Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Existentialism ideas in the novel the stranger
Characterization of meursault in the novel the stranger by Albert camus
Existentialism ideas in the novel the stranger
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Existentialism ideas in the novel the stranger
Does Meursault catharsis affect his own existentialist behavior? Meursault catharsis affects people like the chaplain which eventually led to his own existentialist behavior. Meursault catharsis opens himself to “the gentle indifference of the world” (Camus 122). Meursault means that he is giving up his caring, that it hurts too much and is becoming as indifferent as the rest of the world. Through Meursault catharsis of anger leading towards the chaplain, religion, death and God are not his beliefs. These ideas led to existentialist behavior which emphasizes him into making his own meaning in life with freedom and choices that eventually illustrates the stranger as a final act.
Meursault is not religious nor has interest in religion to the
…show more content…
point where he decided to let out his catharsis to the chaplain. “Then, I don’t know how it was, but something seemed to break inside me, and I started yelling at the top of my voice. I hurled insults at him, I told him not to waste his rotten prayers on me; it was better to burn than to disappear” (Camus 74). Meursault told the chaplain to not waste any prayers for him because the chaplain believes that praying for him will save him from this mess and will escape from this prison cell. Instead, Meursault gets furious because he doesn’t like the idea of religion being in his life because he doesn’t believe in religion but believes in his own beliefs and meanings. Religion ties to catharsis because Meursault not being religious, bothers people and question it but Meursault won’t change the way he is to the aspects of religion. Meursault behavior lead to his anger because he chose to live his life in his way and religion was not in his life. Meursault leads his anger where chaplain wouldn’t listen that Meursault is not religion thus making him really mad and annoyed about religion. The importance of religion shows how Meursault just doesn’t want to believe in the same beliefs as everybody else. Also Meursault not being religious is not a terrible idea because it shows how religion led to existentialist because no one should be able to force someone towards being religious. Death lead to Meursault catharsis towards death going one way where people making their own choice. “All alike would be condemned to die one day; his turn, too, would come like the others” (Camus 75). Meursault mentions how death is all the same where it effects his behavior because to him everyone dies eventually. Death will come to anyone it can be sooner or later and Meursault releasing his anger will be that death doesn’t matter in existentialist. Death connects to him releasing his catharsis because no matter what people don’t live for long. Some die faster than others and it annoys Meursault because he feels that people die one way but people see it other way. He got furious and said it will happen at one point to the chaplain death. Since Meursault knows that his death is coming, his anger shows that his life doesn’t matter and is going to let death happen. This shows how Meursault doesn’t care about dying because everyone dies but not at once since it is existentialist, Meursault choose to pick his life and kill the Arab now he has to face the consequences in which he is by facing death. Death connected Meursault catharsis since he feels that people will die eventually and in his case Meursault knows he is going to die so it shows how Meursault is connecting death to existentialist behavior. Death connecting to his existentialist behavior shows that he doesn’t care about his death and is not sad or worried about his own death. Instead, Meursault accepts the fact that he is going to die and as his catharsis explodes on chaplain shows that even his death will come or happen. Since the chaplain believes in religion, he believes his death won’t be anything soon. Meursault knows by him releasing his catharsis because he will die like the others. For Meursault it is the same thing meaning death is the same way because he knows that people will die one day so his catharsis wants the chaplain to realize that him death will come in time. God was not in Meursault life whereas the chaplain putting and mentioning God out there got Meursault angry, he has his own beliefs.
“What difference could they make to me, the deaths of others, or a mother’s love, or his God; or the way a man decides to live, the fate he thinks he chooses, since one and the same fate was bound to “choose” not only me but thousands of millions of privileged people who, like him, called themselves my brothers” (Camus 74). Meursault states again that he does not believe in God. The chaplain insisted that all the condemned men he has known have eventually turned to God for comfort. Meursault becomes increasingly irritated by the chaplain's insistence that he spend the rest of his short life on God. Meursault shouts that nothing matters. Since God is the main hierarchy of the chain, Meursault doesn’t see God as him being the top. Instead, he sees nothing as being importance other than Marie and his friends but not God. Meursault letting out his catharsis shows that God has no importance towards him. He doesn’t believe in the idea of God or praying. People believe that God has a plan for them and according to Meursault he is just living his life with no importance. Nothing in the chaplain's beliefs is as certain as he thinks. Meursault himself is only certain of his life and his
death. Meursault led his anger to the chaplain in which caused existentialist behavior because Meursault doesn’t believe in religion, god, and death. Religion, god, and death all connect to existentialist behavior because it shows that Meursault does not care about all of this whether people force him to believe or not. The importance of Meursault anger was to show that he is annoyed and has different beliefs other than God. As Meursault is a existentialist behavior he continues to believe in his own meanings and choices. Meursault catharsis leads to him opening himself showing no importance of caring. Eventually Meursault making his own meaning in life led to the illustrating the stranger as a final act.
In, The Meursault Investigation by: Kamel Daoud, the narrator—Harun—questions his presence in the world quite often. Sometimes it seems as though he does it out of grief from losing his brother, or frustration that his mother does not bond with him like they used to. After Musa was murdered, Harun had to become the “man of the house” but, he was stuck in is mothers’ grasp forced to wear Musa’s clothing and stay as safe as possible. In fact, if Harun came home with t scratch, his mother would fuss over him as if it were a serious would, such as a broken arm. In all reality, Harun was suffering from a broken heart due to his brothers passing and his mother’s actions throughout the grieving process. Throughout the time that his mother dressed
Meursault is a fairly average individual who is distinctive more in his apathy and passive pessimism than in anything else. He rarely talks because he generally has nothing to say, and he does what is requested of him because he feels that resisting commands is more of a bother than it is worth. Meursault never did anything notable or distinctive in his life: a fact which makes the events of the book all the more intriguing.
Meursault, an unemotional, a moral, sensory-orientated character at the beginning of the book, turns into an emotional, happy man who understands the "meaninglessness" and absurdity of life by the end of the book. Meursault realizes that the universe is indifferent to man's life and this realization makes him happy. He realizes that there is no God and that the old codes of religious authoritarianism are not enough to suffice man's spiritual needs. One has to create one's won meaning in an absurd, meaningless world.
In The Stranger, Albert Camus describes the life of the protagonist, Meursault, through life changing events. The passage chosen illustrates Meursault’s view during his time in prison for killing the Arab. In prison, one can see the shifts in Meursault’s character and the acceptance of this new lifestyle. Camus manipulates diction to indicate the changes in Meursault caused by time thinking of memories in prison and realization of his pointless life. Because Camus published this book at the beginning of World War II, people at this time period also questions life and death similar to how Meursault does.
This passage is set before Meursault’s execution with the chaplain entering the scene, and telling Meursault that his “heart is blind”, leading to Meursault to yell and delve into his rant, and moment of consciousness. The passage has a calm in the beginning as if Meursault catches his breath from yelling previously, and he starts to reassure himself that he is not wrong for expressing his views as it went against the public’s religious beliefs, and states that this moment was so important to him that it was if his life was merely leading up to it. Why this particular scene is important to Meursault is that this is an instance where he successfully detaches himself from the world, and begins to deconstruct the world’s ideals as his rant shifts on to focusing on how nothing in life mattered. Meursault describes his gripes with the chaplain’s words as he explains his reasoning as to why the concept of a god is flawed as Meursault saw that everyone was inherently the same, with equal privileges just how often people could express them separated them. The passage continues with Meursault arguing that everyone would be faced with judgment or punishment one day, and explains why his own situation was not significant as it was no different. After that explanation the passage ends with Meursault posing the concept of everything in the world being equal both in wrongdoing and life in general, evident in his example of saying “Sala¬mano's dog was worth just as much as his wife.” Although the passage shows Meursault challenging the ethics and morals that the world around him follows, it does have instances like the end in which we see that the rant is still expression of Meursault's complex emotions, as it is unclear whether it is fear or a...
...according to him, a man who is morally guilty of killing his mother severs himself from society in the same way as a man who raises a murderous hand against the father who begat him.” This quote is telling how society input their feelings and ideas onto Meursault. The persecutor compares Meursault emotionless and lack on remorse for his killing the same as a person killing their own father. Society believes Meursault as an emotionless killer or a stranger to society’s morality, Meursault then can’t explain why he couldn’t feel any emotion, drives, or thoughts of remorse for his murder. Lastly, when the chaplain visits Meursault against his wishes, this scene showed how society expects everyone to ask for forgiveness from god when near death. Meursault then thinks it is absurd and refused to believe in him because he says it’s ridiculous and there’s no time at all.
However, upon deciding to kill a man, he quickly learns that his previous unconcern will not diminish the consequences for his deed. Put to death, Meursault remains stagnant on his opinion of justice, refusing to ever consider that justice possesses any worth. Upon receiving a visit from a chaplain hours before his execution, he merely uttered “I had been right, I was still right, I was always right” (Camus 121) Meursault did not understand why the chaplain wanted to force him to turn to God and gain a moral sense about life. Thus he simply reiterated the motto that he lived by: an apathetic, self-absorbed idea that nothing in life means anything. Meursault’s continual refusal to accept the moral standards of the world prohibited him from every truly finding a true sense of
The Cathars were a very peaceful group that adopted a life of extreme devotion. Both men and women could become "parfaits". "Parfaits" referred to people who were seen by the Catholic Church as "perfect heretics". They renounced the world and abstained from eating meat and having any sexual contact. The Cathars lived in poverty. The men would travel and preach, and they earned money by cloth making, and shepherding. Followers were not expected to abide by the same ascetic standards as the parfaits, and they were permitted to eat meat and engage in sex. Catharism, or Albigensianism, was a religion which originated in the Balkans long before it made its appearance in the southwestern region of France , around the 12th century. It was a religion like any other, based on good versus evil. Albigensianism was a heretic religion and the catholics were not very fond of this new and upcoming religion. Its creed stated that god never created Earth, Jesus never existed nor did he suffer on the cross. The only ceremony practiced by the Cathars was the consolamentum or baptism of the Holy Spirit. For the Cathars, this was the only means of salvation. The Cathar clergy were those who had already received the consolamentum as part of the ritualistic ordination and had already been saved. The lay Cathars, or Believers, were obliged to receive the same sacrament before death in order to be saved as well. By the early thirteenth century Catharism was a very quickly growing religion in the area of Languedoc. It was supported by the nobility as well as the common people. This was yet another annoyance to the Roman Church. Even in open debates, Ca...
... his mother and the idea of God which is again supported by his close relationships. Those relationships are with people who don’t believe in a higher being or who show no true morals. Camus accommodates white with many objects and people, yet purposely excludes Meursault and refers to him as dark. All of these techniques show Meursault as a nonreligious man with potential to harm without remorse. This leads up to his interaction with light where he feels uncomfortable just as he does with God. Meursault’s history and personality lead up to the murder of the Arab, the distraction of the light, and in the end, accusing God, “the light”, for his criminal behavior. Human nature needs moral standards or the world would be as corrupt as Meursault’s life.
While coming to terms with the absurd was a gradual process for Meursault, his final days and his heated conversation with the chaplain, and his desire for a hateful crowd of spectators show that he was able to accept the absurdity, and revel in it, finding satisfaction in spite of those around him and justifying his murder. His ego had reached an all-time high as he neared his execution, and his satisfaction left him prepared for the nothingness awaiting him. This process was a natural psychological response to his mortality, for his peace of mind. Therefore, Meursault is not the Stranger, an alien to society, but a troubled man seeking meaning and satisfaction in a life and a world that was overwhelming unsatisfactory and absurd.
...everyone is surrounded by death. Camus explains that life isn’t about what is not envisioned, but it’s about what is evident. Meursault’s feeling of apathy is directly related to his conviction that life lacks necessary order and meaning, “As if that blind rage had washed me clean, rid me of hope…I opened myself to the gentle indifference of the world,” as he awaits his impending death, he finally recognizes that life is the most complex entity in the universe and one only has one life to live, so live it wisely (122). In the end, Meursault changed spiritually because he didn’t concentrate as much on the physical world because while he was in prison, he thought about life’s gifts and (although still atheist) realizes that faith in yourself and life is very important. There is also some irony here; he finally realizes the meaning of live just as he awaits his death.
In Camus’s book The Outsider, one of the major themes is religion, and the protagonist, Meursault, has unwavering views on religion; he refuses to acknowledge the existence of God even before his death. According to Camus, religion is a failed attempt at giving life meaning. As soon as you know that death waits, you start living to the fullest so as not to waste another day doing something you dislike. But there is no fear of death having an effect on Meursault because he is already doing what he wants to do. Through the book, Camus strives to test the efficiency of religion as an antidote for human mortality.
... mother, he does not react in a way most people do. He does not cry but instead accepts what has happened and realizes that he can not change it. He goes back and does physical things he would do on a normal day. When the caretaker offers him coffee, he accepts it, he smokes a cigarette and has sex with a woman he just met. Meursault also does not lie to escape death. He refuses to conform to society and lie. He would rather be seen as an outsider than do something that he does not believe in. Finally, Meursault, will not believe in G-d or Christianity just because it is the only thing to turn to before he is put to death. When Meursault decides not to cry at his mother’s funeral, he accepts himself as an outsider. When he is considered an outsider, it does not matter if he is guilty or innocent; at the end of the day he guilty just for being different.
In Albert Camus’ novel, The Stranger, the protagonist Meursault is a character who has definite values and opinions concerning the society in which he lives. His self-inflicted alienation from society and all its habits and customs is clear throughout the book. The novel itself is an exercise in absurdity that challenges the reader to face the nagging questions concerning the meaning of human existence. Meursault is an existentialist character who views his life in an unemotional and noncommittal manner, which enhances his obvious opinion that in the end life is utterly meaningless.
Camus writes in a simple, direct, and uncomplicated style. The choice of language serves well to convey the thoughts of Meursault. The story is told in the first person and traces the development of the narrator's attitude toward himself and the rest of the world. Through this sort of simple grammatical structure, Camus gives the reader the opportunity to become part of the awareness of Meursault. In Part I, what Meursault decides to mention are just concrete facts. He describes objects and people, but makes no attempt to analyze them. Since he makes no effort to analyze things around him, that job is given to the reader. The reader therefore creates his own meaning for Meursault's actions. When he is forced to confront his past and reflect on his experiences, he attempts to understand the reasons for existence. At first, Meursault makes references to his inability to understand what's happening around him, but often what he tells us seems the result of his own indifference or detachment. He is frequently inattentive to his surroundings. His mind wanders in the middle of conversations. Rarely does he make judgments or express opinions about what he or other characters are doing. Meursault walks through life largely unaware of the effect of his actions on others.