Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Particle Physics plays an important role in attempting to answer many modern cosmological theories, notably: dark matter, structure formation, baryogenesis and nucleosynthesis. I am going to discuss some of connections between particle physics and cosmology and investigate how experimental particle physics and cosmology can complement each other and how dependable the connections are.
Dark Matter
There is now strong evidence pointing towards the existence of dark matter in the universe, derived from a variety of precision measurements; it is now believed that the universe is made up of roughly 5% baryonic matter, 25% dark matter and 70% dark energy (Ade, et al., 2013). Evidence exists to suggest that the dark matter cannot be made up of normal baryonic matter (Weiss, 2006) (Raine & Thomas, 2001) and it is in the investigation of the non-baryonic components that cosmology turns to particle physics. The study of elementary particle physics can provide clues as to what this non-baryonic matter could be made up of, with current possibilities being: neutrinos with mass, weakly interacting massive particles (WIMPs), axions and magnetic monopoles. These are all primeval and interact weakly with baryonic matter. I will now discuss each of these.
Neutrinos with mass
In order for neutrinos to be a significant contribution to dark matter they need to have mass. Neutrinos as they are currently understood have zero mass or mass so close to zero that it cannot be distinguished from zero (karagiorgi, et al., 2007), however, there is currently no reason for neutrinos to have zero mass and by studying neutrino oscillations (when neutrinos undergo transitions from one flavour to another) it is possible to infer a mass, as the rate at which they ...
... middle of paper ...
...tories on Earth. Particle physicists use specialist knowledge in large scale computing, high energy interactions and detector technology to make significant contributions to cosmological experiments, for example, digital electronics and large scale and cost effective detectors.
It is evident that cosmology uses particle physics in a whole host of cosmological theories; the experiments discussed above are just a few examples of where this has and is being practiced. Extrapolating from particle physics models on earth to the cosmological models of the early universe is speculative as the conditions that existed shortly after the universe was created are completely unique from anything that can be re-created on earth. However, the only way that we can approach trying to re-create the conditions of the early universe is through high-energy particle collisions.
Within William Rowe’s Chapter two of “The Cosmological Argument”, Rowe reconstructs Samuel Clark's Cosmological Argument by making explicit the way in which the Principle of Sufficient Reason, or PSR, operates in the argument as well as providing contradictions of two important criticisms from Rowe’s argument.
The Main Strengths of the Cosmological Argument There are many strengths within the Cosmological Argument which have proven theories and ways to prove the existence of God. Many of these strengths have come from such scholars as; Copleston, Aquinas and Leibniz, all of which have put together major points to prove the existence of a non-contingent being. One of the main strengths of the Cosmological Argument is from Aquinas way I that was about motion. This would be a posteriori argument because you need to gather evidence from the world around you.
In the article The Cosmic Perspective by Neil deGrasse Tyson he examines a range of topics from human life coming from Mars to how our perspective of the universe relates to religion. In the year 2000, a new space show opened at the Hayden Planetarium called Passport to the Universe, which compared the size of people Milky Way and beyond. While a show like this might make someone feel minuscule and insignificant, Tyson says that seeing the size of the universe actually makes him feel more alive not less and gives him a sense of grandeur. I agree with his idea that looking at us as a people in comparison can actually give you a sense of grandeur. However, when I compare myself to the vastness of space, it puts events on Earth in perspective while showing how influential we can be as a people even if we are small.
Parmenides of Elea once presented the expression ex nihilo nihil fit, which translates to nothing comes from nothing for one of his many theses. The Cosmological Argument, an argument of the posteriori category, meaning that it requires data based on past experiences, argues for the existence of God with this type of expression at its core. By attempting to prove how the universe must be influenced by an independent being that has godlike qualities, cosmological arguments suggest that it is rational to believe in an omnipotent being and its accountability of creating the universe.
The Reasons Why Some Thinkers Rejected the Cosmological Argument Aquinas’s argument was as follows: If the universe was infinite, it would have an infinite number of days. The end of an infinite series of days can never be reached, so today would never arrive. However, today has arrived, so the past cannot be infinite. Time began when the universe began, which was an event.
The cosmological argument is the existence of God, arguing that the possibility of each existing and the domain collected of such elements in this universe. The inquiry is that 'for what reason does anything exist? Why as opposed to nothing? In this paper, I will explain for what reason does everything need cause? Why is God thought to be the principal cause?
There are two ways to prove the existence of dark matter. We know that the universe must have a certain mass in order for its attractive gravitational forces to slow the expansion of the universe which started at the big bang. We can precisely calculate the rate at which the universe is expanding currently, and how fast it has expanded in the past. From this we get the theoretical mass of the universe. This figure falls far short of the visible mass of the universe, which consists of stars, planets, and hot gas. This is how scientists are able to prove that we can only see about 5% of our universe.
Physicists created sophisticated instruments, such as Japan’s Super-Kamiokande, or Super-K detector. The primary feature of the Super=K is a tank containing 45 million liters of ultrapure water. Another important feature is that it is located about 1.000 meters underground. By building the detector so far underground, the researchers could screen out almost all other particles and therefore observe almost exclusively the reactions of the neutrinos.
Matter is energy (Fernflores 1). The fact that electron-positron interactions can either produce photons or...
Dark matter and dark energy are two entities that have very little known about them, except that they make up about 95 percent of the universe. Even though this is a large part of the universe, it wasn’t even thought about until the 1960’s or the 1970’s. This is because of the fact that it is very hard to detect and almost impossible to see. Although it is impossible to see, we can see the effects of them both in our galaxy.
Technology has progressed continuously since the beginning of civilization. However prior to any technological advancement occurring, early humans studied the sky and observed it through their naked eyes. Through their observation of the sky, people created myths in order to explain what was going on in the sky. Therefore, cosmologies during the early times were not based on reasoning but purely on observation from what they saw. As time passed, many other instruments were created in order to better obser...
The big bang theory was first suggested by a Belgian priest named Georges Lemaitre in the 1920s, when he suggested that the universe began from a single primordial atom. However the big bang theory was born from the observations which were made by Edwin Hubble that other galaxies were moving from earth at a high speed in different directions. This theory was further boosted by the Arno and Penzias Wilson’s discovery of cosmic microwave radiation, which is believed to be the tangible remnant leftover light from the big bang. According to this theory the universe, all of its matter and radiation was compressed into a hot, dense mass, which was very small. However, the theory states that there was a blast which enabled all of universe’s matter and energy to spring from this small dense hot mass. After the matter had cooled down new atoms were formed. The big bang theory has three main types of evidence as its foundation and these are: the big bang theory assumes that the universe is expanding and this is supported by the interpretation of the red-shifts of remote galaxies and other systems as the Doppler shifts. The big bang theory predicts the cosmic abundance of some light elements helium-4, deuterium, lithium-7, whereby the predictions are confirmed by the abundances of cosmic light. In 1948 Alpher, Bethe and Gamow used the big bang to predict the existence of a low temperature background radiation throughout the universe at a relic of about 25K.
Are any scientific theories true? If so why? If not why do we rely on them?
In the explosion of cosmological ideas, it's a difficult battle to decide whether the advancements are made specifically from prior knowledge, technology or simply both. In the case of Werner Heisenberg, he explained “Natural science does not simply describe and explain nature; it is part of the interplay between nature and ourselves; it describes nature as exposed to our method of questioning” (Werner Heisenberg, Physics and Philosophy, 1958). He has a point that prior knowledge helps to create better informed hypotheses and better planned experiments; however, without advancements in technology we might still be significantly behind in all we have discovered thus far. This is why I believe that there is a middle ground in the recent developments
The big bang theory is an attempt to explain how the world began. The big bang theory begins with what is called a “singularity.” This term is used to describe an area in space which defies all the known laws of physics. Singularities are thought to exist at the core of black holes. Black holes are areas of intense gravitational pressure. The pressure is thought to be so intense that matter is pressed together into an infinite amount of pressure. The dense hot mass of the singularity slowly expanded. This process is called inflation. As the singularity expanded the universe went from dense and hot to cool and expansive. Inflation is still continuing on today which means that the universe is continually expanding.