Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Social media and its effect on children
Social media and its effect on children
Impacts of social media on children
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Social media and its effect on children
Is the way you act based on how your parents raised you? After reading “Texas teen Ethan Couch gets 10 years' probation for driving drunk, killing 4” by Dana Ford and “Should Parents Be Legally Responsible For Children's Serious Crimes?” by Nathan Siegel it is clear to see that people have opposing opinions on this subject. Throughout this essay Rebecca Sedwick's suicide, Ethan Couch’s fatal mistake, and why the parents of the children responsible for death shouldn’t be charged will be explained. According to “Should Parents Be Legally Responsible For Children's Serious Crimes?” by Nathan Siegel, the death of Rebecca Sedwick is found to have been caused by cyberbullying however, the blame has landed on the parents of the children doing the bullying instead of them; this should not be the case. Parents cannot be expected to monitor …show more content…
their children 24/7, as they also have to work jobs, cook food, pay bills, and do many other household duties. The article states, “Poorer parents tend to work longer hours and have less time to look after their kids” (Seigel). This shows that you cannot blame parents for the actions of their children; the parents are doing the best they can to provide for their family. Furthermore, as stated by Eve Brank in paragraph 6, “no research has been done to determine the effectiveness of laws that hold parents criminally liable“ (Siegel). On another note, Ethan Couch, 16, kills 4 and severely injures 2 due to drunk driving; psychologist says he suffers from affluenza so should the parents be charged?
The answer is no. According to “Texas teen Ethan Couch gets 10 years' probation for driving drunk, killing 4” by Dana Ford, Ethan crashed into four people who were trying to fix a car and threw his two friends, who were sitting in the truck bed, across the pavement during a drunken stupor. When tried for his crimes, one phycologist claims Ethan is not at fault due to the fact that he suffers from affluenza. The judge believed, as stated in line 5, “He’s a defendant in need of treatment” (Ford). The psychologist believes “that Couch's life could be turned around with one to two years of treatment” (Ford). The fact that he can be rehabilitated means that his mistake was the fault of his affluenza and not his parents. And even so, Ethan was 16 when the events took place therefore, he should have already learned how to act based on society. There is no need to blame the parents, as he was old enough to realize the risks of drunk driving and took his chances and did it
anyway. While some people believe the parents should be charged because they raised the child to be the why they are, The children in these situations were old enough to know better. Additionally, it is impossible for parents to watch their children 24/7. As stated, “Poorer parents tend to work longer hours and have less time to look after their kids” (Seigel). This article also claims that “no research has been done to determine the effectiveness of laws that hold parents criminally liable” (Seigel). In the case of Ethan Couch, the boy suffered from affluenza as well as being old enough to realize the consequences of his actions. The judge believed “He’s a defendant in need of treatment” and the psychologist believed he could be rehabilitated within two years if treated properly (Seigel). In conclusion, Parents should not be charged by the crimes of their children. Rebecca’s death was caused by the bullying of her classmates, not their parents, Ethan’s fatal decision was caused by his own choice to drink and drive, not his parents, and it is impossible for parents to watch their children 24/7. If you were a parent do you think you would be able to watch your children 24/7?
Juveniles don’t deserve life sentences without parole for many reasons but one main reason is becase people don’t know a person’s life at home and sometimes living in a broken home can affect their social life. According to the article “Greg Ousley Is Sorry for Killing His Parents”, the author Scott Anderson states that,“The only way to unlock the mysteries of the psyche is to dissect your childhood, especially the formative influence of your parents” (Anderson 56), proving that juveniles are easily influenced to do terrifying crimes and is not their fault because no one was there to guide them.
For example, Kagan asserts, “It prevents taking into account the family and home environment that surrounds him-and from which he cannot usually extricate himself-no matter how brutal or dysfunctional” . To clarify, Kagan provides the notion that legal systems do not take into consideration a juvenile’s mentality, age, or home environment. Such elements to an adolescent’s life shape them into the person they are today. Kagan discerns that the root of the situation is the type of home that juveniles come from. Kagan’s idea applies to Greg Ousley in Scott Anderson’s New York Times article, “Greg Ousley Is Sorry for Killing His Parents. Is this Enough?”, where Ousley relentlessly murders both his parents. For instance, Anderson states, “Greg says Jobie [Greg’s father] could go days without uttering a single word and can recall only one occasion when he told Greg that he loved him-and this, Greg says, occurred when Jobie was quite drunk...Sometimes the arguments were between Greg’s parents-usually centered on Jobie’s drinking” (Anderson). Here, Anderson indicates an instance where a juvenile comes from a struggling and abusive home environment. Due to Ousley’s father’s substance abuse and
We were all hoping to grow up when we were young, as the time pass by, we are growing older and having more opportunities to decide what we want. However, every decision you made are always coming with many responsible. Why do we need to be responsible for our actions? What if we did not take responsibility for our own actions? Obviously, we’ll influence our future, but even more we may also influence other people’s life and their point of viewing us. In the short story “A Boy Grows Older” by Morley Callaghan, the main character Jim Sloane is a man that realize his own responsibility after he feels he may influence his parent’s life and decides to take his responsibility in the end. We should take personal responsibility for our actions for preventing us to affect others.
Cyberbullying primarily affects young teenagers as they are the main users of social media, thus exposing them to the issue regularly. Providing that teenagers are stakeholders, it can additionally be recognized that parents of said teenagers are affected by cyberbullying also. This is because, having their child experiencing such trauma can be a distressing and overwhelming experience. On the twelfth of January 2018, a cyberbullying case in Warwick, Queensland, demonstrated the brutality of this issue; fourteen year old Dolly Everett, unfortunately took her own life after being harassed online. Queensland’s criminal code act 1995, provides legislation in support of this case. A series of online harassment by an individual offers a maximum penalty of three years imprisonment or a fine of more than thirty thousand dollars (Australian legal information institute , 2018 ). This legislation thereby supports stakeholders involved in cyberbullying; depending on how extreme the case is. On the nineteenth of February 2018, Queensland formed a cyberbullying task force in response to Dolly’s cruel death (King, 2018 ). However, Dolly has not been the only victim of cyberbullying, yet Queensland only developed said task force this year. Thus, Queensland attempts to provide for stakeholders in cyberbullying, but have only recently began to take further
When children commit a horrible act such as a school shooting their parents often look for someone or something to blame rather than looking at what role they, as parents, may have had in the tragedy. The often targeted entertainers, video game developers, teachers, drug companies, and writers are rarely, if ever, responsible for such tragic outcomes and, unfortunately, often become victims as a result of lawsuits filed in an attempt to place blame on them. The parents of dangerous children must be scrutinized and sued alongside every other entity being blamed for the heinous crimes that children commit.
Each day Americans make decisions that affect the outcomes of their lives. Some choices are easily made, while others require intense thought. The consequences of actions, nonetheless, are known from as early on as childhood. For example, a small child knows immediately that he or she can thrust their hand in a fire and feel the consequences. However, Mr. Raeburn states, “teenagers cannot be held fully responsible for their actions because all the wiring to allow adult decision making isn’t completed yet” (517). Still, teenagers can be held responsible for operating a vehicle, and be held accountable to obey traffic laws. These illustration...
In Columbine, Dave Cullen says, “You can’t really teach a child anything: you can only show him the way and motivate him to learn it himself.” Raising a child has to be one of the hardest jobs in the world. Through long days and nights, parenting does not have a step-by-step plan. A parent can only show and teach their child how to act, but it is the child’s job to decide how they want to act and live. The Harris’ and Klebolds’ are two great examples of how parenting can be a blessing, then take a turn for the worse. Dylan and Eric fails their parents in ways such as lying, hiding, and being selfish.
Cyberbullying is no exception to this statistic. The two writers also stated that “There have been several high-profile cases involving teenagers taking their own lives in part because of being harassed and mistreated over the Internet (Apollo, 2007; Halligan, 2006; Jones, 2008), a phenomenon recently termed cyberbullicide—suicide indirectly or directly influenced by experiences with online aggression,” (Hinduja and Patchin, 2007). These cases are not a constant issue in every school, but they have happened frequently enough to raise attention to faculty and parents. With adolescents being at such a sensitive age, it is important to remind them that the actions they take can have serious consequences, including
At the time, society struggled to comprehend how two young teenagers were put on trial as murderers – children were given sympathy for being targeted as victims. However, today journalists and reporters blame the way children are raised for committing crimes. The environment they grow up in and the values that are instilled within them are what influence their every action. While Nathan and Richard were raised in upper-class families, both endured difficult childhoods. Reporters claim that Leopold’s childhood was “scarred by feelings of physical inferiority, the sexual abuse of a governess, and the loss of his mother when he was fourteen” and may be a reasonable explanation for his detrimental actions (Fass 934). This perspective shifted the blame from the teenagers to the parents, who were considered at fault for raising their children irresponsibly.
If they do not help their teenagers with safety tips on the Internet there could be many negative consequences. According to The Editorial Board, “Parents remain the first line of defense against cyberbullying. Too many, however, ignore their children 's online behavior, deny that their kids could be bullies, or are themselves models for this harmful behavior. The stepmother of the 14-year-old charged with bullying Rebecca was charged last week with child abuse over allegations that she punched two boys visiting her home”. This illustrates the importance of parents’ role in a teenager’s activity on the Internet. In this occasion Rebecca’s 14-yeaar-old cyberbully had actually been bullied by her stepmother. This could have been the cause of Rebecca’s bullying since her cyberbully perhaps was bullied by her own
Each year, schools are having to update the Codes of Conduct in order to keep up with the bullying that is occurring on social media. Schools have failed to effectively monitor and take action upon what these students have been doing to others and what others do in return. This has resulted in many lost lawsuits, in which schools were held liable for not taking appropriate action on what occurs outside of campus. School districts therefore must take more responsibility over what happens to the students, on and off campus. Districts argue that such instances are outside of the school’s control, however these victims are still their students. In the case of Ryan Halligan, a teenage boy who committed suicide at the young age of 13, Albert D. Lawton
Most humans tend to live by example and studies prove that our behavior is learned, but how do we explained the bad behavior of those that have good parents that are excellent role models. Some people would said that the parents are too flexible and the kids take advantage of them in the other hand when parents neglect the kids and are bad role models for their kids we easily find the answer to the problem. As a society we contradict ourselves for example; sometimes we tell parents to not be too flexible with our kids but at the same time we do not want parents to discipline their children too harsh. The question of why juveniles commit crime does not have an exact answer. Some juveniles commit crime because of peer pressure, anger against life, and others might be just do it for fun. Even though the question does not have a conquer answer to why juveniles commit crime we know that different factors contribute to the issue. In the book True Notebooks Mark the author did not only explain his personal experience as a volunteer teacher at the juvenile hall, but also what he learned from his students and how his perspective change regarding the juveniles as he spend more time with them. Mark also discover that even though he was not aware of it he was making a positive change on some of them and the fact that he was willing to teach them a writing class meant so much for some of the students, and most important Mark present on the book the different reasons juveniles commit crime.
The initial reason why anyone who cyberbullies should be criminally accused is due to their harmful behavior that can result in people getting seriously hurt both mentally and physically. If the bully is convicted, cyberbullying can be stopped! As directly stated in the Radio Interview of source one “Cyberbullying can also lead to kids getting physically injured.” This statement further emphasizes why the outcome of this act should be punishable by law. Due to the fact that individuals face violent behavior, it could mean suicide for the victim. In no shape or form should this be tolerated since lives are taken due to the
Cyberbullying should be a criminal offense because whether it’s bullying or cyberbullying, it still damages a person emotionally and physically. Admittedly, many will argue that it is crossing the line to force perpetrators behind bars when it is not even bullying, but some foul words thrown in social sites. However, there is no difference between cyberbullying and offline bullying when it is still an issue that constantly eats away at its victims, abusing them with hurtful words and messages. “The United States Department of Health and Human Services calculated the percentages of bullied victims, where 37% of teens have been physically bullied, while 52% of teens have been cyberbullied” (Cyber/Bullying Statistics). Studies shown indicate that there have been more cases of cyberbullying than offline bullying, whereas people believe that “cyberbullying is not real bullying” and “it is to speak out in what...
As a parent, I have spent a great deal of time observing the behavior, motivation, and thought processes of my children. As they mature these processes have changed, and it has been fascinating to watch. I have learned a great deal on the limits of self control in the adolescent mind during this time, and I believe that families should be held responsible for crimes committed by their teenagers.