Differences of Offshoring and Outsourcing
Beginning in the latter half of the last century and continuing to present day, both offshoring and outsourcing have become prominent practices for many successful businesses as a way to decrease costs or to improve the quantity of production. Many people believe offshoring and outsourcing are inherently the same and they are umbrella terms for the same practices. In reality, both terms have different meanings and should not be used interchangeably. The practice of outsourcing is defined as a practice used by different companies to reduce costs by transferring portions of work to outside suppliers rather than completing it internally (Outsourcing, 2014). This states that a firm, in order to cut operating costs, will relocate a job or jobs that were formerly performed within the firm, to another firm which more than likely has a comparative advantage in performing the task. An example of this would be when a company decides to outsource their accounts payable department to an external independent accounting firm who is able to complete the task at a cheaper cost to the company than to pay for an entire department to operate internally. Outsourcing does not necessarily mean that the job in question is being relocated out of the country, however it is still possible. Offshoring, by contrast, is defined as the practice of moving employees or certain business activities to foreign countries as a way to lower costs, avoid taxes, etc. (Offshoring, 2014). While the job is being relocated to a foreign country, it does not necessarily mean that the job has been externalized from the company. An example of this would be if McDonald’s relocates their marketing department to England. To summarize, if a...
... middle of paper ...
...panies to lose not only their best employees-their human capital-but also the consumers who buy their products. Employees displaced by foreigners and left unemployed or in lower paid work have a reduced presence in the consumer market. They provide fewer retirement savings for new investment” (Roberts, 2013). This is an excellent point Dr. Roberts has presented. Today’s corporate greed is not prepared to deal with tomorrow’s consequences from their actions. People who lose their jobs may never achieve the job status they once had. This will usually result in a reduction in pay. With reduced pay, the formerly displaced workers will have less disposable income and will therefore purchase less nonessential goods. If this corporation happened to produce televisions, their quantity demanded would drop causing losses in profit. They are essentially their own worst enemy.
Globalisation is a growing phenomenon that is the result of various developments in the global environment, each of which merits an individual analysis of its social impacts. For the purpose of this analysis, the focus will be placed upon arguably its most controversial aspect, offshore outsourcing. Offshore outsourcing, or offshoring, is becoming an increasingly common business practice as a result of a combination of the recent technological advancements in the areas of transportation and communication, and the increased competitiveness of the business world. From the perspective of firms, tapping into cheap labor from less developed countries is a very logical business decision to reduce costs and maximize profits. This has not only motivated businesses to engage in offshoring, it has sometimes been critical to their survival in fiercely competitive environments. Before making judgments regarding the righteousness of offshoring from different perspectives, its impact on stakeholders must first be evaluated.
...hored, individuals, families, and communities suffer the negative economic consequences due to limited job availability. Most people who work in these industry sectors are blue collars, who are not professional or academically qualified to work in other fields, as a result their job choices are limited, especially when the main industry in that community is to work in the stage of manufacturing. When there is massive unemployment within a single community the loss of manufacturing jobs can threaten consumers, creating other problems in the society that result in economic costs. Such problems may spiral into the loss of one's car or home, personal debt, and the lack of economical means to afford a child's education, thus continuing the cycle of economic poverty. These aforementioned consequences are indirect and important economic effects of offshoring American jobs.
Outsourcing simply means acquiring services from an external organization instead of using internal resources (Butler, 2000). By using outsourced resources, organizations can gain a competitive advantage by utilizing contingent staff to accomplish strategic goals without incurring the fixed overhead. By focusing on the leading edge and highly specialized skill sets, outsourcing providers can often offer higher quality services, or at a lower price than the client organization. Typical reasons for outsourcing go beyond simple contingent staffing. Outsourcing providers are able to maintain economies of scale with regard to specialization (...
The United States is the most developed capitalist economy in the world. The markets within the economy provide profit-motivated companies endless potential in the pursuance of pecuniary accumulation. Throughout the twentieth-century competitive companies have implemented modernized managerial procedures designed to raise profits by reducing unnecessary costs. These cost-saving procedures have had a substantial effect on society and particularly members of the working class. Managers and owners of these competitive and self-motivated companies have consistently worked throughout this century to exploit the most controllable component of the production process: the worker. The worker has been forced by the influence of powerful and affluent business owners to work in conditions hazardous to their well being in addition to preposterously menial compensation. It was the masterful manipulation of society and legislation through strategic objectives that the low-wage workers were coerced into this position of destitute. The strategies of the affluent fragment of society were conceived for the selfish purpose of monetary gain. The campaigns to augment the business position within the capitalist economy were designed to weaken organized labor, reduce corporate costs, gain legislative control and reduce international competition at the expense of the working class. The owners have gained and continue to gain considerable wealth from these strategies. To understand why the owners of the powerful companies operate in such a selfish manner, we must look at particular fundamentals of both capitalism and corporation strategy. Once these rudiments are understood, we ...
The author intended audience are the companies that employed low-wage workers, therefore, the intended audience to modified the payment of each individual that has sacrifice each second of their time. One of the assumptions that the author believes is the fact that companies itself has not acknowledged the efforts of each employ. Barbara assumes that not everyone in our society has even cared about employees feeling or about their lives. Everything we see around us are made by humans who had to sacrifice everything in order for us to basically live in and own it. Ehrenreich considers the target audience as ignorant, unappreciated, and ungrateful for the employees that work for each company within our nation, more likely make up most of the
Since the concept of outsourcing was introduced it has been a subject of debate between politicians and citizens of the United States. Remarkably, it was the United States who supported outsourcing and now it is the United States that feels its economic progress is being threatened by outsourcing. One may argue that the financial situations that existed two decades earlier are not the same as they are today, thus the change of time, business priorities of economies have also changed.
In recessions of the past the American worker was laid off with the impression they would be rehired as soon as demand for goods and services were presented again. Now people in jobs from computer programmers to telephone operators are losing their jobs and never returning to the same field again. The big issue here is that if we continue outsourcing specific jobs overseas we could erase a whole industry of job opportunity from the American people. Economists say the framework of the U.S. labor force has been changed due to past outsourcing of jobs by this country. The more outsourcing that continues the more our job force’s structure will change. As a result, the American worker can no longer wait to be rehired into the same job or profession. Using their time while unemployed, Americans are retraining themselves and attempt to step into an entirely different career.
Many businesses hire low skilled workers for low wage, but many Americans are not willing to work for low wage. Moreover, many businesses want to keep their costs in a very low price, to achieve the high profit margin. They get their employees from other countries and moving production over the world. Many workers in the United States come from halfway across the world. Low-paid workers are used to produce and export raw material. Companies use cheap raw materials to produce products and invest to other countries with high profits. “People in the south still produced items for export to north--but now they export manufactured food as well as raw materials” (Chomsky 5). The New England was the first one to try out with new business in the U.S. southeast in the beginning of 21th century to find lower cost. “The New England textile industry was one of the first to experiment with plant relocation, shifting its production to the U.S southeast starting at the very beginning of twentieth century in search of lower costs” (Chomsky 5). The relocation program was very successful by the end of the
Supporters of letting more immigrants come into the country claim that immigrants do not take away jobs from the hard working American. They have a claim that it actually helps boost America’s economy by increasing the purchasing of goods. Advocates of immigration, claim that Americans think they are too good to hold certain jobs and immigrants fill the jobs Americans do not want. The Director of Workforce Success, Phylis Eisen states, “Tens of thousands of jobs go unfilled in the high tech industry. The Hewlett-Packards, the Intels, the Motorollas, the entire semi-conducting industry has to fill forty-thousand jobs in the next three years. If they can’t do this, they have to go overseas. The companies always prefer to stay in America.” (Immigration: Promise and Hope for Generations. 1998).
Slaughter said it’s a common perception that hiring overseas means fewer jobs in the United States. Not so, he said. While job losses are certainly true for some companies, statistics have shown that, generally, increased hires abroad also have complementary increases here.” (Kibbe, 2004)
Outsourcing has been around for many years. In this paper, I will discuss some of the history of outsourcing, the good things about outsourcing, and the bad things about outsourcing. Outsourcing is important because many companies rely on it in order to get many different products and services to their facility on time and in good shape. Outsourcing is a huge part of the business industry today. Any business can be affected by outsourcing.
Large corporations seeking the extra dollar to pocket are willing to spend whatever it takes to reduce the cost of production and increase profit margins. Doing whatever it takes in some instances can help men moving operations overseas to developing countries who are glad to be working. These developing countries unemployment rates are extremely high, so any job that pays is great to have. Americans lose jobs to foreign workers because the American economy is one of the largest in the world and its citizens enjoy great standards of living, when juxtaposed with a city of the same size in Taiwan. Labor costs play a huge and crucial role in corporations, which in turn pay the profits to the corporate giants who run, manage, and own the businesses.
Outsourcing is a technique for companies to reassign specific responsibilities to external entities. There are several motivations for outsourcing including organizational, improvement, cost, and revenue advantages (Ghodeswar & Vaidyanathan, 2008).
...orking environments for their factory employees. Even with international groups and organizations keeping a constant watch on companies who outsource work to impoverished countries, there is often little that can be done to control these companies. Lack of local enforcement and overlooked international law makes it easy for money-hungry companies to get away with morally wrong behavior. By bringing attention to these types of situations and not supporting companies who do not treat their workers fairly, executives will be hit where it hurts them the most, their pockets. When their profits decrease, they will be forced to look for alternatives to manufacture their products.
What does it mean to offshore outsource? Let’s first start by explaining what outsourcing means. The basic meaning of outsourcing is to obtain goods or services from an outside place. This gives businesses and companies the ability to save money. When the businesses and companies save money that ultimately means the consumers will also save money. The word offshore means some distance from the shore. According to Blinder “Offshoring, by contrast, means moving jobs out of the country, whether or not they leave the company” (20). To better understand the meaning of offshore outsourcing, we can say that it is the process where the companies provide jobs to foreign countries. Big