Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Arguments against ethical egoism
Arguments against ethical egoism
Arguments against ethical egoism
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Arguments against ethical egoism
Individuals need to be conscious of their decisions so that they are able to handle the consequences resulting from their actions. This leads to the article in which Tom knowingly did something that could possibly negatively affect his life. The article outlines a series of events in Tom’s life ultimately resulting in a critical incident involving him needing proper medical care. It was Tom’s actions leading up to this event that triggered situation and now, puts pressure on Kevin in deciding whether to seek proper care or provide a substitute that could be critical to Tom in the long run. Now that he’s facing the possibility of losing his scholarship, he expects someone else to do something on his behalf they don’t wish to do. Although …show more content…
Let say that Kevin call the ambulance and the event is memorialized in a report detailing what was observed during the technicians visit to his apartment. Now considering Tom has already been cited by the school for drinking in the dorms, it’s fair to say that Kevin has also violated the rules. Taking this into account, the school officials find out what occurred and intern, Kevin is then cited and risks the same possibility of losing any scholarships. Should this be the possible consequence, a person representing ethical egoism shouldn’t even consider helping Tom because that would not be in his/her self-interest. As outline in the Egoism philosophy one important thing to consider is the ranking of things that make the decision most beneficial to that individual. Ethical egoism suggests, “What brings the highest payoff to me is not necessarily what brings the highest payoff to those helped.” (Lab, 2016) There would be no benefit to Kevin to do anything to help Tom but to solely base the decision on what’s beneficial to him. Factoring in the probability of Kevin possibly being cited and/or losing his scholarships the proper choice would be bandaging him up and sending him on his way. Should Kevin go with the recommendation the consequences he would face could be damaging to him in the long run. The position I am attempting to make clear is that based on an ethical egoism perspective people only help others for their own pleasure. One of the earlier readings suggests, “People help other people, ethical egoists assert, not because of selfishness, pleasure, or happiness, as psychological egoists assert. No, human beings help their fellow human beings because it is advantageous to do so.” (University, 2016) If Kevin follows this the advice proposed in this paper to seek help would go against the Ethical Egoism
better person, and he could be a positive role model to his family and push others to
The Glass Menagerie, written by Tennessee Williams in 1944, tells a tale of a young man imprisoned by his family. Following in the footsteps of his father, Tom Wingfield is deeply unhappy and eventually leaves his mother and sister behind so he may pursue his own ambitions. Throughout the play, the reader or audience is shown several reasons why Tom, a brother to Laura and son to Amanda, is unhappy and wishes to leave his family. However, the last scene describes Tom’s breaking point in which he leaves for the last time. Amanda tells Tom to “go to the moon,” because he is a “selfish dreamer.” (7. Amanda and Tom) The reasonings for Tom’s departure are due to his mother’s constant nagging, hatred for
Ethical egoism is a claim about what is morally good or bad, whereas psychological egoism is a claim about human psychology. Psychological egoism is a controversial claim as it implies that human beings are not capable of genuine altruism.
• Once more, the ordinary science’ proves itself as the master of classification, inventing and defining the various categories of Egoism. Per example, psychological egoism, which defines doctrine that an individual is always motivated by self-interest, then rational egoism which unquestionably advocates acting in self-interest. Ethical egoism as diametrically opposite of ethical altruism which obliges a moral agent to assist the other first, even if sacrifices own interest. Also, ethical egoism differs from both rational and psychological egoism in ‘defending’ doctrine which considers all actions with contributive beneficial effects for an acting individual
Life decisions are at times hard to make, but we have to choose to define the path which we want our lives to follow. As we have seen in the paper, Michael’s situation where he had to seek more information from her guardian Anne and her maternal mother before making his decision is a good example of rational decision-making procedure. It gives us a lesson that we should take our time to think about the decisions we make in life. In my case, it’s a good example of a decision well
Egoism is a teleological theory of ethics that sets the ultimate criterion of morality in some nonmoral value (i.e. happiness or welfare) that results from acts (Pojman 276). It is contrasted with altruism, which is the view that one's actions ought to further the interests or good of other people, ideally to the exclusion of one's own interests (Pojman 272). This essay will explain the relation between psychological egoism and ethical egoism. It will examine how someone who believes in psychological egoism explains the apparent instances of altruism. And it will discuss some arguments in favor of universal ethical egoism, and exam Pojman's critque of arguments for and against universal ethical egoism.
As previously stated, there is a balance to be maintained between selflessness and selfishness. Logically speaking, you would always want to help people, but overexerting yourself to try and help them solve their problems, won’t really help anyone. These ideas are expressed in Selflessness and the Loss of Self (Hampton, Jean, and Daniel Farnham). The Intrinsic Worth of Persons: Contractarianism in Moral and Political Philosophy. New York: Cambridge UP, 2007.
Ethical egoism is the usual ethical position that moral people ought to do what is in their own self-interest.
According to the article, Altruism and helping behavior, it is common for people to help others. Altruism is defined as “the desire to help another person even if it doesn’t benefit the helper” (Altruism and Helping Behavior. Print.). Helping behavior is “any act that is intended to benefit another person”
Ethical egoism states that an act is good if and only if it serves self-interest. It is a normative theory holding that people ought to do what is in their self- interest
Determining relevant and irrelevant information should consequently result in a deeper understanding of the situation that would moreover mean a proper examination into unhelpful or damaging outcomes (Donna McAuliffe and Lesley Chenoweth, 2008, pg. 45). In the decision to break Errol’s trust and tell his family, friends or emergency services, there is a great risk of losing Errol as a client and furthermore worsening his situation. In deciding to not inform anyone else, while you keep Errol’s trust, there is an even greater risk that Errol may take his own life, whether it be in that very moment or months down the track. This step focuses on the conception that foreseeable harm is not always possible. In both decisions in this, there are risks
Ethical egoism can be a well-debated topic about the true intention of an individual when he or she makes an ethical decision. Max Stirner brings up a very intriguing perspective in writing, The Ego and its Own, regarding ethical egoism. After reading his writing some questions are posed. For example, are human beings at the bottom? Following Wiggins and Putnam, can we rise above our egoism and truly be altruistic? And finally, if we are something, do we have the capacity to rise to a level that we can criticize and transcend our nature? These questions try to establish whether or not we are simple humans, bound to our intrinsic nature, or far more intellectually advanced than we allow ourselves to be.
In the novel The Adventures of Tom Sawyer, there is currently a dispute as to who is at fault for their troubled relationship--Tom or Becky. Becky constantly overreacts and hold grudges against Tom. Becky is stubborn, selfish, and she does not care about Tom’s feelings. Tom has made an effort to be the bigger person in the relationship, and show that he cares about Becky’s feelings. However, Becky has not made a similar effort.