“The developments in the North were those loosely embraced in the term modernization and included urbanization, industrialization, and mechanization. While those changes went forward apace, the antebellum South changed comparatively little, clinging to its rural, agricultural, labor-intensive economy and its traditional folk culture” (C. Vann Woodward, 1951). Between the end of the War of 1812 in 1815 and the beginning of the American Civil War in 1861, the United States experienced a forty-six year period without war called the Antebellum; antebellum literally meaning “before war”. Obviously, the North and the South were different for many reasons, however, they did have similarities as well, both to be explored.
The North, known as the Union,
…show more content…
was immensely known for its industrious culture and manufacturing abilities.
Because they had more abundant natural resources, northern goods production flourished and produced a massive economic upswing. Although, some businesses relied on agriculture, the majority of the North was spotted with large cities, factories, and urban areas. It was difficult to manage farms in the north because of the short growing season and colder temperatures. In fact, the percentage of laborers working in agriculture dropped drastically from 70% to 40% between 1800 and 1860. The water-powered factories, however, thrived. Slave labor had died out in the North and was replaced by the overwhelming majority of immigrants from Europe looking for jobs in the factories of the North. As stated by Civilwar.org, “...seven out of every eight [immigrants]...” (“Overview: North and South”) settled in northern states instead of the South. Because of the influx in population, northern cities often became crowded and dirty, nonetheless, the cities continued to develop as trading centers. In addition to factories, the cities hosted many churches and schools. Actually, Northern children were moderately more prone to attend …show more content…
school than Southern children and they were more likely to acquire jobs in business, medicine, and education because only wealthy children were able to go to school in the South. College, on the other hand, was reserved for only the wealthy in the North. Also, the northern voters often gravitated towards the Whig or Republican party, whereas, the South was considered very Democratic. Another feature of the North was its canals and the abundance of railroad tracks, making easy transportation. Indeed, northern states “boasted… two-thirds of the railroad tracks” (“Overview: North and South”) in the country, according to Civilwar.org. The railroad tracks actually gave the North an advantage, later, during the Civil War. Where the northern states were advantageous over the south with manufacturing, the southern states, or the Confederacy, were superior in agriculture.
80% of all labor force in the South worked on farms. Southern men not working in agriculture had careers in the military. The long, warm southern summers with significant amounts of rainfall created perfect conditions for large plantations and small farmsteads. Plantation estates were owned by the wealthy upper-class, whereas, the farms were owned by the middle and lower classes. Plantations were self-sufficient and cultivated most of the cash crops including cotton, tobacco, rice, sugar cane, and indigo. As a matter of fact, as said by John Green in Crash Course U.S. History, “...three-quarters [of the world’s cotton] came from the American south…” (CrashCourse, 00:01:08-00:01:11). The success of the South’s economy was predominantly due to the large population of Africans, however, of the four-million blacks in the South, not all were slaves, but the crops grown in the south were almost always sown, worked, and harvested by captured Africans. Although, two-thirds of the white population of the South did not own slaves, many rented and borrowed them like property, to work their land. Most white southerners argued that slavery was essential to the South’s economy and some insisted it benefited the slaves. By 1860, the southern states’ “‘peculiar institution’...[became] inextricably tied” (“Overview: North and South”) within
the region’s culture and economy. Unlike the North, the southern community was spread out over the sixteen states and rarely populated large cities because plantations served themselves. Only one in ten of all people in the South lived in urban areas. Cities that did exist, like New Orleans, served as shipping ports and were located along rivers and the coast. Agricultural produce from the American south were often sent to the North and Europe in exchange for their available products. The sparsity of the South created transportation difficulties. 35% of the train tracks in the country were present in the South, but this method of travel was avoided. Instead, people walked, rode horses, or utilized river transportation, such as steamboats. This lead to some obstacles during the Civil War. The North and the South may seem disparate, however, they had a number of similarities. The most indisputable being their forms of government. Both the North and the South continued to manage a Constitutional Republic with three branches- the Legislative, Executive, and the Judicial branch. They operated under their own constitution and issued generally the same laws, with the exception of the Union outlawing slavery and the Confederacy exploiting it. Their social classes were also similar. A small upper class had a superiority over a large middle class and an even greater lower class. Also, both regions relied on each other. The North depended on produce for food and materials like cotton from the South to create textiles and other products, and the South depended on the North for finance of their land and insurance for their slaves. Even their military systems were equivalent. Strategies, tactics, the weaponry, their training, rank structure, and command were nearly the same. Additionally, when it came to the Civil War, both the North and the South had mostly volunteer armies. Even sports and music can be considered. The two were greatly important to soldiers, especially. According to Dennis Ova, “Baseball...was played...in both regions,” (Ova, “Similarities Between the North & South During the Civil War”) and similar music and games were played in military camps and prisons. Finally, it is unmistakable that both the Union and the Confederacy had a greater white population. The distinguished differences of the North and South lead to growing tension throughout the beginning of the 1800s and eventually broke out into the American Civil War. Although, it can be testified that the eventual peace between the two was due, in part, to their similarities. Even today the North and South have a prominent contrast, but they are, no doubt, unified under one flag and one constitution as the United States of America.
In “Antebellum Southern Exceptionalism: A New Look at an Old Question” James McPherson argues that the North and the South are two very different parts of the country in which have different ideologies, interests, and values. Mcpherson writes this to show the differences between the north and the south. He gives perspectives from other historians to show how the differently the differences were viewed. These differences included the north being more industrialized while the south was more agricultural. He gives evidence to how the differences between the north and south came together as the south produced tobacoo, rice, sugar and cotton, which was then sent to the north to be made into clothing or other fabrics. Mcpherson analyzes the differences
2) Was there any degree of autonomy in the lives of enslaved women in the revolutionary or antebellum America? Use the documents to address the question of whether or not an enslaved woman could protect the humanity and if so, explore how this might be achieved. Also include how the specific era (revolutionary or antebellum) affected her autonomy.
Slavery is perhaps the most polarizing subject of American history. Because of this, actual conditions of slavery are biased and marred by personal opinion. The abolitionists made use of the plights of slave in order to push their propaganda whereas the pro-slavery apologists maintained ignorance regarding the treatment of slaves. Because of these varied perspectives, the sources regarding the true nature of slavery are littered with bias. This bias leaves the modern historian trying to decipher the truth behind manipulated propaganda tales. This was the norm until 1956. It was this year in which Kenneth M. Stampp released his book entitled, The Peculiar Institution: Slavery in the Ante-Bellum South. Stampp successfully managed to create a book regarding slavery in the South without inserting his own personal bias. Because of this, Stampp was able to conclude that slavery was used primarily to exploit labor and to produce substantial revenue gains.
The population of the North consisted of forward thinking individuals. They realized that a change had to be made from agriculture to industry if they were to prosper and for them to use free labor to accomplish prosperity would be to take a step backwards. This ushered in an small and early Industrial Revolution. Factories and mills that produced finished goods sprung up all over the Northern United States along major waterways. These factories produced fabric, iron, machinery, weapons. Raw materials such as cotton was bought from the South and then sold back to them in the form of clothes. Iron workers made iron railroad ties for the growing railroads across the country. More machinery was being built than ever before. These machines were able to multiply the work that could be accomplished. These industries drew in people from rural areas because they were paying for work. As more people came, they settled around the factori...
“The contrast in the relative prominence of slavery between the Upper South and the Lower South reflects the adverse health conditions and arduous labor requirements of lowland rice cultivation, whereas tobacco farming continued to be attractive to free family farmers as well as to slave owners”(Engerman, Sutch, & Wright, 2004). The lower South depended on their slaves more than the Upper because they were in the process of cropping tobacco. The Upper South had to keep up with the lower south, because they had to focus on their slave trade that would build and expand their plantations. During this era, the diverse between these two regions were more concerned with the values of slaves. The values of slave price can increase because of high demands between the upper and the lower South. As the upper South was coming up short, the slave profession took off. The slave profession helped the Upper South, yet there were numerous deformities. The slave percentage was at the end of its usefulness of significance “in the Upper South” significance it had a weaker understanding of community reliability than in the cotton areas. This made the upper south separate on what the future may hold. It was not clear on whether if the future was based on the Deep South’s financial growth between the North and the
The Northern economy was on of industrialization, urbanization, and the embrace of new technologies, such as the use of trains for transportation, and shipping goods. Factories were built. City living, and paid labor became the way of life for much of the North. Slavery was never really a factor to the Northern economy, so non-slave owners in the North, greatly out numbered the small number of slave owners that remained.
1. The insight that each of these sources offers into slave life in the antebellum South is how slaves lived, worked, and were treated by their masters. The narratives talk about their nature of work, culture, and family in their passages. For example, in Solomon Northup 's passage he describes how he worked in the cotton field. Northup said that "An ordinary day 's work is considered two hundred pounds. A slave who is accustomed to picking, is punished, if he or she brings less quantity than that," (214). Northup explains how much cotton slaves had to bring from the cotton field and if a slave brought less or more weight than their previous weight ins then the slave is whipped because they were either slacking or have no been working to their
The Union economy was based on manufacturing, and even the minorities in the North were better off than those in the South most of the time. The Northern politicians wanted tariffs, and a large army. The Southern plantation owners wanted the exact opposite.
The southern economy was largely dependent on slaves, who worked on the numerous plantations of the South. Moreover, the main purpose of slavery in the South was for the cultivation of these cotton plantations. (Doc 4) For this reason, southerners believed
In the north, machines, interchangeable parts, and mass production were fast becoming a way of life. Northerners began building factories for mass production. These first factories were used for making textiles and later evolved to manufacturing a wide variety of goods. This created several opportunities for jobs. And with immigrants flooding in from Europe, finding employment was no problem. The factory system was efficient and inexpensive for the north to employ a large work force.
Secondly, the demand for cotton grew tremendously as cotton became an important raw material for the then developing cotton industries in the North and Britain. The growing of cotton revived the Southern economy and the plantations spread across the south, and by 1850 the southern U.S produced more than 80% of cotton all over the world. As this cotton based economy of the south grew so did the slave labor to work in these large scale plantations since they were more labor-intensive...
Near the end of the Antebellum Era, tensions and sectionalism increased as the states argued over what was constitutional. The South had later seceded from the United States and had become the Confederacy of America while the North had remained as the Union. The South had fully supported states’ rights while the north had strongly disapproved it. However, westward expansion, southern anger with the abolitionists, and the secession of the South that had destroyed the feeling of unity in the country because of the disagreement over slavery had been the main factors to the cause of the Civil War. Therefore, since slavery was the primary reason for the discontent in the country, it had been the primary cause of the Civil War.
The North and South were forming completely different economies, and therefore completely different geographies, from one another during the period of the Industrial Revolution and right before the Civil War. The North’s economy was based mainly upon industrialization from the formation of the American System, which was producing large quantities of goods in factories. The North was becoming much more urbanized due to factories being located in cities, near the major railroad systems for transportation of the goods, along with the movement of large groups of factory workers to the cities to be closer to their jobs. With the North’s increased rate of job opportunities, many different people of different ethnic groups and classes ended up working together. This ignited the demise of the North’s social order. The South was not as rapidly urbanizing as the North, and therefore social order was still in existence; the South’s economy was based upon the production of cotton after Eli Whitney’s invention of the cotton gin. Large cotton plantations’ production made up the bulk of America’s...
The North had confidently been recognized as a manufacturing society. Labor was needed, although not necessarily slave labor. Immigration was an encouragement. Immigrants that were from European regions worked in factories, built the railroads in the North, and developed the West. Very little stayed put in the South.
“The two sections diverged in other ways industrialization of the North went hand in hand with the expansion of the transportation system, so canals and railroads were built. In 1860 the South had 9,000 miles of railroad, while the North had 22,000 miles. Industrialization also required a financial network: banks, insurance companies and corporations. The South needed only cotton factors to represent the interests of the slave-owning plantations” (“Encyclopedia of American Social History”). The changes in the population and demographics in the United States in the years leading up to the American Civil War were even more dramatic. The following quote outlines the dramatic demographic changes affecting the two distinct sections of the country. “While the South was slow to change, the North had enough change for both sections. Prior to the Civil War, the United States as a whole was an agrarian society, but the North was becoming industrialized and urban. In 1860, 10% of Southerners lived in urban areas; as compared with 25% of Northerners. The Southern white labor force remained 80 percent agricultural in the first half of the