Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The impact of loss of biodiversity on the environment
Importance of loss of biodiversity
The impact of loss of biodiversity on the environment
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The effect of forest fragmentation is a growing concern among ecologists and forestry managers. Habitat fragmentation is often defined as a process during which “a large expanse of habitat is transformed into a number of smaller patches of smaller total area, isolated from each other by a matrix of habitats unlike the original” (Wilcove et al., 1986). The exact definition of fragmentation differs among studies and commentators, but such features as size of biggest fragment, total amount of perimeter, mean size of fragment, number of fragments, and average distance between fragments have been seen as aspects of fragmentation. The definition of habitat fragmentation above implies four effects of the process of fragmentation on habitat patterns: (a) reduction in habitat amount, (b) increase in number of habitat patches, (c) decrease in size of habitat patches, and (d) increase in isolation of patches. These four effects form the basis of most quantitative measures of habitat fragmentation (Fahrig, 2003). Because fragmentation is generally accompanied by habitat loss, parsing the effects of the two processes is a difficult matter (Wilcove et al., 1986). Many people use the term “fragmentation” loosely, to refer to both processes together. Habitat fragmentation is generally thought to have a large negative effect on biodiversity and is therefore widely viewed as an aspect of habitat degradation (Haila, 2002). This conclusion is, however, generally valid only for conceptualizations of fragmentation that are inseparable from habitat loss. Empirical studies to date suggest that habitat loss has large, consistently negative effects on biodiversity. Habitat fragmentation per se has much weaker effects on biodiversity that are at least as li...
... middle of paper ...
... interpreted as an intensification of the effects of habitat loss at low habitat levels. One aspect of the fragmentation issue, and the one that has been most widely bruited and treated in models, is the extent to which landscape configuration permits movement. The matter of connectivity in general and corridors in particular is thus part of the fragmentation issue.
The bottom line is that complex landscapes beget complex interactions and it will require some clever manipulative experiments to untangle the often confounding effects of boundary quantity, boundary quality, matrix habitat, patch area and patch isolation on different species. This separation is crucial for conservation purposes, seeing as fragmentation and habitat loss are among the most important causes of species decline worldwide (Haila et al., 1994; Murcia, 1995; Didham et al., 1996; Didham, 1997).
Fragmentation is the product of increased human population, and the expansion of the grasslands (due to human activity). Fragmented Population caused from human interference has led to a lack of gene flow within species. Although this problem poses a legitimate threat, no real action has been taken to prevent fragmentation from continuing. Human activities such as “the expansion of farmland, human occupation, the lack of accessible habitat, and the sparsity of suitable/favorable habitat” (Thalmann et al., 2011) are facilitating this critical issue. Lacking gene diversity is caused from extreme isolation, small numbers, and lack of gene flow (Thalmann et al., 2011).
Soule, Michael E et al. “Ecological Effectiveness: Conservation Goals for Interactive Species.” Conservation Biology 17.5 (2003) : 1238-1250.
Many old-growth forests across the landscape of northern Lower Peninsula of Michigan contain a mixture of tree species rather than a monoculture. Many researchers have put forward ideas to explain the competition and co-existence of tree species in such communities. A theory explaining competition and co-existence between two species is gap regeneration. Gap regeneration is when a gap is created upon death of a plant individual and a new individual, sometimes of the same species as died and sometimes not dependent on environmental heterogeneity, takes its place (Kenneth Lertzman). Canopy gaps during gap regeneration can be explained by either reciprocal replacement or habitat preference . In a reciprocal replacement, seedlings of one species would be found predominately under large trees ...
Modern-day genetic technology has granted mankind with the opportunity to bring back extinct species from the dead. If humans have come to possess the DNA from an extinct animal population, it is possible to create an identical clone of the animal in question, effectively “bringing it back from the dead”. Many ethical dilemmas surround the practice of de-extinction, and rightfully so. Recreating an extinct species could produce groundbreaking scientific breakthroughs, generating exciting opportunities for future genetics-based research. However, there could also be monumental consequences: the newly revived, once-extinct species might destroy the ecological equilibrium of modern Earth
In Indonesia, 8.828 million hectares of forests have been destroyed (see appendix 2). Around fifty acres of forests are removed every minute, not o...
Many of these causes could be prevented fairly easily. If people today would just follow some simple rules, none of these would be as big as they are now.
On the first level, when foreign, but previously non-invasive species is first introduced to a new area, the new species may play a role in a community that was previously unfulfilled; it may fill a vacant niche in the ecosystem. Originally this new species may be seen as a useful contributor to its new surroundings because it has only (temporarily) increased biodiversity in the area (Meinesz, 2003).
Humans are very quickly dominating the globe. Today, the human population is around 7 billion people. Humans are populating at a rate of almost 220,000 per day! Humans are rapidly heading towards Earth’s carrying capacity.
Deforestation, defined by biologist Charles Southwick as "the destruction of forests; may involve clear-cutting or selective logging" (p. 365), is a predominantly human-driven process that is dramatically altering ecosystems worldwide. "Clear-cutting" involves the indiscriminant removal of every single plant and tree species from within a selected area. The other major process of deforestation, "selective logging," focuses removal efforts on only specific, predetermined tree species within a chosen area. The statistics gathered about human deforestation over time are considerable, and they can be somewhat controversial. Depending on the source and the location selected, the magnitude of deforestation varies. Southwick estimates that, approximately 10,000 years ago, 6.2 billion hectares (23.9 million square miles) of forest existed on earth (p. 117). That figure is equivalent to 45.5% of the earth's total land. He further estimates that, by 1990, this amount had declined 30%, with only 4.3 billion hectares of forest remaining (p. 117). Southwick also acknowledges other estimates that place the total amount of deforestation between 50% and 75% (p. 117). NASA has similar deforestation statistics that confirm these trends. According to their website, 16.5% of the Brazilian Amazon forests have been destroyed. They also note similar magnitudes of deforestation in Southeast Asia (Cambodia, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia, Myanmar, Thailand, and Vietnam), despite the significantly smaller total area of forest within these countries. These grim figures are somewhat tempered by the NASA finding that, over the past ten years, the deforestation rate has declined from 6,200 square miles per year to 4,800 square miles per year. Though this trend is n...
One of the most important results concluded from this article is the fact that hybrid movements are becoming a widespread concern that deserves more attention. Since 1985, 28 hybrid zones have been analyzed and found unstable, and at the time of the article, another 16 zones were displaying molecular markers that could be a result of a potential movement. With numbers like this, Buggs states that these areas deserve more ecological and evolutionary studies performed on them. The paper also shows how multiple factors (both natural and human-induced) usually influence a zone’s movement, yet a “disentanglement” of the influence of each individual’s impact remains under-studied. Although this paper asked more questions than answered, it highlighted the importance that we further examine these zone movements to truly understand what is going on.
More than 90 percent of primate species live in African, Asian, and Neotropic rain forests. Any outside force that alters the size and structure of these forests will directly affect primate populations. The major players that cause habitat...
nuclei was then inactivated and substituted with dead nuclei from the extinct frog. Some eggs started to grow and divide to early embryo stage (a tiny ball of m...
Deforestation is defined as the destruction of trees, thus removing a forest and turning it into clear land (Deforestation). Not only does deforestation eliminate an entire area of trees, it also does not plan on ever replanting or establishing a new place for trees (Deforestation: Definition, Causes & Consequences).
Biodiversity loss can lead to extinction, and hurt human life. It is our responsibility to take care of the environment. We bring in machines that harm the environment and destroy animal life. We need to limit ourselves on how much land and resources we consume. There are major issues that are causing species to become extinct and hurt our way of life and other animals do to the change in food chain.
Nowadays it is common to read articles in newspapers and magazines regarding biodiversity issues. Human beings have been knowingly and unknowingly destroying biodiversity since their existence. Biodiversity is the measure of the variety of species of animals living in an area. Forests are usually areas with high biodiversity while deserts are the opposite. Human beings have always destroyed biodiversity either by deforestation, or by some other means. Biodiversity depletion is a natural phenomenon. But the present levels of biodiversity depletion are many times higher than the natural rate. Recently the levels of loss in biodiversity have started causing global concern. Some of the main causes for loss in biodiversity are alteration of habitats, increasing levels of pollution and human population growth.