Ethical Dilemmas And Ethics In The NASW Code Of Ethics

As stated above the first step is to determine if there is an ethical dilemma. To determine if there is a dilemma the social worker should refer to the ethical theories noted in Rothman. Rothman (2008) explores three important questions in determining if there is an issue or dilemma. In the case of unethical documentation, it is justified as an ethical dilemma referencing to the distributive question found in Rothman 2008. The distributive question from Rothman (2008) ask whose interest does this theory address (p. 15)? This dilemma balance is close, it can have been seen from both sides. Therefore, it considered to be a dilemma. The next step would be identifying the values and actions involved both personal and client values. According to Rothman (2008) A desire to assist the client toward well-being, grounded in reason and in knowledge of

The ethical responsibility to clients is being upheld according to (NASW Code of Ethics,2008) which states” Social workers’ primary responsibility is to promote the wellbeing of clients. The suggestion that Dot made about Harry needing a mother that is supportive of him and having a stable environment (Rothman 2008) supports the value and actions noted by the ethical responsibility to client’s sub section 1.14 in the Code of Ethics. This subsection acknowledges NASW Code of Ethics, (2008) when social workers act on behalf of clients who lack the capacity to make informed decisions, social workers should take reasonable steps to safeguard the interests and rights of those client (NASW Code of Ethics 2008). Harry is a child with special needs and does need someone to advocate for him. On the home visit Dot took notice of how Harry’s mother was calling him names. According to the documentation above the Judge stated, “Dot was discussing with the mother about parenting skill, and how the name-calling might have some effect on Harry”, but the mother paid no attention to