Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Cons of the progressive era
Progressive era quizlet
Examination of the progressive era
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Andrew Truty 5 paragraph essay rough draft period 5
The muckrakers of the Progressive Era helped instill a new social awareness in the people of their time period. They did this by writing about the problems in big businesses, the government, etc. People like John Spargo and Upton Sinclaire wrote books that would depict these problems and would send the people into a kind of rush to fix all of the things that had come out of the Industrial Age. The problems that they helped bring attention to that ultimately got fixed include such things as corruption (both political and in the big business), the adulteration of food, and the exploitation of labor, among many others.
Muckrakers like Sinclair also helped expose some of the health issues
…show more content…
in how the food was being prepared. In his book, The Jungle, Sinclair describes in detail how the meat was handled. As one might expect, the people reacted with disgust and a sense of urgency to fix this problem, eventually leading to President Roosevelt to mount an investigation into the meat packing industry. The investigation confirmed that the essential truth in what Sinclair wrote about. One of the investigators wrote, “…Meat scraps were also being found being shoveled into receptacles from dirty floors where they were left to lie until again shoveled into barrels or into machines for chopping. These floors, it must be noted, were in most cases damp and soggy, in dark, ill-ventilated rooms, and the employees, in utter ignorance of cleanliness or danger to health expectorated at will upon them. In a word, we saw meat shoveled from filthy wooden floors, piled on tables rarely washed, pushed from room to room in rotten box carts, in all of which processes it was in the way of gathering dirt, splinters, floor filth, and the expectoration of tuberculous and other diseased workers.” After this, Roosevelt helped pass the Pure Food and Drug Act and the Meat Inspection Act. Through The Jungle, Sinclair helped point out another sad fact about big business; they were willing to do anything to make a profit, even if it meant gaining a perverse sense of integrity. In other words, they became corrupt. When it comes to corruption, the muckrakers exposed two different aspects of it; corruption in politics and corruption in big business.
The corruption in politics was very evident in places like New York and Philadelphia. New York had Tammany Hall and Philadelphia had a very corrupt voting system. In his collected articles in the form a book entitled The Shame of the Cities, California-born journalist Lincoln Steffens writes, “The machine controls the whole process of voting, and practices fraud at every stage.” He is writing about Philadelphia and the corruption in the voting process. Steffens goes on to describe how the voting system is corrupt, like, “The assessor pads the list with the names of dead dogs, children, and non-existent persons.” He later mentions one Rudolph Blankenburg, who sent out letters to everyone on the list before hand and 63% of them were returned as ‘not at,’ ‘removed’, ‘deceased’, etc. The muckrakers also helped expose the corruption in big businesses. Upton Sinclaire, a famous socialist muckraker who wrote the book The Jungle, wrote about how unsanitary the meat packing process was and mentioned how when the superintendents were questioned about the conditions, they merely stated and I quote from The Jungle, “…the meat would after wards be cooked and that this sterilization would prevent any danger from its use.” Sinclair goes on to say that statement was not wholly true as some of the meat would be used as smoked products, such as sausage, and …show more content…
therefore would not be sterilized. And in revealing this corruption, it was revealed that there was an abuse of labor in order to make a profit. The abuse of labor and, therefore the laborers, was a common practice at the time.
John Spargo wrote about child laborers in the coal mines in his book The Bitter Cry of the Children. At one point, Spargo says, “I once stood in a breaker for half an hour and tried to do the work a twelve-year-old noy was doing day after day, for ten hours at a stretch, for sixty cents a day…I tried to pick out the pieces of slate from the hurrying stream of coal, often missing them; my hands were bruised and cut in a few minutes; I was covered from head to foot with coal dust, and for many hours afterwards I was expectorating some of the small particles of anthracite I had swallowed. I could not do this workand live, but…boys of ten and twelve years…doing it for fifty to sixty cents a day.” Spargo, a full grown man, could not do the work of a ten or twelve-year-old boy. Unfortunately, because of the work that the children did, they often developed health problems and deformities. And it was perfectly legal for the big businesses like the coal industry to do this. There were no laws prohibiting it and that is the way the businesses liked it. After Spargo’s book, there was an outrage among the people. The people wanted to change the laws to make that sort of thing illegal and so they turned to the government. Now, in 1898, a case had gone before the Supreme Court about a state law prohibiting miners in Utah working for more than eight hours a day and the Supreme Court upheld the state law.
But in 1905, just seven years later, the Supreme Court ruled exactly the opposite in a similar case, one judge going so far as to say that the state law itself was, and I quote, “We do not believe in the soundness of the views which uphold this law. On the contrary, we think that such a law as this,…is an illegal interference with the rights of individuals, both employers and employees…” The Supreme Court decided that the law in New York prohibiting bakers from working more than ten hours except in a case of emergency, had nothing to do with the safety of bakers because being a baker was not considered to be a very dangerous job. The inconsistencies in the government’s rulings at this time proved to people that in order to bring about this change in labor that they wanted; they would have to change the government. Eventually, though, the people got what they wanted; change. And because of that change, we now have things like worker’s compensation and other helpful programs to promote safety in our working environments. While the muckrakers were very useful in exposing the faults in society at the time, they did not really do anything else. Theodore Roosevelt said, “Now it is very necessary that we should not flinch from seeing what is vile and debasing. There is filth on the floor, and it must be scraped up with the muck-rake: and there are times and places where this service is the most needed of all the services that can be performed. But the man who never does anything else, who never thinks or speaks or writes save his feats with the muck-rake, speedily becomes, not a help to society, not an incitement to good, but one of the most potent forces for evil.” More often than not, the muckrakers only wrote about the problems in society; they never did anything about it. However, one cannot deny the usefulness of the muckrakers in regards to their feats in helping move along the Progressive Era.
The Coal Company exploited the workers by underpaying them and restricting their freedom as consumers. The miners were forced to buy their own tools, clothes, food, etc. from the Ôcompany storeÕ many times at higher prices than necessary. This created circulation of money from the company to the laborer back to the company. The miners worked for obvious reasons: to supply themselves and their families with shelter, food and clothing. They relied on company power to supply a means of employment. However, the company in turn relied on the laborers, because without them the company would have no means by which to excavate the coal and continue the production process.
All levels of protection for the miners failed them. Every agency that was entrusted with their safety had other concerns as priority. Mr. Scanlan submitted true and honest reports of violations over a long period of time but never went that extra step to enforce the law. State authorities should have acted when the initial reports were made. The Union membership was at risk and yet the Union never represented Local 52 nor gave it support when it tried on its own to get state assistance with their grievances. Politics and profit motivated elected officials appointees and the coal company.
During the Colorado Coal Strike from 1913 to 1914, one of the largest losses of life was the Ludlow Massacre, or sometimes referred to as the Battle of Ludlow, on April 20, 1914. Colorado was the epicenter for mine-related violence in the West. From 1913 to 1918, the United Mine Workers of America launched a full-scale unionization campaign by sending forty-two organizers to the Trinidad coal mine located in Ludlow, Colorado. Ludlow was the largest tent colony in Colorado and a major source of tension during the Colorado Coal Strike. Strikers were asking for better wages and pay for “dead work” (unpaid work necessary for maintaining workable conditions), an eight-hour workday, the right to elect their own checkweighmen, the right to choose what resources they buy and use, and the enforcement of the Colorado Mining Laws. Consequently, hundreds of mine
Labor’s rights, this issue have been bothering many worker since the 19th century and can still be a problem today. As John L. Lewis has said in his speech “I repeat that labor seeks peace and guarantees its own loyalty, but the voice of labor, insistent upon its rights, should not be annoying to the ears of justice or offensive to the conscience of the American people” (John L. Lewis), which under his words meant that labor is something that can be done right and peacefully but it needs rules and benefits that come with those rules which labor asks for and when labor asks for those rules and benefits it shouldn’t be taken like some annoying kid’s demands but more as something that needs to be done and done with a right mind set. Labor today consists of a man or woman going to work, working their hours, and finally getting paid for those hours at the end of the week, at least a minimum of $7.50 an hour (United States Department of Labor), but before it wasn’t like that before many workers would get paid very poorly even thought they would work for a lot of hours and they wouldn’t get benefits from their work or safety when working such as in the mines like the mine workers, but one man stood up for them and his name was John L. Lewis (John Llewellyn Lewis, Encyclopedia).
Often, children were forced to work due to money-related issues, and the conditions they worked in were terrible. Children worked in coal mining, such as at Woodward Coal Mining in Kingston, Pennsylvania (Doc. 7). Children were used to make the process of producing products cheaper, and they were paid low wages; the capitalists hired children just to keep the process of making products going and to make profit. One cause of child labor in harsh conditions was the unfateful fire at the Triangle Shirtwaist Company factory in New York City in 1911. Teenaged immigrant girls that were employed there worked under sweatshop-like conditions. The building they worked in was inadequately equipped in case of a fire, for the doors were locked, leaving no exit for the girls, and the single fire escape collapsed with the rescue effort; as a result, when the fire started, they were unable to escape. 145 workers were killed, but the company owners were not penalized harshly for this tragedy. This further demonstrates that capitalists were able to get away with the harsh conditions that they put their laborers, especially child laborers, through for their own benefit, which is making more money and using any means to get it, even if those means are low wages and harsh working
At the beginnings of the 1900s, some leading magazines in the U.S have already started to exhibit choking reports about unjust monopolistic practices, rampant political corruption, and many other offenses; which helped their sales to soar. In this context, in 1904, The Appeal to Reason, a leading socialist weekly, offered Sinclair $500 to prepare an exposé on the meatpacking industry (Cherny). To accomplish his mission, Sinclair headed to Chicago, the center of the meatpacking industry, and started an investigation as he declared“ I spent seven weeks in Packingtown studying conditions there, and I verified every smallest detail, so that as a picture of social conditions the book is as exact as a government report” (Sinclair, The Industrial Republic 115-16). To get a direct knowledge of the work, he sneaked into the packing plants as a pretended worker. He toured the streets of Packingtown, the area near the stockyards where the workers live. He approached people, from different walks of life, who could provide useful information about conditions in Packingtown. At the end of seven weeks, he returned home to New Jersey, shut himself up in a small cabin, wrote for nine months, and produced The Jungle (Cherny).
First exposed by Lincoln Steffens in 1902 through a magazine article called “Tweed Days in St. Louis”, government corruption was one of largest problems in the Progressive Era. Many big businesses of the time period had formed monopolies or trusts in order to control their industry and increase their power. They used this power to set high prices and increase their wealth. Political machines, which were powerful
Coal mines in these times were glorified death traps and collapsed. Often. Workers or their families were basically never compensated for anything, and even when they took things to court, essentially no court was sympathetic toward any coal miner or their family, and if their father or brother died, they were on their on for the rest of their life, often then forcing child boys to work if they weren’t already. Also, not many workers spoke proper english in the mines, so they could not read instruction signs, and by misuse of equipment, killing themselves and/or other
Through muckraking they were able to enlighten the people of the need for change, and with the help of the people demand and support reform.
When a group of people must adapt to a lifestyle distinct from the agricultural lifestyle one would not know what to expect. Like a nation that is just starting, it would take time to construct and enhance laws; it’s a trial and error process. These businesses were starting out and there were no regulations as to how to run them. Unquestionably, there were no laws imposed to aid the labor conditions of these employees like we know today. The testimony and interview proved that the 1800’s took advantage of the work of children, often depriving them of food. It was obvious most children stuck around due to the urgency of money, therefore I am sure employees threatened to replace them seeing how the money was needed for families. For those who worked in factories with heavy, dangerous machinery, they were prone to accidents or even death. According to the sub-commissioner, the young girls picked the coal “with the regular pick used by men” . It is typically easier for a grown man to lift a regular pick than it is for a young girl because of the physical development and obvious age difference. Still there weren’t any regulations to protect children against the harms of labor and their wages were unreasonably
At the turn of the twentieth century “Muckraking” had become a very popular practice. This was where “muckrakers” would bring major problems to the publics attention. One of the most powerful pieces done by a muckraker was the book “The Jungle”, by Upton Sinclair. The book was written to show the horrible working and living conditions in the packing towns of Chicago, but what caused a major controversy was the filth that was going into Americas meat. As Sinclair later said in an interview about the book “I aimed at the publics heart and by accident hit them in the stomach.”# The meat packing industry took no responsibility for producing safe and sanitary meat.
Factories were utilizing children to do the hard work. They employed children as young as five or six to work as many as twenty hours a day. According to Document C, children worked in factories to build up muscles and having good intellect in working rather than getting an education. They became a different person rather than conventional children. There were additionally health issues due to child labor: rapid skeletal growth, greater risk of hearing loss, higher chemical absorption rates, and developing ability to assess risks. Progressive Era reformers believed that child labor was detrimental to children and to society. They believed that children should be protected from harmful environments, so they would become healthy and productive adults. In 1912, Congress created the Children’s Bureau to benefit children. The Keating-Owen Act was passed in 1916 to freed children from child labor only in industries that engaged in interstate commerce. However, it was declared unconstitutional sinc...
According to the article “A History of Child Labor” reviewed by Milton Fried, a child could work as long as six days a week for up to 18 hours a day, and only make a dollar a week. Child labor was nothing but cheap labor. The big companies loved cheap labor because then they could make an item for not very much money, and make a huge profit margin. Fried continues to state how cheap the labor was, “One glass factory in Massachusetts was fenced with barbed wire ‘to keep the young imps inside.’ These were boys under 12 who carried loads of hot glass all night for a wage of 40 cents to $1.10 per night.” Unlike, children today who are in bed sleeping by 8 pm each night, these children had to stay up all night working to make just enough income for their families. Sadly, the children had no choice but to work for very little pay. Their mothers and fathers made so little money in the factory system that they couldn’t afford to let their children enjoy their childhood: “Other working children were indentured—their parents sold their labor to the mill owner for a period of years. Others lived with their families and worked for wages as adults did, for long hours and under hard conditions” (Cleland). The child had no other choice, but to work for these big
Reformers known as Progressives attempted to undo the problems caused by industrialization. The Progressive movement sought to end the influence of large corporations, provide more rights and benefits to workers, and end the control possessed by party leaders. At the national level, Progressivism centered on defeating the power of large businesses. The Progressive Era was a period in American history in which improving working conditions, exposing corruption, improving the way of life, expanding democracy, and making reforms were the objectives at hand. With the emergence of the Progressive Era, two important figures gradually emerged as well.
Along with these issues, the progressives tried to stop competition, they also fought many groups that tried to eliminate social classes along the way. Progressives were able to be successful in restoring economic competition, making the government more efficient, and stemming the tide of socialism. Progressives are mostly muckrakers. Muckrakers were writers who wrote of the slums and labor abuse children were facing, bringing many of the issues being faced during this time into the open. By ending the power of big companies, progressives, many of whom included Woodrow Wilson, hoped to restore economic competition.