Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Aspects of effective communication
Ethics and religion
Aspects of effective communication
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Don’t Rely on Yourself
(A Discussion of Jonathan Edwards’ Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God)
In today’s world, cultures are separated by religion. Some people are polytheistic, some are Buddhist, and others are Jewish. The religion that Jonathan Edwards belonged to was Christianity, in which he preached sermons, often begging people to repent of their sins. While his sermon that was called Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God was a bit aggressive, he made several great points, which made it a wonderfully persuasive talk. “Jonathan Edwards is America's most penetrating, rigorous, and subtle theologian, as well as its most literarily accomplished and influential.” (Schwarz). Edwards used three methods, which were using powerful words,
…show more content…
intimidating language, and personal speaking, to convert others to his ways. In Sinners, Edwards used powerful words to grasp the attention of his listeners. “That world of misery, that lake of burning brimstone, is extended abroad under you. There is the dreadful pit of the glowing flames of the wrath of God...” (87). When using words that have such a protruding voice, it is no wonder that Edwards was able to have his audience clinging on to every word. With the language he used, he was able to confuse people enough to help them see his true point, oddly enough. “Powerful words and transparency rise to the surface again and again and make the article so meaningful.” (Spann). Powerful words give boring sermons a new meaning, bringing life into the vacantness. Edwards truly was a brilliant speaker in many ways. The second method Edwards used in Sinners was that of intimidating language.
When he spoke, others had no choice but to listen to the words that he presented to them. He often spoke in loud volumes, clutching the eyes of wandering faces. “The God that hold you over the pit of Hell, much as one holds a spider or some loathsome insect over the fire, abhors you, and is dreadfully provoked…” (89). The words spewing from Edwards’ mouth during his sermon made sure that every person’s full focus was on him and him alone. “Of course, there's a difference between hearing and listening, and all of us could use practice with the latter.” (Onderko). With hearing and listening, however, Edwards made sure that there was no difference, as everyone around him heard every word with an intent heart.
Lastly, in Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God, Edwards uses the method of personal speaking. He could have a audience with hundreds of people and make it feel as though you were the only person there listening. “God stands ready to pity you” (89). While he was often times talking to a large group, he used words that were direct towards a single member of the congregation, not using plural words. “ It implies, that they were always exposed to sudden unexpected destruction.” (Enfield). Edwards was an astonishing speaker because he was able to grasp the concept of getting every person’s attention, and keeping
it. While Jonathan Edwards may have been an aggressive speaker, he was a good one. He knew how to wow people with his words, and keep them clutching to every word. “Edwards did not accept his theological inheritance passively. In his “Personal Narrative” he confesses that, from his childhood on, his mind “had been full of objections”” (Schafer). Not everyone starts their life believing, but Edwards made sure that people didn’t end their lives the same. Works Cited Enfield, J. “Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God.” CBN.com - The Christian Broadcasting Network, 26 Sept. 2013, www1.cbn.com/churchandministry/sinners-in-the-hands-of-an-angry-god. Onderko. “This Is the Secret to a Healthy Relationship.” SUCCESS, 17 July 2017, www.success.com/article/this-is-the-secret-to-a-healthy-relationship. Schafer, Thomas A. “Jonathan Edwards.” Encyclopædia Britannica, Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc., 20 Oct. 2016, www.britannica.com/biography/Jonathan-Edwards. Schwarz, Benjamin. “New & Noteworthy.” The Atlantic, Atlantic Media Company, 1 Apr. 2003, www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2003/04/new-noteworthy/302707/. Spann. “The 10.” Wordsandphrases.org, open.buffer.com/motivation-words/.
Jonathan Edwards creates a more effective argument for the intended audience in “Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God” than “The Speech in the Virginia Convention” written by Patrick Henry, by utilizing various techniques. Patrick Henry makes a strong argument however in the end, Edwards’ sermon grows to be more effective. Edwards creates the argument by strengthening the writing through tone, structure, fallacies and knowledge of the congregation that became his audience. Henry’s piece uses methods of oratory persuasion but the actual topic of “Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God” has an advantage from the start by appealing to fear, a fallacy of logic. Even with the strong basis “The Speech in the Virginia Convention” by Patrick Henry, Edwards’ “Sinners in the hands of an Angry God” proves the more effective piece in the end.
Jonathan Edward's sermon "Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God," was an example of a persuasive speech in which Edwards used scare tactics to persuade his audience. Jonathan Edwards' purpose was simply to convey a message to the people of the church with intentions of changing their moral and religious views. Edwards often appealed to reason and logic and highly emotional "fire and brimstone" techniques to convey his point.
Edwards immediately begins with a harsh, almost cruel, tone with the use of abrasive diction. His first moments of preaching the sermon had the use of words such as, “over the pit of hell;..deserved the fiery pit… wrath in hell… devil is waiting for them,” (1). Edwards
In the passages “Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God” by Jonathan Edwards and “Minister’s Black Veil” by Nathaniel Hawthorne are both powerful text. Edwards used more of an effective style to get his point through. He used a harsh and blunt tone to prove the God is a powerful man and can strike at any time but does not. This is why his text is better that Hawthornes.
The passages given from the Edwards' 'Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God'; and the opening sentence of the Declaration both include many points such as the tone, diction, and syntax. The points shown throughout each sentence aims for the intent of obtaining the attention of the audience. The way each sentence is arranged with its own syntax can very well appeal to listeners, depending on its structure and imagery.
In these text, “The Minister’s Black Veil” and “The Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God” the preachers are teaching their congregations a lesson.
On July 8th 1741, Jonathan Edwards preached the sermon “Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God” in Enfield, Connecticut. Edwards states to his listeners that God does not lack in power, and that people have yet not fallen to destruction because his mercy. God is so forgiving that he gives his people an opportunity to repent and change their ways before it was too late. Edwards urges that the possibility of damnation is immanent. Also that it urgently requires the considerations of the sinner before time runs out. He does not only preach about the ways that make God so omnipotent, but the ways that he is more superior to us. In his sermon, Edwards uses strong, powerful, and influential words to clearly point out his message that we must amend our ways or else destruction invincible. Edwards appeals to the spectators though the various usages of rhetorical devices. This includes diction, imagery, language/tone and syntax. Through the use of these rhetoric devices, Edwards‘s purpose is to remind the speculators that life is given by God and so they must live according to him. This include...
Figurative language is used in a lot of writings to pull you more into the words. Figurative language uses the five senses to place a deep picture in your mind of what is actually happening. Metaphors, similes, personification, hyperbole, etc. are all figurative devices used in writing. Without using any of these things writing would be straight forward and not so complicated to understand. When figurative language is used it makes the reader really think about what is being said by the author and what point the author is trying to make. Both "The Iroquois Constitution” and "Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God” use figurative language but for different reasons.
In the story “Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God” the author Jonathan Edwards uses
Starting in his younger years, Edwards struggled with accepting the Calvinist sovereignty of God. Various circumstances throughout Edward’s own personal life led to him later believing in the sovereignty of God. Jonathan Edwards is known greatly as a key figure in what has come to be called the First Great Awakening of the 1730s and 1740s. Fleeing from his grandfather’s original perspective by not continuing his practice of open communion, there was a struggle to maintain that relationship. Edward’s believed that physical objects are only collections of sensible ideas, which gives good reasoning for his strong religious belief system.
... and taught that mankind is not immortal but weak and in need of God’s sovereignty. Edwards wrote "the God that holds you over the pit of hell…” meaning God has the power to strike man down at any time. He stressed that mankind is small and God is much bigger. He thought that mankind must be submissive to God in order to please God.
In 1741, Jonathan Edwards, a Puritan preacher of that time, had one thing on his mind: to convert sinners, on the road to hell, to salvation. It just so happened to be, that his way of doing that was to preach the reality to them and scare them to the point of conversion. Sermons of this time were preached to persuade people to be converted and to me it seemed that Edwards just had a special way of doing it. Just as people are being influenced by rhetoric appeals today Edwards used the same method on his congregation. In “Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God” Jonathan Edwards positively affected his readers using pathos, logos, and ethos, while trying to convince the unconverted members of his sermon to be born again.
To begin, Edwards utilizes variation in tone to provoke fear and guilt among his congregation. For example, Edwards claims “all your righteousness, would have no more influence to uphold you and keep you
In order to understand Edwards use of language however, one must look at his early life and formative influences. His family undoubtedly shaped his religious career because “[H]e was the only son among the eleven children of Rev. Timothy Edwards and Esther Edwards, the daughter of influential puritan clergymen Solomon Stoddard” (Wachal 1). Growing up in a religious family must have influenced his career path. Then “Edwards attended Yale School of theology at 13 years of age” (Paposian 1). This is important because at Yale, Edwards would create his own “unique style of preaching” (“Jonathan Edwards” Dictionary 1). Here “his theology which soon came to be known as Edwardseanism had developed in hi...
For example, he quotes 1Timothy 1:17 and then declares “As I read the words, there came into my soul . . . a sense of the glory of the Divine Being; a new sense, quite different from anything I ever experienced before.” (313-314). This declaration shows that as he becomes more familiar with scripture, he is able to open his heart and grow more in love with God. Edwards later states how upset he is that he had not sought out a close relationship with God sooner because he deeply wishes he would have had more time to “grow in grace”(315); this statement comes after he quotes Psalms 119:28 “My soul breaketh for the longing it hath.” (315). It’s evident through the use of this verse how strongly he longs for a fuller and closer bond with God and Christ. Furthermore, he expresses that same sense of yearning when he states “I very often think . . . of being a little child, taking hold of Christ, to be led by him through the wilderness of this world.” (316) and follows it with the verse Matthew 18:3. Through quoting this verse, he once again reinforces how greatly affected by scripture his bond with God is, and how it leaves him seeking to be led even more by