Throughout the late nineteen twenties and early nineteen thirties a significant development in the world of theater began. This movement was called The Workers' Theatre and it was partially shaped by the agitprop theatre of communist Russia. Agitprop theatre contained brief bits and were performed on transportable entities of theater. Agitprop Theater performers frequently performed songs which strained to enrage listeners to resist entrepreneurship and acknowledge the ways of communism. They wanted their audience to consent to the notion that the working-class would arise. The Russian Communist agitprop theatre correspondingly utilized presentations, presentational performing, lack of plot, and montages to promote their philosophies. Ultimately, The Worker’s Theatre weakened in significance during the mid-nineteen thirties and one of the developments assisting the deterioration of the Workers' Theatre Movement through use of various approaches and dramaturgical tools originated by The Worker’s Theatre was the establishment of the Federal Theatre Project. As soon as the government acquired the role of positioning individuals to produce theatre, the government had the capability to incorporate the advance. The Federal Theatre Project tried to give jobless theater personal work because trendy radio shows and films with sound had nearly substituted vaudeville as America's preferred practices of performing, and many of even the best vaudevillians lost their jobs. The Federal Theatre Project also attempted to perform theatre which was pertinent within society and politics, was local, and had an affordable price range. A majority of The Federal Theatre Project’s well known work was produced in New York City. The New York Branch containe...
... middle of paper ...
...munist. In spite of their lack of knowledge, Congress removed all assets from The Federal Theatre Project ventures. The additional three Arts Developments which were Music, Art, and Writing continued to be sponsored by Congress up to nineteen forty one. The Federal Theatre Project had produced theatre for millions who had never been exposed to theatre before, the organization hired heaps of individuals, and it brought European epic theatre and Living Newspaper theatre methods to America, and therefore can possibly be viewed as an immense achievement. For all intents and purposes its impact made an exceptional improvement in the American theatre. The Federal Theatre Project has revealed the devastating consequences that can arise in the United States when political figures and officials have decisive jurisdiction exceeding what ought to remain an imaginative venture.
Cullen, Frank, Florence Hackman, and Donald McNeilly. Vaudeville, Old & New: An Encyclopedia of Variety Performers in America. New York: Routledge, 2007. Print.
Throughout the late 1920's an important theatrical movement developed: The Workers' Theatre Movement. In the end, it diminished around the middle of the 1930's, and one of the developments aiding the decline of the Workers' Theatre Movement, was the creation of the Federal Theatre Project. The Federal Theatre Project was the largest and most motivated effort mounted by the Federal Government to organize and produce theater events. Once the government took on the duty of putting people to work, it was able to consider the movement. The Federal Theatre Project’s purpose was “to provide relief work for theatrical artists that utilized their talents and to make their work widely available to ordinary Americans, thus democratizing high culture.” (www.answers.com) Furthermore the FTP tried to present theatre that was relevant socially, politically, and had popular prices, such as free shows. The majority of its famous productions, although not all of them, came out of New York City. New York had many units, such as, a classical unit, Negro unit, units performing vaudeville, children’s plays, puppet shows, caravan productions, and the new plays unit. The Federal Theatre Project was “the only fully government-sponsored theatre ever in the United States”. (Witham 16)
Theatres and How We Had Fun." Little, Brown, and Company. (Boston, Toronto, London); 1991. P. 139, 144.
Biner, Pierre. The Living Theater. Takin' It To The Streets: A Sixties Reader, pp. 288-293. ed. Alexander Bloom and Wini Breines.
Motion pictures from Hollywood had taken Broadway’s place as the king of entertainment. The main reason behind this was that because it was culturally relevant and coming out with new flashy techniques such as Todd-AO and Cinerama.
Houchin, John H. Censorship of the American Theatre in the Twentieth Century. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge UP, 2003.
In Dialogue: Theatre of America, Harold Clurman said, “we make theatre out of life” (27), and it was precisely this view that motivated him to help create a uniquely American theatre. Clurman, considered one of the most influential directors of the modern American theatre, had a unique vision of what the American theatre could become. One of the founders of the quintessentially American troupe, the Group Theatre, Clurman was a contemporary of Elia Kazan and Lee Strasberg, and even married to Stella Adler for twenty years. At a ceremony honoring Clurman, Elia Kazan stated that Clurman’s “greatest achievement [was] himself” (Harold Clurman: A Life of Theatre). An important figure in our theatrical past, Clurman’s theories on theatre and directing require close attention. In this paper, I will first provide a brief biography of Clurman, second, examine his theories of theatre and directing, and lastly, I will explore his criticisms of the then-contemporary theatre, and draw conclusions to the current state of the Broadway theatre.
Kenrick, John. Musical Theatre A History. New York: The Continuum International Publishing Group, 2008. Print.
Most of all, those values that the American musical celebrated — and that is those values of American life, American philosophy, American belief — what we find is by the mid-1960s all of those beliefs, all of those philosophies, are being challenged, are being upset. As in all genres, the musical has had its share of failures. Some worthy dramas have been pressed into service and musicalized and sometimes butchered in the process, and audiences have had to watch a fine play diluted into a mediocre musical. But the successes have been many and spectacular, and they have left a long lasting effect on the American art and culture.
...ts have been brought to millions of American citizens of the economic system generally described as underprivileged'" (Burg, 296). Though it was very short-lived, the Federal Theatre Project was helpful to thousands of Americans during the 1930s. To those involved in theatre, it was able to give the unemployed jobs and for those who were not involved in theatre, it was a wonderful form of public entertainment that helped boost American morale during the Great Depression. The Negro Theatre Project gave black Americans an equal opportunity in theatre as well. Though Living Newspapers caused conflicts, they were still a good way to combine the powers of entertainment and enlightenment for the public. Even if it was a very controversial project, the Federal Theatre Project had a large impact on society in the 1930s and was the most important of the Federal Arts Projects.
Sell, Mike. “Arthur Miller and the Drama of American Liberalism.” Arthur Miller's America : Theater & Culture In A Time Of Change. Ed. Enoch Brater. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2005. 23-30. Print.
In this paper, I will be focusing briefly on my knowledge and understanding of the concept of Applied theatre and one of its theatre form, which is Theatre in Education. The term Applied Theatre is a broad range of dramatic activity carried out by a crowd of diverse bodies and groups.
Theatre will always survive in our changing society. It provides us with a mirror of the society within which we live, and where conflicts we experience are acted out on stage before us. It provides us with characters with which we identify with. The audience observes the emotions and actions as they happen and share the experience with the characters in real time.
My experience watching a live theatre performance on stage was a fascinating one, most especially since it was my first time. I attended a staged performance of “The History Boys” in a small theatre called “The Little Theatre of Alexandria” at 8:00 pm on Wednesday June 8, 2016 in Alexandria, Virginia. The overall production of the play was a resounding experience for me particularly the performance of the actors and the design of the scene made the play seem real.
...er new wave in the 1880’s, it didn’t reach the United States until the 40’s. The first American avant-garde performance was in 1948 at Black Mountain College in North Carolina. According to writer and art historian and professor, Arnold Aronson: “In the roughly thirty-year period from the mid-1950’s to the mid 1980’s there was an eruption of theatrical activity in the United States that would ultimately reshape every aspect of performance and have significant influences both at home and abroad” (Qtd in DiLorenzo). The modern avant-garde theatre performance emerged when theatre decided to liberate itself from drama. This began with the new dynamic concept of the naturalistic "milieu" and its consequences in the art of stage direction. It matured with the poetic theatre of symbolist suggestiveness and imagination and the work of such visionaries as Appia (Glytzouris).