Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay on income inequality solutions
Effect of income inequality in us
Problems of income inequality
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Over the past few years, the income gap between low-income families and high-income families has increased drastically. In the article “10 Practical Steps to Reverse This Diabolical Trend Is Threatening the Foundations of Our Society,” Robert Reich states, “The Congressional Budget Office has found that between 1979 and 2007. . .The gap in income-after federal taxes and transfer-more than tripled between the top 1 percent of the population and everyone else.” As seen in our society, the distribution of wealth is unfair and unjust, which has increased income inequality and will eventually create poverty. As a result, the number of people living in poverty is increasing rapidly. It may seem that income inequality is inevitable, but there are solutions to lessen the gap, like investing in education, hiring American workers instead of overseas workers who accept low pay, and increasing taxes on the wealthy.
The first solution to help lessen income inequality in the United States is by investing in education. For the past few years, the cost of attendance at the 4-year universities is increasing rapidly to a point where college is not accessible for everyone. The essay “Why the Rich are Getting Richer and the Poor, Poorer” shows how important education is in our society and how it can affect a person’s status. There are a lot
…show more content…
of ways to invest in education but the most beneficial way to invest in education is by lowering the cost tuition fees. In the movie “Inequality for All,” Robert Reich states, “In the 1960s, the tuition was free . . . in the 1970s, it was $700 a year in today’s dollar, but now it cost $15,000 for in-state resident.” As shown in the video, in the past, college was available for everyone; anyone can get a higher education. But, as the inequality gets worse, college became unaffordable, which made it impossible for someone who is not rich to have a college degree. As a result, some are forced to choose straight to work that pays minimum wage or less, which made high paying jobs more available because only a few people are getting educated to learn the basic skills that are needed to the areas where job is available. A person who doesn’t have a college degree will have limited job opportunities and they will be paid less than an educated person. Education is important because it can help someone to escape the horrible life that is brought by poverty. The second solution to lessen the income inequality in the United States is by hiring American workers instead of overseas workers who are paid less than minimum wage. To continue competing with other corporations, many companies became unethical; they started hiring workers who accept low pay. In the essay “Why the Rich Are Getting Richer and the Poor, Poorer,” Robert Reich states “It then discovered that producers in Singapore would perform the same task at a far lower cost . . . so in the early 1980s they began hiring cheaper routine producers in Singapore” (Reich 517). As the corporations gain more profit, the corporations became greedy and selfish; the corporations are putting the profits first before the workers. For example, in the recent studies by Center for American Progress, the author says the following: U.S. multinational corporations, the big brand-name companies that employ a fifth of all American workers… cut their work forces in the U.S. by 2.9 million during the 2000s while increasing employment overseas by 2.4 million. (5 Facts) As seen in the recent study, many corporations are more concern about the profit more than the workers who works for them. The overseas worker, who are paid less than the minimum wage, takes away the job opportunities that Americans workers should have. Last but not least, another to lessen income inequality in the United States is to increase the taxes on the wealthy and to reduce the taxes on the poor. For the past few years, the taxing system in our country has been unfair and unjust; the wealthy tends to pay less tax and the poor tends to pay higher taxes. In the video “Inequality for All,” Warren Buffet says, “My total taxes paid, payroll taxes plus income tax, mine came to 17.7%. The average for the office was 32.9% . . . the taxation system has tilted toward the rich” (qtd. in Reich). As shown, the taxation system favors the rich which makes the poor suffer because the poor pays a higher tax rates. Today, lowering the tax rates on the poor will be beneficial because currently, the price of expenses are extremely high and some low-income families are struggling to pay the bills and to provide the needs of their family. Unlike the poor, the wealthy have a lot of more money and paying the bills and providing the needs of their family is easy for them. On the other hand, the other side of political spectrum who practice communism will argue that income inequality will never disappear until the there’s an existence of capitalism and the only solution to lessen the income equality is to become a communist. Communists argue says that they have equality because in their political system, there are no capitalist, which means everyone are in the same class and the workers are getting paid with the same amount of money whether he/she works hard or not. The essay “The Communist Manifesto” emphasizes that, unlike capitalism, communism promotes equality. In the essay, Karl Marx says the following: In this sense, the theory of the communists may be summed up in the single sentence: abolition of private property . . . but communism abolishes eternal truth, it abolishes all religion and all morality, instead of constituting them on a new basis. (Marx 468) As explain in the essay, the communists view equality differently; the communists believe that private property don’t exist and they don’t value uniqueness.
In the modern civilization, North Korea is the only country that practices communism. As explain in the essay, communism would solve income inequality and communism is better than capitalism but as seen today, the citizens of North Korea are suffering from poverty; N. Koreans are famished and they’re living in horrific conditions. It’s great that communism promotes equality but the way they view equality is disturbing and their political system takes away the citizen’s rights and
freedom. The income inequality in our nation is becoming more challenging to the low-income families. In the article “Conservatives Blame the Wrong People for Economic Problems,” Noah Webster says, “The causes which destroyed the ancient republics are numerous, but in Rome, one principal cause was the vast inequality of fortunes” (qtd. in Lundgren). Income inequality is the major problem in our country because it will lead to poverty. If income inequality is left unsolved, it will create a huge problem that can destroy our society.
In Confronting Inequality, Paul Krugman discusses the cost of inequality and possible solutions. Krugman argues to say that it is a fantasy to believe the rich live just like the middle class. Then, he goes into detail about how middle class families struggle to try to give their children a better life and how education plays a factor in children’s future lives. For example, children’s ability to move into higher education could be affected by their parents economic status. Also, He discusses how politicians play a role in the inequality, because most of politicians are in the upper economic class. Finally, Krugman says how we could possibly have solutions to these various inequalities, but how America won’t get
America was once known as the land of opportunity. However, that is no longer the case. Americans are still suffering from a depression that began three years ago in 2008. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, in 2007, the United States unemployment rates were 4.6 percent. In 2009, one year after the depression began, the unemployment rate rose to 7.6 percent. Millions of Americans are living in poverty, unable to afford the basic necessities. On the other hand, there is a minuscule percent of the population that are billionaires. Written in 2005, Holly Sklar’s essay “The Growing Gulf Between the Rich and the Rest of Us” argues that if something isn’t done about the growing inequality between the rich and the poor, the American economy as a whole will weaken. A year later, the Economist published the article, “Inequality and the American Dream” implies that the American dream is broken. Sklar’s argument sheds light on the Economist’s argument. In particular, Sklar’s use of facts regarding the wealthiest Americans, the poorest Americans, and the discussion of the impact of inequality on society provide insight into the Economist’s article.
With each class comes a certain level in financial standing, the lower class having the lowest income and the upper class having the highest income. According to Mantsios’ “Class in America” the wealthiest one percent of the American population hold thirty-four percent of the total national wealth and while this is going on nearly thirty-seven million Americans across the nation live in unrelenting poverty (Mantsios 284-6). There is a clear difference in the way that these two groups of people live, one is extreme poverty and the other extremely
Why are so a large number of people that beg for money, sitting on the streets, looking for food 's some sort? It is not day-to-day that we consider situations like this, but it is out there constantly without all of us realizing it. A number of states have poverty 's more issues than others, but it is sad to think about how plenty of people are actually considered to be in poverty. This is an inequality concerning me a lot, and is getting worse daily. Poverty in the United States relates to people whose annual household earnings are less than a poverty line set by the United States government. Poverty is common, resulted in by numerous different factors such as failing markets, structural problems, unfortunate mishaps, and poor individual
The highest earning fifth of U.S. families earned 59.1% of all income, while the richest earned 88.9% of all wealth. A big gap between the rich and poor is often associated with low social mobility, which contradicts the American ideal of equal opportunity. Levels of income inequality are higher than they have been in almost a century, the top one percent has a share of the national income of over 20 percent (Wilhelm). There are a variety of factors that influence income inequality, a few of which will be discussed in this paper. Rising income inequality is caused by differences in life expectancy, rapidly increases in the incomes of the top 5 percent, social trends, and shifts in the global economy.
The film “Inequality for all” directed by Jacob Kornbluth, begins with Robert Reich asking students three questions to consider in a lecture when talking about the uneven distribution of wealth. First, what is happening regarding the distribution of wealth? He then inquires to why this is happening. Last of all, he asks the students if the distribution of wealth is a problem in America. He addresses these questions as well as many others in his lecture on the growing divide between America’s rich and poor. Robert Reich is an economist, author, and educator as well as public policy professor who served in the Ford, Carter and Clinton administration. He has dealt with this particular topic for over three decades and continues to spread his political views as a professor at the University of Berkley. Furthermore, he talks about the widening gap between the wealthy and the poor/middle class. He goes beyond the obvious facts to show us why this is happening and uses statistical data to display this growing problem. He gives concerning evidence that wages are declining, and that America’s weakening economy is based on consumerism.
Time is Money A plethora of research studies exist on the topic of wealth inequality in America. There is no question that the top one percent of earners consume a large portion of wealth in this country, while the other 90 percent of earners share the left-overs. Some of the related questions that I found during the course of my research are: 1) Why are wealth and income distributions so vastly disproportionate? 2) Can America bridge the wealth gap? 3)
In the United States there are four social classes : the upper class, the middle class, the working class, and the lower class. Of these four classes the most inequality exists between the upper class and the lower class. This inequality can be seen in the incomes that the two classes earn. During the period 1979 through the present , the growth in income has disproportionately grown.The bottom sixty percent of the US population actually saw their real income decrease in 1990 dollars. The next 20% saw medium gains. The top twenty percent saw their income increase 18%. The wealthiest one percent saw their incomes rise drastically over 80%. As reported in the 1997 Center on Budget's analysis , the wealthiest one percent of Americans ( 2.6 million people) received as much after-tax income in 1994 as the bottom 35 percent of the population combined (88 million people). But in 1977 the bottom 35 percent had about twice as much after tax income as the top one percent. These statistics further show the disproportional income growth among the social classes. The gr...
The United States has a pervasive issue of income inequality (Volscho & Kelly, 2012). While the wealthy few live in absurd abundance, poor hardworking individuals often cannot afford basic necessities. Such a dynamic is not only an affront to the ideals of equality of opportunity, but also may increase crime as a result of relative deprivation and lack of legitimate opportunities to achieve (Thio, 2010). This essay describes the magnitude of income inequality in the United States, reveals barriers that obscures its magnitude, and suggests a starting point from which corrective measures might develop.
3. What are the effects of this wealth inequality in the US and what causes it, as well as some possible solutions and their ramifications, will all be discussed and answered below. There has always been a wealth gap between the richest and poorest in society. However, in the past decade, the wealth gap between the richest and poorest citizens in the US has been growing rapidly. In the 70s and 80s, the wealth and income growth rate for both poor and rich people were similar, however, between the years 2009 and 2012 the top 1% income increased 31% while for the bottom 20%, their income actually dropped and for the vast majority of Americans, the average yearly income only increased by 0.4% [4].
Income inequality has affected American citizens ever since the American Dream came to existence. The American Dream is centered around the concept of working hard and earning enough money to support a family, own a home, send children to college, and invest for retirement. Economic gains in income are one of the only possible ways to achieve enough wealth to fulfill the dream. Unfortunately, many people cannot achieve this dream due to low income. Income inequality refers to the uneven distribution of income and wealth between the social classes of American citizens. The United States has often experienced a rise in inequality as the rich become richer and the poor become poorer, increasing the unstable gap between the two classes. The income gap in America has been increasing steadily since the late 1970’s, and has now reached historic highs not seen since the 1920’s (Desilver). UC Berkeley economics professor, Emmanuel Saez conducted extensive research on past and present income inequality statistics and published them in his report “Striking it Richer.” Saez claims that changes in technology, tax policies, labor unions, corporate benefits, and social norms have caused income inequality. He stands to advocate a change in American economic policies that will help close this inequality gap and considers institutional and tax reforms that should be developed to counter it. Although Saez’s provides legitimate causes of income inequality, I highly disagree with the thought of making changes to end income inequality. In any diverse economic environment, income inequality will exist due to the rise of some economically successful people and the further development of factors that push people into poverty. I believe income inequality e...
As technology continues to advance, a college degree becomes more and more crucial to attain wealth; however, attaining a diploma has never been more expensive which is why educational reform is a key component in decreasing wealth inequality. Those lacking a higher education are at an immediate disadvantage since “in 2012, 65% of all jobs required a post-secondary education, completely reversed from the only 34% that did in 1975” (Bunce). Affordable college education is crucial in narrowing the wealth gap since the incline in the percentage of jobs which require higher education has been accompanied by a steep incline in the price of education itself. Where education is the problem, it can also be a solution if the federal government would simply provide the resources to achieve cheaper college tuition; moreover, the money to fund such a program would be made back through the economic gain accompanied with the narrowing of the wealth gap. Education is primarily such a considerable factor of wealth inequality because education runs
Income inequality continues to increase in today’s world, especially in the United States. Income inequality means the unequal distribution between individuals’ assets, wealth, or income. In the Twilight of the Elites, Christopher Hayes, a liberal journalist, states the inequality gap between the rich and the poor are increasing widening, and there need to have things done - tax the rich, provide better education - in order to shortening the inequality gap. America is a meritocratic country, which means that everybody has equal opportunity to be successful regardless of their class privileges or wealth. However, equality of opportunity does not equal equality of outcomes. People are having more opportunities to find a better job, but their incomes are a lot less compared to the top ten percent rich people. In this way, the poor people will never climb up the ladder to high status and become millionaires. Therefore, the government needs to increase all the tax rates on rich people in order to reduce income inequality.
Poverty is an outcome of the mode of production and plays a large role in relation to production. Therefore, according to Marx, it is a contributor to the economic base. People who are living at poverty level struggles to meet the living necessities due to capitalist exchange values on productions. What I mean by this that people in poverty cannot afford to buy enough food, clothes, and most importantly a safe home for their kids. This is due to the fact that most people living in poverty are being paid minimum wages that does not meet the exchange values of commodities. People in poverty are the laborers in the capitalist world, they a commodity as well. Using Marx’s theory, people in poverty are the proletariats since they are the actual