Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Similarities of deontology vs consequentialism
Compare deontology vs consequentialism
Deontological and consequentialist approach to the same problem
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Similarities of deontology vs consequentialism
1.19. Many elderly people have trouble remembering words, people’s names, and recent events. Imagine a memory-aid product. What features would it have? What technologies would you use if you were designing it? Today memory has become one of the key component which is used in all the sectors. If I design a memory aided product for the purpose of the remembering the names and recent events I will include a microphone and a memory chip and to which the words spoken by a user are saved in the memory. The technology that is used is the semiconductor memory in which a large amount information can be saved upon a small chip. This information needs to be retrieved when the user needs according to the date in case of events. It is better to incorporate a camera on one side of that …show more content…
product because, it helps to know the names of a person when the camera detects the face of the person. The camera on this device needs a sensor which automatically detects the face of a person and it should retrieve the name of the person when the camera captures it . For this to be done a focus sensor must be designed to read out the names of the person in the camera or the photo taken by the same camera. In the events a reminder must be used to remind about the on coming events or the events which are completed recently. A day prior to the event should be set for a reminder. So for the device to be designed we need two modules, one for the names of the persons and another for reminder which reminds the recently completed events and on coming events. Reference Next-generation personal memory aids S Vemuri and W Bender Semicondutor Memories by Prentice Hall 1995 1.20 Which kind of ethical theory, deontologist or consequentialist, works better for arguing that it is wrong to drive one’s car on the left side of a road in a country where people normally drive on the right?
Explain. According to the given situation it is totally wrong to drive one’s car on the left side of the road where the people normally drive on the right. So, Deontologist theory stated to be on the path of the truth. In brief it states that to be clear and to be truthfull always in anykind of situation On considering the consequentialist theory we need to evaluate the consequences of the situation and action is needed to be taken which seems to be apt. To some extent we Conseqentialist theory works to argue but Deontologist theory works even more better in this situation Deontologist theory helps to be clear and to face the consequences. On concluding I think the deontologist theory works to make an argument with the situation so it is totally illegal to drive on the left side of the road when the road rules stated to drive in the
right Reference A Gift of Fire: Social, Legal, and Ethical Issues for Computing Technology by Sara Baase
Kai Nielsen defended consequentialism and showed how it can still agree with commonsense, deontological convictions in his article “Traditional Morality and Utilitarianism.” His article focused on closing the gulf between consequentialism and deontology by showing how closely they can agree, and he further evaluated the systems and found that consequentialism as he sees it should be practiced is morally superior to traditional deontology. First, this essay will explain his argument that consequentialism squares with the commonsense convictions of deontology, and second, it will show how Nielsen arrived at the conclusion that consequentialism is a good moral system while deontology is faulty.
Deontology diverges from consequentialism because deontology concentrates on the rightness or wrongness of the actions themselves instead of the consequences. There are different types of deontological theories. According to Kant, theoretical reasoning helps us discover what we should believe whereas the practical reasoning tells us what we should do. Morality falls under theoretical reasoning. In Kantian deontology, motives matter. Rather than consequences, it is the motive of an action makes that action morally right or wrong. Likewise, if an action intends to hurt someone, but eventually it benefits the other person, then it does not make that action morally right. All in all, deontology comes down to common-sense: whether it is a good action or a bad
Consequentialism is ordinarily distinct from deontology, as deontology offers rightness or wrongness of an act, rather than the outcome of the action. In this essay we are going to explore the differences of consequentialism and deontology and apply them to the quandary that Bernard Williams and J.J.C Smart put forward in their original analogy of “Jim and the Indians” in their book , Utilitarianism: for and against (J.J.C Smart & Bernard Williams, 1973, p.78-79.).
For this paper I read the novel The Memory Keeper’s Daughter by Kim Edwards, this novel is told in the span of 25 years, it is told by two characters David and Caroline, who have different lives but are connect through one past decision. The story starts in 1964, when a blizzard happens causing the main character, Dr. David Henry to deliver his own twins. During the delivery the son named Paul is fine but the daughter named Phoebe has something wrong with her. The doctor realizes that the daughter has Down syndrome, he is shocked and age remembers his own childhood when his sister was always sick, her dyeing at an early and how that effected his mother. He didn’t want that to happen to his wife, so David told the nurse to bring Phoebe to an institution, so that his wife wouldn’t suffer. The nurse, Caroline didn’t think this was right, but brings Phoebe to the institution anyways. Once Caroline sees the institution in an awful state she leaves with the baby and
Repressed vs. false memories has been a critical debate in criminal cases and daily life problems. Throughout the years many people has claimed to recover repressed memories with the simplest triggers varying from a gaze to hypnosis. However, a large number of repressed memories claimed are considered as false memories because the images were induced through hypnosis and recalled during a therapy sesion. In the film “divided memories” the main intention was to inform the audience the importance of repressed memories and how those memories can change the lives of the people involved, whether the memory was considered repressed or false. It shows different cases of women being victims of sexual abuse in childhood and how they had those memories repressed. Additionally, the film
Memory is an important and active system that receives information. Memory is made up of three different stages sensory memory, short term memory, and long term memory. According to the power point presentation, sensory memory refers to short storage of memory that allows an individual to process information as it occurs. Short term memory refers to memory that is only available for a limited time. It is information that is held for seconds or sometimes even minutes. Long term memory refers to memory that is stored for a long period of time and it has an unlimited capacity with the ability to hold as much information as possible. Retrieval is key and it allows individuals to have memories. Episodic memory refers to memory for events that we
Recovered memories of childhood trauma and abuse has become one of the most controversial issues within the field of psychology. Controversy surrounding repressed memory - sometimes referred to as the memory wars – reached its’ peak in the early 1990s, where there was a rise in the number of people reporting memories of childhood trauma and abuse that had allegedly been repressed for many years (Lindsay & Read, 2001). There are a number of different factors that have contributed to the dispute surrounding recovered memories. Firstly, there is an ongoing debate about whether these types of memories actually exist or whether these accusations arose as a result of suggestive therapeutic procedures. In particular, this debate focuses on two main
Memory is the process of acquiring, storing and retrieving information. Memories sub-consciously influence the way we perceive novel situations in our environment as well as how we interpret future events. Memory is of the following types: Immediate, Short term, Long term and Specific
The three-step Defensive Driving Course prevention formula is RUA. Recognize the hazard, understand the defense, and act correctly in time. The course wants the learner to be a defensive driver. What is defensive driving? Defensive driving is driving to save lives, time, and money in spite of the conditions around you and the actions of others. If you want to be a defensive driver you have to follow the “What If?” strategy, which means that the driver should always be aware of all the possible outcomes that might occur from a scenario. If you can analyze all the possible outcomes, you can be a safe driver and realize the danger or the safety of your actions. There are multiple factors that need to be taken into consideration when becoming a defensive driver.
Deontological moral theory is a Non-Consequentialist moral theory. While consequentialists believe the ends always justify the means, deontologists assert that the rightness of an action is not simply dependent on maximizing the good, if that action goes against what is considered moral. It is the inherent nature of the act alone that determines its ethical standing. For example, imagine a situation where there are four critical condition patients in a hospital who each need a different organ in order to survive. Then, a healthy man comes to the doctor’s office for a routine check-up.
Consequentialism Framework is the adecuate to study the etchic dilemma that Mylan Pharmaceutical is facing, due to the fact that we can analyze the internal and external impact of the increase in their medications price for convenience of their board members. Their decision is not right or wrong just the result of it might be negative to the society.
For example, if an employee was told at the start of their position if they were ever found lying about something, they would be fired. They get stuck in a situation where it is hard to tell the truth but due to the consequences, they do what is moral right and tell the truth due to consequentialism. Consequentialism differs from Virtue ethics because the reasoning behind the action is for the consequences to occur after rather than the virtue before that allows the action to be performed. Deontology is the study of the nature of duty and obligation.
The mistaken recollection of information or the recollection of an event that never happened is known as a false memory (Rajagopal & Montgomery, 2011). The study of false memories has been of interest to cognitive psychologists (Otagaar, Smeets & Scoboria, 2013) for many years as it implies that human memory is vulnerable to the influence of external information, it also implies that our ability to recall events may not always be accurate. One major issue that has arisen with the research on false memories is the argued validity of eyewitness testimony (Wade, Green & Nash, 2011). Eyewitness testimony is the verified report made by someone who witnessed a crime (Wade et.al., 2011). False memories can interfere with the correct recollection of criminal offences which can potentially result in inaccurate accusations of a crime (Wade et.al., 2011). Researchers have been interested in studying false memories to develop a better understanding of how false memories work, and to what extent our memories can be assumed accurate (Jou & Flores, 2013).
Utilitarianism can be described as an ethical theory that states if the consequences of an action
A deontologist asserts that you should do your duty even if you or others suffer as a consequence. Deontology is seen as an obligation to protect regardless of the impact it has on others, whether it be people, animals, and/or the environment and so on. “Deontology focuses on the duties and obligations one has in carrying out actions rather than on the consequences of those actions” (Mosser, 2013). According to deontologist Immanuel Kant, when doing your duty as a deontologist there are “categorical imperatives” that should be followed. In other words there are exceptions for why one is not taking action. “All imperatives command either hypothetically or categorically” (Kant,