Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Cultural conflict between tradition and modernity
American colonialism on native indians
Essays on national american indian museum
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Cultural conflict between tradition and modernity
A country, a region, a belief, people will proud of the truth will always stand the test of time. Although colonialism is able to force people to behave in its ways, it cannot completely change people’s minds. Until September 21, 2004, the Smithsonian National Museum of the American Indian (NMAI) opened to the public. The foundation which was established in 1916, in New York City, The Smithsonian National Museum of the American Indian located on a symbolically significant site on the National Mall, next to the U.S. Capitol, and it is in a very grand building. I went to this museum twice, and I think this museum is a very special museum, I think it is not a typical history or anthropology museum, but it is a developing mature museum close to the audience. I amazed by the flawless symbolic architecture and every exhibition in this museum. After visiting I have a desire and curiosity to know about the museums history,management concept, and their changing path. This museum is the first national museum in the country dedicated exclusively to the Native Americans/indigenous people. This museum is about hope, the present and somewhat future, it proudly shows that nations/tribes are still around. Before the design of the museum architecture, the museum committees and the museum’s architectural consultants seek opinions from both North and South Americans.The architecture is keeping “balance and harmony”, almost every Indian culture believed that every mountain had a soul, every tree,every rock, every living creature and the Great Spirit flowed through all, keeping nature and mankind in perfect balance. And I have to say the building itself already is a “Native place” for me. A “Museum Different,”... ... middle of paper ... ...f food. They also made traditional Indian cornbread, because cornbread was created and harvested by the early Indians before the settlement of Europeans in North American. American Indians used corn ground for their meals and flour for centuries. I think after visiting the exhibitions take a rest and having meal in this cafeteria to keep learning the food culture is a still relax and knowledgeable part for visiting a museum. A native viewers describe this museum as a “Vehicle”, to bring educational messages to the American public that tribes by themselves cannot do. Overall, the museum as civic and social space is, to be sure, a new and vital direction for the NMAI. It is a thought-provoking museum that raises the question of Native American identity past, present and future.They treated the land with respect. Wonderful art by talented indigenous folk.
& nbsp; The best thing, though, about that museum was that everything always stayed right where it was. Nobody'd move on to the next. You could go there a hundred thousand times, and that Eskimo would still be just finished catching those two fish, the birds would still be on their way south, the deers would still be drinking out of that water hole, with their pretty antlers and their pretty, skinny legs, and that squaw with the naked bosom would still be weaving that same blanket. Nobody'd be different from me. 121) & nbsp;
The National Cowboy and Western Heritage Museum of art exhibits a wide range of collection which covers a period of five century. Looking at an art explores new ideas that enable and inspire to be more creative and develop critical thinking skills. The museum collection offers vivid surprising evidence of cultures from the past. The visit was an educational, cultural and entertaining experience to me. This was a meaningful training to me. A
One of the first exhibits visited was The Story of North Carolina: An Indian House that covered the history of the American Indians. It was learned that almost 400 years ago the English settled on Roanoke Island and found many Native American living on the coast. These Native Americans spoke three language groups, the Siouan, Iroquoian, and Algonquian. The Indians did not have a writing system, so many of their stories were told on oral traditions. The museum displayed the home of typical American Indian Piedmont Siouan tepee. We got to go inside this home, and watch a short video about the history of the Indians founded in North Carolina. There were artifacts on the farming tools use by the ...
“Art Museums and the Ritual of Citizenship.” in Exhibiting Cultures. Eds. Ivan Karp and Steven Lavine. Washington: Smithsonian Institution Press, 1991. Print.
I had an opportunity to visit the oriental institute museum . During my visit to the museum I was made aware of its location and the importance of it to chicago. The museum housed many exhibits of historical value dating civilization back to the paleolithic period of 2,500,000-100,000 B.C. Below you'll find examples of mans rise through the use of tools and refined skills from cave living to structured living throughout evolution. This is an experience that has grounded me to a new interest in structures that we have devised to become the homes we use today for the rest of my life.
Compared to the other Smithsonian institutions, such as the Museum of Natural History and the Air and Space Museum, the Museum of the American Indian’s exterior and shape stands out. The color of the building is a light tan, and the shape of the museum is a set of curves. Although the museum is in an urban, American setting, and the surrounding museums are about how the Europeans came and established
One pleasant afternoon, my classmates and I decided to visit the Houston Museum of Fine Arts to begin on our museum assignment in world literature class. According to Houston Museum of Fine Art’s staff, MFAH considers as one of the largest museums in the nation and it contains many variety forms of art with more than several thousand years of unique history. Also, I have never been in a museum in a very long time especially as big as MFAH, and my experience about the museum was unique and pleasant. Although I have observed many great types and forms of art in the museum, there were few that interested me the most.
...due to the external forces such as other settlers e.g. the Navajos, new settlers along with the Spanish conquerors entered their world. As a result the Pueblo Indians were imposed by these external forces especially through military power that changed their ways completely; having minimal cultural practices of their ancestors before them. The museum may seem like it’s very limited to what’s on exhibit mostly because not all of the building is in use. However the few exhibits they have is substantial in sparking an interest or even beginning to understand the cultures of Native Americans.
There were several pieces of arrow heads, pots, and animal furs. I had the opportunity to talk to one of the workers about one of the fish traps. One of the more interesting displays was a replica of a forest. As you walked you could hear various pieces of information, such as how a new born baby boy would be wrapped in a cougar’s hide while a girl was wrapped in a fawn’s. As you exited that part of the museum there was a circular room with holographic images of a group of Chickasaws dancing around a fire. I might have felt a little silly running around it with my
Pros of The Studio School include that it allowed people, both men and women, to learn how to draw and paint. The school allowed for more artists to enter the art scene, and were allowed to create work that reflected whatever inspired them. Inspiration came from their heritage or even other pieces of art like pottery, beadwork, or basketwork. Students were not taught and drew and painted with their natural ability. Cons of The Studio School include that it resulted in the same type of style, Studio Style, being represented in numerous pieces of art. While students were able to draw and paint whatever they liked, the school, particularly Dorothy Dunn a teacher at the Studio School, encouraged a two dimensional design resulting in similar pieces of art. Also, a lot of the work depicted similar aspects of Native life such as dancing, ceremonies, and ceremonial figures. The Studio School kept Native art in this stylistic framework for quite some time because some artists never strayed from this style of art. The National Museum of the American Indian (NMAI) is a museum in Washington D.C. that was founded in 1989. Like The Studio School, the NMAI also received mixed reviews. Pros of the NMAI include that it allows all Native peoples to have a visual voice. All Native peoples throughout America are represented in the NMAI. People also like the design of the museum itself. It is not like other museums, not only in the design of the building itself, but also the way the pieces of art are displayed. The way the art is displayed is more like Native storytelling. The art is also displayed without any labels identifying what the piece is. Cons of the NMAI include that it is too ambitious and it doesn 't address colonization or the negative aspects of contact. The museum is leaving out part of Native peoples story and how they were impacted by contact with
Items displayed in museums hold historical significance and are representative of society’s culture. Preserving valuable collections for education and enjoyment is a primary role of museums. While fulfilling this role, the architecture of the museum is also an important factor. Historical buildings are converted into museums and architects must consider the use of the space and the museum’s purpose during their initial design. Other museums are built with a clear purpose in mind. As museums are designed, many characteristics are determined. Display and storage spaces as well as visitor services impacts museum’s functionality. Based on the function of a museum, architectural requirements are different.
The museum is run by the community not the state and is in a building that was once part of District Six. It is very appropriate to have a museum like this in post Apartheid South Africa so that people will never forget what happened during Apartheid and so that people who were affected by apartheid can tell others what happened.
I find it to be disrespectful and insensitive. The Natives have already had so much taken from them in their own home, and to now act as if we have some sort of claim to their culture is just another example of Native oppression by the majority. It isn't fair to them therefor I think that Native property should be displayed in museums only when there hasn't been any expressed opposition by the majority. I think that perhaps if they get the blessing of an organization that promotes the Native American interest such as NCAI ( National Congress of American Indians) or the BIA (Bureau of Indian
The museum was fabulous, that was my first visit and it preceded its reputation. I was impressed with the introduction to the entrance to the museum. Before I describe my experience at the museum, I must give kudos to my professor Ms. Narayan, who prepared the way for us to attend the museum. There was no hassle in the parking lot or no confusion at the designated meeting area, all was on point. For that I say thank you, Dr. Narayan.
When first arriving at the museum it was an old styled, rustic, building that was not very modern, which I think fits into the theme of the museum. The outside of the building had history, similar to how the inside of museum is filled with a history. There was also an impressive statue of former president Theodore Roosevelt. I thought it was an interesting display, but Theodore Roosevelt was an advocate for the preservation of national parks and the conservation of animals, moreover, I thought it was a great tribute to him. I think the outside of the museum shows how rich the history of the world is and there is so much to learn. The past has been polished for the people of the present to understand and admire. Overall, I felt every exhibit was easy to understand and not intimidating; subsequently, it was easy for children and adults to look at.