring from any ritualistic ownership. Rather, the English used clear acts of ownership, they had a preconceived notion of possession. Medieval English law gave permanent ownership of land to those who improved it with a house or crops. To the English, this constituted a perfectly transparent mode of possession of New World territories, England was marginal to Europe, they entered the colonization process nearly a century behind their chief rival Spain putting them behind the power curve. Hence, the English viewed possession as the highest form of ownership and this implies that a universal symbolism, centering on metaphors from English folklore greatly affected the English colonization process prior to any Englishman setting foot on American soil. In contrast, other European powers used symbols rather than physical ownership. The Spanish would read a declaration of ownership, the Spanish crown believed these statements extremely important for their official ownership of the territory, differing from the English since they mainly focused on settling land rather than making legal documentation in the form or decrees. It is evident that the English performed clear acts of ownership, this came from their preconceived ideas on the definition of possession, rather than manifesting symbolic rituals, they focused on …show more content…

The French, Spanish, and Portuguese all firmly believed in evangelizing the native population. The Conquistadores read the Requirement, a document which forced the natives to receive Spanish missionaries peacefully and convert to Christianity or be enslaved. In contrast, the English believed religion legitimized their claim to the land, they had no intentions to convert the native populace and did not see conversion as a title to the area. The English viewed the massive depopulation of natives as a divine intervention from God, a message that the land was meant for the Queen. The Spanish on the contrary viewed the depopulation as God’s dislike for the native’s way of life. France would contrast both Spain and England by including the Natives in many of their ritualistic ceremonies, their strategies of political alliance based on native consent were polar opposite to those of England’s. The Portuguese focused mainly on exploration and developing super accurate maps, not placing a focus on the native population at all. They believed that the essence of discovery gave them the rights to colonize and set up trading posts. Likewise, the Dutch had a similar mindsight, they developed detailed maps and chart and used the same finders keepers mentality of the Portuguese. Both the Dutch and Portuguese cared very little for the Natives and were more focused on discovery. It is evident

Open Document