Etymology Of Handicap

1360 Words3 Pages

‘Handicap’ began as a term referencing a 1600s bettor’s game and horse-racing provisions and culminated in describing those with cognitive and physical disabilities. The word has experienced many changes over the years. Rhetoric surrounding disability has become increasingly focused on differences rather than disabilities. A large part of this is due to the civil rights movements emerging in the 1970s that refused to acknowledge some people as disabled or defective to others. The following paper will trace the etymology and development of ‘handicap’ and provide future directions of its conception.
The word, ‘handicap,’ has various meanings depending on which dictionary or source is used to derive them. According to the Online Etymology Dictionary, …show more content…

Okrent suggests that while in the 1900s the word ‘handicapped’ was used to describe mental and physical differences and applied in social work and sociology, this soon failed. ‘Handicapped’ meant there was a flaw in someone. This idea of flaw came from the horse-racing and sports handicaps from the late 1700s because athletes and horses had to be endowed or imposed upon by artificial ‘flaws’ to level the playing field. There was obviously a negative connotation to the word at this point. With the advancement of human rights, people began to see the word ‘handicap’ as acceptable because having a cognitive or physical disability was more than a flaw or failing; it had to be related to disadvantages connected to broader social contexts. ‘Handicap,’ left in its original meaning, meant precisely a disadvantage faced by someone within a competitive context (i.e. world) (Okrent). By the 1970s, some had suggested using the word ‘disability’ to replace ‘handicap.’ On the one hand, ‘handicap’ seemed like an intuitively correct choice because those with mental and / or physical differences are disadvantaged, often in terms of education, career choice and even social life. On the other hand, Okrent notes, disability rights movement activists fought curiously for the term ‘disability’ to describe those with mental or physical differences. Because ‘disability’ refers to being in some way defective, it was an odd choice for replacement. However, it was viewed as more attractive because of its clinical value (i.e. describing literal defects) and its lack of patronization. Words like ‘special’ or ‘differently-abled could be patronizing and the term, ‘handicap,’ simply began to describe something entirely different from what it meant within a contemporary social

Open Document