Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Social media influence political participation
Significant role of transnational corporations in the global economy
The role of transnational corporations in globalisation
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Social media influence political participation
Onlinedatei vom 14.12.2015 02:23
Kate Lucas
Essay Response
Globalization in the 20th Century emerged from the smoke of a devastating world war, thrived in the advent of rapidly advancing modes of travel and communication, and was met with a wave of economic and political reform in western democratic nations. The nature of globalization in the 21st Century is less a natural continuation of this process than a reaction to it, as policies implemented in the late 20th century struggle to address a host of problems considered unforeseeable at one point, but which are now painfully evident.
During the 20th Century, modern globalization arguably began following the postWWII Era, which can be thought of in two phases: the 30 year “golden age” of welfare
The consequences of policy changes in the last few decades of the 20th century, ushered in by the neoliberal movement, are becoming more and more evident. “Neoliberal structural adjustment programmes engineered by the IMF and the World Bank have been implemented in every country cross the globe, based on price stabilization, fiscal discipline, privatization, deregulation, trade liberalization, reduction of tarrifs, liberalization of capital markets, and the opening of economies” (Hemerijick 130). In this structure, transnational corporations have come to dominate the international political landscape in the 21st century, with troubling results. The workforce in various countries must organize transnationally as well as domestically in order to represent its interests, and with concerted efforts by several western democratic countries to legislatively weaken labor representation, many groups are having trouble doing that at home, let alone in a highly bureaucratized framework operated by capitalist and government elite (Tarrow 236237). The consequence of these policies? Opening up the competitive market for dominating financial interests. The method? Creating a quasipolitical structure that could not operate without the expertise and ‘consultation’ of transnational corporations, who often go so far as to help draft legislation adopted by actors in the international community, and then defend it to
As a global community, we are more connected than ever before, not just economically, but culturally. Individuals have access to a huge array of information, and while some hope the proliferation of online technology will lead to political reform in oppressed nations, others point out ISIS and its use of Facebook as an effective recruiting tool, or the ways inaccurate or flawed information can be so easily spread to millions of people as
“Social media, a web-based and mobile technology, has turned communication into a social dialogue, and dominates the younger generation and their culture. As of 2010, Generation Y now outnumbers Baby Boomers, and 96% of Gen Y has joined a social network” (Qualman 1). Social media now accounts for the number one use of the Internet, and this percentage is rising bigger every day (Qualman). As a consequence, people are becoming more reliant on social media, which has a led to a number of advantageous as well as unfavorable effects. The world is more connected today than it has ever been in the past, and this is all because of growth in technology. What has yet to be determined though
These results change or modify political organizations to be suitable for the needs of global capital. Regions and nations are encouraged to import and export of goods from other parts of the world rather than supplying or manufacturing them in their own homeland. Thus, seeking expensive manufactured supplies or goods from third world countries to import them to the first world corporation’s injunction with the free trade zones of globalization (Ravelli and Webber, 2015). These negotiations raises new organizations, for example, the World Trade Organization (WTO) to aid and supervise both countries to for a legalized trade. However, Neoliberalism amplifies the negative aspects of globalization’s effect on the economy. For example, deregulation, decrease of government benefits, and tax modifications (Bunjun, 2014). Nevertheless, relating these negative aspects to the documentary Made in L.A. (Carracedo, 2007) which is the main issue of increased risk of employment for both the first world and third world countries. In regards to, a switch from full time stable and secure jobs to part time unstable and insecure jobs. This reduces career growth for many employees, which they recognize, and thus switch jobs – where as they may not fit as well (Bunjun, 2014). As a result, globalization causes market inefficiency via labor market segregation and exploitation, unemployment and underemployment, unequal access to employment (Bunjun,
The development of free-market economics has, since the 18th century, resulted in the spread of a set of ideas, creeds and practices all over the developed and much of the developing world. Today, the globalisation of trade, capital, technology and innovation has accelerated competitive conditions for businesses all over the world. Globalisation may be defined as the opening of markets to the forces of neoliberalism and capitalism; it is characterised by the free movement of people, talent, skills, capital (intellectual, social and economic) across international borders. All kinds of barriers have either been swept away, diffused or made obsolete by the forces of globalisation: trade barriers, subsidies, geographical boundaries, linguistic and cultural differences. Technological advancements have pulled the world closer and, in the process, affected how labour relations and worker/employer relations operate and develop. The multinational corporation as well as the public sector alike are affected by global competition.
When the term “Globalization” is discussed, most academics, scholars, professionals and intellectuals attempt to define and interpret it in a summarized fashion. My main concern with this approach is that one cannot and should not define a process that altered decades of history and continues to, in less than 30 words. Global Shift is a book with remarkable insight. Peter Dicken rather than attempting to define the commonly misused word, explains Globalization in a clear and logical fashion, which interconnects numerous views. Dicken takes full advantage of his position to write and identify the imperative changes of political, economic, social, and technological dimensions of globalization.
Many historians and sociologists have identified a transformation in the economic processes of the world and society in recent times. There has been an extensive increase in developments in technology and the economy as a whole in the twentieth century. Globalization has been recognized as a new age in which the world has developed into what Giddens identifies to be a “single social system” (Anthony Giddens: 1993 ‘Sociology’ pg 528), due to the rise of interdependence of various countries on one another, therefore affecting practically everyone within society.
Social media has quickly emerged as a dominating force that is not only shaping culture and global trends, but influencing how others perceive the world by making it easier to access world news and public opinions. “The global media landscape in the first decade of the twenty-first century represents a complex terrain of multi-vocal, multimedia and multi-directional flows” (Thussu 376). Although social media has spurred many revolutions and brought together like-minded thinkers, it still proves to be a difficult terrain to navigate and even more difficult to harness its power for long-standing democracy. In the article "Social Media: Destroyer or Creator?" and Wael Ghonim’s TED talk, both the positive and the negative ramifications of social
Media today has made significant leaps in terms of advancements in technology since the beginning of the 20th century. Globalization has led to the breaking down of communication barriers between nation states and now news media can be accessed all over the world; giving exposure to events of war, economic, political and humanitarian strife. This in turn will lead to greater awareness of humanitarian crisis in places such as the Middle East. It has only been in the past two decades that ‘new’ media took the world of media even further. The term ‘new’ means to facilitate information sharing, one of the components of effective resistance; those in countries such as Syria, Afghanistan and Iraq use social networking sites such as Facebook and Twitter to show the rest of the world what the news media is unable to. This type of media was the beginning of an information revolution and the changing of the nature of conflict by strengthening network forms of organization over hierarchical forms. Activists in Tunisia who were ag...
Social Studies – 10 Essay “To what extent should we embrace transnational corporations into the world economy?” Transnational corporations should be embraced when it comes to the economy because they provide many opportunities of education, employment and social exchange. Although there are examples that workers in less developed countries (China, Africa, Jamaica, etc.) that are denied many basic rights and paid a very low income, the amount money workers receive are outstandingly low compared to a worker in a developed country. Transnational corporations include a variety of cultural exchange, which is an example of social globalization. Cultural exchange is very important because it involves different people to connect, share ideas and experience new technology that may have not been easily accessible to the public if not for transnational corporations and their mass production.
Science Initiative Group Institute for Advanced Study, 2007, Globalization: Trends and Prospects, Available from: http://sig.ias.edu/files/Egwang-_Welcome.pdf
Recent technology and new social media websites and apps have changed the world forever. This is no longer disputed. When Mark Zuckerberg launched Facebook in 2004 he could not have imagined the forces it would unleash (Wadhwa). A new era was created. One that would connect the world in a way never imagined. But it was not just Facebook. Many websites dedicated to the art of social media were created and embraced. The new tools of social media have reinvented social activism as we know it (Gladwell). All of this change inevitably brings upon many questions. The most important question of them all: is social media a good thing for the world? This is a fair question. The new social-media filled world is a different world than the one known by the baby-boomers. This new world is filled with change, and with change comes uncertainty. This paper is designed to answer the question posed before and will argue that social media has ultimately changed the world for the better by giving people connecting the world, changing the way political campaigns are ran, changing public policy, and giving people stronger voices in the news media and in general.
With a larger amount of individuals on social media websites the probability that a higher amount of individuals will be affected and influenced by ISIS’ posts is inevitably greater. Social media has altered the ways members of societies get knowledge of what is going on in the world and their societies (Kavamaugh et al, 2012, p. 480). Times have changed in our societies, members don’t read newspapers as much, and they rely on their social media to get all the update news and information. Yet, when ISIS’ posts are all over Twitter and Facebook, certain vulnerable social media users will fall victim to the ISIS’ ideology. Basically, in the end ISIS is having a large amount of control over what is on
After the cold war, word ‘globalization’ was commonly used at a time of unprecedented interconnectedness when advanced nations experienced a ruthless development by exploiting energy resources and stressing culture forms in developing countries. To identify the definition of ‘globalization’, it is significant to clarify its appearance as well as implication.
...o we can achieve our dreams in life: “we are now living in a world where time and space don’t matter anymore” just like J.Mittleman said. Globalization as we just learned is relative, whether it’s an opportunity or an exploitation depends on where you sit and how you look at the world. Kent, J., Kinetz, E. & Whehrfritz, G. Newsweek. Bottom of the barrel. - The dark side of globalization (2008/March24). David, P. Falling of The Edge, Travels through the Dark Heart of Globalization..Nov 2008. (p62)
Krain, Matthew (2005), “AP Comparative Government and Politics Briefing Paper: Globalization,” [http://apcentral.collegeboard.com/apc/public/repository/ap05_comp_govpol_glob_42253.pdf], accessed 15 May 2012.
The impact of globalisation is that international trade has grown rapidly in recent years and decades resulting in transport volumes growing accordingly. Globalisation is an ongoing process in which economic interaction and trading activity will continie to grow and grow faster in future this because countries are become increasingly geographically unrestricted.