Should Teens be Allowed to Refuse Medical Treatment? People should have rights to their own bodies. Refusing medical treatment is something that people do not always have the rights to do. They may want to do this for different reasons; maybe they want to find another way to get their treatment or they do not have time to do treatments. Teens should be able to refuse medical treatment because they have the right to be able to take care of your mental and physical health, they are mature enough to make these kinds of choices, and the costs of treatments and bills. Having the right to refuse medical treatment can benefit and help teens in many ways. It can help teens maintain their health and well-being. When patients are allowed to make shared decisions about their options of treatment, it can lead to them having better outcomes with their long-term health. Those who take part in making choices are more likely to stick to their treatment plans and are less likely to regret their choices (Landro). In hospitals, patients are allowed to ask to be discharged …show more content…
As of 2014, the average household income per year, in thousands, was $53,657. This amount is a decline from the previous years (Lee, p.C.1.). A woman was airlifted to a hospital to receive an emergency surgery that would stop a severe brain bleed. The total cost of her medical bills were $285,507.58. This price was after a twenty percent discount was deducted for patients who were uninsured (Rosenthal). A quote from an article states that “patients who were encouraged by health coaches to get more involved in choices had 5.3% lower overall medical admissions, 12.5% fewer hospital admissions and fewer elective surgeries.” (Landro). This quote has importance with this issue because it helps to explain how being able to have control can help out with the long-term effects people experience in the
Autonomy is a concept found in moral, political, and bioethical reasoning. Inside these connections, it is the limit of a sound individual to make an educated, unpressured decision. Patient autonomy can conflict with clinician autonomy and, in such a clash of values, it is not obvious which should prevail. (Lantos, Matlock & Wendler, 2011). In order to gain informed consent, a patient
In the case study, Betty was adamant in refusing treatment, despite the risks of the illness progressing and potentially leading to death; under the laws of the medical treatment act (1988) any adult who exhibits competency has the right to refuse treatment, even if refusal of care increases the risk to their health, this right is based on autonomy (3). The information outlined suggests that Betty was capable of making a decision as she fulfils all the elements of consent; therefore she is competent and has the right to deny treatment. Betty acknowledges the risks of not receiving treatment and admits that not receiving treatment will make it difficult, demonstrating her sound understanding of the risk and benefits of the outcomes. For a patient to fulfil the element of understanding they must receive, process and incorporate the information they are provided with into their own personal values and Betty demonstrates this level of understanding by sticking to her values, her decision to stay home and by acknowledging the difficulties and risks of not receiving treatment (3). Once Betty received a diagnosis she was informed by the paramedic of the outcomes and potential risks of not receiving treatment for her condition, Betty was sufficiently informed with information and risks relevant to her situation, enabling her to make an informed decision (3). In order for consent to be considered voluntary, a patient must consent to treatment in an environment free of threat and pressure; if a patients decision is genuine they will also accept responsibility for the outcomes and understand the risks (3). Voluntary consent is a slightly grey area in Betty’s scenario, her son is potentially placing pressure on Betty with his demands, however, Betty expresses responsibility by admitting it will be difficult to and
This paper will focus on the two different sides of adolescents and their choice concerning end of life care. The first section will be adolescent centered and will help to provide a backbone to reinforce the choices they legally should be able to make using their right to autonomy. The American Academy of Pediatrics and the Institute of Medicine did a very helpful study, that is pro adolescent choice that will be discussed in the first section of the paper. The second section will focus on Paternalism and the ethics behind the health care team making the ultimate decision that will benefit the patient. As well as information and studies in regard to an adolescent’s decision making process, and their tendency to be impulsive.
Patients’ autonomy is the respect for the decision-making capacity of competent adults. This has now been fully integrated into the practice of medicine. This ‘patient’s right’ to accept or refuse medical care changed the balance of power in the patient-physician relationship and engaged the patient more in ownership of care plans and it is viewed by patient and physician, essential for honoring the individual and his or her dignity. (4)
Though these legislative guidelines deal with the rights of a patient to refuse current medical treatment, ...
Alan Goldman argues that medical paternalism is unjustified except in very rare cases. He states that disregarding patient autonomy, forcing patients to undergo procedures, and withholding important information regarding diagnoses and medical procedures is morally wrong. Goldman argues that it is more important to allow patients to have the ability to make autonomous decisions with their health and what treatment options if any they want to pursue. He argues that medical professionals must respect patient autonomy regardless of the results that may or may not be beneficial to a patient’s health. I will both offer an objection and support Goldman’s argument. I will
Almost everybody on Long Island, and probably all around the world, has been prescribed a drug by a doctor before— whether it was to knock out a nasty virus, or relieve pain post injury or surgery. However, what many people don’t realize is that these drugs can have highly addictive qualities, and more and more people are becoming hooked, specifically teenagers. But when does harmlessly taking a prescription drug to alleviate pain take the turn into the downward spiral of abuse? The answer to that question would be when the user begins taking the drug for the “high” or good feelings brought along with it—certainly not what it was prescribed for (1). The amount of teens that abuse prescription medications has been rapidly increasing in recent
¨ If I cannot give my consent to my own death, whose body is this? Who owns my life?- Sue Rodriguez. If one cannot choose when they die and how they go out, then are we really the owner of our life and body? Physician assisted suicide is the practice of providing a competent patient with a prescription for medication for the patient to use with the primary intention of ending his or her own life. When the patient is terminally ill and is in a lot of pain they should be able to end their own life instead of waiting for it to end itself. Even though some argue that physician assisted suicide is not a humane way of dying it still stops the patient´s suffering and gives them peace of mind.
Imagine yourself laying on your deathbed, hooked up to countless machines. The doctors are constantly coming to check you while you're trying to get what little sleep you can through the agonizing pain. Even more you're suffering from the side effects of countless drugs, constipation, delirium, you can barely breathe and you've lost all your appetite. There no chance of survival and death is imminent, it's just a matter of time when. You just lay there fighting for your last seconds. Now, if you had the chance to choose how your life ended, wouldn't you choose how and when it ends? Hence, doctor assisted suicide should be a legal option for terminally ill patients. This is a humane way for them to end their lives with dignity, without shame and suffering. We don't have the freedom of speech unless we have the freedom to refuse to speak. The same goes for our rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, we can't have complete freedom unless we have the freedom to deny these things. We can't claim full control over our life if we cannot choose when to end it. Thus, people should be given the right to assisted suicide in order to end their unnecessary suffering, to preserve the individual right of people to determine their own fate, and to reduce the burden on their families both, financially and emotionally.
their medical coverage. In the current system, it costs about $8,400 per household for medical
Advocates of this issue believe that minors should have the right to be in charge of their medical decisions. Dr. Eric Kodish believes that decisions made by teenagers on the older side who are able to make a righteous decision should be carried out. “I think the ethics of modern American life suggest that if people have the capacity to make a decision, they should be free to refuse treatment” (Shute 1). Advocates of minors being able to make their own medical decisions believe that if the minor shows enough maturity understanding of their desired action, then it should be respected and carried out. Dr. Eric Kodish uses what he calls “The Rule of 7s” to determine when a child should be allowed to make the decision.
Teen Drug Use I once read in an article “Some teens use alcohol or drugs to dull the pain in their lives”. When they are given a choice to take something to make them temporarily feel better, many cannot resist” (Look). The use of drugs will [affect] the everyday lives of many teenagers today. Throughout history, more and more teenagers have turned to the use of drugs to help them through their everyday struggles. Many teens often feel as if they cannot deal with the everyday pain they may be going through.
Specific Purpose: To inform my audience about the dangers of prescription drugs when not taken as prescribed by your physician or pharmacist.
In recent years, smoking has started to take over the lives of many teenagers. The number of teenagers smoking has increased dramatically in the last several years. This is a major problem because smoking can lead to sickness and major diseases that can lead to death. Teens tend to participate in this while out of the presence of an adult figure. Although teens should not be smoking in the first place, an adult figure should be around to help insure that their children are doing the right things, even when they are behind sealed doors with their peers. Teenagers as they mature become a model for younger children and when they set the example of smoking can ruin their respectable image to the children that look up to them.
Each day drugs make a huge impact on our generation. Throughout this topic I would like to know what causes teenagers to try illegal drugs and how impacts their lives. Drugs can affect a person in different parts of their lives. For example their education, work, personal life, and can affect the relationship with their family and friends.