More handpicked essays just for you.
Trotsky as the main leader of the Bolsheviks
Trotsky as the main leader of the Bolsheviks
Trotsky's contribution to the Bolsheviks
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Trotsky as the main leader of the Bolsheviks
Many historians such as Issac Deutscher suggest that, “Trotsky was a revolutionary hero” despite his arrogance and ego, he was still considered significant in Russia. He was greatly admired for his role as a leader and brilliant strategist during times of crisis, such as in the 1917 November revolution, the Russian Civil War and as a lone voice in exile. Though his status was prominent in Russia, he made a slight difference and gained very little recognition internationally. The evidence of historical accounts of Trotsky’s role in the 1917 November revolution mostly contained the praises for his brilliance as an inspiring speaker and leader, and an amazing organiser in times of crisis. Trotsky had demonstrated his incredible powers as an orator and in tapping and appealing to the revolutionary attitudes of the masses at the time by directly speaking and engaging to them. In this, his popularity with the masses increased as he gained their support and trust. As a result, he managed to successfully coordinate the fractured revolutionary groups, Petrograd Soviet and Military Revolution ...
Trotsky, L., 2014. The Overthrow of Tzarism and the Triumph of the Soviets. In: L. Trotsky, The Russian Revolution, 1st ed. Garden City, New York: Doubleday.
Ultimately it was his failure here that prevented him having any long-term significance, despite his huge short-term significance. ‘He had too many characteristics that made it extraordinarily hard to collectively work with him. But he was an industrious worker and a talented person, and for Lenin, that was the main thing’. Trotsky, despite his nuances and arrogance, was hugely significant in the short term through his brilliant tactics throughout the October Revolution where the Bolsheviks took control of Russia. Furthermore, his coordination of the Red Army was definitive in Bolshevik victory in the civil war, removal of opposition in the terror, and he played an under appreciated role in reclaiming of occupied Russian lands following the world war.
The continuation of the violent anti-Jewish riots that had plagued the Russian Empire in post-Revolutionary Russia forced the response of prominent communist party leaders. Both Vladimir Lenin, leader of the Bolshevik party and head of the Soviet state, and Leon Trotsky, leader of the Bolshevik army, formulated responses that attempted to promote the ideas of communism through condemnation of the attacks. However, the content of these responses varies in a way that reflects both their differing backgrounds with communism, and reveals their distinct purposes in responding to anti-Jewish violence. A comparison of Lenin’s speech “On Anti-Jewish Pogroms” and Trotsky’s “A Word to the Ukrainian
The accumulation of these factors centred on Lenin's leadership helped stamp Bolshevik power across the Soviet Union. Lenin’s pragmatic leadership was the most considerable factor in helping to fortify Bolshevik power. His willingness to take power in October/November 1917 and the successes of the move, through his right-hand man, Trotsky, was critical as it helped give him unquestioned authority within the party despite members of the Central Committee i.e. Zinoviev and Kamenev suggested industrialisation needed to occur first. This highlighted Lenin’s communist ideology, which was essential to the Bolsheviks maintaining power. Following the failure of the Provisional Government, Lenin recognised that it was the Bolshevik’s priority to legitimise their government.
From the late eighteenth century and early nineteenth century major historical events such as the Industrial revolution had occurred. During this period of time Europe was switching into an economy that is focused mostly in the industrial field. From this emerged two social-economic classes, the rich bourgeoisie and the poor proletariats. Furthermore tension brewed from the two groups since the bourgeoisie source of wealth was from the exploitation of the proletariats. Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels’ book The Communist Manifesto responded to the situation and created a vision of an equal communist society. The Communist Manifesto was defined by the abolishment of the bourgeois sovereign rule that followed to a revolution against capitalism
In the following essay I will discuss the reasons why Stalin rather than Trotsky emerged as the leader of the USSR in 1929. First of all, Stalin was lucky. Trotsky remained ill for most of the power struggle and Lenin died at an opportune time. Indeed, had Lenin lived, Stalin would probably have been sent to the provinces to work for the party. Dzerzhinsky, the head of the Cheka and political adversary to Stalin, also died fortuitously in 1926.
Trotsky also saw the value of the soviet as a form of popular government and the use of a general strike to bring down a government. To successfully revolutionise, the “masses” needed guidance from a political party. The masses were the main driving force of the 1905 Revolution. But the masses were not properly led by the political parties to seize power.
To decide on Lenin’s importance, regarding Bolsheviks success in the November Revolution of 1917 we need to identify the factors that we can take into account. These include: Lenin’s April Thesis, His effective use of “Peace, Land, Bread” and his ability to convince the Bolshevik central committee for an immediate revolution. However over the course of the essay we will see that it’s not just Lenin’s leadership that was the reason for Bolshevik success, we also have the mistakes of the Provisional Government and its overall weakness.
Trotsky. Instead he was more of a mediocrity, described. as a grey blur which deceived people into trusting him. However, Stalin was a very cunning man. He made up for all of his weaknesses.... ...
Stalin was able to damage Trotsky’s reputation and political prestige, by tricking Trotsky for not showing up at Lenins funeral. After Lenins death, on the 21st of January 1924, on over three days, about three and a half million people queued to see Lenins body. Although many people felt hatred towards the regime, many felt a bona fide affection towards Lenin, which was comparable with the affection the people had to the Romanov dynasty, before the October Revolution. Throughout Lenins funeral, Stalin hoped that he could strengthen his position in the Party and remove Trotsky from his powerful position, which he was in. Trotsky turned ill just before Lenin’s death, and had settled in the south of Russia, to recover. Stalin contacted Trotsky about Lenins death and meant that Trotsky would not make it to the funeral. For Trotsky not attending the funeral, caused his reputation and political prestige, within the party, to be damaged. During Lenins funeral, Stalin made a speech referring t...
Inspired by the works of Karl Marx, V.I. Lenin nonetheless drew his ideology from many other great 19th century philosophers. However, Marx’s “Communist Manifesto” was immensely important to the success of Russia under Leninist rule as it started a new era in history. Viewed as taboo in a capitalist society, Karl Marx started a movement that would permanently change the history of the entire world. Also, around this time, the Populist promoted a doctrine of social and economic equality, although weak in its ideology and method, overall. Lenin was also inspired by the anarchists who sought revolution as an ultimate means to the end of old regimes, in the hope of a new, better society. To his core, a revolutionary, V.I. Lenin was driven to evoke the class struggle that would ultimately transform Russia into a Socialist powerhouse. Through following primarily in the footsteps of Karl Marx, Lenin was to a lesser extent inspired by the Populists, the Anarchists, and the Social Democrats.
According to most historians, “history is told by the victors”, which would explain why most people equate communism with Vladimir Lenin. He was the backbone of Russia’s communist revolution, and the first leader of history’s largest communist government. It is not known, or discussed by most, that Lenin made many reforms to the original ideals possessed by many communists during the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. He revised Karl Marx and Friedrich Engles’ theories to fit the so-called ‘backwardness’ of the Russian Empire. Lenin’s reforms were necessary to carry out a socialist revolution in Russia, and the contributions he made drastically changed the course of history. It can be assumed that, the Soviet Union would not have been as powerful if it was not for Lenin’s initial advocacy of violence and tight organization.
Communism was the sole ruling party in the USSR during the periods between the First World War and the Second World War. This was due to the loyalty and left-wing focused government that was established after Lenin led the Bolsheviks to victory during the October revolution. Stalin had succeeded in inheriting the legacy that Lenin had left behind by becoming the leader of the USSR after Lenin’s death. This paper will address the following points: Stalin’s powerful position in the government, Stalin’s use of tactics and deceit to manipulate his image in order to associate himself to Lenin, and Stalin’s dominant reputation which eventually led to his triumph over Trotsky enabled him to be the sole leader of the single-party led USSR. This paper will argue that following the death of Lenin, the USSR was in a time of need for new leadership which offered the perfect conditions for Stalin to rise to power given his position of influence in the USSR.
Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov better known as Lenin. Lenin was an important part in Soviet Union history . lenin had a determined goal , he wanted power . Lenin was so powerful , he took the practice communism and made it reality throughout Soviet plus other countries he had an influence on. Lenin believed that communism could solve the problems of society , because his brother was killed by a tsarist regime. He started as a politician and war general , he later became the leader of the Soviet Union. Before Lenin was the leader a man named Stalin Ruled Soviet . Lenin despised Stalin , Lenin then started to take control of the states he created.
Through this Stalin maintained his political support by rooting out opposition and strengthening support from other