The Framers of the constitution wanted a government where the national government gained power from the states, as a stronger national government would help fix the issues the Articles of Confederation had caused. They didn’t want the national government to be too powerful and controlling though, because that would upset the Americans who had fought to get rid of the unitary system that had governed them while they under British control. Federalism provided the American people a government where things could actually get done, while protecting the individual rights of the citizens. The necessary and proper clause, also known as the elastic clause, is located in Article 1, Section 8 of the constitution and states that any law can be created …show more content…
if it necessary or beneficial to the people. The first time it was ever used was to create the First National Bank under the Washington administration. Alexander Hamilton argued that a national bank would be necessary for the U.S., and cited the elastic clause as his reasoning to create the bank.
Marshall means that if the State had the power to tax anything, or in this case the National Bank, they could destroy it if they did not agree with it. Marshall used the supremacy clause, which states that the national law is the law to be followed over any state or other laws, in order to deny Maryland, and other states the right to tax national government institutions. It is a valid argument, as he had the supremacy clause from the constitution to back up his decision to keep order in the states. In the case McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) the main questions in the case were if the national government had the right to charter a bank, and if a state could tax the bank. The Marshall Court, siting the necessary and proper clause, declared Congress could charter banks, and that because of the supremacy clause denied the power that states could tax the bank. In Gibbons v. Ogden (1824) New York tried to give two men the power to use the Hudson river for only themselves in trade. The main question in this case was how far Congress’ power could go in the commerce clause, and Marshall’s Court decided that Congress could also control interstate commerce …show more content…
activity. In Barron v. Baltimore (1833) Marshall’s Court ruled that enumerated rights only applied to the national government in the Bill of Rights, not individuals. Nullification is the right of a state to declare a federal law unconstitutional. In the policymaking process, it can be used so that when there is a law the state deems unconstitutional, they can refuse to implement the law. It’s the people speaking their thoughts on a matter that is less rash then secession, but not just submission to their government, and the federal government can’t do too much to stop the nullification process.
The federal government started to expand after the sixteenth Amendment passed; Congress gained the power to levy and collect an income tax without giving any money to the states. With the Seventeenth Amendment states lost their protection in the Senate as the people voted for their senate representation instead of the state legislation deciding. Certain New Deal programs had the state become especially more involved with state policies. The Federal Housing Administration provided funds to help build new homes, and other agencies such as the Civilian Conservation Corps and the Public Works Administration provided jobs to Americans who desperately needed them to support their families. The Agricultural Adjustment Administration and the National Recovery Administration gave limits to production in agriculture while helping them with subsidies. Many thought that these acts went beyond Congress’ ability to regulate commerce, and some of the agencies were declared unconstitutional. Dual federalism is the belief that the best type of government is one with equally powerful and separate levels of
government. Supporters of this form of federalism often thought that national governments should not exceed the enumerated powers. John Marshall’s successor, Chief Justice Roger B. Taney believed in this layer-cake federalism style. Taney’s Court held up Marshall’s nationalistic doctrines, as well as emphasizing that states should be able to make necessary laws for themselves. During F.D. R’s New Deal more money was given to the states for public work projects, giving the government a lot of power in domestic policy. Until 1960, most federal grant projects were made in cooperation with the states, but today grants go out to state and local governments, organizations, and individuals. The grants today are to help give more funds to state and local governments, to help set standards for national problems such as clean air and water, and to help even the playing field between richer and poorer states. Block grants are portions of money given to states with general use guidelines, and have helped funding of education and healthcare. Categorical grants can go to states for funding in environmental development and pollution control. Like President Obama I would advocate for progressive federalism, where the relationship between the states and the national government is cooperative. Public policies such as Obama’s administration allowing states to declare stricter air pollution laws let the states lead, while also moving towards cleaner air laws. Other laws, such as healthcare or education acts, can be national government led in order to help out the states or individuals that need more help. This type of federal-state relationship hypothetically allows the country to work together and help improve the lives of Americans, but only if the government can work with itself.
Maryland 's main arguments were as follows: 1) they had the right to regulate businesses and taxes within their state 2) the Federal government regulated state banks so why couldn’t a state regulate a Federal bank 3) the Constitution gives the Federal government no authority to set up a bank, and therefore it was unconstitutional. On the other side, McCullough 's arguments were: 1) Congress had deemed the creation of a national bank as necessary and proper as a way to conduct financial operations 2) the Constitution is only a framework and not all national operations that may arise could have been listened 3) the federal government is supreme over the state government, and therefore Maryland has no right to question the Second Bank of the United States. In the end, John Marshall gave his verdict in favor of McCulloch and the federal government. In his explanation, he said because of Article I, Section 8 Congress could indeed do whatever they felt was necessary under the “Elastic Clause”. Also, Marshall referred to the Supremacy Clause when he said “As long as the national government behaved in accordance with the Constitution, it’s policies took precedence over state policies”. Finally, Marshall laid out the groundwork for the “implied powers”, which are the powers of the government which have not been explicitly granted by the Constitution.
You little tyrant king george off with your head.Since the Americans had a bad experience with one person having too much power they made a constitution that guarded against tyranny by, dividing power, making the branches able to check or limit each other, and dividing power between big and little states.
In his speech, The Making of the U.S. Constitution, Gordon Wood discusses the history of how the U.S. Constitution came to be. He explains what factors contributed to its making and what the general consensus was about it during the time. He explains that the reason the constitution was created was because the government needed more power. Why did the government need more power? In short, to unify the 13 states and make life, in general, easier for its citizens, officers, artisans, and even to help with commercial interests (Wood, 2012).
The states attempted to limit the power of the national government because they feared that it would become a monarchy. In an effort to limit the power of the national government, Congress created one without enough power to govern effectively, which led to serious national and international problems. One of the main weaknesses under the Articles of Confederation was its incapability to regulate trade and levy taxes. The states controlled all of their “cash flows.” Sometimes, the states were in debt because of tariff wars that they would engage in with one another.
Eric Foner claims the definition of Federalism refers to the relationship between the national government and the states. Unlike the Constitution, the Articles of Confederation came with many weaknesses. Some provided by our powerpoint include that the Federal government had no power to make the states obey the Articles and laws that were passed by the legislature. The states also had the power to tax, and the opportunity to print their own money. Our powerpoint focuses on the $10 million Congress owed to other countries, as well as the $40 million it owed to the American veterans. The Constitution differed. Foner states that not only did the Constitution enhance national authority, but it also permitted Congress to levy taxes, conduct commerce, confirm war, deal with the foreign nations and Indians, and rent and help the “general welfare”. According to the powerpoint, Federalists focused on the weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation.
The power to tax is key to a successful government. If a government is to act it needs the means to do so. The Articles withheld the power of taxation from Congress and gave it to the local governments. Congress could only appeal to the states for money. Unsurprisingly, the states did not respond with any of the requested money. This was a serious problem because the U.S. was in an incredible amount of debt as a result of the Revolutionary War. If money cannot be collected, how are debts to be paid? Some in Congress believed the problem could be solved by printing more money. However, this strategy only led to inflation, which weakened the economy furthe...
The Articles of Association Every major role in the government. Not satisfied with this system led to the US constitution, increase the power of the national government. Although the national government has imposed its will succeed in suspending the crisis, the question of the exact relationship between the central government and individual states were still open. The civil war is, in part, a struggle over the meaning of the federal system and the appropriate relationship between the national and state governments. After termination of the reconstruction, the United States operates under a dual federal system. The start of the Great Depression in 1929 brought forward new calls to change the current federal system. According to him, the relationship between the national government and the states change in what has been described as cooperative federalism. In an effort to reduce federal control, Nixon has introduced a financing mechanism known as block funding and trying a slightly different version of the Union, which he called the new federal. Add new, federal actions have been described as federal enforcement where federal regulations are used to force states to change their policies in order to achieve national objectives. Under a federal system, the state is basically 50 laboratory setting to experiment with different approaches to the problem of determining which works
Despite the downfall of the Federalist Party in the early nineteenth century, John Marshall continued to exert a strong Federalist influence on the government, which acted as a catalyst to ignite political controversy. In the McCullough vs. Maryland trial of 1819, Marshall deemed Maryland taxing the second bank of the United States as being unconstitutional, which gave even more power to the central government. (Doc D) Majority of the American population was against his ruling and refuted it because many people believed that having a strong central government was bad because if a bad decision was made, it would have affected the entire union, whereas if there was a strong state government, a bad decision would have just hurt the state. However, this was not the only time where the economy had failed in the early 1800’s. In 1816, John Randolph addressed congress and stated that it was unjust to tax the poo...
...ers. It also defined what power a state has over a legitimate federal institution. For example, a state may not use its power to impede the operation of a federal institution by taxing its activities, but still has the authority to collect property tax from a federal institution.
In the Constitution, central and state governments received power that was shared and split in a federalist system, preventing tyranny of one over the other. Madison put forward his idea of federalism in Federalist Paper #51. “...the power surrendered by the people is first divided between two distinct governments...The different governments will each control each other, at the same time each will be controlled by itself” (Doc. A). A Venn diagram derived from the Constitution shows that the central government controlled national affairs such as war, foreign trade, and foreign relations, and states controlled internal affairs such as establishing public services and regulating in-state businesses. The shared powers included taxes, loans, and laws. Despite Madison’s bias towards the federalist system (rarely does one truly attack one’s own political treatise within it) in his quote, the apportioning of powers shows that neither the central or st...
In my opinion, the relationship between the Federal government and the States is unclear whether which institution has the authority to implement legislations. The vagueness of the American constitution particularly in the 10th Amendment of the Constitution that quote ” The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.” The ambiguous of the American Constitution may be the main cause of the over power of Federal government.
Contrary to what I believed in the past, the United States federal government retained and expanded their power and authority during the years of the Civil war along with the period of Reconstruction. Through drafts and monitored elections, they exercised this power during the Civil War. Then, as Reconstruction began, they initiated other methods of increasing their authority over the citizens. Military was placed in Southern states, by the federal government, in order to keep control over the rebellious people. Not only that, but, the idea of putting the federal government in charge of Reconstruction and rebuilding an entire nation gave them an enormous amount of power. Finally, the creation of the 14th and 15th Amendment were two more big achievements on the part of the government.
Whereas the six functions of government, as articulated in the Preamble remain the same, the functions have extended to govern issues not a factor during the 18th century. However, the primary function of the government to maintain order has remained unchanged. Demonstrated through various avenues, these functions are open to interpretation. Throughout time, the government continuously adapted itself to provide various services and regulations to the public that it views as beneficial for the public good. Such services have grown to include food standards, consumer protection, health, and education among others. Examples of governmental function expansion since ratification of the constitution can be seen in the Department of Agriculture, the Department of Energy, FEMA, and much more. Through FEMA, the federal government provides disaster relief funding to help communities struck by floods and tornadoes and other natural disasters. The Department of Agriculture put out the food pyramid, which helped people develop a healthy diet. The Department of Energy provides funding for research on wind energy. Clearly, food pyramids and wind energies were ...
The Constitution that was created had a strong central government and weaker state governments. Under the Constitution, Congress was given the power to levy taxes, regulate trade between the states, raise an army, control interstate commerce, and more. A three-branch government was established in which a judicial branch handled disputes in a federal court system, a President headed an executive branch, and a legislative branch. Conversely, the anti-federalists believed in weak central and strong state governments, as the way it was in The Articles of Confederation and believed in strict adherence to the writings of the constitution.
The American Revolution stirred political unity and motivated the need for change in the nation. Because many Americans fought for a more balanced government in the Revolutionary War, they initially created a weak national government that hampered the country's growth and expansion. In the Letter from Abigail Adams to Thomas Jefferson, Mrs. Adams complained about the inadequacy of power that the American government had to regulate domestic affairs. The Articles of Confederation was created to be weak because many had feared a similar governing experience that they had just eliminated with Britain. The alliance of states united the 13 local governments but lacked power to deal with important issues or to regulate diplomatic affairs. Congress did not have the power to tax, regulate trade, or draft people for war. This put the American citizens at stake because States had the power to refuse requests for taxes and troops (Document G). The weakened national government could not do anything about uprisings or small-scale protests because it did not have the power to put together an army. The deficiencies of the confederation government inspired the drafting of the American Constitution. The document itself embodied the principle of a national government prepared to deal with the nation's problems. In James Madison's Federalist Paper, he persuades the American public to adopt the Constitution so that the government can protect humans from their nature and keep them out of conflicts.