Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Presidential powers
The president is given several powers in the Constitution that allow him or her to exert influence over domestic policy; two of which include legislative powers and appointment power. However, as the checks and balance system and the division of power remain throughout the three branches of the government, there are certain provisions that prevent the commander in chief from exerting too much influence. Of these, mandatory spending and the lame duck period assist in stopping the president from influencing public policy too often.
The president of the United States has the power to veto, pocket veto, and sign legislation; all of which aid the president in implementing or enforcing policies that he or she agrees with. After Congress passes a
…show more content…
bill, a President can block the legislation from becoming a law by refusing to sign it; or vetoing it. Veto power allows presidents to influence legislation concerning domestic policy; as he or she can reject the final legislation. The vetoed bill is sent back to Congress where Congress can alter the bill so that the president will be more likely to sign and pass it. Additionally, the president holds appointment power, where the president can appoint someone to a domestic office. The nominee that the president appoints is usually someone that is of the same political party and has the same or similar beliefs as the president; giving the president indirect influence over policy making. For example, the president, with approval from the senate, has the power to appoint supreme court justices who will serve for life. Prior to appointing a justice, the president will be aware to the nominee’s political ideology and ensure that the justice will make decisions that the president agrees with. However, despite powers that the president has that allow him or her to exert influence over domestic policy, there are several hindrances that prevent the president from exerting too much power.
Two examples of these hindrances include mandatory spending and the lame duck period. Mandatory spending is not controlled by annual budget decisions and is required by pre-existing law. These budgetary constraints make it difficult to accomplish policy goals as a lack of money can prevent actions from being taken. However, as mandatory spending follows its name, it can be difficult to make budget cuts that might accomplish policy goals that require spending. Furthermore, the lame duck period helps prevent the president from exerting too much power by diminishing the president’s power. The lame duck period is a period of time in which an officeholder’s term is coming to an end (namely, the months between when the president elect assumes office and the previous president still resides in the white house). During the transition months, the previous president is still in office, but has diminished influence. Congress is less interested in what he or she proposes and often, very little is accomplished in these months. The lame duck period can help stop the president from trying to pass or sign excessive amounts of legislation before the new president takes office (much like the midnight judge signings of John Adams the night before he was succeeded by Thomas
Jefferson). Although the Constitution has granted the president certain powers that allow him or her to exert influence over domestic policy, the checks and balances system is prevalent and there are certain hindrances that come with the presidency regarding policy influence.
The Constitution of the United States sets out the procedure of a bill becoming a law in Article 1, Section 7. Scholars have interpreted the Constitution to read that a president can only sign or veto a bill, but the section that many other scholars have looked over that would allow for the line-item veto is that, “if he approve he shall sign it, but if not he shall return it, with his Objections to that House in which it shall have originated, who shall enter the Objections at large on their Journal, and proceed to r...
Presidential power has become a hot topic in the media the in recent years. There has been extensive debate about what a president should be able to do, especially without the involvement of Congress and the American people. While this debate has become more publicized since the Bush administration, similar issues of presidential power date back to Truman and the Korean War. As with much of the structure of the U.S. government, the powers of the president are constantly evolving with the times and the executives.
... This precedent allows future presidents to take actions strictly forbidden by the executive branch in times of national emergency without congressional approval. The most important expansion of the power of the presidency happened during the Jackson administration. When Jackson used the veto power of the president to influence legislation as a matter of policy and not constitutionality, he arguably altered the balance of power between the legislative and executive branches.
Today the word presidential veto does not come out in the United States Constitution, but Article I require that bills, orders, resolutions or other act of legislation by the Congress be brought to the President for his approval (Belz 1998 p 136). Normally the President is presented the bill, he can either sign it into law or may return the bill to the originating the Congress with his objections to the bill the appropriate constitutional term used is a veto, or neither sign nor return it to Congress after having been presented the bill for ten days exempting Sundays in cases where the Congress is still in session, the bill becomes a law; otherwise, the bill does not become a law and is considered a pocket veto according to the US constitution (Donald 2001 p.112).
Congress also has the ‘power of the purse’ which can control the Presidents war makings, but again this as not always been effective. Article II of the constitution states that, ‘The president shall from
Congress and The Presidency Congress as a whole makes laws. When Bills are addressed they must meet the approval of both the House and the Senate in order to become a Law, and then the President can always veto it. Congress also deals with matters of public concern be it something that needs to be investigated or something that needs to be put before the public to raise awareness. Congress is made up of two parts: The Senate and the House of Representatives. Each is granted different powers and responsibilities.
It is obvious the president was not given enough power under the Constitution. This is in part because Article II of the Constitution was written in a short period of time with little thought. Many presidents have had to make unclear decisions with little information about the circumstance in the Constitution and the president is beginning to take over the government due to increasing implied powers. However the president’s power has recently proven that it has outgrown the constitution and is swiftly evolving. The Constitution gave the president broad but vague powers, including the authorization to appoint judges and other officials with the Senate’s consent, veto bills, lead the military as commander and chief and make sure “that the Laws be faithfully executed.” Many of these powers however are shared with the Legislative Branch, and cause conflict within the government.
The presidential role as Chief legislator is not written in the National Constitution, it is, however, one of the created major roles that the president must fulfill. Chief legislator is defined in the as the president having an influence on making and recommending laws to congress. For example, it allows the president to either accept bills into law or veto (denying) bills from becoming law. Speaking of vetoes, the veto power has developed into a powerful instrument of the President’s leadership in legislation (Binkley, 1956). Meaning, the president has the ability to threaten to veto a bill as a tool to spook Congress into changing a part of legislation that the president does not agree with. Being chief legislator is one of the many hats that the president wears while in office that grants him/her a persuasive voice in the legislation process as well as recommending legislation to
Several aspects of the executive branch give the presidency political power. The president’s biggest constitutional power is the power of the veto (Romance, July 27). This is a power over Congress, allowing the president to stop an act of Congress in its tracks. Two things limit the impact of this power, however. First, the veto is simply a big “NO” aimed at Congress, making it largely a negative power as opposed to a constructive power (July 27). This means that the presidential veto, while still quite potent even by its mere threat, is fundamentally a reactive force rather than an active force. Second, the presidential veto can be overturned by two-thirds of the House of Representatives and Senate (Landy and Milkis, 289). This means that the veto doesn’t even necessarily hav...
Thanksgiving break a bust,I thought.The fall air swept through as my sister and I kept playing volleyball.My mom came bursting out,she was trying to catch her breath as I questioned,
The Constitution lays out power sharing amongst the President and Congress. However the Constitution is not always clearly defined which leaves questions to how the laws should be interpreted and decisions implemented. There are three major models of presidential power within foreign policy; the first being the presidential model in which decisions abroad are made by the president and his or her top aides and advisors. This model is accepted amongst many because during times of urgency and crisis the president must make quick decisions. The president unlike congress is provided various sources of intelligence information, which is a benefit in analyzing situations globally and making sound decisions.
The main powers of the executive branch rest with the President of the United States of America. Powers granted to him by the constitution include serving as commander in chief of the armed forces; negotiating treaties; appointing federal judges, ambassadors, and cabinet officials; and acting as head of state. The president also has a cabinet which includes officials such as the attorney general and the secretaries of State, Treasury, Defense, Interior, Agricu...
The Founding Fathers who made the Constitution did not intend for the president to be a major domestic policymaker. Article II establishes that Congress, not the President, as having the policymaking power. Congress is to legislate and the president is to take care that laws are executed the way they were supposed to be. The president is given the authority to recommend legislation that is necessary and expedient but has no written power to get it passed. Nowhere in the constitution is does it state that the president will be chief domestic policymaker. Yet this is actually what has occurred. The president is expected by the people and Congress alike to propose legislative programs and use the influence of the office to make sure it is
The president of the United States can make executive agreements (equal to a treaty) and meet with other world leaders without the Senate’s approval. He also has powers that allow him to obtain control in times of an emergency, without the interference of Congress. Abraham Lincoln used this during the Civil War because he needed to ensure he could spend all the money he needed to win the war. The Iranian president can also do this, he can declare a state of emergency which suspends all laws and can enact a state of martial law. However, no president has actually used this power as of now.
There are many steps in running for president. Running for president is said to be one of the longest campaigns. Running for President consists of mainly two different parties and which consist of: the presidential primary campaign and the general electoral campaign that follow the party’s national convention. Generally both campaigns take place within the first 10 months of the election year. The primary campaign was mainly used for opening the nomination process to ordinary party members and to delay and postpone the influence of party bosses. During this time there is a process where the candidates go through a “beauty contest” where they are competing for popular votes; however the “popular” votes do not have