Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Theodore roosevelt's approach to progressivism
Monroe doctrine significance
Assess the significance of the Monroe doctrine to the development of the United States. research paper
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Theodore roosevelt's approach to progressivism
The Founding Fathers who made the Constitution did not intend for the president to be a major domestic policymaker. Article II establishes that Congress, not the President, as having the policymaking power. Congress is to legislate and the president is to take care that laws are executed the way they were supposed to be. The president is given the authority to recommend legislation that is necessary and expedient but has no written power to get it passed. Nowhere in the constitution is does it state that the president will be chief domestic policymaker. Yet this is actually what has occurred. The president is expected by the people and Congress alike to propose legislative programs and use the influence of the office to make sure it is …show more content…
enacted. If the president fails in this regard citizens hold the president accountable. The framers did not foresee the president as chief domestic policy maker; they did however provide the president some policymaking powers. The president has the power to recommend necessary and expedient legislation.
This would become important for the presidencies of the early 1900's. If the framers had not included this detail then the president could never have produced credible legislation. The president also implements this legislation into law and sees to its execution. These two acts have evolved as the Constitutional basis of the president’s policymaking role. For the first century presidents recommended measures, took positions on legislation before Congress, occasionally even drafted bills, but did not formulate a cohesive domestic policy on a regular basis. It wasn't until the 1880s that there was a change in the public's view toward the role of the federal government in the United States. This changed ideology was brought forth by market competition that was carried to its extreme, and resulting from the laissez faire policy. Laissez faire is Latin for let do, which was a policy that basically stated that the government was to have little to no interaction with the private sector. This was a well enough policy until people started to abuse it and create giant monopolies. The government promoted industry as a means to develop the economy. However, “big” business grew larger and was able to dominate markets in many areas through monopoly. Business …show more content…
men were arrogant to the fact that they could fix prices to their liking due the fact that there was no competition. An example of this would be when Standard Oil was created they bought out 39 independent oil companies, eliminating the need for economic competition which meant people couldn't not shop around for prices. In economics if people are allowed to look for lower priced goods then those goods will find a medium point of being affordable for the consumer and producer. When all economic competition is eliminated then companies can charge what they like because the people have no choice but to buy from them. This can be seen in the steel industry, from which the ruthless behavior of Carnegie, Rockefeller, etc. eliminated small steel companies. Likewise in the banking industry, J.P. Morgan attempted to create a banking trust. Calls for change were becoming more and more frequent, but Congress, like we in today's Congress, was fragmented, special interests were given to much say so, and they were lacking in policy leadership. In 1886, Congress passed the Interstate Commerce act to address the issue of overcharged prices by the railroads against farmers. This was during the first Grover Cleveland term. It was amended during 1867 to prevent the Republican President Benjamin Harrison from failing to implement the legislation by placing responsibility for implementation in an independent commission. By placing it into an independent commission Congress took away the Presidents power to directly affect policy. In 1890, during the Benjamin Harrison administration, Congress passed the Sherman Antitrust Act and President Harrison signed the legislation into law. However, the Supreme Court removed the main component of these enactments based on a restrictive interpretation of the 10th amendment. William McKinley was business friendly and because of this it lead to little action to suppress monopoly practices. Beginning with Theodore Roosevelt in the early 1900's and continuing through till Woodrow Wilson, presidential participation in the policymaking process greatly expanded. President Roosevelt would consult frequently with Speaker of the House Joseph Cannon. Cannon’s power as Speaker would help President Roosevelt get his progressive era legislation through Congress. President Roosevelt’s legislative program was called the “square deal”. This legislation would deal with things from the creation of the Panama Canal, to the creation of a National Parks Service, to various conservationist measures. President Roosevelt administration attempted to use a trust-busting strategy by using the Sherman Act, but the Supreme Court restricted his ability to do so. President Roosevelt did push through legislation known as the Pure Food and Drug Act of 1906 in reaction to the excesses of the meat packing industry. The White Slave Trade Act of 1910, otherwise known as the Mann Act, prohibited the movement of Women in interstate commerce for the purpose of prostitution. While he did not have the reputation for doing so, President Taft continued many of the policies from the Roosevelt administration. Woodrow Wilson would expand the presidential role even further. Having been a political scientist he wrote a book while a professor at Princeton entitled Congressional Government. In the book he depicted government in which the United States was primarily Congress centered. The president was depicted as assuming a rather small policymaking role. Nevertheless, Wilson compared his responsibilities as similar to those of the British prime minister, which meant he could propose an agenda of measures that addressed social and economic problems and then to use his personal and political influence to see that they were enacted. President Wilson would personally help formulate a legislative program, even going so far as to draft some legislation. He also would address Congress and gave a State of the Union, thus making him the first President to do so since John Adams. Wilson would push the limits of the Presidency by pushing legislation that would help the working class of America and this program was labeled as the new freedom.
He would introduce legislation that created the Federal Reserve System for the purpose of stabilizing the money system. He also secured passage of the Adamson Act which would establish an 8 hour work day for Railroad workers. This new expansion of legislative power would be greeted by opponents who did not want this new extension of presidential power. The Supreme Court would continue to take a strict view of the expanded role of the federal government that had survived since the progressive era. A restrictive interpretation of the 10th amendment implied that the federal government did not have the authority to regulate matters in intra-state commerce or to interfere in the economies or affairs of the states. This decision would eventually be overruled during F.D.R presidency when the Supreme Court would allow the government to manage who much of a product could be manufactured, which was the basis of acts such as the Agriculture Adjustment
Act. The depression would do more to expand the president’s role than any other single event in American Presidency. Herbert Hoover would take a hand off approach to the nation’s economic difficulties. Herbert Hoover believed in rugged individualism and this was seen by his inaction throughout the beginning of the Great Depression. This sense of rugged individualism meant that he believed it was up to the people to fix the economy and not the governments. Under the leadership of Franklin Roosevelt he would address many of the problems of the depression and from this point onward, the president was expected to be the chief policymaker. Under President Franklin Roosevelt many industries would come under the control of the central government. The Banking Act of 1935 would centralize the banking system and federal regulation of depository institutions. While the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation would insure bank deposits so that people would have a guaranteed amount of money always in the bank. The Agricultural Adjustment Act would make payments to farmers to control production and reduce acreage and competition, affect prices. National Industrial Recovery Act would bring about fair competition in specifying wages and hours for labor and prices. Under these programs the government rained in the economy and controlled it like never before. President Franklin Roosevelt participated in designing a program for bringing the nation out of the depression. He would draft legislation and fight for that legislation in Congress. When the Supreme Court struck down major components of the New Deal, President Roosevelt threatened to “pack” the court with one new justice for every one that opposed the program. By doing this he was threatening to something that was technically not in the constitution and the fact the Supreme Court back down from their stance showed the growing power in the presidency. From here on the branch that the American people look for in terms of policymaking in the new policy making system has been the president. Kennedy and Johnson expanded the role of the federal government to include social welfare and civil rights measures. Some of their programs included: Medicare and Medicaid, the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and the Equal Pay Act of 1963. These programs expanded the help the government gave to people who needed it and expanded the governments reach into the social lives of the American people. The 1960s were a period of prosperity and economic development. However, with the weakening of the economy that happened during the beginning of the Nixon administration produced new constraints. Higher inflation, greater unemployment, declining productivity, and increased foreign competition restricted the ability of the government to address both economic and social problems. The public’s mood also shifted through this period into a more restrictive attitude. Presidents from Carter through Clinton would attempt to shrink the role of the federal government in how it affected the economy and in the realm of social welfare. However, government would grow substantially during the Carter through Bush I presidencies. Indeed, the federal debt grew to enormous sizes during the Reagan administration. Only Clinton was successful in shrinking the debt and size of the federal government, both in terms of personnel and how much the government spent as a proportion of Gross domestic product. The size of the federal government has expanded drastically during the George W. Bush administration: the new Department of Homeland security, increased defense spending, and the recent expansion of Medicare benefits would once again push the presidential limits in terms of power. This new extension didn't necessarily help the people directly, but rather is helps them indirectly by keeping them safe from foreign and domestic threats. The office of the President has changed tremendously since the beginning of the nation. The President rarely offered legislation to Congress during the first century of its existence and it wasn't until President Theodore Roosevelt that the Presidency got involved. Ever since then Presidency has taken it upon themselves to become the champion of the people when it comes to domestic policies.
Presidential power has become a hot topic in the media the in recent years. There has been extensive debate about what a president should be able to do, especially without the involvement of Congress and the American people. While this debate has become more publicized since the Bush administration, similar issues of presidential power date back to Truman and the Korean War. As with much of the structure of the U.S. government, the powers of the president are constantly evolving with the times and the executives.
In 1901 Vice President Theodore Roosevelt took over as President after William McKinley was assassinated. The country had many opportunities ahead but was in need of some changes that the American people were all too ready for. Roosevelt was brought up in a well to do family and had was Harvard educated. But he was known to be a down to earth man that understood the needs of the people. His first priority as president was to give the people a “square deal” which encompassed his plan for the era. He wanted to reduce control the big businesses had over the U.S. economy and the workers, create more protection for the consumer, and create a plan to conserve our natural resources.
...he government to the ordinary people as explained in July 5, 1892 by the Omaha Morning World –Herald (Doc F). Lastly, the laws for the regulation of businesses was enforces until President Theodore Roosevelt had also contributed by suing companies that violated the Sherman Anti-Trust Act.
When he took office, 'the nation was in the fourth year of a disastrous economic crisis' and 'a quarter of the labor force was out of work [and] the banks had been closed in thirty-eight states' (Greenstein 16). In order to remedy these problems and restore trust in the government, FDR enacted the New Deal in the Hundred Days legislation. Many of the programs created in the legislation are still around today in some form, continuing to show FDR's influence on the modern presidency. Such programs as the Works Progress Administration and The Tennessee Valley Authority helped poor Americans unable to get jobs or afford the luxury of electricity. These programs were some of the major reasons FDR was so popular during his terms in office. Also created was the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, which insured the money in banks. This helped because then in the case of another bank crisis, people's money would not be lost. The FDIC was another reason, along with FDR's rhetoric, that people began to trust the banks and government again. One major policy FDR began was social security, which is still around today. When creating this idea of social security, it is clear he meant it to help the people, but also that he meant it to be permanent. FDR wanted, and received, a lasting effect on the government. By designing and implementing so many new programs and policies to help Americans, FDR showed what
He did this by increasing the power of the presidency, “by taking the position that the president could exercise any right not specifically denied him by the Constitution.” Theodore Roosevelt saw the president’s role to defend the citizens by regulating businesses and breaking up trusts that had gained too much power, defend the very resources of the country by establishing 50 wildlife sanctuaries, 5 national parks, 18 national monuments, and placing more than 230 acres of American soil under federal protection, and lastly increased the role of the president in foreign policy by heavily engaging in foreign affairs. Before Theodore Roosevelt, Congress was the most powerful branch of the government, but with the help of Theodore Roosevelt’s presidency it helped establish an influential and reliable executive branch. During both the Progressive Era and New Deal Era, many American citizens faced low pay.
Presidents create the leadership position that has a say in all of the decisions for a country. In this era, many judgments of situations needed to be decided, and it made it blatantly obvious as to who made the wrong or right decisions. In the political cartoon published by Washington Post in 1907, Roosevelt wanted to convey that it was necessary to determine what trusts were good or bad. Trusts were made to shut down businesses and he felt he had the power to run these options and opinions. After some violated the Sherman Anti-Trust Act, Teddy really took a step forward in proving his trust-busting techniques. In a speech that Roosevelt made in February of 1912, he expressed his belief on the importance of the people participating in direct election of Senators through his speech. This importance that he felt was necessary eventually led on to the 17th Amendment, which was passed the year after. In Herbert Croly’s New Republic, Wilson received quite a bit of loathing from Croly as he expressed his opinions. The supporters of Wilson definitely disagreed with an article like this, and it was unacceptable to some. Whether liked or disliked, the presidents during this period made an impact on our nation, and the people wanted to be heard for the rights they wanted.
This forced industrialists and monopolistic corporations to consider public opinion when making business decisions, which benefited the consumer and helped grow the economy. One way that Wilson and Roosevelt tried protecting these smaller businesses was by removing trusts that were much bigger than they were. Under Wilson’s authority in 1814, the Clayton Anti-trust Act was passed, which abolished interlocking directorates. This law was passed as an amendment to clarify and supplement the Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890. When Roosevelt became president in 1901, he demanded a “Square Deal” that would address his principal concerns for the era- the three C’s: control of corporations, consumer protection, and conservation.... ...
Congress has helped develop the Presidency as we know it today. This is because Congress argues over proposals and legislation proposed by the President. They are a major determent in whether bills turn into laws. But it’s not easy. One reason for this is because there are many powerful groups out there who argue about what should be discussed such as air pollution with the EPA or jobs.
It is obvious the president was not given enough power under the Constitution. This is in part because Article II of the Constitution was written in a short period of time with little thought. Many presidents have had to make unclear decisions with little information about the circumstance in the Constitution and the president is beginning to take over the government due to increasing implied powers. However the president’s power has recently proven that it has outgrown the constitution and is swiftly evolving. The Constitution gave the president broad but vague powers, including the authorization to appoint judges and other officials with the Senate’s consent, veto bills, lead the military as commander and chief and make sure “that the Laws be faithfully executed.” Many of these powers however are shared with the Legislative Branch, and cause conflict within the government.
From the inception of the Constitution, there has always been a power struggle between the President and Congress. In the beginning, Madison and the Jeffersonians were placed in a gridlock with Hamilton and his school of political philosophy. Andrew Jackson fought to extend the powers of the President, then Congress spent 50 years fighting to repeal the powers of the Executive. Abraham Lincoln refined Jacksonian presidential politics, then Congress impeached his successor, Andrew Johnson, for fear of another quasi -- tyrannical President. Even today, a Congress, whose majority is of the same party as the President, fights 24 hours a day to check the power of President George W. Bush. But why, and how? Inherent Power Struggles Within the Constitution: Article I, Section I -- "All legislative powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and a House of Representatives" VS. Article II, Section I -- "The executive power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America" Article II, Section II -- "The President shall be the Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several states, when called into the actual service of the United States" - The Founders' ambiguous and contradicting language sets the stage for a power struggle between the Executive and the Legislative branches - Being that the Founders were political masterminds, they realized that unique circumstances would demand some deviations from the restraints that the Constitution places on both the Executive and the Legislature - Founders anticipated that during times of crisis', the nation would need ...
Several aspects of the executive branch give the presidency political power. The president’s biggest constitutional power is the power of the veto (Romance, July 27). This is a power over Congress, allowing the president to stop an act of Congress in its tracks. Two things limit the impact of this power, however. First, the veto is simply a big “NO” aimed at Congress, making it largely a negative power as opposed to a constructive power (July 27). This means that the presidential veto, while still quite potent even by its mere threat, is fundamentally a reactive force rather than an active force. Second, the presidential veto can be overturned by two-thirds of the House of Representatives and Senate (Landy and Milkis, 289). This means that the veto doesn’t even necessarily hav...
...lroads gave special rates to some shippers in exchange that the shippers continued doing business with the railroad company. In the Clayton Antitrust Act, it said no one in commerce could regulate rates in price between different buyers (Document E). It said that otherwise, this would create a monopoly in any line of commerce. However, the Elkins Act of 1903 pushed heavy fines on the companies that did that. The Hepburn Act of 1906 also cracked down on depravity of the railroad companies. The Underwood tariff bill lowered rates on imports. Also a significant change was the graduated income tax. The Federal Reserve Act created the Federal Reserve Board which was enabled to issue paper money backed by commercial paper. This increased the rate of money flow throughout the country allowing many businesses to survive critical financial crises.
When the constitution of the United States was formed, the framers specifically designed the American Government structure to have checks and balances and democracy. To avoid autocracy the President was give power to preside over the executive branch of the government and as commander –in –chief, in which a clause was put into place to give the president the power to appeal any sudden attacks against America, without waiting for a vote from congress. While the president presides over the executive branch there has been ongoing debate over the role of the president in regards to foreign policy. Should foreign policy issues be an executive function by the president or should congress play a much greater role? With the sluggishness of our democracy,
From the perspective of congress, Roosevelt’s political priorities could not have been more wrong. Roosevelt’s didn’t let that hold him back with his determination he wanted to promote the rights of workers, he wanted the federal government to take the lead in dealing with public health and poverty. Roosevelt idolized Abraham Lincoln he would quote from Lincoln often reminding Americans of what Lincoln had told Congress in 1861. From the start of his presidency Roosevelt understood that he and the Congress where not going to see eye-to-eye. Knowing that the legislature was hostile to his policies, Roosevelt decided to use the president’s executive authority to realize his vision. Theodore most dramatic use of executive authority concerned conservation. Roosevelt is often considered the “conservationist president” conservation increasingly become one of Roosevelt’s main concerns. He used his authority to protect wildlife and public lands by creating the United States Forest Service and establishing 150 national forests, 51 federal bird reserves, 4 national game preserves, 5 national parks, and 18 national monuments by enabling the 1906 American Antiquities Act. Today the legacy of Theodore Roosevelt is found across the
The power of the Executive branch has expanded over time to become the most authoritative division of government. In contrast to the Constitution 's fundamental designer, James Madison, who predicted the Legislative branch would dominate due to it’s power in making laws and regulating taxes/spending, the executive powers have proven to be superior and ever broadening. From the birth of the Republic, the President has sought to protect his rights and seek beyond his restriction of power. Setting the precedent as early as 1795, George Washington refused to relay documents relating to the Jay Treaty to the House of Representatives and saw his actions as a justified act of “executive prerogative.” Moreover, weaving throughout the Nineteenth century, presidents such as Andrew Jackson and Abraham Lincoln conceived and added functions, such as the extensive use of the veto and the president’s direct and active role as Commander in Chief to their executive tool-belt. The Constitution communicates very little details regarding the President’s use of the power of veto and the role as Commander in Chief, but it was these presidents which established the major authority of the executive branch in these areas.