Introduction
In an increasingly globalised world, where international trade is constantly growing, the creation of free trade areas and the facilitation of trade are more and more at the centre of debate. It is generally believed that trade is beneficial as it allows countries to use their comparative advantage on specific products, leading to lower prices and greater choice for consumers; however, trade is often hindered by trade barriers such as tariffs and waiting times among others (OECD, 2005). The creation of a FTA offers a solution to these problems. Depending on the economic and political situation of the countries entering the agreement, a different model of free trade area might be chosen; for example, free trade areas where tariff barriers are abolished for member countries but no single policy on tariffs with external countries or custom unions that include a common policy on tariffs with non member countries. The most advanced trade bloc is currently the European Union, with a single market and currency and freedom of movement of people, goods, resources and capital (European Union 2013). But what is the impact of FTAs on member countries and the rest of the world?
Free trade areas: direct effects in the short run
In the short run, forming an FTA impacts the national and global markets in two ways; the first is trade creation and leads to boost trade in member countries that can now sell their products exempt from tariffs to other member countries. The second is trade diversion and it implies the transfer of consumption from a lower cost producer to a higher cost producer within the FTA.
Figure 4 Trade creation and diversion
As illustrated in Figure 4, when establishing a trade agreement with a partner country, bot...
... middle of paper ...
...ng number of countries.
References
Anderson, J., Yotov, Y.V. (2011) Good news on free trade agreements. Vox (http://www.voxeu.org)
European Union (2013) The European Union explained: Internal market. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union
FATF/OECD (2010) Money laundering vulnerabilities of Free Trade Zones. FATF Report, March 2010
Newron, P. (2006) Proton announces Q1 net loss more than quadrupled due to falling sales. Global Insight Daily analysis
OECD (2005) The Costs and Benefits of Trade Facilitation, Policy Brief by the Public Affairs Division, Public Affairs and Communications Directorate.
Sloman, J., Hinde, K. and Garratt D. (2013) Economics for Business, 6th ed., Prentice Hall / Pearson
WTO (2007) World Trade Report 2007 of International Trade Cooperation. Sixty Years of the Multilateral Trading System: Achievements and Challenges
One extracurricular activity that I am very passionate about would be the FFA. FFA has taught me so many things and it has brought me so many places. I 've learned how to be a great speaker from different events my advisor has challenged me to do. Public speaking has taken me so many places and I have attributed most of my success to FFA. When I was a freshmen I competed and received gold in the creed speaking competition. As a sophomore, I tried extemporaneous speaking and received a gold for that as well. As a junior I really wanted to challenge myself so I took up agricultural sales as my winter career development experience. I ended up being recognized as the state runner up individual agriculture salesman as well as the 15th best agricultural sales man in the nation. Now as a senior, I have been going around speaking at different school board meetings, advocating
Free trade is a policy that lifts all trade tariffs and barriers and thus encouraging the free movement of goods (imports and exports) between nations. Agreements to free trade establish free markets where countries can engage in trade in a free and conducive environment. This type of trade is made possible by free trade agreements made between countries. According to the International Trade Administration, these agreements help minimize barriers to exports form the US, protect their interests as well as enhance the rule of law in member countries. NAFTA is one of such agreements.
Princeton, 1963. Hailstone, Thomas and Rothwell, John. Managerial Economics, pp. 93-95. Prentice Hall, 1993.
The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) is an agreement between America, Canada And Mexico that coincides a triune free trade economic bloc between the three countries. NAFTA was a necessary deal to be made between the North American Nations to compete in the “Economic World Order”. NAFTA was first designed and drafted by American president George Bush senior, Canadian Prime minister Brian Mulroney and Mexican president Carlos Salinas on December the 12th 1992 in San Antonio Texas. NAFTA’S original creators where not the men that finalized the triune trade bloc but instead NAFTA was redrafted to appease all recipients of the deal and its respectful citizens. NAFTA was finalized and singed on December the 8th 1993 by American president Bill Clinton, Canadian Prime Minister Jean Chretien and Mexican President Carlos Salinas. NAFTA came in to full effect on January the 1st 1994. The history of NAFTA and its negative and Positive effect and the necessity of NAFTA will all be explained in this paper.
In the 21st century, the European Union has realized the importance of changes and advancements in their trade policies, where they need to become more advance and faster in economic policies to compete with rest of the world and stay ahead of them, due to which, they have introduced Free Trade Agreements (FTA’s) especially with emerging markets such as Asia to promote more bilateral trade and business. The stages in regional trade agreement are as follows:
The United States free trade agenda includes policies that seek to eliminate all restrictions and quotas on trade. The advantages of free trade can be seen through domestic markets and the growth of the world economy. T...
...: Reassessing Legitimacy in the European Union. Journal of Common Market Studies, 40 (4), pp. 603-24.
The goal of NAFTA was to systematically eliminate most tariff and non-tariff barriers to trade and investment between the countries. NAFTA has allowed U.S., Mexico, and Canada to import and export to other at a lower cost, which has increased the profit of goods and services annually. Because the increase in the trade marketplace, NAFTA reduces inflation, creates agreements on intern...
Globalization has become one of the most influential forces in the twentieth century. International integration of world views, products, trade and ideas has caused a variety of states to blur the lines of their borders and be open to an international perspective. The merger of the Europeans Union, the ASEAN group in the Pacific and NAFTA in North America is reflective of the notion of globalized trade. The North American Free Trade Agreement was the largest free trade zone in the world at its conception and set an example for the future of liberalized trade. The North American Free Trade Agreement is coming into it's twentieth anniversary on January 1st, 2014. 1 NAFTA not only sought to enhance the trade of goods and services across the borders of Canada, US and Mexico but it fostered shared interest in investment, transportation, communication, border relations, as well as environmental and labour issues. The North American Free Trade Agreement was groundbreaking because it included Mexico in the arrangement.2 Mexico was a much poorer, culturally different and protective country in comparison to the likes of Canada and the United States. Many members of the U.S Congress were against the agreement because they did not want to enter into an agreement with a country that had an authoritarian regime, human rights violations and a flawed electoral system.3 Both Canadians and Americans alike, feared that Mexico's lower wages and lax human rights laws would generate massive job losses in their respected economies. Issues of sovereignty came into play throughout discussions of the North American Free Trade Agreement in Canada. Many found issue with the fact that bureaucrats and politicians from alien countries would be making deci...
While free trade has certainly changed with advances in technology and the ability to create external economies, the concept seems to be the most benign way for countries to trade with one another. Factoring in that imperfect competition and increasing returns challenge the concept of comparative advantage in modern international trade markets, the resulting introduction of government policies to regulate trade seems to result in increased tensions between countries as individual nations seek to gain advantages at the cost of others. While classical trade optimism may be somewhat naïve, the alternatives are risky and potentially harmful.
For example: France is one of the most efficient manufacturers of wine. After signing the FTA it now becomes possible to import wine from France without paying any tariffs or duties. This ultimately results in an efficiency gain to the UK buyers.
As Ian Fletcher pointed out in Free Trade Doesn’t Work: What Should Replace it And Why, nations need a well-chosen balance between openness and closure toward the larger world economy (Fletc...
International trading has had its delays and road blocks, which has created a number of problems for countries around the world. Countries, fighting with one another to get the better deal, create tariffs and taxes to maximize their profit. This fighting leads to bad relationships with competing countries, and the little producing countries get the short end of this stick. Regulations and organizations have been established to help everyone get the best deal, such as the World Trade Organization (WTO), but not everyone wants help, especially from an organization that seems to help only the big countries and those they want to trade with. This paper will be discussing international trading with emphasis on national sovereignty, the World Trade Organization, and how the WTO impacts trading countries.
Senior, Nello Susan. "Chapters:4,15." The European Union: Economics, Policies and History. London: McGraw-Hill, 2009. Print.
Trade creation occurs when low cost producers within free trade area replace high cost domestic producers. These agreements create more opportunities for countries to trade with one another by removing the trade barriers and investment. Trade creation allows member countries for a wider selection of goods and services not previously available. They can acquire goods and services at a lower cost after trade barriers due to lowered tariffs or removal of tariffs which will encourage more trade between member countries the balance of money spend from cheaper goods and services, can be used to buy more products and services. Regional economic integration significantly contributes to the relatively high growth rates in the nation. By removing trade barriers between members countries the factor of production can be move