Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The US civil rights movement
Civil Rights movement in the USA
The US civil rights movement
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The documentary “Dolores” narrated the experiences and passionate work of civil rights activist Dolores Huerta. Dolores dedicated most of her life to the United Farm Workers organization. She fought for workers rights and equality in the latino community. One of the biggest causes Dolores fought against was the mistreatment of farm workers. In a conflict theorist perspective, agribusiness profits off minorities, which in this case was the latino workers. Agribusiness as whole depends on the growers, which are the managers of the company, and farm workers. In this split labor market, growers continuously exploited farm workers. With poor working conditions and inadequate housing, they were one of the lowest paid workers in general. In one instance, …show more content…
the growers completely disregarded the lives of their workers. Growers authorized dangerous pesticides to be sprayed on the vegetation knowing that it's chemicals were extremely dangerous. The capitalist class has no regard for the lives of the working class.
Conditions were so poor, farm worker got paid 90 cents per hour. Growers often told them they were highly replaceable, if they did not like the horrible working conditions, someone else would be ready to take their place. A high amount of workers added with low pay resulted the great amounts of profit to the growers. Dolores saw this discrimination and unequal distribution of power, and pushed for better working conditions for farmers. Early on as an activist, Dolores encountered a lot of sexism. Dolores worked alongside with Cesar Chavez. Even though Dolores did most of the work for the UFA, Cesar Chavez was the face of the organization. In a sense Dolores, since she was a woman, was not able to break through the glass ceiling. She was often criticized about her personal life, she divorced a couple of times and had several kids. This tied into the role strain that she experienced. In traditional terms women are supposed to take care of the children, be the mothers of the family, but since Dolores dedicated most of her life as an activist, she was often judged of her place in the organization. In contrast Cesar Chavez, a man, he did not experience that type of treatment. This flawed social structure was what made Dolores support other causes such as
the feminist movement around that time. When Dolores went to New York to gain support for workers rights, she met with the main leader of the feminist movement Gloria Steinem. Steinem goal was for men and women to be economically, politically, and socially equal. When they interacted, Steinem explained how narrow her views in feminism was. She did not take into account the intersectionality that women of color experience. Dolores received opposition in society because she is minority. On top of that since she is a woman, so in resulty she experiences the same type of treatment than women endure. This social interaction was what enlightened Steinman to fight alongside her.
3. Dolores Huerta was the main negotiator during the Delano grape strike. In 1965 Dolores Huerta and Cesar Chavez were approached by Filipino members of the Agricultural Workers Organizing Committee ("AWOC"). AWOC wanted higher wages from the Delano are grape growers. AWOC wanted to negotiate new contracts with their employers but they needed the help of Huerta and Chavez. The NFWA was still new and growing although Huerta thought that NFWA was not ready to attack corporate America she could not refuse to help AWOC. The two unions formed into one union called United Farm Workers union. Under this the union Dolores began the battle with the Delano grape growers. Dolores organized over 5,000 workers to walk off their job and to strike until they could reach an agreement with their employers.
...l across the country, and they both deserve credit for thier efforts. However, in order to be successful in creating a movement, you need help. Caesar Chavez, motivated people all types of people all across the country and gained tons of support. Gonzales, on the other hand, focused mainly on chicano youths and did reach the whole country. Gonzales played a key role in the chicano youth movement, don't get me wrong, he motivated thousands and changed their lives. But in order to acheive the great success that Chavez did, his views and opinions had to go beyond the chicano youth.
Wendell Berry writes in his book, “What are people for?” a thesis that modern culture is destroying the agricultural culture. He feels that technology is seen and used as the easy way to produce food faster and more efficiently. With this modern way of farming comes the idea that we need to work smarter not harder which is not always true. The goal is comfort and leisure and Berry feels that this is the reason for the down fall of the agricultural culture. He believes that hard work and pride in workmanship is more important than material goods and money. This was by no means a perfect society. The people had often been violent wand wasteful in the use of land of each other. Its present ills have already taken root in it. Even with these faults, this society appreciated the hard work of farming compared to the easy way of living today.
Cesar Chavez was an effective leader for many reasons, but mostly it was because he never gave up. Chavez was born on his grandfather’s farm during the Great Depression. When he was still young, his family lost their farm and became migrant workers meaning they had to move many times. Chavez attended 36 schools up until eighth grade when he dropped out of school to help his family out with the farming. While he worked in the farms, he was exposed to the hardships of farm life. Since then, Chavez decided that he did not want anyone else that was a farm worker to experience the same things he did. He wanted to follow in the steps of Martin Luther King Jr and Gandhi to protest in a nonviolent way.
Cesar Chavez just helped with the worker’s pay and not very much physically. In the end in my opinion Mother Jones helped a little more than Chavez. I already said why I think this. Cesar Chavez did a lot of things for farm workers but not very much physically. I know that physically is better since people won’t get hurt as much. This concludes my essay on Mother Jones and Cesar
With pure intension the people understood a bit more what Cesar Chavez was trying to do. They saw that he was not only fighting for equality but for other things as well. They also saw that he would do almost anything to be able to reach that goal. Cesar Chavez proved that he would do almost anything when they protested with the 250 mile
After viewing the clip, “Chicano! The Struggle in the Fields,” I found some interesting details that surprised me throughout the movie. One aspect that I found intriguing was the wages farm workers earned on average, being two dollars a day and two-thousand five-hundred dollars annually. As well as wages earned, I found grower’s beliefs interesting because they believed Mexican Americans chose the life they were living in when in fact, they were trapped in a poverty cycle trying to survive every single day. I believe an informative detail that the clip describes is not all grape growers were harsh people. Some growers were sympathetic for farm workers, but they couldn’t give what they couldn’t afford. Lastly, a feature from the clip that I
The United Farm Workers of America, 30 Jan. 2016. Web. 15 Jan. 2016.) since he was hero and a savior for every farmworker. Cesar chavez impact every farmworker life because without him every farmworker would be in the same condition. they were before Cesar
The traditions my parents instilled in me at a young age are important to me. They are part of my Latin culture and identity. One of the most important traditions that I value the most is our devotion to “La Virgen de Guadalupe” (The Virgin of Guadalupe), and although I don't go to church or share a specific a religion, I believe in La Virgen as a protector and a guardian figure and maintain her presence in my daily life.
When a group of people must adapt to a lifestyle distinct from the agricultural lifestyle one would not know what to expect. Like a nation that is just starting, it would take time to construct and enhance laws; it’s a trial and error process. These businesses were starting out and there were no regulations as to how to run them. Unquestionably, there were no laws imposed to aid the labor conditions of these employees like we know today. The testimony and interview proved that the 1800’s took advantage of the work of children, often depriving them of food. It was obvious most children stuck around due to the urgency of money, therefore I am sure employees threatened to replace them seeing how the money was needed for families. For those who worked in factories with heavy, dangerous machinery, they were prone to accidents or even death. According to the sub-commissioner, the young girls picked the coal “with the regular pick used by men” . It is typically easier for a grown man to lift a regular pick than it is for a young girl because of the physical development and obvious age difference. Still there weren’t any regulations to protect children against the harms of labor and their wages were unreasonably
Women used to be the mothers who always took care of the family.
The National Farm Association was co-founded by Cesar Chavez and Gil Padilla. The main purpose of this association was to seek and enforce Mexican-American labor laws. Such as reasonable work hours and pay an individual receives. To get their message across, many formed marches, boycotts, and strikes. With these forms of expression, people started to hear the voices of those wanting a change in El Movimiento.
While Dolores Huerta would work at CSO she organized and founded the Agricultural Workers Association in 1960 .In 1962, the CSO turned down her and Cesar Chavez’s request, to organize farm workers, her and Cesar Chavez resigned from the CSO. After that happen she went to go work for the National Farm Workers Association which would later be known or become the United Farm Workers Organization. Dolores Huerta was a big key and important to the growth of this organization that she was in. Dolores Huerta was the main person besides Cesar Chavez at the United Farm Workers who worked with employers and there organized strikes,boycotts and marches for the farm workers. For over about 40 years she devoted her time into improving the
During the 1920’s not everyone had participated in the consumer economy, especially the minority. Because of the increase in industry, those who worked in an agricultural based environment had suffered, “Despite agricultural overproduction and successive attempts in Congress to provide relief,... an ongoing depression. Large surpluses were accompanied by falling prices at a time when American farmers were burdened by heavy debt” (Poverty in the 1920s). As of the results of the transition from agricultural over to industrial, the wealth was not being equally distributed. Farmers depended on consumers to buy their goods, and due to the transition, the burden and the struggle to pay off debt was left for the farmers to deal with. Going off of that. In “Victimizing the Farmer” the document explains that “ ...for the farmer will never regain prosperity until farm products sell as high with relation to the general price level as before the war”(Capper 5). Subsequently, farmers did not get a part of the riches. They have provided for citizens for ages, and now they no longer are able to have anything to provide for their own
On the Tanaka Farm, Holmes found an ethnic hierarchy existed that affected how jobs, housing, and resources were distributed among the workers. Located at the top of the ethnic hierarchy, Japanese Americans and White individuals exclusively held positions as farming executives. These individuals mainly focus on maintaining the business and earning profit; they have flexible schedules, work indoors, and are financially secure (Holmes 2013). White individuals also held positions as administrative assistants, crop managers, and checkers. While administrative assistants were paid minimum wage, they worked closely with farming executives and had access to lunch and bathroom breaks. Crop managers who oversaw the labor force and were in charge of