Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Features of New Public Management
Features of New Public Management
Features of New Public Management
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Features of New Public Management
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATON REFORM: FROM TRADITIONAL TO NEW PUBLIC MANAGEMENT
HISTORY OF NEW PUBLIC MANAGEMENT
The new public management (NPM) movement started to develop in the late 70s and early 80s. The United Kingdom was the first mover. They were reformed by the Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher and communal governments in the United States which faced the predicament of recessive developments and tax revolts of their citizens. Other common wealth nations such as New Zealand and Australia joined and after their reform success, almost all OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and development) countries also joined in, including other countries in the world (OECD 1995).
INTRODUCTION
As a contemporary paradigm of public administration, New Public Management (NPM) unveils the failures and inadequacies of public sector performance over time, and the traditional public administration. It has been established as a summary description of the way of fine structuring the public sector bodies, to bring their management approaches in close proximity to business methods.
The world-wide administrative reform movement ( caused by the Thatcherism process, originating from UK) in public management has been brought about by the necessity of the government to respond to the fiscal stress caused by changes in international economic system, on the other hand by the unrelenting demands for government services and regulations in national political systems.
These stresses bred a lot of policy responses aimed at budgetary restraint and at lowering the public services of governments, including different measures to privatise government operations and to deregulate private economic enterprises.
The global reform movement in public management has been ...
... middle of paper ...
...lacks some of the good aspects as seen from the old model high ethical standards. Moe (1994) points out that the new public management fails to account for critical differences between private and government sectors, thus it ignores that government is based on a rule of law not market driven mechanisms.
CONCLUSION
There have been changes in public sector and reforms which had never been seen before. For a number of reasons, the traditional model of public administration is replaced by a new model of public management. This change involves much more than mere public sector reform. It implies changes in the operation of the public services. The new public management can be useful to government and ought to be seriously considered. However, new public management is not a blanket solution to all predicaments of public administration in modern governments.
Max Weber, German sociologist, social theorist, and economist, explicated the theory of bureaucracy in which he details the monocratic bureaucracy “as an ideal form that maximized rationality” (Bolman & Deal, 2008, p. 48). He provided his most complete exposition of theory in his 1922 tome Economy and Society (Casey, 2004). This classic form of bureaucracy is characterized by the following (a) well-defined official functions; (b) specialization of function; (c) clearly defined hierarchy of offices; (d) rules governing performance, which require training to administer; (e) impersonal treatment of clients, in that all are treated equally; (f) merit as the basis of promotion or appointment; (g) compensation based on rank; (h) separation of personal and company assets and interests; (i) discipline and control of daily work; (j) files and record keeping for decisions, acts, and rules (Bolman & Deal, 2008; O’Connor, 2011). There are numerous shorthand versions of Weber’s theory including Harmon and Mayer (1986) in Organization Theory for Public Administration and Heady (2001) in Public Administration: A Comparative Perspective (O’Connor, 2011).
Thus, the fundamental question of who and how the government should approach public administration has continued to evolve as leaders have carried differing
Public Administration involves the development, implementation and management of policies for the attainment of set goals and objectives that will be to the benefit of the general public. Since Public Administration involves taking decisions that affect the use of public resources there is often the question of how to utilize public resources for maximum public good. The National Association of Public Administration has identified four pillars of public administration: economy, efficiency, effectiveness and social equity. These pillars are equally important in the practice of public administration and to its success. This paper seeks to explain the role of each of the pillars in the practice of public administration.
The study of public administration only continued to grow over the course of the next two decades. As the study of public administration expanded, so did the development of s...
Max Weber, Henri Fayol and Luther Halsey Gulick all addressed issues, concerning how an overall organization should be structured, bureaucratic administration, while Frederick Taylor’s theory of scientific management concentrated on techniques for increasing production (Tomkins, 2005). This essay will focus on the disadvantages and the advantages, including the effective and efficient components, of bureaucracy in public management.
Over time, how have members of the field of public administration examined the subject of policy and administration (has the dichotomy changed)?
Since its emergence as a field of study, there have been some important contributions to public administration. Its goal has always been to improve productivity which then improves workplace performance. All of the contributions have been aimed at completing the work with the highest level of efficiency and at the lowest cost.
In the future I would like to see myself, as a continuously promoted public official who could possibly become a pro-active politician in today’s demanding political arena. To achieve this, I would like to gain more knowledge which can help me reach intellectual maturity to the latest practices adopted in the field of Public Administration. My desire for self-development in this area and curiosity to learn past and contemporary developments in different societies will help me to solve the problems easily.
Public Management: between the Traditional and New Models. Review of International Comparative Management 408, 411. Marino, C. (2011). The 'Standard'. The Introduction of New Public Management in the Italian Public Sector.
This essay discusses the radical transformation of the principles and foundations of public administration from traditional to New Public Management. Firstly the essay will attempt to define the key terms of traditional public administration and the doctrine of New Public Management. Rabin J. (2003) explains that New Public Management embodies “a process in public administration that uses information and experiences obtained in business management and other disciplines to improve efficiency, usefulness and general operation of public services in contemporary bureaucracies.“Traditional Public Administration progresses from governmental contributions, with services perceived by the bureaucracy.
In the political approach, political authority is divided between a central government and the provincial or state governments. This means that some provinces or states are accorded a substantial measure of constitutional or legal sovereignty, although they still remain subordinates of the central government in certain constitutional or legal respects. The political approach promotes the political values of military strength, economic development, union, and representation. In addition, it is characterized by three central features: state sovereignty, bicameralism, and multiple layers of representation.
Public Managers are uniquely positioned to positively affect policy process due to their tenure, job security, absence of political pressure and expanded role in the society. The
Public policy can be defined as “What ever governments choose to do or not do” (Dye, 2008, p 2). In the context of this essay, public policies are a set of actors by the government in order to reach out to the masses. The ministries and departments are mandated to deliver specific mandates in the form of public goods and services.
Despite these criticisms, the reforms in public administration have had a widespread impact across this country and around the world. The principles underlying these reforms have enhanced government performance and accountability, public administration has employed various strategies to streamline management and enhance pubic service. It is important to keep in mind that while there may be significant improvement in productivity as a result of technological advances or reform, the most meaningful long-term gains will come about as a result of attention to the humans side of the organization. Successful public administration demands a successful balance between the concerns of the technical side of the agency and paying attention to people.
Today in the present world, most countries have the core object of governance in the “public good provisioning ” leitmotif. According to the main principles ; accountability, participation and transparency, from the governance ecology interaction between the State, Civil Society and Market –place, within the global-village environment, (Higgot and Ougaard 2002; Stiglitz 2003; Woods 2006) “Governance Deteriorate the Economical Progress of the Developing Countries”(Box 15.4 Kaufmann, Kray, and Mastruzzi, 2008 p 291 Governance Matter Vll: some leading findings). In my opinion governance on itself without parametric recognition is doomed to fail, instead of reflecting to new mechanisms of responsibility to steer and guide the social and economical issues, which I will try to clarify in the upcoming body breakdown. Governance is supported as structure through institutions, as process through instruments and as agenda through elements of good governance, generating the capacity to improve significant development and positive impact of economic growth and to cut back destitution. Despite of the fact that developing countries can come in line with the quality of governance by accepting it as a crucial determinant of developmental performance, it didn’t came into effect. The underlying fact of weak and poor governance was identified as a result, for not effectuating the measureme...