Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Catholic social teaching on abortion
Ethical dilemmas for assisted reproductive technology
The debate about abortion laws
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Catholic social teaching on abortion
The cornerstone of all human rights for individuals is the right to life that is afforded to us by society because we are human. The right to life has initiated the debate over exactly when life begins which has led to laws and regulations granting latitude to humans regarding reproductive rights. But regardless of the laws granting reproductive rights there a great many others that take issue with them based on their personal moral and ethical codes.
Ethical Conditions Under Which Physicians May Perform Abortions
Ethically physicians may perform indirect abortions if the life or health of the mother is at risk or in danger. Under the principle of double effect physicians in an attempt to remove a pathological condition that indirectly terminates the woman’s pregnancy is considered ethical by the Catholic Church (Ascension Health, Abortion, 2011). There are other physicians and many ethicists outside of Catholicism that feel the life or health of the mother must be protected regardless of the direct or indirect nature of the abortion and they too cite double effect. Bellieni & Buonocore (2006) report that it is an ethically accepted practice during in vitro fertilization (IVF) to cull embryos after the fertilization cycle in order to have a healthy child. Benatar (2006) states that those engaged in procreation that has a very high risk of harm then should be prohibited or prevented if the benefit outweighs the moral cost.
Applicable State and Federal Laws and Regulations Pertaining to Abortion
The best known and most controversial of the Federal laws regarding abortion is the Supreme Court ruling in 1973 on Roe v. Wade. The Supreme Court, under the 14th amendment overturned states laws that prohibited abortion granting...
... middle of paper ...
...&Itemid=172.
Bellieni, C. & Buonocore, G. (2006). Assisted Procreation: Too Little Consideration For The Babies? Ethics & Medicine, 22(2), 93-8. Retrieved February 7, 2011, from Research Library. (Document ID: 1129967071).
Benatar, D. (2006). Reproductive freedom and risk. Human Reproduction, 21(10), 2491-3. Retrieved February 7, 2011, from http://humrep.oxfordjournals.org/content/21/10/2491.full.pdf+html.
Curlin, F. A., Lawrence, R. E., Chin, M. H. & Lantos, J. D. (2007). Religion, Conscience, and Controversial Clinical Practices. The New England Journal of Medicine, 356(6), 593-600. Retrieved February 19, 2011, from ProQuest Medical Library. (Document ID: 1212653521).
McLachlan, H. V. (1997). Bodies, rights and abortion. Journal of Medical Ethics, 23(3), 176. Retrieved February 19, 2011, from ProQuest Medical Library. (Document ID: 13074275).
Caplan, A., & Arp, R. (2014). The deliberately induced abortion of a human pregnancy is not justifiable. Contemporary debates in bioethics (pp. 122). Oxford, West Sussex: Wiley.
Works Cited Warren, Mary Anne. On the Moral and Legal Status of Abortion. Trans. Array Exploring Ethics: An Introductory Anthology. . 2 nd.
Our culture has a stringent belief that creating new life if a beautiful process which should be cherished. Most often, the birth process is without complications and the results are a healthy active child. In retrospect, many individuals feel that there are circumstances that make it morally wrong to bring a child into the world. This is most often the case when reproduction results in the existence of another human being with a considerably reduced chance at a quality life. To delve even further into the topic, there are individuals that feel they have been morally wronged by the conception in itself. Wrongful conception is a topic of debate among many who question the ethical principles involved with the sanctity of human life. This paper will analyze the ethical dilemmas of human dignity, compassion, non-malfeasance, and social justice, as well the legal issues associated with wrongful conception.
In 1965, all fifty states in the United States banned abortion; however, that was only the beginning of the controversy that still rages today (Lewis 1). After abortion was officially banned in the United States, groups such as the National Abortion Rights Action League worked hard on a plan to once again legalize abortion in the United States (Lewis 1). It wasn’t until 1970 when the case of Roe (for abortion) v. Wade (against abortion) was brought to the Supreme Court (Lewis 2).... ... middle of paper ...
Warren, Mary Anne , and Mappes and D. DeGrazia. "On the Moral and Legal Status of Abortion." Biomedical Ethics 4th (1996): 434-440. Print.
Contrary to common beliefs, abortion has been a hot topic 200 years prior to 1972 Roe vs Wade. According to an article by Brian Young, “Life before Roe”, “the first US law against abortion, adopted by Connecticut in 1821, criminalized the administration of poison or of any "destructive substance" to induce a miscarriage…In 1840, however, Maine became the first state to pass a law that expressly protected all babies…” In 1859 The American Medical Association did their own investigation on how to protect the unborn fetus. From 1821 to January 1973 when the Supreme Court handed down the Roe vs Wade there were many laws passed and many laws amended. However, after many disagreements, laws and amended laws by 1973 abortions was the law of the land. Although an abortion was law, there was another huge organization that stirred up even more controversy, Planned Parenthood. According to an article, “Ex...
Hinman, Lawrence. “Abortion: A Guide to the Ethical Issues.” May 13, 2010. University of San
No other element of the Women’s Rights Movement has generated as much controversy as the debate over reproductive rights. As the movement gained momentum so did the demand for birth control, sex education, family planning and the repeal of all abortion laws. On January 22, 1973 the Supreme Court handed down the Roe v. Wade decision which declared abortion "fundamental right.” The ruling recognized the right of the individual “to be free from unwanted governmental intrusion into matters so fundamentally affecting a person as the right of a woman to decide whether or not to terminate her pregnancy.” (US Supreme Court, 1973) This federal-level ruling took effect, legalizing abortion for all women nationwide.
As women, it is important to remember that the reproductive freedoms we now have can be easily taken away. Some people take for granted the accessibility to birth control, condoms, and abortion. President Bush has initiated policies since coming into office that threaten women’s choices. As the Bush administration takes over, it is important for women and men to come together to support women’s rights. “Bush is setting a tone for anti-choice legislation, so I expect that any legislator who is anti-choice will put something in this year,” said Jessica Morgan, president of the Baltimore chapter of the National Organization for Women (Koenig, B2). Legislative, executive, and judicial action can very possibly come together during this administration to limit or eliminate women’s reproductive freedom.
Have you ever wondered how abortion came to be legal? It was decided in the Supreme Court case of Roe v. Wade. The 1973 Roe v. Wade decision was a major landmark in not only the abortion issue, but also in American government.
Abortion cannot be discussed unless you know the origin of the debate. In December 13, 1971, the argument of abortion surfaced (“Roe v. wade,”). The class action suit was brought by a pregnant single woman who challenged the constitutionality of the Texas criminal abortion laws, which proscribe or attempting an abortion except on medical advice for the purpose of saving the mother’s life (“Roe v. wade,”). Proceeding Roe v. Wade, abortion was illegal in almost every State. In 1973, the courts ruled and abortion became legal again.
Baird, Robert M., and Stuart E. Rosenbaum. The Ethics of Abortion: Pro-life vs. Pro-choice. Buffalo, NY: Prometheus, 1989. Print.
Over the duration of the last century, abortion in the Western hemisphere has become a largely controversial topic that affects every human being. In the United States, at current rates, one in three women will have had an abortion by the time they reach the age of 45. The questions surrounding the laws are of moral, social, and medical dilemmas that rely upon the most fundamental principles of ethics and philosophy. At the center of the argument is the not so clear cut lines dictating what life is, or is not, and where a fetus finds itself amongst its meaning. In an effort to answer the question, lawmakers are establishing public policies dictating what a woman may or may not do with consideration to her reproductive rights. The drawback, however, is that there is no agreement upon when life begins and at which point one crosses the line from unalienable rights to murder.
Abortion’s legalization through Supreme Court’s Roe v. Wade, has allowed for one in three pregnancies to end in abortion. This means that 1.5 million abortions are performed in the United States each year (Flanders 3). It ranks among the most complex and controversial issues, arousing heated legal, political, and ethical debates. The modern debate over abortion is a conflict of competing moral ideas and of fundamental human rights: to life, to privacy, to control over one's own body. Trying to come to a compromise has proven that it one cannot please all of the people on each side of the debate.